« first day (1744 days earlier)      last day (3493 days later) » 

08:00
@SPArchaeologist that can be userscripted. Sort by ID. Not sure what the UI should be
I would expect to be able to jump to the "message moved to" item in the original room. As now, I don't seem to be able to, so I can't see the original context the message was posted it, and understand why it was moved.
@JanDvorak that is an idea
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body: body section in html isn`t working well by yong jin kwon on stackoverflow.com
@SmokeDetector ignore
@ProgramFOX Post ignored; alerts about it will no longer be posted.
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in username: Full-Salon ///// 010-5938-0880 EVENT ///// SEOUL by 손아섭 on aviation.stackexchange.com
If I'm honest, I came here to watch Unihedron flag spam. — James 6 hours ago
lol
08:09
yeah
Apparently the mystery is not what their cleavage looks like
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in username: Full-Salon ↔ /// 010-5938-0880 EVENT ↔/// SEOUL by 손아섭 on aviation.stackexchange.com
Can we get this account mod-nuked
or just nuked?
I mean a literal nuclear strike on the server who posted it?
You don't know their IP address
@James and who's gonna provide that literal nuke b?
08:18
Whoever
I literally do not care
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Remove all wrinkles fast and easy by wrikrhsi smith on drupal.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector tpu
@ProgramFOX Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title: Does black magic work? by Vinoth Kumar C M on skeptics.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector ignore
@James Post ignored; alerts about it will no longer be posted.
08:33
@SmokeDetector fp
@ProgramFOX Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in username: Full-Salon ↔☎ 010-5938-0880 EVENT ↔/// Hard=SEOUL by 손아섭 on meta.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector tpu
@ProgramFOX Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
Emoji spam. Where has the world gone to?
08:50
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in username: Full-Salon ↔☎ 010-6603-7635 “69Culb” ↔/// Hard=Ulsan by 이영도 on meta.stackexchange.com
No.
No.
@SmokeDetector tpu
@No. Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
@SmokeDetector tpu
@James Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
09:12
Uh, what happened here and more important, how do I get rid of my full-name there?
OK, updated my profile to get it synced...
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, url in title: http://testosteronebuyonline.com/supreme-garcinia-cambogia/ by joancox on drupal.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector tpu
@ProgramFOX Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
so close to 100flags/day on drupal o_o
used, or available?
09:18
Available; soon used
extrapolating :P
@ShadowWizard What can I do?
delete all questions...
@JNat There was an answer here that contained product keys. @Sha requested hard deletion while the rest of us flagged as abusive/LQ
09:33
I've deleted that answer
@rene What exactly do you guys mean by "hard deletion"?
@JNat That it gets removed from the database table all together, not only soft-deleted
@rene ... JNat isn't a dev and can't access the database.
Okay, I don't think I can do that
nothing warrants hard deletion anyway
@Unihedron I think @ShadowWizard assumes CM's can do those tricks as well....
09:36
@rene ...
@Unihedron I disagree (cc @ShadowWizard)
And as @Uni said, I don't think it needs to be hard deleted
@rene Let's agree to disagree but it still doesn't warrant a hard deletion.
I've asked TimPost, though
those product keys are likely long used/expired/blacklisted anyways
09:38
^
If at all important, Microsoft isn't worth helping.
shrugs
Calm down everybody, I only explain what @ShadowWizard wanted to get done, blame him.... ;)
@rene ... no
goes looking for Bart's smiting stick
steals your smiting stick
09:42
warns @Bart about the theft of his weapon of mass destruction
!xkcd blame
@AndrewT. It's AstroCB's fault.
.... uh oh.
looking left
looking right
looking down
@ShadowWizard Boo!
09:45
look up!
whoops
flying FOX!
@JNat maybe not hard delete, but delete a post revision so that it's not visible even to 10k users and possibly even to mods
I'm pretty sure Shog did it in the past, and he's no dev
Spam Q (TPA'd by Sam): More aerodynamic router designs need, by john, on drupal.stackexchange.com.
