« first day (2124 days earlier)      last day (2891 days later) » 

12:41 AM
Now with sandwich spending less time here, I might need to transform into Twitter bot
 
Oh god they're making another jQuery.
 
1:07 AM
You think that's bad... Look at how many Reacts there are.
 
I don't want to look.
 
Speaking of React:
any one interested in a React Native contracting gig? Really interesting product being made by great people who could use some extra help.
 
1:52 AM
Here's my proposal from Programmers, but refined, regarding counting net up/down votes towards close/reopen votes: meta.stackexchange.com/a/279700/239121
 
will it help?
I mean, it's all elegant & schit
but will it actually make any real difference?
 
Of course it will help!
pshh
 
quickly coming to the conclusion that auto-closing anything scoring < 0 is the only way to really make a difference here
collecting votes just takes too long
 
Aren't you working a bit late?
 
who says I'm working?
also, how'd you escape The Whiteboard?
I thought they had a better labyrinth than that.
 
2:01 AM
I get around. I'm not prolific, but I get around.
 
user202362
you need to create another dimension
 
user202362
all problems are solvable by creating an addition dimension
 
must've forgotten to feed the Pale Man
So here's the quandary.
Stack Overflow wants fewer questions
Not necessarily even better questions, just fewer
They're at the limits of what they can reasonably process
and growing the number of folks processing is... hard
Programmers wants to have the same questions, but a different name
their current name doesn't describe the sorts of questions they accept
their proposed names don't describe them either
So they try to make it work with elaborate descriptions of their scope
full of $100 words that go right over the heads of the folks they wish to talk to
 
I thought you wanted more questions, not less. Easy: you need to make it harder to ask questions. Make them jump through hoops.
 
user202362
maybe learn from how brain works - most asked/viewed/answered questions should be in the foreground. Old, inactive ones hiding deep inside the memory lane from searches ...
 
2:05 AM
The best questions come from folks who can answer them themselves, given enough time
add time to asking, and they won't be asked.
Most questions come from folks who can't answer them, even given infinite time
add time to asking, and they will still ask them
ban them for months, and they still come back and ask
 
"Must be this tall to ride"?
 
almost any hoop is easier to jump through than, "learn to program and read the docs"
 
Invitation only?
 
user202362
...
 
user202362
google is made for all sorts of idiots, why can't SO/SE?
 
2:08 AM
quick IQ test?
 
user202362
if you want to be popular, learn to how to deal with idiots
 
user202362
because they made for the most of worlds population
 
Apparently you don't want that.
I mean, I understood that from the beginning.
Atwood and Spolsky.
Not interested in dealing with idiots or being popular.
 
So, that's an option. The entrance test thing, I mean
It's a hell of a bar for folks who don't like being tested though
And doesn't do much for folks who don't mind cheating
 
yeah, easy. Who doesn't like being tested?
if you're smart, I mean.
 
2:11 AM
lots of folks don't like being tested
Even if they're smart, even if they're good at the stuff being tested.
Some people just react badly to it
Conversely, some folks love tests but aren't particularly bright
<---
So, you can end up optimizing for the wrong thing
As a number of organizations found when they got too enthusiastic with those "clever puzzles" in job interviews
Ideally, we'd optimize for folks who... Read.
Really.
 
user202362
@AaronHall a lot of people don't like to be tested, because it's a waste of time
 
user202362
they could use the time for more productive things
 
But all of this, it takes a certain... Willingness to discard probable rubbish
Up-front
 
user202362
also you can get better at tests
 
Not as a block, but as... Don't show it to anyone unless they go out of their way to look for it.
 
user202362
2:14 AM
so the more you do those tests, the better you become
 
That's a tough sell.
 
well, you said you wanted less questions.
 
@AaronHall actually, I said Stack Overflow wants less questions
I, personally, would be happy with just different questions
I mean, if we didn't have to delete 10-20% of questions, that'd just be less work for everyone
 
user202362
why does Stack overflow want less questions?
 
