« first day (1663 days earlier)      last day (3356 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

kaboom
 
At least sh.st seems to be gone
 
Hey @Undo, can SmokeDetector have regexes for "bad keyboard in body"?
I guess it can, because it can detect repeating characters and whatnot.
 
user259867
@Doorknob It does have them. Check the source.
 
@Doorknob Pretty sure that's a yes
 
6:14 PM
@Doorknob Yes, it can, and it already does.
 
user259867
In the file findspam.py the rules with body: true apply to post bodies.
 
Shouldn't the "bad keyword in title" hooks also apply to the body, then?
Pretty sure either "muscle" or "testosterone" (or both) are blacklisted, but SD didn't catch that spam.
 
@Doorknob They do, but for body fetching, all posts are added to a queue so title and body are not checked at the same time.
 
Ah, right. Okay then.
 
Also relevant:
in Charcoal HQ on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, yesterday, by hichris123
I have a feeling Smokey is missing a post sometimes when it fetches from the API (i.e. it tries to fetch 2 posts, but sometimes gets two and sometimes only gets one).
and further messages
err... wait, link not on my clipboard anymore
 
6:18 PM
What are we closing now? Yourself? :P
 
@ProgramFOX Although IIRC for meta posts it checks on every post.
 
oh, right
Then perhaps the post wasn't included in the API data yet.
 
Probably.
Which means we need to find a good way to do what I was saying.
Or find a different way to make sure we get all posts.
 
yeah
 
6:21 PM
or just convince the devs SE needs an official modding API with a realtime answer feed
 
I wish.
 
And while we're at it, I want a unicorn and a million dollars.
 
user259867
yesterday, by Tim Stone
There's up to 1 minute of lag
 
user259867
Bodyfetcher.py waits 30 seconds at present.
 
in Charcoal HQ on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, yesterday, by hichris123
Perhaps, but I don't want to make it too long as then the spam might already be gone.
 
6:23 PM
Or we could just blackmail SE give up spam hunting until we get proper tools
 
Waiting 60 seconds should probably be feasible though. What do you think @hichris123?
 
@ProgramFOX Is one minute really too long to ask for?
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat My idea was to put posts back in the queue if we don't get them from the API, but then we'd have to figure out how to do that. :P
@ProgramFOX How about add that for now, and we can find a long-term solution later.
 
good idea
 
@Doorknob That's 60000 ms!
 
6:24 PM
@hichris123 Or, 1/60th of an hour! :P
Come on, is 1/86400th of a day really too much? :P
 
Think what we could be doing in that amount of time.
 
!!/rev?
 
done
 
yay
 
user259867
6:26 PM
The little summary that comes from websocket (first ~200 chars of the question) often contains those bad keywords already. If one is really impatient, that could be checked immediately.
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat Oooh, good point.
 
How about we all fly to New York and threaten random SE staff until someone makes it so that the entire body is sent with the websockets?
@FamousBlueRaincoat I just noticed how interesting that URL is.
 
Hmm, so that's called bodySummary - what do you think, @ProgramFOX?
 
I think it's a good idea.
 
@ProgramFOX I'll put it in.
 
6:30 PM
k
 
user259867
@Doorknob Interesting? It's a public Dropbox folder because I'm lazy.
 
lol, the tool says "You're welcome!" are my wise words.
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat What? That's an imgur URL.
Click the reply arrow
yesterday, by Famous Blue Raincoat
user image
 
user259867
Oh, QQQvQ.png name... perhaps that's interesting...
 
user259867
@ProgramFOX That's a hint to delete a chatty comment...
 
6:38 PM
heh :p
 
I noticed some of my "words of wisdom" were auto-generated comments of the VLQ queue
 
user259867
@KevinBrown The wisdom tends to be wiser on meta sites.
 
status-completed
 
user259867
That was a pretty easy modification...
 
Yup. :)
 
6:42 PM
@FamousBlueRaincoat Ah, much better :)
 
6:54 PM
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: How to print a this diamond pattern in java? by Yash Jain on stackoverflow.com
 
False positive
 
@SmokeDetector The answer there could probably be improved
 
@61612 And probably because bodySummary doesn't include HTML. :/
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: loop test strings to see if input is valid for C program input by jmunsch on unix.stackexchange.com
 
6:59 PM
Ugh, yeah.
@ProgramFOX still around?
 
user259867
Another of the same. Yes, it's a problem. Suppressing repeated-chars check specifically for that thing seems nontrivial.
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat Yeah. I was thinking of stripping code blocks... but I'm not sure if it gives us Markdown.
 
user259867
@hichris123 It's plain text.
 
user259867
One solution (kludge) would be to run the repeated char regex on bodySummary and to not send it if matches.
 
