« first day (3469 days earlier)      last day (1567 days later) » 

3:20 AM
@rene what memo?
 
Rob
3:54 AM
@SamuelLiew "Get/got the memo" is an expression. In this case they (not just Rene) probably refer to these: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/featured-tag and meta.stackexchange.com/a/342363/282094
 
Rob
4:35 AM
Ah, RPQ.
 
 
3 hours later…
7:39 AM
18 messages moved to Chimney
 
7:51 AM
@SamuelLiew Just to get this right: I love, admire and encourage people to use their own judgement. I thank you for doing exactly that.
2
 
8:03 AM
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog only API bugs that cause indirect bugs in the apps are still fixed.
 
@Shadow9 Well, because they're API bugs.
 
Anything that requires build and/or deploy on the app server side code itself (not API) won't be touched anymore, even if it leads to the final shutdown of the apps.
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog API is totally different than the apps. It existed before them.
The apps use the API, but it's one-way.
@Sonic what bug(s) you have on mind?
 
But not everything used by the mobile apps is necessarily part of the API. For instance, the apps use some undocumented APIs and have special keys that give them unlimited access.
 
Dunno about that, yeah.
 
@Shadow9 Just an example, a bug with /hot-questions-for-mobile.
 
8:06 AM
Anyway, Yaakov did fix one such bug two weeks ago:
6
Q: Stack Exchange mobile apps still use 'on hold' for recently closed questions

GlorfindelSince the introduction of new post notices, the "On Hold" label is not used anymore: "On Hold" had been used to label recently closed questions. The idea was that this language would imply less permanence to the current state than "Closed". However, user research showed that this distinction ...

Only API fix, so it was done.
 
Another example, the special API keys suddenly granting 0 queries or the default 10,000 instead of unlimited.
 
Pretty soon only Smokey's key is going to be special-cased...
 
@Mithical Don't some SOBotics bots have more than the usual quota?
 
8:28 AM
@Shadow9 the really funny thing is there is one really critical things the apps do that is probably possible to do, but hard to do well - push notifications
More precisely, it is a feature for a small number of super hardcore users and I have literally no idea how you would make it non annoyingly opt in
I mean the ideal would be a preference checkbox (where?)
 
8:47 AM
I'll update and bumpety bump it a bit
If someone thinks its a good idea, might as well make it easier to sell :D
 
@JourneymanGeek hmm?
 
15
Q: Now that the mobile apps are no longer in development ... Could we get Web Push Notifications?

Journeyman GeekTLDR: Mobile is sad. Can we have web push notifications? (While the eventual intended audience will know what I'm talking about,google has a nice, though somewhat technical article on what this is. I don't expect it to happen soon, but would be nice to put it on the radar.) For starters - and t...

 
@JourneymanGeek there are some apps on Stack Apps also doing it, but dunno if any of them still work.
 
Probably something for someone who knew what they were doing to write it :D
(The question that is)
 
 
1 hour later…
10:06 AM
just noticed an interesting bug, wasn't sure whether it's been reported yet
I ran out of comment flags for the day (on travel.SE)
Afterwards, I'm still able to click the flag icon and bring up the dialog box of flag reasons (and select one)
however, when I click "flag comment", I sometimes get the error message "You may only flag a comment every 5 seconds"
checking again, it seems like if I wait 5+ seconds and click the button, I get the right error message "Daily comment flag limit reached; please try again in 13 hours"
but if I then try to click the button again within the next 5 seconds, I get the "You may only flag a comment every 5 seconds" error message, even though that previous flag attempt didn't actually go through
has anyone else encountered this bug or reported it already?
(if anyone's wondering why I clicked the button repeatedly, I hadn't yet noticed that I was out of comment flags, and I just initially assumed the initial error message was for having flagged another comment in the preceding 5 seconds)
 
Can you also open the developer console of your browser and verify the network traffic? Do you get server responses that match your observation or could it just be a client side awkward handling
I've never seen that bug myself, nor do I recall previous reports of it on MSE.
 
10:32 AM
@rene I suspect userscript
 
I suspect a bug
 
10:55 AM
deploys a spider
 
AAAAHHHHH SPIDER KILL IT KILL IT GET IT AWAY
 
killing spiders is murder
My house is insect-free ever since I stopped relocating every spider in sight
Did you know that spiders have retractable claws, while insect claws are ginormous compared to the rest of their legs?
 
