At this point, my involvement in the network is so minimal, I'm like a guest observer at some secret weaponized leprosy trial. Just watching with casual interest, safely behind impact glass, as horrible things unfold.
At this point I wouldn't be too surprised if the email was, literally or at least in meaning, "Here's your promised email. We won't be hiring you back. <Signature>"
From her response it could have been more like "Here's more detail on why we fired you and will uphold that decision. Btw this information is confidential and cannot be shared"
@Magisch corporate HR probably dictates that. Not doing that might put them up for damages. This way they can negotiate their way out, assuming the other party is prepared to settle.
@Mgetz put behind you? How so? From what I know, we fast on Yom Kippur to ask forgiveness for our sins. But not religious, so might be missing some things, even after all those years.
@Shadow I'm clearly failing at communicating. But the whole point isn't for sins against god per se, rather taking a moment to A) forgive ourselves of sins against god, B) clear any sins we've committed against others. Thus putting them behind us.
At least Monica didn't say that she is saddened or disappointed. She said: "I am not satisfied and I have asked for a conversation". Sure, that's not great, but it's not hopeless, either.
@Magisch Just as an example, the IPCC report for 1990 (which is old enough to give us a reasonable amount of data) predicted global mean temperature rise of 0.3C per decade, with uncertainty range from 0.2C-0.5C. Actual global mean temperature rise to date is just over 0.4C, almost 3 decades later. So that one at least was overly pessimistic.
About a decade ago, the left-wing Australian Federal government took bold steps against global warming, with a carbon emissions trading scheme. They got voted out of office, the carbon trading scheme was killed, and we've had right-wing Federal governments ever since.
@Magisch I mean, there's pretty much no way this kills all of us. Earth has been a lot warmer than worst estimates say it'll become, I don't think we're going to turn into Venus. Then the survivors rebuild civilization and hopefully aren't stupid enough to do it again.
@Magisch Meh. On a cosmic timescale, it'll take a blink of an eye for us to go from stone age 2.0 to back where we are now. I don't think it works as a great filter.
@JohnDvorak you mean like a version of anthrax already better than the best weapon grade the soviet union ever developed that's been killing large herds of reindeer?
Agreed. Earth can't get as bad as Venus. But if civilization does collapse, humans can't simply restart the Industrial Age. We've consumed a lot of the easily extractable resources. Some of those take a long time to replenish, some are simply not replenishable, without many millennia of volcanoes, etc. Stuff like tungsten. Etc.
Any virus that's ever been this deadly had the flash fire problem of burning out its infection vector. It would have to be one that nobody is immune to, with a long incubation time and high infectivity during incubation. I don't think such a virus exists or even can exist
Hell, the industrial era started primarily due to ready availability of coal and iron near the surface
@Magisch yes and people will survive plague and anthrax too. But that doesn't mean it can't have a 50-60% mortality rate that then spirals out due to the massive depopulation
@PM2Ring We haven't consumed it. We've actually refined it, making it easier for post-apocalypse humans to get. And the stuff in alloys can be either extracted or, well, those alloys were useful in the first place, they'll probably be useful again.
even collapse of society terrible wouldn't throw us back into the stone age. Understanding how a boiler or turbine works isn't impossible if you have the remains of one lying around somewhere
There's basically no way humanity goes extinct (outside giant killer asteroid or some such), and even if we somehow lose everything, we built up from nothing the first time around. We'll do it again.
Use a lava extruder to generate cobblestone. Use solar power to crush the cobblestone into gravel. Sift the gravel to gather precious stones and seeds. Let the seeds rot. Once you have one cubic meter of soil you can grow trees.
you dont get solar panels until later. You do the manual labor yourself and hope your food doesn't run out before you've grown apple trees from nothing...
Do you know how hard it is to future-proof nuclear waste sites? And that's as simple as conveying "Don't go there, you'll die, no we're not superstitious fools and we're not joking". It's very hard.
If large-scale technology collapses the number of machines that can untangle your legacy data will diminish fast. Ultimately you're stuck with English (or other local) text on paper.
I love that they copy/pasted an entire paragraph directly from MSE
> While this affair attracted a lot of attention, it's only one of the many sources of disagreement and tension between community volunteers and the company that profits from them. There's also unrest about mandatory binding arbitration, animated ads, user fingerprinting for ad targeting, and changes in the way site content is licensed.
Scratch that. 75% of the article is copy/pasted or paraphrased from the second apology.
> Sorry mods, we'll do better, promises CTO (again)
question that i'm just tossing out into the void: user that harassed me serially and started acting up again after the mass mod exodus has been suspended for a year. user's profile is still visible, but when visiting the user's questions, the name for who asked it is all grayed out, and it doesn't have user's display name; just "user#####" where #'s are random numbers. is this what automatically happens when users are suspended for a year?
huh. weird. i got a notification that said "user was removed", and i gained rep, but it doesn't look like he's actually been removed, just suspended. maybe that was someone else? still doesn't explain why his questions are no longer associated with his user though.
pretty sure. when i see user's profile on other networks, user is still shown to be on writing, just with 1 rep and a banner that says "this user is suspended to cool down, ends october 2020" or something like that
@weakdna The user probably deleted and recreated their account, resulting in a new user code. The system automatically reinstates suspensions in case users try to get around them that way.
user473022
i don't think user did delete their own account though - user still exists on other sites on the network
As promised, I'm on my way out. I am unsustainably exhausted after the past few weeks, and... it's time for me to go. I don't see another way. But I have some final thoughts, and I can't leave in peace without writing them down. This post is not about me.
I will perform a magic act: to cut a gna...