« first day (1634 days earlier)      last day (3373 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

12:01 AM
@Mooseman New preview build.
 
Heh I didn't know lawyers were still arguing with Sony over the intrusion back in 2011...
Though this class action lawsuit does absolutely nothing whatsoever for me. I already own all these games, I sure as hell don't want some stupid themes, and they won't let you select the PS+ subscription if you're already a subscriber...
How lame.
 
yeah animuson is so lame
 
Yeah that.
He obviously hasn't even cleared the mod flag queue.
 
Been fiddling with my new monitors
 
Active is so ugly.
oh god it all is
 
21
Q: The re-design has brorked the user flag history page

André DanielIt seems like the design changed very recently, and I'm pretty sure this is not how the flag history is supposed to look : All the vote counts are on displayed on a separate line and there is no background on the count itself unless there is an accepted answer : Also, the "active" tag's tex...

 
user259867
@SmokeDetector ignore
 
@Fundamental Post ignored; alerts about it will no longer be posted.
 
Dropping the x-bomb?
 
@hichris123 Yeah, that brorked
Wonder whoes fault that is.
 
12:07 AM
@Fundamental why not fp?
@bjb568 *whose
 
user259867
@JanDvorak adding that title to doctype good didn't feel right.
 
Why?
 
@JanDvorak yea k
 
user259867
It's a weird one. Algorithm learning from outliers like this will get more confused, not more accurate.
 
The harder it fails the purer samples it gets
 
12:12 AM
@Fundamental you love the edge cases don't you? ;)
 
user259867
 
12:42 AM
am going to watch automata
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: facebook.login() is not working in Corona SDK by user2639160 on stackoverflow.com
 
user259867
Unfinished spam, or work in progress? Whats the best medicine for Rheumatoid Arthritis?
 
user259867
That profile... maybe not spam.
 
That profile doesn't scream "not spammer" to me
no visible activity on SU, one question on WB
 
Oh right, I still never posted this image here...
 
12:55 AM
People who claim are real usually aren't
 
I'm real!
 
Prove your existence up to the quality standard of Skeptics.SE.
 
I'm fake! Oh wait...
 
1:33 AM
> i'd expect u to treat/talk to me as u would my 19 month old son
 
1:52 AM
140 lqpwfr
> Thank you for reviewing 20 low quality posts today; come back in 21 hours to continue reviewing.
It's no shame to fail an audit after an honest effort to understand the question. Failed audits should be a learning experience. Shame is counter-productive. — AirThomas 9 hours ago
 
2:09 AM
Damn idioms
 
user259867
Fail an audit once, shame on me. Fail an audit twice, can't review again.
7
 
animuson rolled back then nuked, yay
 
user259867
chat should have suggested edts
 
2:28 AM
personally, i'd abuse the suggested edits in chat
 
@Fundamental There are. It's called "mod editing". ;)
 
@hichris123 that's not "suggested" anymore
 
2:43 AM
@Fundamental Fail an audit 0 times, shame on you… wait what?
 
user259867
wonders if bjb/hichris generation even knows who is being referred to
 
Randall Terry? whoever that is, or do you mean W?
 
user259867
I did mean W
 
3:22 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: B1/B2 visa validity after getting F1 by hhaiua on travel.stackexchange.com
 
user259867
^ gibberish
 
user259867
happy he doesn't have to worry anymore about F1, I-20, or other such SEVIS
 
is happy too
:D
 
3:56 AM
is stanford.precollegiate.summer.sunshine@stanford.edu legimate?
 
Yes, but no.
They send it to everyone. Even me.
 
I see jQuery and flash on their site. Dat PDF tho… must be design students.
 
@Fundamental I've heard the expression before, not sure where.
 
user259867
 
Maybe. Or someone just said it to me. shrugs
 
user259867
4:05 AM
@bjb568 You're not applying to any colleges with jQuery on front page, right?
 
@Fundamental If they plead and beg for me to redo their website, maybe :P
But no, I'm not applying to anything.
Since applying is present tense.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body: How to makes skin smoothen? by normyroyed on drupal.stackexchange.com
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu. Yay, the check for >>> worked!
 
user259867
 
[php]
 
user259867
4:44 AM
all spam gone
 
@Fundamental SNAFU?
 
