@ShadowWizard the best part is TechNet blog claiming that one of the kb is for sharepoint foundation and the other one for standard/enterprise. That is, when both kb claims that
This cumulative update package contains all the .msp files that we released as hotfixes or as public updates that target SharePoint Server 2013. This update package also targets SharePoint Foundation 2013. Therefore, you do not have to install those packages separately.
Or in short, nobody really knows anything. One must download both, install both, remove both, then manually see what exactly changed to have first impression of what is each file - so what if it's taking hours? Microsoft can't care less. :)
@SPArchaeologist the single answer there was CW from the very beginning, it's author gained 0 reputation for it and asked from the beginning that it would serve as canonical answers and that others would edit it with their findings. Instead, people prefered to harvest rep and/or boast their own hats by posting new answers, some repeating the exact same thing for the 10th time. It became a total mess. Not talking about your answer, which predated that canonical answer and was indeed innocent victim.
So, Laura was 100% right by cleaning the mess, I actually flagged asking for this a week before it happened.
@SPArchaeologist I doubt the Eureka was based on answers in there to begin with. And even so then yes, it's easy for the team to see the revisions and get who said what.
@ShadowWizard yet I don't feel it was needed. No prob for the rep, but I say all this is just fun witch hunt. Like someone expected that topic to be ordinate? Like someone in the future will browse that and feel that the other answers where noise? Answer was accepted, so it was displayed first for whoever wanted to just have a list. The other ones could read the rest for historical archive of the bash days.
I say that the answers where deleted for fashion sake.
@ShadowWizard Correct. Red was the character in first Pokémon game, and the region champ in the following one.
@SPArchaeologist well, the goal was to explain how to gain secret hats. People turned this into "see, I got a secret hat", and thus the mess began. There were several attempts to start "post your best hat screenshots" but all failed, and personally I'm not against such a thing.
@SPArchaeologist it's not you, it's all fancy unicode characters so that the name becomes unbreakable. I already reported two design bugs it causes, likely there are more.
(there is also a user with a blank display name, so for example it's impossible to reach his profile)
Reporting a bug before it actually happens:
When this user will collect more than 18 hats, the display name would invade into the hats region.
Need to stop this invasion! :)
After viewing this user name (which contains a lot of Unicode) I had the idea to test if usernames allow ZALGO. To my dismay they do.
Is this wanted? Together with ShadowWizard we did a quick test. ZALGO has the ability to "break" comments.
Shouldn't that be avoided before someone start abusi...
@ShadowWizard haha! ya, but I don't think that kind of leniency will be towards everyone, plus I only wanted to do that if enough attention wasn't given to question
@SPArchaeologist I find it worth a laugh, that the answer technically saying nothing should be done has two upvotes and they brag about how busy they are all the day
@DroidDev See my edit. Even if they really want to handle it manually, it may be worth to check why the behaviour changed suddenly (see @ShadowWizard above) since it may hide some other bugs.
When an OP accepts an answer, there are two options:
The answer "deserves" an upvote.
The answer "does not deserve" an upvote.
It is overwhelmingly recognized that option 1 is representative of more than 50% of the cases.
If we want rating to be a faithful representation of usefulness, shoul...
@SPArchaeologist no. The question is really very unclear. Your first comment there does make sense, but OP did not yet confirm that's what he really means. I also cast a close vote, if the OP will edit to clarify or confirms your comment and you edit, I'll retract or cast Reopen vote.
(might be a language barrier, but still... many non-native English users are able to post much better questions, better means easy to understand)
@ShadowWizard that was the point. First comment should have been "Sorry, isn't that a duplicate? could please clarify your question?" not "no question here move on"
@SPArchaeologist how come? If someone don't understand the question, he/she can't really assume it's duplicate. Instead of just casting "Unclear what you ask" flag or vote, the user also posted a comment which might make the OP edit before the question is actually closed. (users are not notified about pending flags/close votes)
So the comment was meant to be helpful, though can be more polite e.g. "Sorry, I didn't understand what you're asking here, can you please edit and clarify"? /@SPArchaeologist
@SPArchaeologist well, we can't really educate grown ups very much. It's not directly rude or offensive so guess we just have to accept it. (again, personally I'll probably be more polite when commenting :))
@DroidDev OK, went over your files and the structure looks good and MVC indeed. Just one small question, why getImagePaths does not return list of strings but rather list of complex object?
@ShadowWizard now you can see the model class contains more than one attributes of image. I can directly pass this list to adapter without having to get the string array from getImagePaths and then put it into the objects to pass to adapter
@SPArchaeologist since Marc isn't posting answer you can post your own answer quoting his comment and accept it after 48 hours will pass. (make it CW if you feel uneasy to get rep for this)
@ShadowWizard It sounds like a good idea, but there's one problem: @Frank would have to run the open-source code, but the secret spells are obviously not open source.
@ProgramFOX I know, that would be quite impossible unless you always keep the last known good word then following the chain downwards. Sounds like tons of work for little gain.
hmm... will sacrifice my own word for the sake of playing with the bot
@ShadowWizard The bot logic would be "take the latest message in the shape :number word". That will give some false positives, but that's also with all other features.
See for yourself:
Name with a space doesn't cause any problem as far as I could see.
After viewing this user name (which contains a lot of Unicode) I had the idea to test if usernames allow ZALGO. To my dismay they do.
Is this wanted? Together with ShadowWizard we did a quick test. ZALGO has the ability to "break" comments.
Shouldn't that be avoided before someone start abusi...
When an OP accepts an answer, there are two options:
The answer "deserves" an upvote.
The answer "does not deserve" an upvote.
It is overwhelmingly recognized that option 1 is representative of more than 50% of the cases.
If we want rating to be a faithful representation of usefulness, shoul...
