If you found duplicate, please vote to close and I'll use my hammer.
Anyway I was about to rollback the edit, if there's no dupe I will, it's not needed to add time of asking to titles.
(just noise.)
If you mean this it's not dupe. Related, not the same. It's asking who are the associates, not what does it mean. Other user edited the body of the question, not the OP.
@ShadowTheKidWizard The rest of the edit summary states why I think it's useful to have as a separate post.
@ShadowTheKidWizard Without any notion of the time, the questions are exact duplicates of one another. However, it's useful to have modern versions of posts if there's evidence to show the answer has changed (in this case, that valued associates aren't announced on the blog as they were in 2012). There are also people who vote to close based on post titles without reading the post body and seeing that it's different.
I just noticed I can reply to a deleted message in chat, while this wasn't possible before, i.e. the reply function used to disappear when the message was deleted.
Evidence can be found here, here and here. It seems that the reply doesn't ping the author of the deleted message, but it does conver...
@Luuklag of course, it's just matter of writing :xxxxxx in the beginning of chat message, placing ID of a deleted message. But it won't become a reply to the deleted message.
And after page reload, the @[name] will be replaced with the :xxxxxx correctly.
@ShadowTheKidWizard I think they all start with a clean "mod" account, and then get to choose if they merge their older account with it. Some chose not to merge and to start off with a clean slate so to say. — Luuklagyesterday
@MetaAndrewT. I was just about to ask, can mods see merge history of a profile?
Could check a previously-staff member. Though I do not know whether or not that is something that's frowned upon, since you're technically jumping around the previous restriction placed on seeing their profile history.
@M.A.R. sure! I've never said I'm against others watching it. After all, they need the money to have chance to create something better in the future. ;)
@Spevacus nice, I'll take a look later. In the meantime, I've created two new tags, will give it a day or two before starting to retag other questions adding them, in case other users disagree and will remove the tag(s).
(tags for the Stack Overflow Support site, and for general mobile device usage, was surprised none exists so far.)
Hm, yeah, there's tags for specific browsers but not a generic one for mobile sites.
I can see merit in having it, since it's certainly worthwhile to report issues that happen on mobile devices broadly, especially since mobile-web's view is gone forever.
@Spevacus There's a comment on some MSE post somewhere where Ben explained that he wants to keep his personal account separate from his staff account. (It's one where he accidentally answered a post from his personal account, and I ended up reassociating that answer to his staff account.)
To chime in with some updates, we hear you and agree that we can and should do better.
This year we have engaged some external firms to help us identify and plan ways to rectify our current shortcomings around our goal to make our Stack Exchange sites as universally accessible as possible. We sha...
@ShadowWizardSaysNoMoreWar I actually decided to keep the accounts separate and will just be working under this account going forward. But, for the record, the process usually takes a few days from what I was told. — BMatt-StackMar 23 at 18:05
@Mithical actually they still might add, it's not mentioned in the announcement. So keep your fingers close to a keyboard so you can report the bug once November 1 arrives... ;-)