@Telkitty have a look at the home page
or /questions
most of them are...
 
user202362
2:17 AM
That doesn't answer my question ... I mean that's not an answer :x
 
...boring
if you're into C++
or you're into JavaScript
or web-dev
 
Correction: Look at any page. The questions are crap.
 
or, like @bjb, are a jQuery fiend
 
@bjb568 That's not true.
 
We need to reduce crap, therefore we need to reduce questions.
 
2:18 AM
The "Too Broad" question was actually pretty interesting.
 
you might think you could drop onto SO for a good bit of education and entertainment
 
@hichris123 psst, kat is making generalizations.
 
user202362
most of the things on news or twitter or facebook or google are crap
 
user202362
your point?
 
and instead, you're mostly gonna be wading through trivial / ultra-specific nonsense looking for something that piques your interest
And you think, "if there were just 10x fewer questions, I'd find something interesting faster"
which... Probably isn't true, unless something else happened along with that reduction
 
2:20 AM
@Shog9 One thing that would help is making typo-questions just vanish. People get at least 60 rep from answering one of those, only encourages answering and not closing.
 
but when you're paging through "debug my code" questions, the notion of having fewer questions to page through has an undeniable appeal
 
Although that's but one bit of the problem.
 
user202362
looks like you need to work on your search functionality not the amount of questions
 
needed: a novelty search operator
or much, much more specific tagging
but yes
just showing fewer boring questions by default would be a huge step up
 
@Shog9 If only there was a project to do just that...
253
Q: Let’s improve our site navigation

Sklivvz A Release Candidate has been announced A.k.a. the 2015 Questions to Answer Refactoring Konversion (QuARK) A.k.a. the great cheese move of 2015. TL:DR; we are looking to change the navigation of the question lists on the site. We are not looking to remove any functionality or break any ex...

... it's been over a year now...
 
2:23 AM
yeah, because it's hard
 
@Shog9 Hard or no one is working on it?
I haven't seen a bug fix in several months.
 
little bitta column a little bitta column b
Hopefully Docs and Teams and Stories and such get to some sort of a milestone soon
 
Well, if no one is working on it... you can't really get anything done...
 
you can't get anyone working on it unless there's an end in sight either
and... sooner or later, you gotta face up to the idea that showing folks more interesting questions means not showing folks a heck of a lot of questions
so, that's gotta be digestible
 
People were perfectly fine working on it until the "great new projects" were introduced.
 
2:25 AM
you say that, but it's not exactly true
I mean, the goals are good, and I think the foundation was good
but I guarantee you, if what you can use today was turned on for everyone... There'd be blood.
 
Yeah, there's a lot to fix with it.
I'm saying that as a new nav user.
But it doesn't help if no one is working on it.
 
hey, I've used it for months, I like it, but it's not a solution yet
And here's the thing, right?
Gotta have a clear goal
"get questions answered" ain't quite enough
if those answers don't get upvotes, don't get views, don't actually go on to be useful
 
No kidding. When things like your browser's back button are broken... there's a lot of work yet to do.
 
I mean, long tail and all that, can't hit it out of the park every time
But we got folks who are... Pretty good at answering.
 
@Shog9 Well, okay, when was the last time new nav was actually discussed in a meeting for an extended period of time?
 
2:28 AM
And if they're struggling to find interesting stuff to answer, that doesn't bode well for anyone else.
@hichris123 two months ago?
I'm not in every meeting, so many not that long
Last I heard of it was back about then though.
 
And I wonder why it's not being changed...
 
:shrug:
Like I said, needs a solid goal
SO's views aren't exactly brilliant, but they seem to have worked well enough for a shocking number of people for a shockingly long period of time now
 
You don't get to a goal without discussion.
 
So, if you're gonna move everyone's cheese, you gotta beat that by a mile, not an inch
@hichris123 you don't get a goal with discussion unless you had one before the discussion. You might identify one, but if everyone comes into a discussion with different goals you're probably gonna leave that way too.
Remember your "blood & guts" thing from a while back?
 