How about a bearded dragon instead
 
That's not a bad choice, but don't they need UV lamps?
 
I don't know, I've never actually looked into the practicalities of owning one.
 
11:14 AM
Clint's Reptiles rates bearded dragons at 3.8/5, while jumping spiders get 4.8/5, and he only "had to deduct a point for handleability because they are so tiny".
I'm about to watch the full video on bearded dragons; I've already seen the one about jumping spiders
He even gets a better score (4.2) to a black widow.
-> black widow video youtube.com/watch?v=MrGn9hQjrY8
 
Is elections.stackexchange.com 404 indefinitely or did it get a new home that I fail to find? I mean it is mentioned in several posts, for example here and I've seen bug reports in this very chatroom about the site.
 
It's been dead for... years.
Blame @Tim. :)
 
Okay, so it is not me, failing to search
 
@ArtOfCode had put up a replacement at some point but I can't find it
 
> A bearded dragon is no more likely to lose its tail than a cat is
 
11:23 AM
(won't load, though, presumably because there are no active elections?)
 
> They have a distinct bearded dragon-ly aroma
 
@Mithical He can post an answser on my MSE question.
 
I somehow doubt SE have changed their minds about featuring resignations, so I'm curious what will happen here
 
11:48 AM
@DisappointedinSE nothing, probably. e.g. this is still featured.
And in case you missed it:
Yeah, here are my reasons: this was unfeatured previously to grant slots for CEO's and a sponsored tag merge post. Also, I miss Shog. — Samuel Liew ♦ Jan 28 at 14:07
 
@Shadow9 that's not a moderator resignation, so there is some room for interpretation of the new rule for that particular post.
 
@DisappointedinSE oh. Well, checking boundaries is important step of growing up. :)
You might get yelled at and even spanked, but without trying, you'll never know.
 
I don't think the SO mods are the ones that need to grow up ;-)
5
 
Hopefully if they kick Samuel for that, all SO mods will follow.
@Mithical which of them?
 
all
 
11:52 AM
(and they're both pingable)
@rene even Tim Tam?!
Tim Tam is a brand of chocolate biscuit made by the Australian biscuit company Arnott's. It consists of two malted biscuits separated by a light chocolate cream filling and coated in a thin layer of textured chocolate. == History == The biscuit was created by Ian Norris, who was the director of food technology at Arnott's. During 1958, he took a world trip looking for inspiration for new products. While in Britain, he found the Penguin biscuit and decided to, successfully "make a better one".Tim Tam went on to the market in 1964. They were named by Ross Arnott, who attended the 1958 Kentucky Derby...
 
@Shadow9 both
 
@Mithical why Mr. Post is to blame with the dead elections page?
!!/Tim Tam
 
@Shadow9 No such command 'tim'.
 
:(
 
18
A: elections.stackexchange.com isn't loading

Shog9Yeah, this is gonna be down for a bit; Tim Stone was maintaining it and Tim Post was hosting it. The domain, of course, was controlled by the company... Which is currently moving all se.com subdomains to HTTPS. This presents two problems: Tim Post can't continue hosting it, and we don't have an...

 
11:56 AM
thanks
 
Hey that's not my eye ^^
@Mithical ugh... can't they have it hosted externally, e.g. where Smokey is hosted?
 
Smokey is hosted across a dozen different private servers and computers, and regularly goes down and switches to a different instance. That's not really good for an official SE page
!!/location
 
@Mithical iBug/Sandy
 
!!/status
 
@Shadow9 Running since 09:46:16 UTC (2 hours, 13 minutes, 50 seconds)
 
12:05 PM
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog If there bugs in the mobile apps due to bugs in the public API, we will try to fix these bugs. Server side issues that are only related to the mobile apps and nothing else, as well as bugs in the actual mobile apps (which would require new releases) will no longer be addressed.
@rene what did this site even show? I am not at all familiar with it
 
@YaakovEllis It used to show an overview of all ongoing elections across the network, including candidates, nominations, candidate scores, etc
 
With the oncoming mass elections, it's kind of.... needed, yeah.
 
