Catija has recently explained that which blog posts get displayed in the side bar for each site depends on a blog tag:
It's tag-dependent.
Blog posts tagged "bulletin" appear in the sidebar on sites that are considered technology sites (based on the sites listed in the footer) but not...
Meta winked out (for maintenance) for a minute. If goes out again (or remains out for others, outside of NA) updates will be available at: twitter.com/StackStatus and stackstatus.net
This question is about something I expected to have been asked before, but I could not find anything, neither on physics.SE nor on general meta. Apologies if I have missed something. I started thinking about the topic after reading the recent question How to Help the Physics.SE grow (member-wise)...
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@YaakovEllis Will remember. Since I'm not experiencing the issue, I didn't file it on the site, as I remember a prior conversation here that I shouldn't file reports on behalf of other users unless I can independently reproduce the problem.
@JourneymanGeek He might or he might not. But we have processes for following up on server errors as efficiently as possible. Nick is involved in a ton of things, and it is incredibly inefficient for him to be the first point of contact and pinged directly on any little issue that happens.
Ask user to create a meta post about it? One user does not seem like a reason to go make an investigation out of it, it is just as likely a problem on their end. If a meta post exists at least people with the same problem can gravitate to it
@YaakovEllis Not much of a random error - they claimed to be getting it for a few hours. Also, shortly after their initial claim, there was this chat message here which seems to imply that there was something more widespread.
@Magisch Well, another reason I thought it was OK in this case was because the specific message I replied to said "please don't hesitate to ping me". Guess that was a red herring.
@JohnDvorak eh, I know some staff members (including shog, who used to be one) in the past said they disliked pings from replies so I got into the habit of avoiding them
It's useful to recognize that responding to and reading pings is at least in part a part of their job (for CMs), so it's worth thinking about whether a ping is necessary in any given situation
I know it was steadily growing back when I was still flagging, and I know I wasn't responsible for more then a small fraction of it, so I assume it's still growing
In any case, what would be the correct action to take to report a potential issue from another user where you can't independently reproduce the issue, and which the user is unwilling to make a report on Meta (possibly due to a reasonable fear of being negatively received)?
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog nothing. The problem either resolves itself, grows to get noticed in the logging or gets linked later on to unrelated events and fixed in the process.
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog Nothing, probably. If it's a serious issue, someone else will experience it and report it. If not, it's not worth bothering with.
@Gimby There are some things that would ruin a perfectly good movie for me. Now I'm far from a preacher, but reinforcing the notion that showcasing 'girl power' is showing them half naked walking around being mean to men is just inexcusable
If it's supposed to be fan service, then don't be coy about it
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog Actually, I'd kill to see Jackson say half of rene's lines
Admittedly, I haven't watched Birds of Prey, but it has enough of that plastered all over it that it's a good guess, methinks
@Gimby That . . . doesn't rule out what I said. Sigh Anyway, some time along the way, DC forgot how to make for good movies, and hasn't fully recovered still IMHO
and her shape water cantrip doesn't come from her racial abilities, because she's definitely a human, which as we know, are natural-born JOATs with zero innate magic.
@ShadowWizardisEarForYou No, but if the official stats given to WHO are tainted with politics, why would these estimates not be?
Two million is just outrageous @Sha. The Atlantic has quite a few journalists too nationalistic for my taste. The whole thing is riddled with "government lies", it's not aiming to be an accurate scientific evaluation of what's happened.
> If COVID-19 is so rare—fewer than 400 cases had been reported in Iran by the day she announced her diagnosis—what are the chances that one of the afflicted would be a famous politician?
This is bovine excrement.
Although they do lie, this argument doesn't hold any water.
Plus, the stats have flipped since then: Iran has a lower fatality rate than the world average.
> Instead Iran greased its own path toward the most catastrophic outbreak in modern history.
Well, this guy has already decided we're the worst, so I don't need to help in that.
And it's curious that he's chosen the narrow window between Iran stats updating and Italy stats updating to prove how catastrophic it is here but not elsewhere. Italy has more cases, and a higher fatality rate than Iran
@M.A.R. I didn't read, but the idea makes sense: the numbers are so "good" because they're made to be good. If you say it's not true and think the government is reliable it's fine, I believe you more than the media. :)
@M.A.R. No data yet, but pretty sure Orthodox Jewish people will get sick much less due to keeping much better personal hygiene. For example, for them washing hands isn't just something the parents tell them as kids and never enforce it later on, it's part of their core since it's ordered from "above".
@ShadowWizardisEarForYou Well, what can I say? Our government has lied and will lie, that's for certain. But such biased outlook is very unlikely to resurface the truth. His numbers are outrageous, his bullet points are bullshit arguments, and he doesn't have a background in things he assumes he knows about. I actually don't have much reason to doubt any of our government's figures except the recovery rate.
