I came across a post on Ask Ubuntu with SOLVED in the title, so I went to it, did a rollback, cleaned up a few other things (formatting, nothing that changes the post significantly. It got approved. But then the OP came along and rolled-back my rollback. I firmly believe that my edit is correct, but I worry that if I rollback their rollback to my rollback I will start a rollback war.

I'd like to avoid doing that, so what's the proper way to handle it when an OP rolls back a perfectly correct edit?

askubuntu.com/posts/1390790/revisions

@cocomac looks like another user noticed it, rolled it back, and posted an informational comment. If it's still continuing, you might want to notify a mod, either by flagging the post, asking on chat, or posting on meta.

@MetaAndrewT. Sorry, that happened after I asked here. Sounds good, if the OP does another rollback, I'll flag for mod attention and let them deal with it

Thanks!

→ 38 messages moved to Chimney

another flurry of support number spam on Server Fault

:(

just a handful so far, well under control, but it might be picking up

@JNat please put this NSFW profile on your nuke list

....

@rene fun one!

@JourneymanGeek, you can nuke some of those profiles already ;)

@Luuklag for several degrees of fun, sure.

Only 2

Its a start

I wonder how many Glorfindel could nuke of those

@tripleee yesterday was busy too.

not nearly enough

What a proper Dutch answer :D

Any gold discussion badge holders for this dupe?: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/375917/…

@JourneymanGeek you kept score, or does SE keeps stats?

@Luuklag there is a way to check

I forgot the mse count but about 6k on SU

@SPArcheon would be happy to know there's no escort spam on either site 😁

About 2.8k here

@JourneymanGeek You could boost that: meta.stackexchange.com/…

I'll deal with that next time I am bored and vengeful

@Luuklag all gone but 1 I was not sure about

So you're bored and vengeful now?

@JourneymanGeek yeah, totally, it is not like it took me just going on page 2 of the new users lists (obviously inappropriate user profile beware)

and it is not like a filtering on the profile could be implemented.

Gone

@SPArcheon I just searched for escorts in usernames and nuked everything there but one user 😁

@Tinkeringbell well I am always bored and vengeful

Or even 10

These are nearly zero effort

10 is actually a good idea, aligning with "new user privilege"

I can post the proposal if you want, but I wouldn't keep my hopes too high..

spammer to nuke, journ, tink, glo: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/375918/…

gone

@Luuklag How is that f? It's literally an ad for crackz.

Argh stupid lazy loading of pages, it showed me another answer that was totally legit

Thanks for pointing that out @RobertColumbia

It showed me this answer: softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/a/46991/70370

anyways, retracted feedback and spam flagged. Gone now

@Luuklag yw and ty

@SPArcheon +1. Useful. Also, unique idea. Like having someone (respectfully) tell you "Something is on your face".

"User Profile Editing" is (except Wikipedia?) unique. 50 rep or 10 rep would be reasonable, StackExchange has good democratic moderation tools if it's an issue.

@rene cleared the profile and network-suspended. Too many profiles to be worth deleting one by one :P

thanks!

@SPArcheon Wait, was the idea for editing your own profile? I was thinking editing others (if some are legitimate), "bug on your face"...