What's a snafu?
DevDoodle pull request #170 @uni @hichris @programfox @sam
test plox
 
5:01 AM
@bjb568 situation normal: all fucked up (which means that everything is as bad as always is)
 
ah
 
5:29 AM
Night!
 
user259867
 
user259867
Tagged , as if being spam wasn't bad enough.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body: This is less the fat. This quantity is sufficient by alishawallace on drupal.stackexchange.com
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu
 
@Fundamental Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
 
6:33 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Best Supplement To Build Muscle And Burn Fat Fast by Belle Richard on drupal.stackexchange.com
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu
 
@Fundamental Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
 
user259867
The four newest questions on Drupal are all spam.
 
user259867
6:58 AM
\o/ all gone
 
7:30 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body: This is especially determining if sun danger by Lyman on meta.stackexchange.com
 
8:06 AM
 
This question appears to be off topic because it is about finding a link to a download site. — Unihedro 7 secs ago
It's a spam seed + spam answer, right?
 
@Unihedro I'd agree
 
 
1 hour later…
Sam
9:29 AM
Morning!
 
Morning
 
Mornin
 
Morni
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Top 10 Skin Care Tips For 2012 - Part 4 by Thad Som on meta.stackexchange.com
 
^ ccccCCCCCooooooommmmmmmbbbbbOOO breaker!
 
9:42 AM
Low Quality A (60.8%): vy4bub6gu fcbvcnvmbn,mnergrhstrhsbk rjtkvwghksar, by tegau, on gaming.stackexchange.com.
 
Weekend horror.
 
Sam
:O
 
all spam gone
 
10:03 AM
:D They could be bothered until "test" ...
 
10:22 AM
Speaking of bad examples. If even SE employees ask off-topic questions we are lost ...
 
@rene nice click-bait
 
@rene It's back in 2008, so..
 
Yeah, it turned up in the current burnination of 'Looking for' questions
 
@SmokeDetector Shouting at Wifi usually doesn't work.
3
:P
 
Sam
10:53 AM
@Pham clean
 
2 minutes are too short.
 
Sam
agrees
 
gone
 
11:23 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: MYSQL MY QUERY! ONE WHERE POSSIBLE? by user2648080 on stackoverflow.com
 
11:40 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Vita Ultra The Astounding Skin Care Tips by toninetel250 on meta.stackexchange.com
 
@SmokeDetector tpu
 
@Mooseman Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
 
12:07 PM
@SmokeDetector headshot
 
\o
 
Sam
o/
 
\o/
 
/o\
\o/
/o\
\o/
^^ lava lamp
 
I misread that as "Java lamp" -_-
 
12:15 PM
I read that as lava vamp. :/
 
Java vamp would be totally terrible.
3
 
LOL
 
So the misread gets stars...
cya
 
see ya!
 
12:31 PM
Low Quality Q (81.2%): What is the best way to start a new game, if you are a student?, by William Eriksson, on meta.stackexchange.com.
 
you're welcome...
 
:)
 
@MetaWonder meh
 
Makes sense ?? i do not think so
 
It's not really an issue I care about
If it's an issue at all
 
@MetaWonder meh
 
So it does make sense huh ??
 
12:53 PM
meh...
It does make sense but it's not worth any attention IMO
 
1:17 PM
Just why is "commulative" so hard to spell?!
@Pham scam
 
*cumulative?
 
@JanDvorak Yeah, that.
 
@Pham gone
 
@PeterJ gone, and q protected
 
1:29 PM
cool, out of interest does anyone know if you run out of close votes for a day do you revert back to being able to flag as off-topic etc (assuming you have enough other flags)?
 
@PeterJ no
 
@Unihedro k thanks
 
@PeterJ yw
 
2:07 PM
 
2:19 PM
@bummi dead
 
2:53 PM
Morning!
 
Morning!
 
Morning!
 
3:15 PM
Morning!
 
3:49 PM
I guess nobody is interested in getting this reopened?
 
@rene You have a SEDE query to do that and want to answer, don't you? ;)
 
To be honest, yes...
But I guarantee you the OP needs to do extra work to get the answer he is looking for even with my query...
 
