« first day (1392 days earlier)      last day (3630 days later) » 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

4:30 PM
Best title ever:
-5
Q: i cant get this to work

user3680574I cant run it and i cant see if it works. So, to questions It crashes if i try to run it so ofcourse theres an issue. And the next thing is that i dont even know if this code works, so please give me help, beacuse im kind of a nobb at java. import java.lang.Math; import java.util.Scanner; pa...

 
How long does it usually take for a dissociation request to be processed?
 
@AmalMurali Three incalculable eons.
(Just kidding, I don't know actually.)
 
ha! thought so.
Unrelated question: what's the etiquette on copying content from different sources, but using them without blockquotes?
 
When I copy I always use blockquotes.
 
As in: in a way that does not make it perfectly clear whether the content is written by the author themselves or copied from a different source (the answer has links to the said source)
 
4:43 PM
And provide attribution, of course.
 
@Louis Yup. I recently flagged an answer with the "other" flag describing this. But the flag got declined.
Personally, I think that answer is very useful, but the attribution is not so clear in many places.
 
Hard to tell why it was declined without knowing the details of the case.
I flagged one answer once as plagiarized but lost track of it. At the end of the day, I know that the moderator(s) after investigation might find that the author of the blog post from which the answer was taken and the author of the post on SO are the same person. (Not something I could readily tell.)
 
Mat
@AmalMurali: that's not something mods can really do stuff about, except delete the post if it outright plagiarism. Any editor can clarify the citations though.
 
@Mat This is what I flagged with. With an additional note at the end saying "please take the appropriate action here".
It was declined with the following message:
> declined - The sources are quoted in the answer
But some of them are not.
I'm not really sure if it was okay to edit those sources in — that's why I flagged it. Otherwise, it's a very good answer (probably the best one on that thread).
How can I know why the flag was declined? Starting a meta discussion just for this specific case sounds a bit stupid. What do you think?
 
Mat
The fact that the sources aren't quoted isn't evident in your flag (I don't see it). And if it's good content, and the sources are cited, then deletion isn't an option, so the mod can't do anything about it except edit him/herself.
There's no issue with adding references if one or two are missing, if the post is generally ok otherwise - in my opinion, I'm no lawyer. Adjusting the formatting would be ok too, but given the length that might be detrimental.
You could start a post about guidelines for properly quoting and citing sources. That would be helpful (IMO), and it could be applied to that post once the proper "etiquette" is established.
 
4:54 PM
@Mat Only some of the sources are cited. I'm not sure how would you even give attribution to that many sources in a single post... But you're right - I could have made that bit clearer in my flag message.
 
@AmalMurali It's not completely clear from the message you showed you sent that the issue is with quoting. Also, I'd say it is not impossible that the moderator who handled the flag does not know what plagiarism actually is. (Having been in the position to take action in such cases, I can tell you for a fact that more faculty members in US universities than you'd think don't know what plagiarism is, and end up incorrectly advising students.)
 
Mat
Shog9 and ThiefMaster are in here too, you might want to ping them for more advice.
Got to go, cya.
 
byebye, @Mat.
Yeah I saw them. I was afraid Shog might get mad for pinging him :-P
 
Thing is, if you point out that something was copied without making it clear that it was copied (with a blockquote or quotation marks), and the reply you get is "this is not plagiarism because there are hyperlinks to the source (or because the source is cited with author, title, whatever)", they are flat out wrong.
 
5:32 PM
 
Gone.
 
yeah
 
Does anyone have a reference to the most recent Chrome Update that caused a loss of the "image pasting" capability?
 
@TimPost - Sorry for the random ping, I felt this was more efficient than sending an email. I was one of the posters for What happens when you plug a UPS into itself?. The locked message said there would be an email. I was unsure if my email was available. If you need it, it is im@emailtravis.com . If that was not the case, please disregard this.
 
5:40 PM
@Werner Folks were discussing that before in here, I think.
 
@AmalMurali ...thanks. Found a starting point:
May 8 at 19:08, by ThiefMaster
> Clipboard was renamed to DataTransfer in the WebKit source, which was merged into Blink/chromuim/Chrome:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=revision&revision=168494
 
7
Q: add support for pasting images

Nathan FellmanI was very happy to learn that you had added support for directly uploading images to imgur. However, I would like to see this taken one step further, if it is even possible. Today, if I want to upload a screen shot (and let's face it, this is probably the most likely case in the computing-rela...

