Is this article from June 2013 about Healthcare.gov common knowledge? It's full of crazy buzzwords about how great the relaunch is going to be, and contains some (to me) bizarre quotes.
> "You're just using HTML5, CSS, and Javascript, all being done in responsive design. The way it's being built matters. You could in theory do the same with application servers and a CMS, but it would be much more complex. What we're doing here is giving anyone with basic skills to basic changes on the fly. You don't need expensive consultants."
> "It's fast, built in static HTML, completely scalable and secure," said Bryan Sivak, chief technology officer of HHS, in an interview. "It's basically setting up a web server. That's the beauty of it."
What
Ahh ok it makes a bit more sense now:
> The code for the informational part of Healthcare.gov — the "frontend" of the site — was written by a Washington, D.C. startup and a small team of innovative consultants. The code for the healthcare exchange — the "backend" of Healthcare.gov — was built by more than 50 contractors and was never made public.
@hims056 the automated "community eval ended" answer didn't update the denormalized answer count. This would've been caught and fixed by an automated job later today, but I updated it now (and fixed the bug). Good catch, thanks.
Currently there is a service tag.
It has 9201 questions
It usually contains questions about
android-service
windows-service
web-services
I belive we should retag that questions with the more specific one, but with that large number of questions I believe it is not really doable by hand.
I do want to make sure that the mods know that they're always free to yell at me here if I start flagging the wrong way - I'm always looking for ways to improve the workflows of everyone.
tl;dr
"Many hands make light work."
Based on the belief that incentivizing moderation (e.g. close-votes reviews) via competition can undermine the integrity and quality of said moderation, this is a proposal for a non-competitive, camaraderie-focused community event, designed to chip away...
@jadarnel27 Pops-Perturbing Pedantic Problem of the Day: getting pinged into the Tavern for no good reason when I'm hard at work doing... uh, hard at work making... oh, fine, never mind.
I'm usually here but lurking lately. Just... don't have much interesting to say.
@Pops Haha, that sounds like it could be frustrating =)
Top Secret is the name of a mainframe security platform I work with at my job. Which makes for really misleading email chains about "Top Secret" databases / usernames / updates and such.
Not an announcement, @Undo - this is just an expedient way for me to get a feature-request into the system before a deadline... (which is 6 minutes away) — Shog950 secs ago
I was about to open a request for the wording of the 'unclear' flag reason, but found it was already asked, sadly he proposed a poor rewording and is currently at -1 score...
Well, that's the message that's going to be shown to the OP. How would you phrase that reason and description without referencing that the OP needs to provide more information?
usually they word it like "this question was closed because X", and the OP knows it was meant for him, so it could be rewritten as " As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what the question is asking."
Currently there is a service tag.
It has 9201 questions
It usually contains questions about
android-service
windows-service
web-services
I belive we should retag that questions with the more specific one, but with that large number of questions I believe it is not really doable by hand.
tl;dr
"Many hands make light work."
Based on the belief that incentivizing moderation (e.g. close-votes reviews) via competition can undermine the integrity and quality of said moderation, this is a proposal for a non-competitive, camaraderie-focused community event, designed to chip away...