4:09 PM
Give me a good reason to reopen it @rene
 
user259867
4:34 PM
@Bart The question has been clarified: "for each SE site, what is the % of answers on it that were provided by Stack Exchange employees"? The reason "is unclear" does not apply.
 
4:46 PM
@Fundamental sounds too broad to me
 
@Bart because you're a nice gu... oh wait...
 
@rene don't you dare utter such filth!
 
Because he's a nice pair of glasses?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body: A question about parenting constraints and mesh by Tony on blender.stackexchange.com
 
Why do I even attempt to make plans for the weekend? It's almost 18h and I've done nothing productive.
 
4:51 PM
@SmokeDetector fp
 
@ProgramFOX Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
 
It matched ">>>>"
 
@Bart Ha, same, my IDE has been idling for several hours, and I'm somehow ended up reading a book about test driven development.
... For the fourth time in a row.
 
/me is enjoying the weekend
 
At least you are enjoying your weekend, @Inf :D
 
4:53 PM
Oh, I'm enjoying it.Just had other plans than playing Minecraft and watching Youtube.
 
/me is enjoying how everybody else is enjoying their weekend
 
Considering how I'm probably never going back to code, I should play a game too.
 
@Unihedro yay!
or should I saw "awww"?
 
why not both?
 
yawwy?
that sounds that I'm bored or sleepy, you are making me bored or sleepy @Unihedro?
 
4:57 PM
:p I have no idea
@Sam: I asked something in the anti pond.
 
Sam
Hiya!
@Unihedro :O
 
Hiya!
 
Sam
Ok, just checking.
 
Hiya!
 
Sam
Well, I survived another shopping assault.
 
5:11 PM
:O
 
5:22 PM
Wow, it seems Kate Gregory produced an entire serious of Youtube videos on how to use SO/SE
Was that announced anywhere?
 
Is Kate working for SE?
 
No
But her contributions (Meta and otherwise) are generally awesome.
 
Yeah, I agree with that
 
Haven't watched through the videos much, but if good, they would certainly deserve some attention/promotion.
 
3
Q: Allow filters for bounty lists?

euphoria overlord As you can tell, SO has quite a huge amount of bounties. Can we get a filter option for bounties like these? So similar to shopping sites, we can have filters for highest bounty --> lowest bounty, date expiring, activity, views, etc.

What do you guys think?
 
5:31 PM
I hate the idea
But I already expressed that in my comments
 
I think you bring some valid points, but it's kind of unfair to assume people will only be searching through tags
 
Well, if they don't search by tags at all they may have missed that and I'm happy that I have pointed that out. After that I would not want to spend dev-time on providing those search options as long as there are other requests waiting. I didn't investigate but maybe a userscript could add what you ask until it is implemented.
@Bart I think they are helpul ...
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: UNQ_INDEX_PROCESS_INDEXER_CODE by Ronny on magento.stackexchange.com
 
user259867
6:19 PM
@ProgramFOX Consider matching >>>>.*http instead, to avoid such fps.
 
Looks quite helpful indeed @rene
 
Say @Shog9, are you familiar with this video series by Kate Gregory?
 
yes
 
Okay. That's all then. :D
 
6:22 PM
hmm
 
There was a suggestion to endorse the series officially if it's good
 
@Fundamental Good idea; done.
 
@Fundamental How about >>>>(?s).*http
Hiya @random!!!! Can I have your autograph? :D
 
Officially there is a space between Stack & Overflow and Stack & Exchange
 
@Unihedro What does that do?
 
Sam
6:26 PM
@Unihedro How about adding some case-insensitivity?
 
@Sam Smokey's regexes are case-insensitive.
 
Sam
Oh, k.
 
@ProgramFOX treat dots to match newlines as well
 
@Unihedro They stopped allowing that
 
@random D:
 
6:27 PM
@Unihedro ohh.... cool!
 
> 10 views
:O
 
@bjb568 yeah, it deserves more than that.
 
Lesson 69 has 2 views
And I was the second.
 
user259867
@KateGregory if it makes you feel better, that really reinforces our view that this is a key "introduction moment" for new users. Hmm. That probably only makes ME feel better. Well, now at least we'll definitely feel guilty enough to have to tweet it out when you launch. :) — Jaydles ♦ Sep 24 '14 at 20:47
 
user259867
6:41 PM
Haven't found such a tweet by @StackExchange
 
user259867
6:53 PM
@bjb568 Still more than the total views of Stack Overflow TV.
2
 
total views of what???
 