*sets out to earn 150 reputation on every site across the network*
 
@Shadow9 I think one big problem is that giving out an SSL certificate is inherently problematic. So it would have to change domains in any case.
 
getting ready to flag @Mithical's socks
:D
 
12:16 PM
I flag all my socks myself to have them annotated as socks
 
@DisappointedinSE yeah... :/
@Mithical prove
 
@DisappointedinSE IIRC the official policy is if it isn't hosted on SE hardware and part of the public Q&A network, its not on a foo.stackexchange.com domain
even their auto-mail services and the blog
 
This is your sock then? @Mith
:P
 
hmm, did the election site get stackexchange cookies? That would have been very bad even before SSL
 
But that's not really that critical IMO. As long as people can find it, and the information is up to date, it'll do the business.
@DisappointedinSE I don't think you needed to log in at all
 
12:19 PM
@JourneymanGeek I don't mean for login, I meant if the session cookie was available to the election site, Tim could have hijacked any user account that visited it
 
/me wonders if there's a waybackmachine backup of one of those pages for references, its been ages, and my memory is terrible
@DisappointedinSE maybe
but we trust those Tims :D
And well, I think that was a kinder, more innocent time :D
 
hmm, that cookie was probably marked as SSL-only, it would have been far too much of a security breach otherwise
 
@JourneymanGeek true. It can be seen in the web archive: web.archive.org/web/20160324124549/http://…
 
@DisappointedinSE no SSL for much of the time it was there
in fact the SSL push was one of the things that made the site more difficult
 
12:22 PM
@Mithical Good!
 
(Took a bit of time to track that down...)
 
@Shadow9 looks like it generated stats on the fly
not... very useful if you don't know/remember what it was :D
 
@JourneymanGeek it did, using the API from what I read
 
yup
maybe we can find a meta bug report...
ah hah!
something like that per candidate, and other assorted stats
art has a clone cause, well, it rather sucks without it :D
 
oh wow, that dates back to before age was removed
 
12:31 PM
"Judge me by my age do you? mmm?"
 
heh, posted almost exactly eight years ago
@JourneymanGeek Exactly. ;)
 
facedesk
 
careful with the nose there
 
I'm on helpdesk duty right now. THis involves waiting for emails to come in, that get automatically processed by our ticketing system, which sends another email, then forwarding that to the appropriate vendor or engineer, and updating the ticketing system manually. We also close external vendor cases in the ticketing system which automatically sends a mail to the last distribution list.
It was worse before
I closed a case. Then got confused cause a new mail came in... it was the closure email for the case I just closed
(No, they don't exactly pay me to sit on chat all day, or night :D)
But its a very trigger/interrupt driven shift
 
@JourneymanGeek They just don't know that that's what they're paying you to do.
 
12:36 PM
@Mithical :D
It so happens its the easiest way for them not to pay me to take a long nap
which... one of my ex co-workers apparently did, and he's no longer with us :D
 
They killed him!?
 
I hope not!
When I originally joined this job, I mostly did monitoring. Twas boring but mostly needed your attention
I do more helpdesk and "we have no idea what's the status of this case so we need to go down and check" now
 
("no longer with us" generally means "dead")
 
@Mithical I was aware of the dual meaning
 
:)
 
12:52 PM
@Mithical "Departed" then? ;)
Wonder if there are people saying "Rest in peace" when someone goes to sleep? :D
 
:D
did something more happen around #featured ?!
 
sigh
He got realigned?
 
/me needs a 'last time on the meta' update
 
@djsmiley2kTMW er...
nothing on meta
 
12:57 PM
Nothing I can talk about, but I haven't exactly ragequit so... :D
(that said, if I ever quit being a moderator, I'm going to explictly ask for it not to be featured, and for folks not to fuss too much :D)
(no plans for that, and least for SU, Y'all would get to know first :D)
 
@JourneymanGeek PREPARE FOR YOUR WISHES TO BE DISOBEYED
 
1:18 PM
@Mithical I think anyone who has the ability knows me well enough to understand why :D
Well there's one circumstance I wouldn't have minded, but it would need a monumental change in the company's course for that to be possible :/
 
Indeed. I wouldn't apply for a job now either.
 
The other circumstance - I don't really feel making a scene, or a obvious stand is how I want to do things
Quitting should be a quiet disengagement at best. Taking my leave at worst
And If I end up one of those guys who harassesses people who work or mod here on twitter, shoot me :D
 
Deal. *solemn handshake*
 
2:02 PM
> Gundam Factory Yokohama, which is a Gundam Factory in Yokohama, is constructing an 18-meter-tall, 25-ton Gundam robot.
I guess there's ONE upside to the onion timeline
 
 
1 hour later…
3:24 PM
@djsmiley2kTMW in case of spam use just "k", it will also blacklist the spammer and won't give the extra Smokey message.
 
heh wasn't sure i should blacklist the use
but looking at their name... lol
 
Typical spammer
 
Can we have a here plz.
 
