I believe that it shouldn't be the winning of the harsher (q-ban on meta let them silence who they don't like) and instead I strongly believe in conversation and comparison
@Revious Think of yourself as a thin branch on a tree. There is a strong wind. You can either bend and adjust yourself, waiting for the wind to pass, or you might break.
But like I, and many others in the past, try to explain, that's how things are and we can't change human nature or Meta rules. (well, we can change rules, but not in the way you suggest)
@Revious you have enough reputation to create new chat rooms on Meta. Nothing is stopping you, when you do it post link here and those who want will come and join.
Thanks for actually proving what a ridiculous "troll fest" this site has become. I'm glad that there are so many expert critiques on the actual subject, since you all obviously know how to correctly answer the question given. Well done all. — Neil Lunn1 min ago
[tag:cv-pls] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22765069/is-require-js-useful-in-jquery-based-website-development So opinion-based it's not even funny.
Quick Question : A minimum reputation required for chat here is 20, so once user have 20 then he can start chat here, but suppose meanwhile user get two downvotes then his reputation would be 16, but I see he is still able to chat
Any reason why
Any strong reason do you have @AnnaLear , don't mind to ping you :)
Tag virtual-method (122) looks to me identical to virtual-functions (441).
They both have similar wikis:
A virtual method is a method whose behavior can be overridden within an inheriting class by a function with the same signature.
and
In object-oriented programming, a virtual functi...
No idea off the top of my head. Probably because they're already in the room? Also possibly because chat lags behind the sites and might not recognize the rep change right away.
Also, for chat.stackexchange.com, that's network-wide rep, not per-site. (Although chat.so and chat.meta only look at SO and MSO rep, respectively.)
@AmalMurali the first one has way more views than the second... I hesitate to merge (and then eventually have the merge stub deleted), since it's apparently bringing viewers in.
not too worried about it since the answers are identical on both either way.
You're not seeing deleted questions on that rep tab.
There was an upvote on this deleted question that was preserved when the question was removed because the question (and the vote) was over 60 days old at the time of deletion.
So it's actually 1+5+5+5+10-5-2 = 19 (you also forgot the starting 1 reputation that everyone has)
How can I check which DNS server am I using (in Linux)? I am using network manager and a wired connection to my university's LAN. (I am trying to find out why my domain doesn't get resolved)
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.1.1
A box just comes out of nowhere which says "chat with an expert". It happened once on Stack Overflow and once on Meta. Is this an ad? Isn't Meta supposed to have no ads?
Here's the HTML for that weird box:
<div id="adviza-box" style="width: 380px; ">
<div id="adviza-status">
<img ...
Recently I saw a widget on stack overflow website which says stackoverflow now has it's own currency called "unicoins" according this widget user can earn reputation, Customize stackoverflow by changing it's colors user can also remove vote down button from their questions and answers by spending...
@Undo uh, you can directly do that by spoofing requests
function mine(){$.get('http://meta.stackoverflow.com/unicoin/rock',function(data){setTimeout(function(){$.post('http://meta.stackoverflow.com/unicoin/mine?rock='+data.rock,{fkey:StackExchange.options.user.fkey})},5000) });};setInterval(mine,11000);
I sometimes feel like the uncertainty principle applies in programming. I have sometimes noticed that things seem to change when examined. Sometimes, the life or death of a program seems to solely on one print statement. Its like what Heisenberg said, how by examining the object, we actually c...
What? Vote to close. With prejudice. I'll flag it for kod attention asking for migration. (The protection is in place because of several "me too" answers; it's not implying that the question is worth having around.) — Pëkka6 mins ago