7:07 PM
Hi
 
hi
 
hi
 
Hmm
 
Hmm
 
@bjb568 robot
@Fundamental cute. CV'd
 
@bjb568 what.. :D I don't even remember that post. I seemed to approve that because the edit indeed removed the useless info
 
@JanDvorak yay, you helpful'd my flag
 
I would have approved that edit as well. It was a good edit as it attempted to removed the noise. Now, I closed the question and removed the noise.
 
7:20 PM
no, you bumped it
 
Why bump it?
 
Why not? I edited and removed noise. The edit was worth the bump. There is no rule saying 'don't edit because it bumps'
 
The function I hate most out of DD is minHeight on the front end.
@InfiniteRecursion But did it cause a net positive?
 
7:24 PM
Yes, it caused a net positive IMO.
 
meh
 
O ... M ... G ... did you just "meh" Inf @bjb568?
 
yeah
If you should have read your daughters diary without her permission, I'd suggest you to respect her privacy in the future and not spy on her. Why do you want to discipline her for being in love? If this is a serious question, you should add more details why you are worried, etc. — BBM 2 days ago
gah, at least this comment got upvs
 
@Bart Stay tuned to know 'the fate of the cat'.
 
7:34 PM
Popcorn time!
 
nomnomnom
 
Popcorn time!
Yay! Great question, Bart!
 
:D not yet sure about those answers. But there's no hurry
 
-5
A: How do I handle a 10 year old girl "in love"?

BeenThereDoneThatWhy are people going bonkers about a parent reading a TEN YEAR OLDS DIARY. Privacy? No honey, A ten year old doesn't have privacy at least not in the absolute sense. That will come when she's sixteen or so. Of course maybe she's super-mature and has the mental age of a 21 year old. In that case t...

Can y'all flag the crap out of this?
(NAA)
 
You have been advised to accept one of those answers @Bart :D
 
7:43 PM
@Pham tp
 
@InfiniteRecursion I saw, I ignored.
 
Sam
Darn.
 
@Pham clean
 
Should link-only answers be flagged as NAA or low quality on SO?
 
And nuked
 
7:44 PM
@KevinBrown doesn't matter. Both flags are confusing and nobody understands them.
 
user259867
@Pham del
 
@Fundamental Access denied.
 
Sam
@Pham del
 
@bjb568 I had a feeling that might be the answer, which is unfortunate really
 
Sam
>>add-user 259867
 
7:45 PM
@Sam Error executing command.
 
:O
 
Sam
...
 
user259867
This incident will be reported
 
Hey, what about 237813?
 
Sam
@bjb568 You already have access.
 
7:46 PM
Oh kewl.
 
:P
 
user259867
It took me second to figure out that "Keep all of your items in a chest and die" was not an offensive answer.
6
 
Sam
@InfiniteRecursion Don't worry, there's a >>ban-user command too. ;)
 
7:48 PM
:O
 
Please sanitize Pham's reports. I vaguely recall that I had added an FR for that on github as well.
 
@Fundamental been there, done that.
 
Sam
@InfiniteRecursion You did, and I did implement it. But... you know, bugs.
 
user259867
Nowadays, both of those flags go into review where reviewers don't see if it was NAA or VLQ. The difference matters only if a moderator handles the flag. But on SO, those flags are not shown to moderators for 1 hour... so it may not even matter.
But in principle, NAA is a better fit because one of its uses is conversion to a comment. VLQ is associated with outright deletion of garbage.
 
7:53 PM
@ProgramFOX Fixed DD bug
 
"...NAA is a better fit..."
That's what I was looking for. I've had a few NAA flags get declined with the answer also being deleted, so I wasn't sure if I was missing something.
 
Sam
@InfiniteRecursion It's official. ;)
 
nice tags
 
I always knew Pham had issues
 
Sam
lol
 
user259867
7:56 PM
@KevinBrown The flag feedback is confusing. There is a feature request Explicitly mention who decided on the fate of a flag that would help with that.
 
devdoodle tags are so primitive
 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (1634 days earlier)      last day (3373 days later) »