On the other hand, everyone else comes in on an hour later and all I have is some web page editing (until half past 12 at the other other building...) so I'll be slacking off unless needed
If SE implemented anonymous close-vote and delete-vote just like anonymous voting (which doesn't seem to be useful in daily use), I wonder what would the result be.
@Elephant Hmm, that would be interesting. I don't think that should be binding but ... i don't recall that has ever been proposed. How do you think it will help in driving quality up?
Heh, I (ab)use my "about me" to keep my "what to ask" questions by HTML commenting them. Perhaps, it can act as multiple drafts.
user315433
2:40 PM
You'll also notice that account hasn't been used for over a year. That seems to be an archived account at this point. We're not gonna continue updating something that never gets used. — animuson ♦33 mins ago
user315433
So, it's okay for SE to have an abandoned account just sitting around, but when this happens to a site, it's taken offline...
Heh... Eh, @Jason, y'know that big chunk of code you wrote to make scroll-to-message work properly? Turns out chat already has functionality for a fixed top-bar built in - to enable it you just gotta add a special class to <html> before chat initializes.
To make it work, you gotta do three things: 1. Add `document.documentElement.classList.add("fixed-header");` to the userscript (should be like one of the first things that runs, and NOT part of the code that's injected into the page. 2. Add `// @run-at document-start` to the script metadata, so that we get a shot at modifying the DOM before chat initializes 3. Re-add that bit of logic to listen for the "load" event before injecting the script. This'll now be needed by both Firefox *and* Chrome, since otherwise we'll be running before chat is ready.
Lol... awesome, thanks. I'll test it out as soon as I'm done rewriting this smokey message move thing, which might be one of the worst chunks code I've written this millenium.
@JasonC Yeah, and it's almost always the software that's the problem; printers themselves are fairly reliable... But printer mfgs can't write software to save their lives.
The less software you install to support a printer, the better the printer works. If you see it installing the .NET framework, just save yourself time and burn the computer.
Cloud Print is pretty great. Printer lives in a spare room, and I can send stuff to it from anywhere I can get a data connection. And no mfg software save for one little driver on one little machine that I never print from directly.