> You voted to close this question 2 mins ago
 
Urgency calls for urgency ;)
 
3:44 PM
Kaboom
 
Rob
4:33 PM
They built a Gundam (bicorn?) a few years ago, and there's walking ones more recently: youtu.be/zgF_-JEBG1M?t=1m8s youtu.be/Z-ouLX8Q9UM?t=16m46s youtu.be/-DKwl0OjoYE youtu.be/F1nVldck7HM
 
?
 
???
 
?
 
4:47 PM
Short for: Who cares?
 
For rice spilling? I do. I love rice.
Also, China is more than rice.
Also, still don't get what @Rob was trying to say.
:D
 
Me neither :D
 
Rob
Run everything through here: rewordify.com
 
 
2 hours later…
8:03 PM
> Comment: add image description for accessibility

> [...]

> ....reviewed this 1 hour ago: Reject
This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.
Ah the irony
 
8:25 PM
Oh, it looks like chat.<site>.stackexchange.com redirects are broken
 
@Mithical uh, what? Not for me ...
 
Ah, it's only broken on http://. It gives me a "privacy error" if I use https://.
 
right, that is a server error for me as well.
 
Oh, and if I click "continue" on the privacy error for https:// I get a server error again.
 
yeah.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:44 PM
> Monica Cellio’s account gives context. The week she described was one of the most miserable I ever experienced in my career. I could see a conflict that began in a relatively private place (the moderators’ chat room) threatened to spill into very public places. I have long held as a universal principle of ethics that admonishing another person should be done privately. Public rebukes without first attempting to resolve the situation privately violates our shared morality. So that week I sent an email to others in the company stating my intention to call Monica in order to attempt reconcil
 
heh, I was just reading that
> In 2019, the Community Team was given a directive to reduce our use of Meta. On the one hand, I get it. Employees posting on Meta were repeatedly dismissed as incompetent. I even wrote an appeal for compassion when it comes to designers, who often got the worst of it. On the other, “Meta is Toxic” seemed to be code for “It’s hard to understand our users and it’d be easier if they didn’t exist.” I doubt anyone actually said or even thought that, but that’s how it felt to me.
 
...for those curious:
"2019 in Review", by @JonEricson
 
oh and
> In retrospect, this was a giant red flag. One of the great joys of community management is having agency to resolve community conflict. It’s already been a highlight of my new job. Taking away this agency was a clear sign my contributions were not valued. ↩
I guess a question I wish I had an answer to was... how to convince the higher powers that be that, well, CMs and the community is critical to the success of the org, and they need agency to deal with these things
 
...basically, what I'm getting from that is "SO is directly interfering with the people who know what to do and preventing them from doing it".
 
9:56 PM
@JourneymanGeek I have a feeling !!/stopflagging might cause a stir... ;P
 
@Mithical would it?
OH
@Mithical I don't think folks higher up the food chain would even notice
 
They might, when they start getting complaints about their sites being covered in spam
 
@Mithical who would complain? ;D
 
The people looking for answers.
 
I guess
 
9:58 PM
....sorry, I'm in a vengeful mood
 
question is are folks mad enough to do it?
I am somewhat
 
your vengeance would spill to the innocents, keep in mind
 
That decision probably rests with @ArtOfCode TBH. I'm not running that command myself, I don't want a pallet of bricks on my head
 
The additional details we've seen now about what happened do make it clear that it wasn't just a snap decision to fire Monica, but a deliberate act against the advice of the most experienced CMs. This does make it a fundamental moral failure by the decisionmakers, as the consequences and harm that would affect Monica were predictable. And they still decided to act in public against the custom and the advice of CMs.
 
