« first day (588 days earlier)      last day (4428 days later) » 

12:43 AM
\o/ Happy Pi Day, everyone! :P
5
 
It's not Pi Day here yet o.o
 
1:39 AM
Happy 3.13 day everyone.
 
1:56 AM
Rofl. Adobe really needs to work on their crash messages. Just changing the screen to a white box that says "Not enough memory." that you can't close out of is not a very good error.
 
2:21 AM
Happy brumfday.
 
3:08 AM
@animuson Their designer obviously didn't spend time in Photoshop, mocking up the UI for Photoshop. Wait.
Evening
 
 
4 hours later…
7:06 AM
user image
2
 
 
6 hours later…
12:58 PM
@YiJiangsProble LOL
 
 
1 hour later…
Lix
2:02 PM
Top of the morning to ya @Shog :P
 
'morning @Lix
Happy Pi Day, @YiJiangsProble
mmm... pi...
 
Lix
lol :P Oldest joke in the book
Has anyone heard of the most accurate PI day that any of us will see in our lifetimes?
Happens to be Mach 14 2015 at 9:26:53
 
@amanaPlanaCAnalPAnaMA 3/14/'15 9:26:53 (PI == 3,141592653)
 
Lix
I appologise for the Facebook link and all..
but here is a great explination :P
 
@StevenJeuris LOL
 
@Lix That's fantastic!
 
2:20 PM
@Lix More accurate would be adding ms and ns.
 
Lix
@StevenJeuris - I dont follow... :S
@jad - it is quite cool hey? :P
 
@Lix milliseconds and nanoseconds?
 
That's it, I'm officially writing a PI day countdown app.
 
@StevenJeuris I'd buy that for a dollar.
 
@jadarnel27 No, it's 3.14.
 
Lix
2:25 PM
@jad - maybe?
 
@StevenJeuris I refuse to pay that outlandish and irrational price.
 
@jadarnel27 outlandish fine, irrational? I did not think so. :)
 
@StevenJeuris I was making an awful math joke. Irrational number =)
 
@jadarnel27 Wow, :) haha, sorry didn't get that.
 
2:32 PM
I can't believe some really made an app for that.
 
What's up with this suggested edit?
"4 identical lines skipped"
 
Probably this, I guess
4
Q: Suggested tag wiki edit with no changes at all

awoodlandThere's a pending tag wiki edit which actually makes no changes at all as far as I can make out. As far as I can see there's a bug somewhere, the side by side diffs show no change and the markdown diffs show no change either. (Shows 7 identical lines skipped). I can't see any <!-- extra space ...

Actually, more specifically, this:
3
Q: Side-by-side viewer missing from suggested edit with no obvious changes

RupThis suggested edit shows only 4 identical lines skipped Now this happened before, but the problem now is that the side-by-side rendering option has disappeared too: so there's no way for me to see any changes. (I'm tempted to reject as 'too minor' anyway.) Snuck-in-feature-suggestion: ...

 
Haha, I just had a dupe flag collision. Now I have a "exact duplicate" flag pending for a post that has already been closed as an exact duplicate.
Ah, the flag and the closing timestamped at exactly the same time (14:42:11Z).
I guess that's why it hasn't been auto-dismissed.
 
3:21 PM
@balpha - Is the Eliza room still around?
 
no, I froze that and disabled her
it was getting boring :)
 
sob
Now where will I go when I'm mentally unstable?
 
noooooOOOOOOOOO!!!!
 
@Moshe I finally wrote the blog I vaguely threatened to last week. mootinator.com/2012/03/mvc-y-u-no-mvvm
 
@balpha Can we have it back please? My English class is discussing cleverbot and Eliza right now, I'd like to show it off.
 
3:24 PM
@mootinator Mentally unstable? I'd recommend meta.stackoverflow.com. You'd fit right in.
 
(slow network in the classroom, bah)
 
English class?
 
Yup, we're discussing technology and society this semester.
@balpha, I've got another question, since you've implemented a chat bot. My professor wants to know what kind of question would identify a bot over a human.
 
Technology (nukes) can easily destroy your puny "society" thing.
 
I haven't implemented it -- it's a javascript port of the original I took from the internetz
 
3:26 PM
@balpha :-(
 
Lix
@Moshe - there are loads of implementations of the Eliza bot out there...

http://nlp-addiction.com/eliza/
 
Ah, ok.
@Lix Thanks.
 
An question which implies a specific type of answer would normally identify a bot pretty easily.
 
Lix
@Moshe - np
 
Like, "What is my name?" is trivial for a human to answer, but most AI bots have a hard time with that one :P
 
3:30 PM
@Lix or @balpha - Got any source code?
 
Lix
@moot - you quick fox you :P
 
I win the internets!
 
Lix
Just don't clear you cache now.... EVER!
 
Hello @balpha, Whom should I email for account deletion?
 
3:39 PM
team@
 
Thank you.
 
 
1 hour later…
Lix
4:44 PM
Anyone entering the room now will be confronted with those last 3 messages.... :(
 
I'm sort of confused about what Mr. Disappointment is saying to me in this comment. Thoughts, anyone? I think I'm just misunderstanding his argument (or something).
 
