« first day (1159 days earlier)      last day (3856 days later) » 

1:37 AM
hi, I have just reviewed 40 close votes in the review queue, and have not faced any audit questions. Is this normal?
 
 
4 hours later…
5:24 AM
> If it's too loud, turn it down.
 
6:01 AM
@jadarnel27 HONK
 
I remember having dial up Internet.
Vaguely.
But all I knew about it was how to sign on =P
 
Do I dare to click that link at work or not?
 
It's...fine.
 
Good morning friends. Can anybody suggest me a way to search questions that have been posted in a fixed timeframe say questions that have been posted this month?
 
Mat
6:44 AM
meta.stackoverflow.com/help/searching has date range docs, @Mistu4u
 
user206222
Is anyone else having serious delays when opening the flag dialog?
 
@Emrakul Yes, it's rather slow on Stack Overflow. Not on Meta, though.
I wonder what's going on.
 
user206222
I'll ask.
 
user206222
It doesn't happen on any other SE site.
 
Could just be a temporary issue. How long have you been experiencing that?
 
user206222
6:50 AM
Last couple hours.
 
user206222
Hrm. Yeah, maybe I should give it overnight or something before asking.
 
@TCPMAN.EXE That website hasn't been updated in a while. I feel nervous about donating.
 
heh
 
@Emrakul I am having the same issue on SO.
 
user206222
I'm going to see if it persists before asking.
 
7:03 AM
@Mat Thank you! :)
 
 
2 hours later…
8:51 AM
Now I can understand why begging for downvote reasons can be bad overall. I see some people when they actually get those reasons for the begging, they start long and unproductive discussions rather than just improving their post. That is unfortunate.
 
 
3 hours later…
11:51 AM
Hi, Came across this answer posted by user id "Alexandar' while reviewing another VLQ answer for the same question. The code formatting wasn't initially done for this answer, so I edited it. After editing, this answer seems exactly similar to chapagain's answer posted more than a year after the original one. Does this qualify as copying/plagiarism? Should it be flagged?
 
When will the "I do not understand" button be added to audits?
 
Just had this audit where OP seemingly has no clue what he actually wants, but apparently it has been upvoted anyway and made it's way in de audits.
 
@Sumurai8: 5 upvotes for that question? I would have failed that audit too.
 
Mat
@Harry: yes. Flag the answer with a custom reason, and explain that it's a copy/paste of a much older answer with no additional info. (And add a link to the other answer in the flag.)
 
11:56 AM
thanks @Mat
 
@Sumurai8 Seems legit to me...
 
Can moderators delete a question which has an answer (or) in other words is such a request even valid? In this question OP had updated the question contents asking for a mod to delete it. Since it looked odd, I rolled back the edit and added a comment. Please have a look.
 
Mat
Mods can delete anything. Your edit+comment is the right thing to do in that case. (Mods are unlikely to delete an answered question that's not off-topic, especially when the answer has a positive score.)
 
thanks again @Mat
 
 
8 hours later…
Anonymous
7:45 PM
possible Release the data dumps in a format that is more widely supported, like .bz2, instead of .7z/LZMA. It would make it easier to programmatically handle the data dump data. 7Z also isn't very seekable. If a seekable format was used, it would be possible to (very coarsely) only download sections of the dump at once. For example, to only look at posts that have been added since the previous dump.
 
9:06 PM
@JeremyBanks Just out of curiosity, what do you mean by "more widely supported", in this context?
 
9:41 PM
pretty much every *nix system can unzip bzip2 and gzip by default while 7zip/zip/rar are rarely supported unless you install additional programs
and many languages support those common formats in their stdlib so they can often be read easily (almost like a regular uncompressed file)
 
 
1 hour later…
10:53 PM
@ThiefMaster Ah, thanks. I haven't ever had to work with compressed files in code, so I didn't realize there were such caveats.
 
11:28 PM
Thanks to DST, I now have to remember that the UTC day changes at 11:00+11:00 rather than 10:00+10:00. This is mildly annoying.
 
Darn it. Are we still doing that DST nonsense?
I'm going to stop participating.
 
@jadarnel27 Most of Australia (my country) does DST, anyway... (Couple of states up north don't. Weird lot they are.)
 
@michaelb958 Ah, I see. I think all of the USA does it.
 
@jadarnel27 Why can't it just be DST all the time??? It would be much easier...
 
11:43 PM
Haha, indeed.
 

« first day (1159 days earlier)      last day (3856 days later) »