« first day (3265 days earlier)      last day (1759 days later) » 

Rob
1:29 AM
 
 
6 hours later…
7:14 AM
@rene already voted, here is another one (cc @sha @bar)
 
the doggy ate it
 
chewing noises
of y'all are bored aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/45532/… some of the answers here need moar spam flags
 
7:41 AM
not bored, flagged anyway ...
 
8:00 AM
cheers
 
8:38 AM
6 messages moved to Chimney
8 messages moved to Chimney
 
 
3 hours later…
12:02 PM
5 messages moved to Chimney
 
→ 19 Chimneys clogged
 
 
2 hours later…
1:37 PM
2 messages moved to Chimney
 
2:23 PM
Weekend MSO reading
-18
Q: StackOverflow vs. StackOverflow - What can we as a community do to improve the relationship with the company that backs us?

Jonas WilmsThe relationship between us, the community, and the company is far from perfect. Yet we depend on each other: StackOverflow (the community) would not exist without StackOverflow (the company) providing infrastructure, maintenance, development, and last but (definetly) not least: Community Manag...

 
I don't get the -18
Its a perfectly good question to ask
 
probably
When reading the title I thought: "Wow, great idea to reconcile the sides", but at the end of read, you're mostly asking us to "give the other cheek" and accept being ignored, your example of company listening to us is one half baked (there's far much to add ot it, per tag templates, etc.) thing which hasn't improved in a visible manner the influx from a large amount of feature request not getting any feedback. — Tensibai yesterday
and
"Let's stop blaming the other side for not listening. Let's stop all those strikes, accusations and snarky comments" - yes! "towards the company that backs us" - there you lost me, it is more us that backs the company. "So what can we do to support the company? (in revenue, workforce, or words?)" - not the first two, that's for paid employees to worry about. We can help to build up the brand, though. As long as we get some clear guidelines on how to do that of course. — Gimby 24 hours ago
 
2:44 PM
@MetaAndrewT. thats kind of a thing
if SE didn't care and wanted folks who didn't meet what they wanted now...
what's the point of a strike or other obvious move?
folks would basically be just tilting at windmills
 
I'm afraid the answer to the title is "welcome wagon", but this time at SE the company...
 
@MetaAndrewT. personally?
We suck at communicating.
Everyone sucks
we're all terrible
Less hypobolically? A lot of folks are pretty ineffective at communicating - both meta-wise and employeewise
But that's a process folks need to be willing to fix
On SO's side? What's the pain points for employees? Are folks who are better at it able to shield and teach the less good ones. Where's the failure points?
Its literally an engineering problem ;)
For us, its trickier
since we're basically trying to influence a semi black box as far as feature requests go
 
3:06 PM
The one dollar question: does SE still have hope in us?
 
@MetaAndrewT. I wish I knew
There's folks within the company that do
but I'm not sure which way the wind is blowing at the moment
More broadly - there's a lot of stuff that folks are doing that's good - like better mod tools. There's also a few things they need to stay the course on + broaden imo like the AAQW
MSO is prickly thought
You're not going to win those folks over without a lot of work and obvious changes. Even then....
 
Oh I didn't notice you were discussing that mso post here
 
Yeah, SO with its very heavy customization... (SO Top bar™, SO New Homepage™, ...)
wonder if the reception would be better if it's posted on MSE instead...
 
@MetaAndrewT. And cause most of the stuff that's supposed to make money is SO linked.
Probably. Or at least different
 
 
2 hours later…
Rob
5:19 PM
Effective communication: pass the blame effectively, in a thoughtful and caring manner.
 
 
3 hours later…
8:25 PM
I suspect an author of a blatantly off-topic question is trying to write a spam botnet.
 
9:09 PM
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog that's... a bit of a logical jump
 
@ArtOfCode Well, to be fair, I asked the author in a comment and they later claimed they're not...
But yes, the official policy is that we don't help people doing malicious things.
(e.g. don't answer questions on programming viruses on SO)
 
sure, but there's plenty of legitimate uses for that script before you even have to suspect malicious intent
 
 
2 hours later…
10:56 PM
@Catija I like Ben's hair. ;)
 
@Mithrandir he came home from school that way but I put it back today.
 
11:15 PM
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog um. You do realise emails are a common way to send notifications right?
Also anyone writing a spambot in powershell is amazing
@Rob eh. No
That's being a 10x communicator
 
11:55 PM
I don't understand what the 10x thing even means. I've seen the twitter thread but was it a preexistant concept?
 
Yup
Ok, The broader concept is... well...
management/HR types are clueless ;p
and there's this whole myth of the lone super-coder back from...
I donno movies
that guy with the giant pile of old systems I guess
and typing on three PCs at once with a wall of monitors
and they want those folks to exist cause then you can pay one guy 2x to do 10x the work
then take the other 8x as bonus.
 

« first day (3265 days earlier)      last day (1759 days later) »