Anonymous
> To condemn this would be to stifle intellectual considerations and even ambitions,
 
Anonymous
hyperbole, but a lot of good writing uses slightly obscure language, so perhaps this editing policy would constrain the quality of posts in that way if it's not allowed.
 
Anonymous
> I can trace the logic of doing so right down to us all using text-speak as standard, because, well, the masses understand it.
 
Anonymous
I personally do sort-of like the idea of editing lots of posts down to simple English for understandability, but think we should also let people who want to distinguish their posts with more unique writing styles do so.
 
Anonymous
4:58 PM
(I haven't actually looked at the original answer in question yet.)
 
The way I read it, he's basically arguing that we shouldn't edit something out (or edit a translation/replacement of it) simply because it's not commonly seen or understood.
If the answer as a whole is understandable, then a less-commonly-understood summation at the end is perfectly acceptable.
 
@JeremyBanks Ah, I got lost at the hyperbole there.
@JeremyBanks Right, I think that's cool. I've seen some metaphor-style posts from Eric Lippert that are great. So I agree with that in general. Just in this specific case, I don't see how that little latin phrase is helpful / insightful.
 
I guess he's just trying to prevent a slippery slope. Currently that edit is in question. If it becomes commonly acceptable and encouraged to make that edit, then the next border case becomes in question. And so on until we reach his hyperbole example.
 
@David That makes sense.
@David Right. I certainly wouldn't want that. I was sort of speaking to the specific case. I guess a more general discussion would have to take into account the slippery slope.
 
@jadarnel27 Agreed. For the specific case I would say that it's enough of a border case and, while it arguably doesn't add to the answer, it also doesn't detract from the answer in any way, it's simply not worth an edit fight or raising to the moderators' otherwise very precious time.
 
5:06 PM
Those sorts of discussions should be avoided. Sapienti sat
 
It makes for a good Meta question, but if it escalated to the point of heated debate I'd say it's a mountain out of a molehill situation.
 
5:20 PM
@David Exactly.
@mootinator -_-
Related to this discussion, I just had one of those types of edits rolled back on me today: stackoverflow.com/posts/9703648/revisions
RAWR!
 
@jadarnel27 Incidentally, I would tend to think the poster may have been using the phrase to clarify why he posted an answer contrary to what the asker wanted, rather than being condescending. Colloquially, "A word to the wise" usually emphasises a statement which is meant to be taken as an important hint.
As in this sentence: "A word to the wise, @TimStone doesn't like it when you ping him for no reason."
7
 
@mootinator That's probably a more correct interpretation. I doubt the OP was being insulting.
@mootinator Why would @TimStone be bothered by that? =P
 
5:35 PM
Who is this @TimStone guy anyway?
 
@YiJiangsProble_ some hooligan
 
@YiJiangsProble_ Someone with an increasingly large number next to their avatar in chat, if I had to guess (@TimStone could probably confirm that though)
 
@RebeccaChernoff So says the welder of the almighty pointy stick
 
5:41 PM
Woah woah woah, what's all this nonsense?
 
Whats going on all?
 
@TimStone Oh, hey. What are you doing here?
 
@TimStone Didn't expect to see you here.
@amanaPlanaCAnalPAnaMA Harassing room members at random.
 
@mootinator Sounds like fun ^_^
 
Lix
6:02 PM
Ugg.. what a day... home sweet home....along with meta sweet meta ;)
 
@Lix layla tov ^_^
 
Lix
@ama - What "good night"???? Now the real action starts! :P
(* ALT-TAB to facebook.stackoverflow.com *)
(* screw that.... back to meta *)
 
 
2 hours later…
8:14 PM
hatehatehate
 
8:28 PM
^ To: Javascript
Love: Josh
 
You should really try Node.Js
 
DON'T TELL ME ABOUT NODE.JS!
Wait. Ok, what is that?
googles node.js
 
It allows you to do everything with javascript.
 
Oh God!
MY EYES!
 
Throw some mongodb in there.
And you're set.
 
8:35 PM
@mootinator You are a cruel person, you know that?
 
Lix
9:41 PM
hide yo kids, hide yo wife, cause they @mootinator ing evry body out there...
 
Wtf... Google Play? Seriously? That sounds so stupid...
 
Lix
@ani - totally right? I wonder whats the reason behind it...
 
iPad also sounds so stupid. And yet...
 
Lix
@Moo - They even had that MADTV sketch on iPad before it came out... youtube.com/watch?v=lskbO1k9VO0
@mosh - "The miranda rights are the rights of someone who is arrested. In C++, the miranda rule is that if a programmer does not provide constructors, one is provided for you" - i lold :P
 
9:51 PM
What creates the first object if you only provide a copy constructor? CS students ask the darndest things.
 
@Lix Haha.
 
I have serious issues.
 
Lix
@moo - may these be your problems ;)
whats up?
 
I'm feeling a bit underutilized at the moment and am unable to track down anyone who cares.
 
Lix
would you like me to ask you a technical question? Would that make u feel more utilized?
 
9:58 PM
I'd have to get that approved first.
:P
 
Lix
its ok - i'll wait ;)
 
Turns out the transition from IS department of one to one of thousands of technical staff at a Fortune 500 company isn't the easiest thing in the world.
 

« first day (588 days earlier)      last day (4428 days later) »