Without an understanding they will more than likely continue the same pattern until they hit a ban and then presumably go away. Sure, taking the outlook of sending every user who cannot figure out the system at first glance may be some sort of hurdle to impose, but at the same time tossing out every user who does not immediately understand the system is not desirable.
This question appears to be off-topic because it is not related to a bug with the Stack Exchange network as tagged. Instead, it should be posted at a more relevant exchange which deals with coding in a format which fits that exchange. — Travis J39 mins ago
@ShadowWizard Picked up and spread 12 cubic yards of topsoil, for a seeding job. Then I tamped over 1000 sq. ft. of it with a ten pound, 8" sq. tamper. I'm a little tired. Tomorrow, back to seed, sod, and mat.
Poor wheelbarrow doesn't like carrying the full 6 cubic foot capacity of topsoil. I used it a little hard.
@Shadow I guess you did something different than me today. You work with computers?
@AnnaLear … I mean the reject reason "This edit was intended to address the author of the post and makes no sense as an edit. It should have been written as a comment or an answer."
@bjb568 Ah, hmm. It's awkwardly worded in that case, yeah... but I think it could still be useful. Just cause the post is CW doesn't mean someone isn't trying to edit it to ask a question :)
@AnnaLear "It should have been written as a comment or an answer." Both of which can be blobbed into a CW answer. A question doesn't fit that reject reason.
Maybe it could be changed to "asks for clarification" or something.
@bjb568 "But how do you fix X?" could be a comment. :P Anyway, I'm not trying to define the one and only scenario where that rejection reason applies, but just saying that aside from the "address the author" part it's still valid for CW posts.
@Braiam merciful zeus
@Braiam oh thank god, I thought there were 8 different posts ;)
> Unfortunately, we weren't able to approve your educational discount request. You're welcome to re-apply, or follow up with any questions by replying to this email.
> If you're a student aged 13+ and enrolled in a degree or diploma granting course of study, the GitHub Student Developer Pack is for you. All you need is a school-issued email address, valid student identification card, or other official proof of enrollment.
off topic for chat, but which post has the most links in it on stack overflow?
if SE is still doing that expert thing in NYC on video, they should really do a jeopardy game thingy too, where the experts and team members play eachother about random facts of SO and other stuff, I'd watch that