> When you use IntelliTrace, the navigation gutter provides icons that you can click to navigate through your debugging session. The navigation gutter appears by default if you have set the information collection level to IntelliTrace events and call information. If you do not want to see the navigation gutter, you can disable it so that it never appears.
> Just in case you aren’t familiar with the terminology, the gutter is the gray vertical area just to the left of the code in the editing window and is circled in red in the picture. This area is used to provide visual indicators for breakpoints and other information that is useful or important during a debugging session.
Idea: what about bringing the keyboard into play Ctrl+click a message to star it, Shift+click a message to reply. Flag stays in the menu because it's an irreversible action
> So I just hit 3K reputation; and have no motivation to hit 10K. What should I do on Stackoverflow next? (Question not marked community wiki so that you can downvote me; I don't recall getting any question go below 0).
For the main SO I believe there should be something like "related rooms". If there are lots of people regularly visiting rooms A & B, they are probably related.
(@Wim, technically, it indicates they did an explicit reply, because nothing stops them from explicitly replying to the most recent message) -note that currently Mark is still working on removing the arrow for the implicit replies
Not sure I follow you there... you're saying code could detect and turn an explicit reply into an implicit one if it's the most recent post by the poster?
> The second and more powerful function of the Rage Meter is Rage Mode. Once the bar is full you press the rage buttons as described for the Quick Kounter, and your character will become engulfed in a yellow haze. You then have a set time to attack whilst the bar is depleting; your attacks will be almost twice as powerful and will break blocks frequently. As mentioned before there are many ways of filling the meter
Agreed that the rate of message flow is an issue, in which case you could check if it's not the most recent AND (older than X OR Y messages 'away') - well, something along those lines anyway.
I can see a potential problem in that you can't edit the reply-ity of a message. If you get it wrong, (i.e. if the other poster sends another message while you're creating yours) there's not much you can do apart from start over (if you haven't yet sent), or delete and start over. Though admittedly I can't think of a usable alternative off-hand.
The site descriptions at http://stackexchange.com/sites are inconsistent. According to the list:
SO is for programmers
SU for computer enthusiasts
SF for administrators
Webmasters for pro webmasters
Ubuntu for Ubuntu users and developers
Gaming for passionate videogamers...
but
Electroni...
at the moment it is explicit vs implicit, but we could also check if the explicit is their last message (and then not show). Not sure it is worth it though. They went to the trouble of doing it explicitly, etc.
I must admit the first thing I starred I was just trying it out, I guess I should've undone that one. But I assumed you were talking about the second one, which was about a new feature relative to chat so... ?
stars decay in sort order, there is a hotness. but the stars never "go away" unless I clear them out (which I do, eventually, if you aren't starring potential chat improvements)
Yeah, arrow works as specified, now all that's missing is the hover for the implicit replies and (in my opinion) the automatic inclusion of @name for explicit replies
Providing context is good for people joining chat later, but because this looks and acts more like an IRC/IM chat, it isn't as natural as twitter to include context in every single message.
Found a problem While catching up, page up/down page just more than a single page -- a couple of lines are lost. (FF 3.6.latest) Would be nice if it were a little less than a page (context), but shouldn't be skipping content.
Steps to reproduce:
Change your name on Stack Overflow. After some time it won't allow to change your name again for one month
Create user account in Super User or change your name on Super User with the same OpenID
Go to Stack Overflow and associate your account with Super User
Now the n...
Clarify? I was just pointing out that whom you want to speak to isn't in the room, I assume you thought he was because his name appeared on a message just a bit ago :)
The only method I can think of involves wrapping every word in a span element, and then using document.elementFromPoint(x,y) to get the span element at the given location. Something like this:
function highlightWordAtXY(x, y) {
// Get the element containing the text
var par = document.e...
@Richard, can't work it out. I originally detected this on Jeff/JeffAtwood, so I thought it was about imcomplete @Names - as Nick/NickCraver test would seem to confirms. But that doesn't explain why you don't work
@Richard, in any case you can unstar my original message for Marc as it seems to be wrong - in the analysis anyway, I think I'll just do a question on meta.
The all-new implicit replies functionality has a quirk.
Hovering over an @Jeff doesn't highlight the previous message
Hovering over an @JeffAtwood does.
I assumed that the difference was to do with incomplete names, but here are some other examples:
@Benjol (full name): works
@Richard (full ...
I don't usually fiddle these sorts of answers, but +1 to yours for the working example. I was unsure of whether or not to delete mine after I saw yours but I got an upvote so I didn't :p
@TomWij better asking that in the SU room: http://chat.meta.stackoverflow.com/rooms/100/super-user This room is for feedback/discussion of the chat system itself
I look at SO this way, every question is ideally an excellent google resource after it's answered and accepted, if a good/valid answer is accepted and up top I see no other issues
@Benjol: I wrote an answer to a question, then edited it as Nick was posting his. Both turned out to be more or less the same answer, but technically Nick's was there first.
Since version 1.4 of jQuery; you have been able to create an element using an object literal, defining the elements properties...
$("<div />",
{
id: "test",
name: "test",
class: "test-class"
});
On top of assigning a few properties to an element; I'd like to add some in-line ...
The site descriptions at http://stackexchange.com/sites are inconsistent. According to the list:
SO is for programmers
SU for computer enthusiasts
SF for administrators
Webmasters for pro webmasters
Ubuntu for Ubuntu users and developers
Gaming for passionate videogamers...
but
Electroni...
Steps to reproduce:
Change your name on Stack Overflow. After some time it won't allow to change your name again for one month
Create user account in Super User or change your name on Super User with the same OpenID
Go to Stack Overflow and associate your account with Super User
Now the n...
The only method I can think of involves wrapping every word in a span element, and then using document.elementFromPoint(x,y) to get the span element at the given location. Something like this:
function highlightWordAtXY(x, y) {
// Get the element containing the text
var par = document.e...
The all-new implicit replies functionality has a quirk.
Hovering over an @Jeff doesn't highlight the previous message
Hovering over an @JeffAtwood does.
I assumed that the difference was to do with incomplete names, but here are some other examples:
@Benjol (full name): works
@Richard (full ...
Since version 1.4 of jQuery; you have been able to create an element using an object literal, defining the elements properties...
$("<div />",
{
id: "test",
name: "test",
class: "test-class"
});
On top of assigning a few properties to an element; I'd like to add some in-line ...