 
@AmalMurali Yes, thanks... but even though there is a and answer post, it's not functional in Chrome at the moment.
 
May 8 at 18:52, by Amal Murali
Neither works for me. (Google Chrome 32.0.1700.102 / Ubuntu 13.10)
 
SPAM Ok, gone!
 
5:47 PM
@ProgramFOX You made me slide down the firehouse pole for nothing! :P
 
Weeeeeeee
 
gone
 
Years ago I rebound the key combination to exit Emacs so that I would not hit it by mistake. Idiot proof, right?
Turns out this idiot managed to hit the rebound combination by mistake.
"If you make something idiot proof, someone will make a better idiot." QFT.
Sometimes the one who makes the thing idiot proof and who is the better idiot is the same person.
 
6:01 PM
gone
 
Are these people dumb or what? What could they possibly gain from a few minutes exposure on a foreign website? o.O
 
@AmalMurali riches beyond your wildest imagination
 
And why do they write sentences like this: All ProBlEm SoLuTiOn
ಠ_ಠ
Let me get my guns.
““”̿ ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿’̿’̵͇̿̿з=(•̪●)=ε/̵͇̿̿/̿ ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿’““
Alright, enough stupidness today. I'm going back to watch GoT :-P
 
6:29 PM
@AmalMurali it's a few minutes times a million
 
Gone.
 
@JanDvorak Just curious, how do you identify spam so quickly?
 
@Andy He has a spam detector.
 
@Andy I run a script that catches quite a few, especially of the classic type
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive title detected: Why the fuck is apple ran by corporate scum? on patents.stackexchange.com
 
6:36 PM
@JanDvorak nah, is NAA, and who the heck marked "Looks Good"?
 
@ManishBot flagged, thanks
 
@ProgramFOX 1 hour ago :(
 
@TravisJ I'll be contacting folks tomorrow, 'twas a holiday and all, just a bit backed up
 
7:31 PM
G'morning all.
How did this user get the 100 point bonus?
 
@SomeKittens No clue.
 
jumping in: his oldest account was granted the association bonus.
 
From what, though?
 
so it looks to me like he had an account before the meta account which has since been deleted.
not sure if "single account deletion" is a thing
one would think if you were abusive on one exchange site you would be banned from all of them
 
Does anybody else think the edit queue should only be for 3k reps? Or 5k reps?
 
8:12 PM
@ProgramFOX No one had nuked that yet. :( Just nuked it.
Also, I just made some changes to the SmokeDetector regex. I'm going to ping Manish to redeploy it.
 
Wow, my first dupehammer, that was scary. Not sure it even warned me, didn't notice.
 
Meh, I treat every review and vote as if I was the only one voting. It increases my vote/review quality.
 
8:45 PM
Anyone want to help me clean up the tag? (close vote queue)
 
We're having a CV party in 13 minutes.
 
I'll be there.
Ooh.
 
voted...
 
@rene Thanks
 
Me too!
 
CV, -1
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: FORALL MULTIPLE TABLES UPDATE on dba.stackexchange.com
 
10:24 PM
@Louis Hammered
@Werner it's bug in Chrome, Stack Exchange aren't going to fix it.
Everyone saw the secret chat room already?
 
tbh, if someone doesn't want a camera pointed at them while they are trying to eat, you shouldn't point a camera at them while they are trying to eat.
 
I think Google should be killed a fiery death for all the privacy invasion.
 
Reminder: I have Glass. so... :P
@3ventic It's not always on.
 
@hichris123 Can the person it's pointed at see that it's not on?
 
11:38 PM
Well, if the screen isn't on...
Psst. @animuson are you bored?
 
I can't say I'd be bothered by someone wearing Glass, but omg if a restaurant asks you to take them off just do it. Like seriously, wtf? Getting all your friends to write 1-star ratings for a place they've never been? She should be in jail, imo.
 
... that means you are bored.
Would you help me burn the [tournament] tag?
 
I went out to Walgreens for the sole purpose of buying Mike & Ike's.
I'm not sure if that's considered boredom or lack of priorities, though.
 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (1392 days earlier)      last day (3630 days later) »