« first day (4126 days earlier)      last day (906 days later) » 

Rob
Rob
12:13 AM
If you find on this webpage "SR-IOV" you'll note that this is an errata: https://pcisig.com/specifications/iov/single_root/
- if you are not a member this appears to be an alternative source: https://composter.com.ua/documents/ECN_SR-IOV_Table_Updates.pdf - **6** pages long. --- But it's more of the matter of a human manually editing the post, to improve on outdated information; I don't expect the script to do that. --- Agreed, the script shouldn't edit in a new error, rather than leave the old erroneous link alone; ideally it would change nothing and write a log, that one can review and m…
 
forest distrusts StackExchange
forest distrusts StackExchange
12:33 AM
@Rob My reason to link that was only to describe ACS, so most errata won't be relevant.
 
 
7 hours later…
rene
rene
7:31 AM
→ 8 messages moved to Chimney
 
 
6 hours later…
Luuklag
Luuklag
1:01 PM
Did this comment of mine ping you @Journ meta.stackexchange.com/questions/372079/…
 
Journeyman Geek
Journeyman Geek
I might have had that still open
 
Luuklag
Luuklag
Yeah just wondering if you are actually pingable in this case
 
Journeyman Geek
Journeyman Geek
Ah
I have a message in my inbox about it
 
Luuklag
Luuklag
Ah cool :)
 
 
1 hour later…
Rob
Rob
2:11 PM
Haha, I was allowed to vote long after your binding vote - Bug?:
@Glo
 
Glorfindel
Glorfindel
2:26 PM
Some queues allow that, others (Suggested Edits) don't.
 
Rob
Rob
2:47 PM
OK, thanks. It seems fair, as I did spend some time checking the history of the post; and we do dislike when binding voters don't go last, and cut off a few reviewers from earning a credit for reviewing.
 
 
3 hours later…
Kevin B
Kevin B
5:29 PM
🚽
 
 
3 hours later…
rene
rene
8:22 PM
→ 12 messages moved to Chimney
 
 
1 hour later…
Glorfindel
Glorfindel
9:30 PM
@Rob who's we? I try not to make single-handed decisions if I see room for reasonable different opinions (ever since I acquired a dupehammer). But gaining credit is not the purpose of reviewing; it's just a (nice, granted) side effect. I don't begrudge you your progress towards Steward; I just don't take that into account when reviewing :)
 
Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog
Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog
9:42 PM
5
A: Why did my First Post review not count?

Sonic the Anonymous HedgehogYou probably made your review more than 15 minutes after the other user finished making their review. The system generally allows users to submit reviews after a task is already completed in order to give credit to all users who are reviewing a given post at the same time. However, if it's been ...

There's a 15-minute grace period where users can submit reviews even after they get completed, so they get credit for the review even if it was sniped from underneath them.
It was originally indefinite, but people abused it, so...
 
Rob
Rob
10:19 PM
@Glorfindel Here are a couple of hundred "we", and here's one example where a dozen slots were lost from the queue. --- I don't suggest you begrudge my progress, if anything you go 2nd or 3rd (confirming my choice, and completing the review), or deliberately try to shortchange others; if only we could get other moderators (not talking about you) on other less active sites to peruse
the review queues (even the moderator flags, that only they and the CMs can do) every few days, instead of letting them age away.
I do notice you going last frequently also, thanks.
 
Rob
Rob
10:49 PM
And, here are links supporting my 2nd to last sentence above, in the case of later links you need to click on "stats" to see the total number of reviews while on the first couple of links you can see the participation is non-existent (all these sites are over 11 years old) - missing from the list is a better example which I have recently mentioned frequently, I don't want to hold their feet to the fire, they have few reviews and queues with many reviews waiting to be handled:
^^^ Thank you Sonic.
 

« first day (4126 days earlier)      last day (906 days later) »