@ShadowWizard Sure. I did just that
@ShadowWizard There are CMs with special powers
@JNat cool, that should be enough :)
@JNat that's just not fair! :P
@SouravGhosh "I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it exists."
09:52
@ShadowWizard so that is not hard-deleted but delete a revision then?
just want to make sure we use the correct terminology
@rene not sure, @Shog9 can answer that though :)
hmm... is it still active?
@Mooseman FOX
yup
@rene What I did was edit the answer, and remove the previous versions from the revision history. I'd never hear about hard deletions, but I suppose they should be possible. I see no reason for ever doing so, however.
Which does not mean there aren't reasons for doing it
Just that I don't know them
@JNat DMCA request, I suppose
or content posted by minors below 13
09:56
@ShadowWizard Even then we usually don't do that. At least from my experience (which is limited :P ).
@ShadowWizard Possible, yeah
OK, thanks for the clarification.
@Mooseman bunny
@Mooseman lion
too quiet, no spam at all?
!!/alive?
@ShadowWizard You doubt me?
@SmokeDetector yes
10:01
YOU PEOPLE WOKE ME UP
[ SmokeDetector ] Nested quote blocks in body: How to say meeting is about my questions? by mari on english.stackexchange.com
You're welcome
cheaper than alarm clock, @Moo ;)
@Mooseman You deserve it because you are one of those people who kept pinging me :P
10:02
@ShadowWizard lol sure
@ProgramFOX But did it wake you up from sleep?
@Mooseman so you're still in bed? :D
@Mooseman Uh, no.
@Moo ordinary people put things on silent mode when going to sleep :D
believe it or not, I even put the phone on silent so the app notifications won't wake me up
I don't
so I wake up
@SmokeDetector fp
10:04
@ProgramFOX Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
@Unihedron but you can probably fill those missing hours somehow
@ShadowWizard Yeesh, well I forgot to turn off the speakers last night.
@ShadowWizard I WISH
@Mooseman what's preventing you from getting back there?
@ShadowWizard Fun fact: (or, rather, not so fun for me) It is not possible for me to go back to sleep. I just can't do it.
sounds like you need therapy
10:07
a hammer
@rene wow you people care so much for my well being
@Mooseman who mentioned sleep? I asked about bed :P
@ShadowWizard What's the point of going to bed if not to sleep?
@Mooseman more comfortable
@Mooseman sure, anytime
10:10
FTR, now I'm working instead of sleeping. An hour before I had to. Thanks to those who pinged me.
@Mooseman oh, that's a different matter than. You deserve a Bonus! :D
@Mooseman oh, also, when you'll grow up you'll learn about some more things people do in bed :-D
@ShadowWizard When I'm married, I suppose.
@Mooseman if you say so ;)
Oh boy...
Wow such silence
10:16
I have time for a game of chess. Anyone?
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklisted website: Mark Wahlberg "Shooter" Body in 1 Month - by jeff bron on meta.stackexchange.com
@Mooseman your fault
@ShadowWizard How is that? You brought it up first...
!xkcd blame everyone
10:24
@Mooseman you mentioned bed first :P
!xkcd alive?
@ShadowWizard Unrecognized command. Use !xkcd commands for a list of commands.
!xkcd blame nicael
It's nicael's fault.
probably must be in room ^
same like unicornify
@ShadowWizard Unicornification is unavailable for absent or non-existent users.
10:26
@Mooseman unicorn everyone
@Mooseman unicorn nicael
wtf? ^
!xkcd blame not nicael
It's not nicael's fault.
!xkcd blame JS
:o
!xkcd blame always nichael
10:28
It's always nichael's fault.
!xkcd blame everyone but nicael
It's everyone but nicael's fault.
@ShadowWizard hope I never find that service again, but know that I will try
does it compare the given string against everyone in the room?
@SPArchaeologist remind me? :)
(i.e. what service)
!xkcd blame Shog9
@ShadowWizard Nice try.
10:31
lol
Stop contradicting yourself, @xkcdBot
!xkcd blame xkcd
It's xkcd's fault.
