@JourneymanGeek I never said it's the same thing. Just a bit in the similar vein. But Tim doesn't deserve to be treated like this. My point is that nobody deserves to be treated like this.
Of course not. What happened now is that someone with a personal vendetta against Tim made attacks on his person on amazon, and they acted on the report without doing proper investigation. What happened back then was someone with a personal vendetta against SO made attacks on members of the community on SO, and they acted on the report without doing proper investigation.
Well, TL;DR is that he lost the company he created in Israel and was left with no money whatsoever and with warrants forbidding him from ever trying again anything related to chocolate in Israel.
That's why he was forced to move to different countries.
Dunno about details, they're probably not public too, but I guess each of the partners thought the other stole their ideas, and the other one won in court.
> Eleven years later, after a long court battle, Brenner signed a non-compete agreement with the company, which precluded him from working on any chocolate-related endeavors. According to the legal agreement, he couldn’t even use the word “chocolate” in any of his professional pursuits.
This is a random question. I remember seeing a post on one of the metas about not calling "frame challenge" answers as such since many people don't know what that means. Does anyone know where that was? I can't remember if it was on SE Meta or one of the specific ones.
@CaptainMan When an answer challenges the framing of a question
e.g "What stance should I use when torching my house with a flamethrower to exterminate spiders" being answered with "You should probably use some pesticide instead of torching your house"
The concept of a frame challenge is fairly ubiquitous in our community, at least for meta users or those who've been around long enough to have seen it a few times.
There's an issue here though: I'm pretty sure nobody else uses that terminology but us. All the results on Google or DuckDuckGo for...
@Tinkeringbell heh. "frame challenge" is a particularly terrible bit of jargon. I suppose it makes some amount of sense in the context of an RPG discussion, but seeing it applied elsewhere makes me sad.
talking about the "premise" of a question is only slightly better, but seems to be considerably more common when discussing normal questions (that is... questions that don't inherently relate to storytelling)
I've noticed a sizable number of questions here where the petitioner asks something like
"I'm trying to flange my dichromatic howitzer, but I can't defibrillate the metacarpus. Any suggestions?"
... and the first answer (and the one that attracts a lot of upvotes) is one that says
"That's...
@Somewhat If it's facts, an edit or comment can correct. If it's 'I disagree', you leave it alone. And if it's not there, comment ask for it and close...
a core bit of guidance for many years has been that questions should be based on a real problem. If you're asking how to hammer in a nail with an old shoe, there better be a story behind that...
I think IPS does 'hypotheticals' as long as they have that bit of story behind it (enough details to answer)... Last meta consensus was that we can't figure out what's real or not anyways.
when I was about 8 years old, I was playing with some friends, exploring a forested hillside and chasing each other around with cap guns (of the sort that used a role of paper tape with dots of charge that went "bang!" when struck sharply).
Tiring of the tedium of torn paper rolls, I took a strip of tape, placed it on a rock, and found a discarded beer bottle nearby with which I was able to quickly trigger the charges by fast and accurate taps on the tape.
...until the bottle broke in my hand
Sometimes, what seems clever isn't such a good idea anyway
@Tinkeringbell funny enough, what tends to matter more than enforcing the "real problem" aspect against presumably hostile askers... Is simply expecting folks to explain their problem in context.
You see this all the time on SO: folks ask for something weird, so folks just stand & scratch their heads in amazement. Answers, if any emerge, tend to be... not helpful.
Then they add some bit of explanation, and folks are able to get past the confusion over the weird thing they're asking for.
@Shog9 We did that too, with bricks. We weren't allowed guns ;)
Yeah, asking for details works quite well. We've put two questions on hold recently that seem so weird that they really need the details to work (and the right details)
Lisa: I'd like 25 copies on Goldenrod. Clerk: Right. Lisa: 25 on Canary. Clerk: Mmhmm. Lisa: 25 on Saffron. Clerk: All right. Lisa: And 25 on Paella. Clerk: Ok, 100 yellow.