@Manishearth Do you know if the latest version of ChatExchange should work on Stack Exchange chat? I've tried it, and I keep getting an error. It's working nicely with Stack Overflow chat.
@Matt If the system replaced every time with 'derpderpderp', I wouldn't care. It's as annoying as the pluralization "bugs". Somebody needs to bring out a giant clock to bang these people with :P — bjb5686 hours ago
In an answer, I tried to use the spoiler markdown to hide an image. (It wasn't offensive, but it was unappetizing which seems worthy of hiding on Seasoned Advice.) But the image seems not to be hidden even if the text is. Here's an example:
(Oh. Link descriptions aren't hidden either, it se...
Hmmm, the close reason on mso are limited. How do you close these type of questions? off-topic: not about SO or the software used? Or a custom reason: aka too localized?
@JanDvorak I'd love to know. As far as I can tell, it contributes little (doesn't even give the "suggestions" it claims to) and links to an unrelated site (networking? really?).
High voted comments are in black text and look boring and unremarkable, while comments with a few votes have the red "hot" color on them. (I have no idea what is with the blue 25 :P)
Could this be changed so that highly voted comments actually look highly voted?
while reading this question, I just looked at related question and their vote count. The questions with votes in tripple figures are showing the votes in two lines. I found a bug O.0
When the vote count of a related question is 100 or more, the number overflows the box.
Picture:
(To be clear: "How does accepting an answer work?" has +622, and "FAQ for Stack Exchange Sites" has +1341.)
Part of the promise we made when we split MSE away from MSO is that users of MSE would keep most of their reputation and privileges. In order to make sure this happens, we must curtail migration of questions that are Stack Overflow specific to an essential minimum - reputation is lost on migrated...
@JeroenVannevel I'm curious if there's any deleted answers on the C++ FAQ.
This brought it up:
Interesting that they (presumably) deleted all the other answers there. Usually, I think those questions work the best when there are lots of answers, that can be voted on, and then one accepted wiki answer that lists the best of the others in a standard format, and links to the answer for more detail. Then people can quickly view the whole list, and go into detail if they need it. Once the question stabilises, I suppose there might be some reason for deleting all the answers other than the main one, and replacing all the links. — naught10129 mins ago