@Bart Yes, however, raise a custom flag on the post. Then the mods will see what you were talking about, and can show the deleted comments on the post.
Your diagram looks great! I used a website called Lucidchart to create my own deployment diagram and it was really easy to understand. If you use diagrams often you should check it out!
@bjb568 Yeah, it matters. A) 6 spam flags/1 mod spam flag == 100 rep penalty + (maybe) a black mark on your profile for mods. B) That spam flag feeds into the spam blocking mechanism, which might prevent legitimate answers from being posted. Probably not, but still....
The funniest thing there is that he apparently started typing it out by hand and only after a couple thought "this is taking far too long, let's copy paste"
Facial skin, exposed every day to external aggressions such as sun, cold or pollution, requires special care every day.
The golden One Moment Essential Day Cream rule for beautiful skin is to thoroughly remove make up every night. Whatever your skin type and your favorite (cleansing, milk, wate...
I think it should be more of a "Your answer was crap, don't post any more for the next week" than "Meh, you can override 4 people who obviously know more than you"
Especially for crap answers by high-reps. I just hate how they don't know better.
Every time I copy something then paste it this happens:
<p dir="ltr">YouTube</p>
You see I wrote down YouTube and those letters and symbols came up beside it. Its annoying me.
Tell me.in the simplest terms how to get rid of it
On android 4.2.2
@Laszlo: Dunno, it seems to be useful advice, and I'm not sure how to phrase it much better than that. It doesn't answer the direct question, but then, it has been answered already (and comments shouldn't be answers, anyway).
@LaszloPapp: Copy-pasting from the manual would be kind of redundant, since there's a perfectly good answer that basically does that already. Yes, the comment could've been softened, e.g. by prepending "If you haven't already..." (the OP clearly hasn't, but it would still soften the tone), but I still would not call it "not constructive" -- telling the OP about the existence of man pages, and how to use them, is very much constructive.
The direct man-page link in the first comment is kind of non-constructive, though, since the page it links to doesn't actually contain the answer. (That would be found in the ctime(3) man page instead.)
Question for the community. Does anyone know if any browser or external tool provide a client-like version of Delicious? Basically an archive of favourite links with tagging/searching options...
to much Stack. I was browsing this page and I got stuck thinking why this "Rene" didn't had the usual avatar.
@LaszloPapp: Seriously? A bare link to an online copy of a man page that doesn't answer the question is constructive, while an explanation of what man pages are and how to use them isn't? We must have a very different understanding of what "constructive" means. (Hint: It's not just an antonym of "rude"; a comment can be both very polite and totally unconstructive at the same time.)
@LaszloPapp: Now, I can see where you're coming with the "learn to use man pages" comment -- it would be terribly rude and unconstructive to offer only that as an answer. But that comment was posted almost five hours after the question had been properly answered.
Yeah, it's not really very nicely phrased; feel free to flag if you don't like it. But the OP is probably better off for having seen it, nonetheless.
(whereas the link to man strptime would've been totally useless to them, because the answer is on another man page)
What's surprising to me is that the question does not seem to be a dupe; the only good match I can find is this, and that's about the Java calendar API (which inherits the same issue, but is not really the same otherwise).
I will, but I did want to edit that question into shape first, since it seem to be the best question we've got on this subject. Anyway, you might be amused to know that I just flagged the comment you were initially talking about for removal, since it's indeed not very useful if the question is going to be used as a dupe target. And yes, I chose "not constructive", because it's the closest of the canned flag reasons.
@Braiam OK, I think I didn't messed that up. Most of them I had were install/dual boot issue, not kernel compile/grub thingies. On the efi tags I was not so sure but I didn't handle much of those (yet)
We did not invent the algorithm. The algorithm consistently finds Jesus. The algorithm killed Jeeves. The algorithm is banned in China. The algorithm is from Jersey. The algorithm constantly finds Jesus. This is not the algorithm. This is close.