« first day (3 days earlier)      last day (776 days later) » 

Oak
12:00 AM
Yea that's what I hope will happen
 
Yeah, I think you're right @Oak, with one exception. I don't think CW is the way to go. I think the candidates who missed some should answer in chat, and I will copy and paste in the answers in the same format. I think CW is dangerous
This is supposed to be a historical record, we don't want the community altering it :-)
 
Oak
Well, there's a full edit record for any post, CW or not, and I think it's more important getting an answer for all the questions than it is making sure nothing gets changed...
But your post, your call
 
I'm doing it for the community, so, everyone's call :-)
@badp @RebeccaChernoff @TimStone:
Should the gaming Town Hall answers be CW?
in The Tavern (General), 12 secs ago, by drachenstern
@TheRenamedException NOOOOOOOOOOOO
in The Tavern (General), 10 secs ago, by drachenstern
Wait, nm
 
Oak
Anyway it's late, I'm off
 
Thanks @Oak!
 
Oak
12:04 AM
Good luck with it!
 
@TheRenamedException It doesn't really matter
if in doubt, go non-CW
you can always switch to CW later
also I don't see the need for mass editing
 
@badp Great. Thanks!
in The Tavern (General), 57 secs ago, by ChrisF
@TheRenamedException Ooh - tricky. I can't see anyone being nefarious enough to alter what was said, but you also need to be seen to be above board.
in The Tavern (General), 37 secs ago, by ChrisF
I'd go with getting them to answer in chat (or via comments) and then you edit the post.
I'm going to stick with the format and post answers as non CW. Feel free to argue with me! I'm just basing this on the popular view (which I do hold as well)
 
CW on meta is basically "should people with 150 rep be able to edit this?"
 
Right, that's how I saw it when I did AskUbuntu's
 
the only other sider effect is whether or not it counts towards your discussion tag badge
 
12:11 AM
And no, nobody really should be editing
 
and I'd say those posts deserve counting towards the tag
 
@badp and my Mortarboard badge :-)
I'll probably be the 4th person to get it on meta.Gaming. I was the first on meta.AU
 
← Waaay before you :P
 
Yes. I am sure!
 
 
1 hour later…
1:19 AM
OK time to finish this puppy up!
 
2:01 AM
Hey there @tzenes
Feel free to weigh in on anything I am looking for feedback on, or, watch me as I compile. Digest meta question coming soon, with part 1.
@RebeccaChernoff the biggest question is, should the digest meta question and answers be community wiki? I am thinking no
 
and why do you think that? (:
 
The other questions I have pretty much answered, namely, how to deal with the two town halls for gaming and should I combine questions from the two
@RebeccaChernoff because it's a historical document so to speak. not just anyone shoiuld be able to come and edit it
 
then roll with that (:
 
I.E. if someone really hated badp he could come in and vandalize all the answers
@RebeccaChernoff Thanks!
Most seemed to agree with me, except @Oak, who preferred CW, but, not strongly:
2 hours ago, by Oak
Well, there's a full edit record for any post, CW or not, and I think it's more important getting an answer for all the questions than it is making sure nothing gets changed...
2 hours ago, by Oak
But your post, your call
 
Someone is always going to be able to edit your post, CW or not. Seems silly to worry about it.
 
2:12 AM
Uh, right. Good point. I seem to have forgotten that!
Damn this new anyone-can-edit function!
;-)
 
Heh, I just meant the edit priv.
 
Well I would assume a 2k user would know better
That is a poor assumption isn't it? ;-)
alllllllllmost done with part one
Argh, and the timer on the oven is going off! OK. I'll be back after I eat, and will post the first half
 
 
10 hours later…
12:37 PM
OK. did not get a chance to post the digest last night, but will post shortly; need to touch base with emails and get some breakfast
be back very shortly!
 
 
1 hour later…
1:56 PM
Okay, finally posting Gaming town hall digest! \o/
 
2:17 PM
0
Q: 2011 Moderator Election - Town Hall Chat Digest

Josh Status: This digest is still under construction. New answers still being posted. Please stand by... The following is a "digest" version of the 2011 Moderator Election Town Hall Chat. The format, as described on Meta Stack Overflow, is one answer to this question for every question asked in t...

Hm, the italics format isn't working well...
Digesting in progress...
I welcome a better way to emphasize if it's the first or second town hall as a H3 is already bold and the question asker is already italic
 
2:41 PM
Correction work needed to Gaming Town Hall's digest
Volunteers welcome ;-)
 
3:39 PM
Okay. Work calls, need to break from town halls for a bit.
 
 
4 hours later…
7:16 PM
Digest is continuing
in The Bridge on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 4 mins ago, by Josh
I could use help making sure the most recent answers to the digest are correct, I'm rushing through due to time constraints, LOL
 
 
3 hours later…
10:22 PM
@MarcGravell Gaming's digest was finally posted!
I am finishing the second part and editing now
 
cool
 
This one was a mess! LOL
 

« first day (3 days earlier)      last day (776 days later) »