@DisappointedinSE I always felt like it was a show of strength
3
as were other things
Problem is... we don't work here. And we know how things work a lot better
 
10:01 PM
@JourneymanGeek I suspected something similar as well, but back then we didn't have those small insights into the way it happened
 
@DisappointedinSE I've suspected enough
but on the other hand, its only where the position lets them
 
@Mithical I've said it before, but the only thing I could see getting attention from high up would be a coordinated strike by a majority of SO mods and the automated spam tools. And even then probably only because that might be big enough to be picked up by the media. The problem I see with it is that I wouldn't even know what demands to set, anything that could really restore trust is stuff that is almost certain to never happen
 
@DisappointedinSE at this point, so much needs to be fixed that I can't think of where to start
 
First off would be them following the mods' and CMs lead on stuff - e.g. not trying to police featured meta posts (and for that matter reinstating HMP). They need to release a press release apologizing to all of their moderators and former staff members. They need to give all the CMs a pay raise and start listening to them. And reach out to every single mod who stepped down or was removed and work something out. That'd be a start.
 
@Mithical those same people are the ones who post crap on twitter that causes such messes....
 
10:12 PM
Then they can start paying more attention to meta, fix some of the issues we've been begging them to fix for years, and basically they need to grovel. I'm angry.
 
@Mithical I think everyone realises policing featured meta posts is a lost cause at this point
 
hahaha none of this is going to happen
:(
 
@Mithical funny thing is - I think to a certain extent, these actions are fed by a fear of meta and the community
 
and sadly someone high up is reenforcing that fear at every chance they get.
 
@djsmiley2kTMW hmm
the difficulty is I think that's the person most afraid
Its easy to lead from a position of strength
Dealing with an angry mob is more challenging
I deal with it by not being a leader :D
 
10:18 PM
like it or not you are kinda a de facto leader on MSE
 
@Mithical Possibly, but it isn't (just) by virtue of that position
 
No. As in, you have the trust enough of the community that they will follow you.
Irrelevant of whether or not you have a diamond.
 
@Mithical and I don't need to rely on shows of force :D
hmm
Its 6 am, and I've not had any sleep
 
you should probably sleep
 
But there's 2 kinds of leadership - "Servant" leadership - of the sort you talk about, and leadership by position/force
2 hours to get off work ;D
 
10:54 PM
> There is... Some reason to believe that forcing action while Jon, one of the people most familiar with the situation at that point in time, was away... Was not accidental.
 
> Everything I've learned since that day suggests pure, boring apathy: folks too annoyed that they had to spend even a few minutes thinking about messy humans to put even a tiny bit of effort into talking to more of them.
> FYI: I was the person who actually pulled the trigger on the de-modding. Was told it was urgent and that details would be forthcoming... They were not, and by the time I had the full picture - 5 weeks later - it was apparent that there had been no valid reason for the urgency.
The urgency always seemed weird, I did suspect for the most part that it was simply something like counsel saying that there was some legal risk for some weird reason. It does make more sense that there wasn't any actual reason at all, though it really emphasizes that management is either incompetent or evil
 
it's the latter
 
> The retrospective document that we finally compiled after 5 weeks was... Brutal. The same folks who called the shots had had stuff on their plates for half a year or more that they'd just... Ignored. Then, suddenly: it's the CMs fault for not handling this sooner.
 
they wanted to do it while the people who knew were away and so the people doing it wouldn't have time to think
 
11:02 PM
@ArtOfCode I suspect it's both, with the evil being closer to oblivious to the harm they're causing
 
@ArtOfCode the onerous conditions that were mentioned for sevierence make sense if they didn't want this coming out. ._.
but I'm feeling less than charitable
 
Did this ever have a chance of not blowing up?
 
Good question
 
Depends on how you define "blow up".
Things had come to a slow boil even before the "firing incident"; what that did was send it all into a roiling boil.
 
Firing Monica in this way created an inevitable cascade, and that was entirely predictable. If you didnt' want this to blow up, you have to change things before that step
SE could also have stopped digging after they fired Monica, but instead they doubled down on every bad decision. The discussion before the firing and just after it was still controversial in TL, it got pretty one-sided after the news article appeared, and it was unanimous when they fired Shog and Robert. There is nobody left to defend the company
 
11:17 PM
Lawyers can still defend the company, but that too "costs too much money"
 
11:29 PM
@Mithical where is that quote from?
 
27 mins ago, by Mithical
https://discordapp.com/channels/628507458452586497/628507458910027777/673663952814604326
Shog
 
@Mithical does that channel only work when you register?
 
Probably. And you probably need to have joined the server as well.
Discord is a bit annoying.
 
@Mithical yeah, the link doesn't do anything except dump you in an empty wasteland ;-)
 

« first day (3469 days earlier)      last day (1567 days later) »