@ymb1 To confirm the correct usage of a tag, if the Wiki isn't exhaustive or you have an edge case, sort by newest and read ~10% of the first usages; more if there's few and less if that's too many, read a reasonable amount and edit the description if it comes to that. Don't expand the usage to cover your use when a new tag would be better.
@JourneymanGeek the target audience of that tip is (was) those who forget about the network profile. Like I said earlier up, someone did benefit from it, I checked the tags for tips, read the description, and went ahead, and apparently it's OT without a source, which is fine (community driven, though it was not closed as OT), but I can't use that Q&A style or any other I could come up with for this use case; doesn't matter now though, thanks still for trying to help
I've posted quite a few (relatively speaking to the community) self-answered questions, some right away (sharing something I found), some after figuring out the answer
the one that I could think of that would be applicable here is:
Q: I pressed *save to all* on my profile, did I forget anything else? A: Yes, your network profile
Tell me that won't be seen as someone farming for rep
Heck, the tag usage question which I think is very normal already had 2 close votes and ~50% downvotes
mathematically a net rep gain, but really it's unwelcoming, I'll stick to bug reports I think, less hassle
@ymb1 So, is a tips really an iFAQ or FGA; things people aren't aware of, and thus mandatory reading. It's a good (or bad) thing that there's only 15 of them.
Counter/piledriver: Press ↑↓←→ or ↑↓→← when not firing. Land on an X to get hidden powerups
Secret level/true ending: Counter the giant rainbow laser
Summon Goddess (once per game): Press ↑↑↓↓←→←→ when not firing
Cheat codes (enter during play): RGIOSA RGCATS RGFILL RGGIVE RGCELL RGWISH RGXCES
R...
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog it may be worth noting that the part of the faq that says “please keep it professional” can be ignored as long as you talk about pointy sticks
Compared to many other sports fencing is much safer.
There is an article on this by Peter Harmer.
For prevalence:
Studies in Table 10.1 indicate consistent findings of a time-loss rate of 0.0 to 0.3 per 1,000 athlete exposures (AE) across a wide variety of competition and...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Any changes that someone makes now are likely to be overwritten once I'm done, so I wouldn't want someone to waste time with a substantial edit, just to have a merge conflict
Compared to many other sports fencing is much safer.
There is an article on this by Peter Harmer.
For prevalence:
Studies in Table 10.1 indicate consistent findings of a time-loss rate of 0.0 to 0.3 per 1,000 athlete exposures (AE) across a wide variety of competition and...