I guess, but it's not like all of a sudden The Perfect Idea will come to one of you and suddenly The Problem Is Solved!
 
2:32 AM
@hichris123 hell no
but... I've noticed something
there's generally a sort of emergent consensus in groups
 
@Shog9 I distinctly remember it.
 
and sometimes, you get one person who sees it before it emerges, and if that person is in a place where they can wield a good bit of influence, they manage to look really good
But mostly, everyone sorta tries to pretend that nothing's going on until they can't ignore it anymore, and then... Reluctantly... Agrees that X needs to be done.
And until then, if you propose X, you're just trying to ruin this good thing we got going.
So, the blood and guts... The thing that drives Stack Overflow... What do you think we're talking about there?
 
Obviously something...
 
Getting answers to programming questions?
Building a library of knowledge?
Helping people learn?
Spreading The Gospel?
Having fun?
 
Isn't it pretty much all of those and more? (except for maybe spreading The Gospel...)
 
user202362
2:36 AM
Maybe create a sub-section: homework questions - answer those questions for a fee paid to the answerer's account? :p
 
user202362
answer + tutoring ...
 
user202362
side business for SO!
 
@hichris123 yeah, sure.
 
user202362
question gets answered, askers knowledge improved and people who answer them get paid.
 
Ever throw four balls with a dog near you?
Dog chases all of them, gets none of them.
 
user202362
2:37 AM
worse come to worse, there will be less homework questions on SO
 
Default front page like Reddit then? HNQ -> HSiteQ?
 
@Shog9 But this is a company of several hundred we're talking about. Hopefully multiple goals can be accomplished.
 
By who?
Someone's still gotta have a goal.
not four goals, not infinite goals, not one impossibly vague goal...
One, specific, goal.
When SO launched, it was "let folks answer programming questions in an environment that's less shitty than Experts Exchange"
possibly expressed a bit more flowery, but... That was the goal.
 
Unless you consider "making the world a better place" a goal, there seem to be multiple directions even with the new projects.
 
So if you want a goal here now, "let folks answer programming questions in an environment that's less shitty than Stack Overflow" wouldn't be a bad one.
 
user202362
2:41 AM
Don't mind me asking, why does stack overflow decide to take on linkedin instead of elance or freelancer?
 
@Telkitty are they somehow worse and more pervasive than linkedin? I wasn't aware.
 
user202362
linkedin is more for full time placement, the others were more about freelancing jobs
 
so, no.
 
user202362
but stack overflow can be either right?
 
@hichris123 sure. There are folks working on Jobs, there are folks working on Docs, there are folks working on Teams... And they each have their own goals, and they mostly align in a general sense.
 
2:43 AM
In the "make the world a better place" sense...
 
"...for programmers", sure
 
(and I do note the lack of Core folks... ;))
Honestly I have been wondering why SE has decided to focus on doing a bunch of things rather than doing one thing really well.
 
aside: remember that "minus 100 points" thing? Folks always brush it off, but damn if it ain't a good thing to keep in mind. Every feature, every little enhancement, every little rule that makes total sense but adds a tiny bit of complexity... That never dies. That never stops costing.
I can't even remember how all this stuff works anymore. I'll wager most devs can't remember, but they actually gotta keep it working.
I should be declining a lot, lot more stuff.
end aside.
 
information hiding and modularity
 
user202362
but programmers have specific problems, programmers start as newbies and newbies tend to ask newbish questions and those are the crap question you are complaining about ...
 
2:46 AM
Yeah, the system is way more complicated than it should be.
Try explaining even reputation to someone...
 
I mean, look at bluefeet's post from today.
 
what's that?
 
24
Q: Fixing the disconnect between VLQ and Triage

bluefeettl;dr; When flagging questions as VLQ, we're inadvertently sending too much noise to the moderators to handle. Over the past year, the reviewers here on Stack Overflow have shown themselves able to accurately sift through the majority of these flags, but due to various assumptions, the system sti...