@Mooseman kill !xkcd blame @rene
> !xkcd blame @rene is no longer with us. They ate to the point of explosion at a feast given in their honor.
10:32
It's rene is no longer with us. They ate to the point of explosion at a feast given in their honor.'s fault.
I'm gone obviously...
I can probably kill two bots with one command.....
so tempting....
!xkcd blame @Sho​g9
10:33
It's Sho​g9's fault.
@ShadowWizard there was a MLP gravatar service out there somewhere. I will find it again soon or later, and then we'll see how users look like as ponies.
Why doesn't @xkcd @mention?
@SPArchaeologist sure thing, I for one would enjoy it :)
So, to kill or not to kill, that is the question
!se PIC
10:35
?
!se woot
!se why are cats annoying
here it comes....
yay!
!se alive?
!se wtf !xkcd blame @Mooseman unicorn bjb568
omg
@nicael you borked the auto complete
... indeed
Wot?..
I fear the day when you'll have 10k on MSE
!se The <center> cannot hold
yes nicael got their doppelganger
10:39
strange things will start happening... :D
!se Zalgo
Wait, trying to unbork auto complete...
Low Quality Q (TPA'd by Sam): Dirty dogs help?, by GodTheAlmighty, on christianity.stackexchange.com.
@ShadowWizard Nah, there's actually two of him.
10:40
@hichris123 so need a better design to show it...
(e.g. using user ID)
@hic not anymore, so that's strange.
[ SmokeDetector ] Nested quote blocks in answer: How can I use limits in everyday life? by Yalda Yazdanpanah on math.stackexchange.com
@bjb568 HURRAY!
10:45
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body: will help you figure out which skincare by Michale Dozom on askubuntu.com
Gosh are they still up?
@Unihedron gg
gg ^^
Can anyone kick my old bot, please?..
10:49
@hichris123 and how long do I have to wait?.. I removed my account >15h ago.
... a while? I dunno.
Sam
Sam
in Low Quality Posts HQ, 2 mins ago, by Pham
Low Quality A (60.8%): hiya bjfdbb jdhjgdkw fjfbwnkwjfbjfhjk, by actc, on judaism.stackexchange.com.
not NAA, LOA
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: SQL Check Constraint MSSQL by user3604973 on stackoverflow.com
@bjb568 So hey, how’s your math coming along?
reminds self not to start things with Whæt! anymore
Cats. Annoying at night. Ug. Is that why I get up at 4:30am? Damn it, it is.
I can't do anything with the ghost of my inexistent bot!
@Shog please remove my bot ghost account chat.meta.stackexchange.com/users/288071/nicael
!se !xkcd
!xkcd
!xkcd !
@nicael Unrecognized command. Use !xkcd commands for a list of commands.
11:08
!se !xkcd !
omg so many botling messages
Kill the bot! Kill the bot! Kill the bot!
!se !xkcd
11:09
!xkcd !se
@nicael Unrecognized command. Use !xkcd commands for a list of commands.

Botlings practice room

A room for bots to try their own logic and that of other botli...
^ please play there
@Uni bjb bot missing.
!se help
11:18
in Low Quality Posts HQ, 6 mins ago, by Pham
Low Quality A (42.1%): Will you help me please? I have a problem., by Eamonn, on parenting.stackexchange.com.
NAA
@Mooseman That comment discussion...
u fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come odPWASERIAEIOPIF O RQWU TFWEQROWIEPUGTPGUIPOGHGOu fgot me a padgre come — Eamonn 2 mins ago
get to flagging those comments as rude / offensive... :P
right im away cya later on my private boat which can fly come fly with me sweg lelelele — Eamonn 23 secs ago
oh well, free helpful flags
status-out-of-flags
11:23
same
I raised an OTHER
in Parenting on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 2 mins ago, by Unihedron
any mod on to nuke the trolling user?
I posted a chat message.