And that, because the way they describe the process, they're probably being reckless, but I'm no medical expert either. They say after 24 hours from the last sign of any symptom, they run two tests, and two negatives means the patient has recovered.
This seems too narrow a window for me, so it wouldn't surprise me if someone returns to the hospital after getting sick again. Other than that, the reports still show 500–1000 new cases everyday, and Italy's case seems much worse.
It's probably easy enough to hide the number of the infected, but deaths you cannot hide, and we haven't had many, compared to Italy.
FWIW, other governments also seem to have lied about their stats. Six deaths in a day, the first six deaths in the US, sounds as fishy as a politician lying about having caught the disease. But stats are all we have, and you can't further anything if you don't trust anything. It's too simple to stand aside and shake heads and throw in some random political commentary.
@JohnDvorak Well, the Chinese government rules with an iron fist. I don't think any other government, except perhaps Russia, can contain its people like that. Even so, there is another side to the coin as well: China has been exemplary in containing the virus.
> The 2017-2018 flu season was severe for all populations and resulted in an estimated 959,000 hospitalizations and 61,099 deaths. This is the highest number of patient claims since the 2009 flu season.[10] 186 pediatric deaths were reported to the CDC.[3] It is estimated there were more than 600 pediatric deaths related to influenza. This estimation is made because every child death is not tested for influenza.[10]
@JohnDvorak Might be an outlier, of course. Normally you get short-lived immunity after any sickness. But that will probably only apply to a single strain
@djsmiley2kTMW I don't know about you but we have flu epidemics pretty much every year. Nothing major, but it's a thing. Most people are fine, of course, and mostly the immuno-suppressed die, or the few unlucky ones with complications
it wouldn't be an epidemic if it only affected those who need herd immunity
but because we don't call every years flu outbreak a epidemic, people are now panicing? XD
> Epidemic: An outbreak of disease that attacks many peoples at about the same time and may spread through one or several communities. Pandemic: When an epidemic spreads throughout the world.
@djsmiley2kTMW Last I heard that was quite well established. But it isn't that relevant anyway. Point is, this is not the flu. It is something different.
@djsmiley2kTMW yes. But it's not to be feared because what it will be next year. It's to be feared for what it is now, when we, yes, don't have immunity...
@JourneymanGeek No we don't. Not one that spreads at this speed. What we usually have is a slightly different strain of an already existing virus, as far as I know. Every now and then we get new ones, but the speed with which this one has spread is what sets it apart.
@djsmiley2kTMW incubation time is probably something like 5-6 days on average as far as I've read. SARS had a much shorter one like 1-2 days, and SARS was most contagious at the end of the infection. CoV-2 is more contagious at the beginning
Hey, is there an admin around? I have reason to believe someone is down voting my question with fake accounts just because I didn't award them the bounty.
However, note that mods don't have access to voting details, so it's unlikely they'll be able to do anything. The good news is that there are automated scripts that run once a day and are quite good at detecting targeted voting. It's quite possible that this will be fixed automatically.
@Sherif Either. But it's easier if you flag one of the ones you suspect were downvoted.
If the post you're talking about is the one I'm looking at right now, the serial voting script is unlikely to get involved
we're talking about 4 downvotes by 4 different accounts across 3 days in a fairly heterogenous pattern, that would show up on no heuristic analysis, and it's rather unlikely someone earned 125 rep on 4 accounts just to do that to you
Bloody hell. The morons at the Greek Orthodox church just announced that they will not be pausing holy communion (which, in Greek Orthodoxy is done by feeding a spoonfull of wine into everyone's mouth, yes, with the same bloody spoon and from the same glass) because, of course, since this is holy communion, it kills all pathogens.
But has the Catholic church come out with a public announcement to tell the faithful not to worry and there is no danger whatsoever of infection from holy communion?
I wouldn't be surprised, mind you, but I don't think they've gone that far yet.
@terdon they have recommended here to not share the cup during communion and to not put the host directly into the mouth, as well as skipping the peace greeting with handshakes
If you touch anything that is supposed to be safe after touching an unsafe surface, you're doing it wrong. If you touch yourself with gloves you're doing it wrong
@ShadowWizardisEarForYou It is different because it is incredibly irresponsible. The church is saying that you simply cannot get infected this way and that is criminally irresponsible and dangerous to public health. If you want to risk it, fine, but this will just increase infections and affect everyone in society.
If you're working with actually dangerous substances, you have to dispose of them immediately. Otherwise many substances will go through them after some time
@ShadowWizardisEarForYou A glove is just a different surface, if you keep it on for a long time and don't change what you touch, it doesn't make any difference in spreading stuff.