 
That's aiming to fix weird edge-cases in a system that was built mostly to fix weird edge cases in a system that was built to paper over deficiencies in a system that was built to allow normal users to assist moderators.
SIX YEARS AGO.
The temptation to throw it all out and start over is intense
But... That's kinda treating the folks who depend on it like crap too.
Ideally, you keep plugging away at it, hard and boring though it is, until it works without requiring every user to know 6 years of history and errata.
 
Eh. Who really depends on /review?
 
2:48 AM
without requiring a novel-long meta FAQ
@hichris123 the folks who just assume that when they flag something inappropriate it's gonna get removed?
 
If you build something that works better that should still happen.
 
sure, but the predicate there is that it's gotta actually work better
like, immediately
 
And I think review has been failing at that function for years now...
 
or nearly so
 
(definitely with the CV queue, less so with LQP)
 
2:50 AM
Were you around in 2011?
 
No, I think you know that.
 
I have trouble remembering all this stuff anymore
 
I joined right around the time the New Close Reasons came out.
so ~July 2013
 
Anyway, two moderator elections, first review system, beefed up 10k flag queue, and still "all hands on deck" because flags were piling up everywhere
"no time to read, delete everything"
 
user202362
 
user202362
2:52 AM
one of those awkward times
 
"Indeed"
"quite, quite"
"very much so"
@hichris123 ok, so that was right when we took close flags out of the mod queues too
until then, mods had to not only handle most NAA flags, most VLQ flags, the heaping piles of Other flags, but endless waves of Close flags to boot.
It was... Not exactly scaling.
 
That means there must've been several thousand active flags at any one time...
 
You need more moderators.
 
159
Q: Stack Overflow is not yet a vast wasteland: a history of moderator tooling

Shog9Warning: this is long, rambling and extremely boring. I'm writing it because I tend to get a lot of questions regarding the rationale for changes to the moderator tooling on SO, and I'm hoping to have something to point to next time. If you already know all there is to know about this - or just d...

 
Programmers/SESE wants more too.
 
2:55 AM
@AaronHall well, that's probably true... But it ain't a solution.
it's not like we got a thousand flags to clear today and then we're golden.
There's another couple thousand tomorrow
and the next day
and the next...
 
user202362
How about creating a tutorial side business - all those homework questions will be referring to the tutoring section and deleted from the main page?
 
Docs
 
> On Stack Overflow, we close or delete questions that can't be answered straight away - it's not very sociable, but it scales wonderfully by effectively enabling a vast, human-powered computational grid.
Scales... wonderfully?
 
@hichris123 as opposed to the alternative
 
Okay, fair enough.
 
2:58 AM
Use my suggestion to close crap quicker.
 
@AaronHall -1 == close?
that'd actually reduce the number of people involved
 
@AaronHall But closing doesn't cut it. For every person who asks a question you have several more right behind them.
 
-1 + 4 votes still == 5 people
 
Score     Close Votes required to Close/Put on Hold
  0       5
 -1       5
 -2       4
 -3       4
 -4       3
 -5       3
 -6       2
 -7       2
 -8       2
 -9       2
 
Might as well just reduce votes required to 3
 
2:59 AM
Well do it.
 
That... seems like you'd lose a lot of interesting stuff.
 
Simpler implementation there.
 
probably because we would
 
interesting answers?
 
There's problems on both sides: a) people post poor questions -> don't get closed, b) people post interesting questions but people see them as skirting the rules -> get closed.
 
3:00 AM
I mean, that's the issue with closing, right? Close voting, I mean. The goal is to introduce resistance for the sake of controversial questions, not to enable speedy removal of crap.
 