@Unihedron I brought it up in TL
... I wouldn't know so how about just don't tell me at all anyway :p
while I have to admit I'm not sure about the question too
11:27
!xkcd blame @!se wtf
s/too/either/
It's !se wtf's fault.
@AlexisKing will add
@bjb plz join bottling practice room
@tchrist What's the question?
11:31
should all bots roaming in the Tavern be enforced with a botling migration protocol to move to the practice room on request?
3
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklisted website: home page troubles in IE by lloydm on security.stackexchange.com
Huh, that user has a decent profile on SO
I wonder whether that's actually spam
@Unihedron Only if they post other than when called
@bjb568 It’s a puzzle for people good at numbers, the puzzle of the heptahexagon. Here’s the short version:
    +------------------------------+
    |                              |
    |               1              |
    |                              |
    |               1              |
    |       5               3      |
    |           7       4          |
    |               7              |
    |           5       2          |
    |       4               2      |
    |               8              |
    |                              |
    |               6              |
    |                              |
@tchrist 23!
11:36
The name heptahexagon already gives away the real answer, but the question is what the significance of those numbers is.
If you don’t get in two, I have a larger, more obvious version.
Hint: Rational people figure it out faster.
No.
No.
@Unihedron Yes.
Calling it the Platonic Snowflake Puzzle would have avoided giving away the answer. Oh well.
@No. Yes.
@tchrist The outer layer is rather straightforward, but I'm wondering why its relation to the middle layer is what it is.
@JanDvorak Ah. Yes, that's the trick.
Here’s the bigger, more obvious version of it. You need a widish screen to read it, like 50 columns, not a phone's little 15-column window.
    +-----------------------------------------------+
    |                                               |
    |                       1                       |
    |                                               |
    |                    7     4                    |
    |                       1                       |
    |            8       5     2       2            |
    |                                               |
    |         2     5       8       4     8         |
    |            6                     2            |
@JanDvorak That larger version should make the relation between the inner and other rings in the smaller version obvious.
I think it’s purdy.
I think my explanation for the outer layer is wrong...
Uh oh. :)
As you see, it’s a very rational puzzle.
11:47
I apologize for the spam answer. Will clean it up as soon as I'm on my computer, I don't have mod tools on the phone app. — Erica ♦ 19 mins ago
:| mod tools on phone app plz
@Unihedron I hate it when that happens.
I had to do something to fix something last night and simply couldn’t do it from the phone.
@Unihedron They can be accessed via mobile web, just not the app.
@Mooseman i'm well aware
@Unihedron Another mod replied to my TL ping that they cleaned it up.
while we're at it, the mobile web sucks
in Parenting on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 2 mins ago, by Erica
Oh, never mind, Rory beat me to it by 12 minutes :)
I don't really need to know what goes on in your lounge. :P
11:52
@JanDvorak The inner is the key to the outer.
Literally.
Figuratively.
No, actually.
Literally.
oops? I thought the outer layers were the sides of a die
That’s the inner.
Oh wait, no.
The outer is the die faces.
The inner is which rational bit you’re at.
It’s for remembering all possible sevenths.
The key is where you start the sequence at.
I got that 1,2 are not incremented, 3,4 are incremented once and 5,6 are bicremented relative to their keys
11:54
Start at one of the outer ring number. Enter the inner ring at that point.
Oh, you don’t see.
14 28 57
Is the famous rational sequence for sevenths.
oh, gotcha
There is no entry for 7/7 because it is all zeroes.
So you have 1/7 through 6/7.
They have the same repeat sequence, but start at a different point.
The outer ring is the key, the number of sevenths you have. Use the key to enter the inner ring at that point and proceed clockwise forever.
You now have the decimal version of that rational number.
The large puzzle does the same thing, but more obviously.
And in the larger version, they all start at the top and go clockwise
Yes.
Very good.
Nice one
11:57
Thanks.
Do you see then why it’s called the heptahexagon puzzle?
There’s also a Transformers version of it called Galactus’s Birthday Cake.

« first day (1744 days earlier)      last day (3493 days later) »