Yeah... hm...
 
user259867
7:01 PM
Because repeated chars in the first 200 characters of a question are probably fp.
 
user259867
May be better to strip them away with replace, actually.
 
Someone may have replaced their question with aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa though.
 
user259867
@hichris123 So that would wait 60 seconds to be detected in the normal way.
 
True.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: Installing XRDP on Cent OS 6.5 by Asshole on unix.stackexchange.com
 
user259867
7:11 PM
@SmokeDetector gone
 
@hichris123 yep
 
@ProgramFOX We're now catching repeated characters from bodySummary even though they're in code blocks.
Although it looks like the websocket gives plain-text, so...
 
Plain text? Hmm...
In that case, we could add an extra parameter to check_if_spam and if that's false, don't check for repeated chars in the body.
 
We could...
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: PHP SEARCH NEED HELP PLEASE by maiko on stackoverflow.com
 
7:21 PM
I'll add a thing to do that now.
 
the above
> - The search party is on its way now. Please stay calm. - Thankyou
 
7:46 PM
!!/rev?
 
@hichris123 ^
Got to go now, cya!
 
0
Q: Please make [document.ready] a synonym of [document-ready]

MoosemanBoth tags have the same meaning, although only one question is tagged with both.

 
@nicael I've been removing the tag: markdown from excerpts...
 
7:53 PM
@Mooseman why?
 
@Mooseman Definitely shouldn't be reopened, I just pushed it out of that queue.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: Last line is wrong when splitting a file with awk by user40129 on unix.stackexchange.com
 
False positive again...
 
user259867
Let's find the bug!
 
user259867
8:10 PM
(False if body_is_summary is True and rule['body_summary'] is False else True) looks suspicious
 
Looks somewhat reasonable without context
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat What is it?
 
user259867
That one was okay, actually.
 
user259867
 
Yeah, that's it.
 
user259867
8:14 PM
The last parameter of check_if_spam should be True in this case.
 
@nicael huh? Why it says that Mooseman is the author?
 
user259867
But the line (False if body_is_summary is True and rule['body_summary'] is False else True) ought to be expressible in a nicer form: it amounts to (NOT body_is_summary) OR rule['body_summary']
 
@Braiam Just going through [musicxml]?
 
@KevinBrown actually no, linked post from a closed question
 
8:26 PM
@FamousBlueRaincoat Done.
 
@Braiam cuz he is the creator of the first excerpt. To be honest he is just the first filler of this except, the creator is Community, but this is how the things work :D
 
@Mooseman Looks like you're getting rejected on that one
 
that reject reason for both are totally BS
how something can be made easier to read, if it didn't exist?
or harm?
 
0
A: How do I fill a hot water urn that doesn't fit in the sink?

nicaelThis is really simple, but if you urn is very big, it is quite difficult to do :D take a smaller volume fill it with water from your tap pour the water from the smaller volume into your urn. Another variant: take a large plastic bottle (e.g. 1.5L+) cut the bottom and put the bottle in this ...

How do you like my freehand? :D
 
8:33 PM
+1, great drawing
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: Bypassing Transistors with a Switch, problems? by user68375 on electronics.stackexchange.com
 
Yay, true positive
 
user259867
Or any large plastic bottle with the base cut off... — RedSonja Feb 2 at 14:45
 
Wait, bad :( But she didn't specify how to cut. And provided no freehand.
 
8:40 PM
I really think they've gone off the deep-end...
 
8:56 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: PLEASE HELP W EASY MATH QUESTION by Sam on math.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: firebase promises, (data), and index values of asArray by Chris L on stackoverflow.com
 
@SmokeDetector Quality issues on that question
 
9:21 PM
 
@HoboSapiens I tried... and then remembered I was out of close votes for the day.
 
lol - I hate it when that happens
 
user259867
@HoboSapiens gone
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat 6 minutes - not bad.
 
user259867
10:08 PM
You ever accidentally spend 2 hours working on something before checking to see if the APIs even support it?
2
 
10:48 PM
Good. It's not just me.
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector fp
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
 
user259867
11:14 PM
@SmokeDetector fp
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat Registered answer as false positive.
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: db2 - export into File by tiago on stackoverflow.com
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector fp
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in answer, Offensive answer detected: What if an asteroid the size of the moon hitting earth by user73788 on physics.stackexchange.com
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu
 
@FamousBlueRaincoat Blacklisted user.
 
@Mooseman closed
Thoughts on stackoverflow.com/questions/28204978/… being on-topic or not?
 
11:55 PM
@KevinBrown I think it definitely straddles the border. It could probably be improved to make it more on-topic.
 
Just failed a review audit for it :\
 
@KevinBrown Since there is already a valid answer pointing back to documentation, I think it's on-topic.
 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

« first day (1663 days earlier)      last day (3356 days later) »