Then stop closing them to answers, and just let them be voted on for deletion.
 
user202362
Also, questions are questions. I don't know about you, but when I was a newblet, I asked a lot of stupid questions.
 
closing is infinitely more useful for those Hot questions Progse likes to complain about than for the waves of boring questions on SO
 
user202362
if this site is designed to help programmers, it should cater for people of all sorts of levels and experience.
 
and of course, you kinda want some resistance then
 
3:03 AM
You have questions, you get answers to the question. That's a directed acyclic graph, not a metcalf law situation.
 
sure, as long as you don't need discussion
 
And you don't. You move "discussion" to chat.
Where it can be safely ignored.
 
user202362
I don't know about you, but I don't feel like to have discussion with a stranger in a chatroom for 2 people
 
user202362
I don't know how many people are into that
 
Well, considering you need 15 rep to chat, that cuts down the number of people who even can anyway.
 
3:06 AM
Well it's what we do, more or less. Seems like a lot of posters everytime I see one.
 
@AaronHall How many people actually talk in the chatroom once the comments have been moved to chat though?
 
Who cares, that's where it goes. Problem solved.
 
"Out of sight, out of mind"? Not... exactly...
 
Once you stop caring so darn much, you can stop wearing your hands out with all the wringing.
Here's the thing, Spolsky and Atwood set the site in motion. No one wants to change what seems to be working. I don't know that you have to change it. But if you want to make marginal improvements, I think I've done my best to try to offer a local optimization.
 
It all depends on how the conversation goes. Usually on sites like TWP the conversation doesn't even really need to be preserved. On other sites, they proactively move any comment chain that might lead to extended conversation to chat... doesn't make too much sense, does it?
 
3:13 AM
use some unused signal, and give more bandwidth to moderating users.
As for moderators, make more of them. Not me of course. I'm not that ambitious.
 
3:26 AM
Oh yeah, how about putting on-topic and off-topic criteria where someone in the middle of asking a question can't miss it?
well, bedtime. Good night!
 
user202362
 
3:51 AM
 
user202362
when if your flight to taiwan?
 
4:24 AM
Tomorrow at 17 PST.
 
I just read the last few hours of chat transcript and I gotta say... it felt less like a conversation and more like a CoGro musing with a sprinkle of hichris
Still good to read, I suppose
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: To Gaining Muscle Fast 3 Ways by Christolain on drupal.stackexchange.com
 
4:50 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: The Dark Jet Penile Enlargement Pill That Is Pure by tephaniarman on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: You to help keep shape moisture by Nancyrsccott on drupal.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps answer, offensive answer detected: GTA5-takes me back missions when I load saved data by Tristan on gaming.stackexchange.com
 
5:14 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching website in body: Muscle Pro Xtreme Reviews by malikmazzotta on gaming.stackexchange.com
 
5:25 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: fully typical dietary complement? by Alberte bandi on drupal.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: It is a scientifically established truth every by aird jurina on superuser.com
 
5:46 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: http://menhealthreviews.org/pure-muscle-x-scam/ by Alisha Jil on arduino.stackexchange.com
 
5:58 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title, pattern-matching website in body: Muscle Building Methods For Workout Routines by terencestacy on workplace.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: Cleanse Booster- clean the body internally? by Davidcone on superuser.com
 
6:09 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer: How does the MMR vaccine affect lymph nodes in preventing measles? by Lawson Victory on biology.stackexchange.com
 
6:22 AM
Wow...
sd 11k
 
user315433
6:47 AM
@hichris123 20
 
user315433
@Quill Better to read than the dozen of posts that followed.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, link at end of body, link following arrow in body: http://nebusconitirk.com/zymax-male-enhancement/ by user21486 on arduino.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
8:00 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching website in body: Garcinia Deluxe There are interesting by user148600 on gaming.stackexchange.com
 
8:25 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching website in body: As a form of exercise and fitness by Susie34D on drupal.stackexchange.com
 
8:41 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: ifficult for them to get? by Albertebandi on askubuntu.com (@kos)
 
sd 3k
 
9:14 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklisted website in answer, blacklisted user: Download Manager for Mac OS X by Jared barnes on apple.stackexchange.com
 
9:26 AM
sd k
 
10:32 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Researchers have been studying men’s by hynahoor on arduino.stackexchange.com
 
@hichris123 15 is to flag
 
@hichris123 *20
 
15: flag
20: chat
50: comment
100: create chat room
200: veteran
∞: Jon Skeet
 
@ShadowWizard How can you define Jon Skeet? :o
 
@TIPS I can't, hence infinity :D
@TIPS no admins in SE, only devs, CM's, VP's, and one Shog.
 
