« first day (4318 days earlier)      last day (707 days later) » 

5:23 AM
@Feeds How an average onebox became Chat’s meme
 
6:13 AM
LOL got exactly 151 rep here just enough to vote for mod. One downvote on my single answer there, and I can't vote. :P
 
6:51 AM
@ShadowWizardSaysNoMoreWar What happens if you vote, and get downvoted afterwards? Is your vote counted or discarded?
 
I think voting is for time of vote
 
@nobody I'm 99% sure the vote stays, same as any other vote anywhere on SE, but can't know for sure. Don't think it ever happened. ;)
Only thing that is "discarded" is tag badges, which are based on current score of posts.
 
Want to find out? :P
 
@JourneymanGeek I think so too:
8
A: What is the reference date for reputation levels regarding moderator elections?

GlorfindelYou can vote/nominate if your current reputation is 150/300/.... Likewise for any badges needed to nominate. For votes, I conducted an experiment (but I can't find a reference to it) where my votes remained visible after my reputation dropped to below 150 (of course, I can't prove they made it to...

 
Also, how do you decide who to vote for given you aren't active on the site?
 
6:55 AM
@Glorfindel you ruined our fun :D
 
you can be active and not have much rep
 
@nobody Mr. Glorfindel already tested it, duh.
 
@JourneymanGeek Sounds pretty tough...
 
@nobody based on what they write in the nomination message, and quickly going over their posts and public site activity, including on the meta site.
 
@nobody I don't have much rep on say pets, but I'm active
 
6:59 AM
> 2,456
 
0_0
really?
 
Not much rep, yeah sure
 
Security I guess?
well only chat-active so I guess it dosen't count
 
@JourneymanGeek lol, I was about to give you a little pop quiz :D
 
7:17 AM
@nobody umm, by rolling the dice? ;)
 
o/
 
@nobody one of the top voters on...a large number of SE sites doesn't post on the vast majority of them, just reads and votes.
 
7:38 AM
@RyanM and when that kind of behaviour is rightfully corrected, people start to complain about it on Meta ...
 
7:50 AM
@RyanM Not sure who you're talking about, but that user must be an exception. I believe it's somewhat difficult to consistently read lots of posts on a site and have enough domain knowledge to vote on them, but not learn enough to eventually start usefully contributing to the site in at least some small way.
 
@nobody people sometimes so obsessed with the meta-game of SE they forget the actual use of it :D
 
@JourneymanGeek oh, so there is actual use?? Good to know. :D
 
@Glorfindel As far as I know, the user I'm referring to just spends a lot of time on SE and isn't doing anything wrong. You can pick them out by checking a few sites' top voter charts.
 
@RyanM he's fine, yes.
 
8:19 AM
@JourneymanGeek Wait, what's the actual use?
I've been playing the meta-game since day 1
 
@nobody To kill time during boring work meetings :)
 
@Tinkeringbell Oh, I thought that and farming imaginary internet points was the meta-game...
 
@nobody Hmm. The imaginary internet points are definitely not it, given how Geek defined the meta-game as something other than 'contributing in some small way'... and you need to contribute to get those imaginary points! :P
 
@Tinkeringbell yup
In theory finding answers to questions 😅
 
Sure, as long as it's 'finding' and not 'getting' I guess we're good :D
 
 
2 hours later…
 
3 hours later…
1:57 PM
hm
Apparently if you have a modernish browser, the SE responsive layout works on...240x430 :D
 
2:29 PM
huh?
Well that's the biggest fp I've seen in long while.
@SmokeDetector f
 
@ShadowWizardSaysNoMoreWar User is not blacklisted.
 
oh the "f" actually removes from bl? Nice.
 
2:44 PM
28 messages moved to Chimney
 
breathing smoke free air
 
@ShadowWizardSaysNoMoreWar Ah, the reason they were blacklisted is because their previous non-answer was manually reported. Manually reporting someone's post adds them to the blacklist. That report later got NAA feedback, which unlike FP feedback, doesn't remove them from the blacklist.
 
@Spevacus yeah, pity, but figured as much.
NAA should not be reported via Smokey, IMO.
 
and now they get downvoted for just having a crap Q, instead of a spammy one
 
@Luuklag not crap actually, there is potential, but yeah, it's not something that's going to happen.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:08 PM
6 messages moved to Chimney
 
 
3 hours later…
7:49 PM
in order to better understand some accessibility issues I'd like to try some free screen readers. I found this usabilitygeek.com/… but I wonder if there are "canonical" (free) screen readers that are used for testing or discussion purposes?
 
Bah
You guys have too much time on your hands.
When I want to be heroic, I simply go and sympathy-upvote a few posts and I immediately feel better.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:18 PM
@uhoh both Android and iOS have canonical free screen readers that ship with the devices (TalkBack and VoiceOver, respectively)
(disclosure: I work for the company that develops and occasionally work with the team that develops TalkBack)
 

« first day (4318 days earlier)      last day (707 days later) »