10:48 AM
@ShadowWizard *janitor
 
@TIPS not anyone who deals with crap is a janitor
 
@ShadowWizard crapophile, then
 
blech
 
chelb
 
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, link at end of body: http://fornatgaex.com/alpha-plus-male-reviews/ by simondocherty on security.stackexchange.com
 
11:04 AM
@Quill Isn't this how Tavern looks like when active?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in answer, blacklisted website in answer: Why does VIKI allow Calvin to fake Sonny's death? by user66787 on scifi.stackexchange.com
 
11:23 AM
@TIPS It's usually more like Comedy Club on the Meta
 
11:38 AM
"… Monday 12 September 2016, Symantec will be discontinuing the service currently located at: pip.verisignlabs.com …"
Verisign is still amongst the OpenID providers that are prominent when adding a new login
What's the best way to arrange/suggest demotion of that option?
 
11:51 AM
@GrahamPerrin Post on meta.se
 
in Language Learning on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 2 days ago, by Flimzy
I've just about given up hope on this site. How is it that questions like these are still open after days? We have practically zero site participation :(
Site participation has dropped down far, potential moderators are losing optimism
and now someone's asking for a moderator questionnaire... this isn't an election
 
12:10 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Link at end of body: Book Chandigarh to Delhi Bus Booking with runBus.in by runBus on askubuntu.com (@kos)
 
12:31 PM
@rene thanks, does this appear OK to you?
0
Q: Verisign Labs Personal Identity Portal (PIP) beta: Symantec will discontinue the service on Monday 2016-09-12

Graham PerrinIn the Stack Exchange routine to add a new login, the Verisign option is prominent. If (as some users have observed) the Personal Identity Portal service will be discontinued in less than four months, then: Stack Exchange should cease promotion of the Verisign option. Thanks Here, with...

 
@GrahamPerrin Not sure if I would have tagged it Feature request and I would ask a question like: Should we start warn users up-front or just remove the service when it gets discontinued?
 
I cleaned it up and balanced out the upvote
 
@rene someone has already edited the question :)
 
@GrahamPerrin it still has a downvote, but now it has an upvote to balance it
 
@Quill thanks, maybe edit again to include keywords such as Symantec
 
12:37 PM
How about the tag @Quill? is it a feature request? It is more like an unfeature-request
 
... uh, weird, that word is there but my browser didn't find it. sorry
 
I just cleaned up the content, feel free improve it yourselves guys :)
 
1:16 PM
 
 
1 hour later…
user202362
2:24 PM
 
user202362
does it matter that anyone can monitor and log what I do online if all I do is chatting in some public room?
 
3:53 PM
@Telkitty they can probably also steal your login cookie, if they try hard enough.
 
Eeeek someone can steal your Stack Exchange login cookie.
 
4:33 PM
 
@Telkitty insecure is always bad
 
4:53 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: The thing contains no limited fixings Money by maanali on arduino.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in body: • Which sentence is best suited for the blank? by niue on ell.stackexchange.com (@ShadowWizard)
 
5:26 PM
sd f
 
6:00 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: How does one "get rekt"? by Jdawg on english.stackexchange.com
 
 
2 hours later…
7:39 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: What happens if I invest candy with Baron? by Tommy on gaming.stackexchange.com
 
 
3 hours later…
10:58 PM
leadership 101 https://t.co/JMlsfPXxlo
 
11:23 PM
Got to the airport 3h early. Plane is 1/2h late. Boredom ensues.
 
11:43 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Health, Fitness, Bodybuilding, Volcano, Force Factor by choot palish on drupal.stackexchange.com
 

« first day (2124 days earlier)      last day (2891 days later) »