For those who haven't been following, you may be interested to know that a post on security.SE which was cross-posted to their blog was the first to publicly guess (correctly) the nature of the newly-presented vulnerability in HTTPS. It's been linked in a bunch of places; it's probably really good promotion for the site.
The following post asks for a workaround for a problem which I feel should not have happened in the first place. Should I edit in a [bug] tag or post a new question? (or moan about it in the tavern?)
If I use http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/*sql* I get all tags which include sql.
But I want all tags which include or vb6 So I tried this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/*sql*+or+vb6
But I am getting like this:
So I need or between *sql* and vb6 like this:
Is it possible?
@ShawnChin I agree and I'd prefer to see it retagged, particularly since it wouldn't invalidate the existing answer. The OP seems to be online, so I'd go with posting a comment asking if they're okay with retagging. Maybe give them a couple minutes to reply to be polite, but if not I'd probably go ahead and retag it anyway.
That's what I'm inclined to do. Only concern is that the workaround has been accepted and I wonder if the question would then just fall under the radar.
Anonymous
Hmm, perhaps.
Anonymous
Either'd be okay, but that does seem like a bug so just don't only leave it here in the tavern. ;P
Bug tracking is currently distributed throughout the Internet. Each project has its own bug system.
Wouldn't it be great if there could be a single place (and single UI) where people could get credit for their efforts of bug reporting?
No more wondering about trying to find that bug tracking si...
@Pop I plan to take a more southerly route from LA on, so I probably won't make it there! However, I'll be making up my route as I go along. If I come anywhere near Denver, I'll be there.
Is that a ruse to lure me to Colorado? That'll work only if you're actually there. Otherwise, you'll be in trouble.
I might be so disappointed that I'd use the superpowers I will have acquired in L.A. by then (it's a Stan Lee expo, remember?) and mentally set your mailbox on fire or something.
Will Joel Spolsky be wrestling Zombies at the STACK EXCHANGE EXPO?
@Pekka I don't know what things are like in that "Europe" fantasy land, but interfering with the postal service is a serious federal offense here. I'm pretty sure I can have you Guantanamoed now.
Besides, how can the promise of Shogcakes not be lure enough?
In other news, people have clearly forgotten the lesson of I outwitted the 30 day waiting period:
The other Loungers decided to have a bit of fun whilst I was afking, and a truckload of them or so changed their username and Gravatar to match mine. Whilst this was hilarious for a time, now I'm back and some of them can't change back. I've got highlighting for my own messages and even I can har...
any progress on this, it's still not available except on the profile card. It really does need to be in a more obvious position linked to reputation. — Stu Wilson1 min ago
Their jaw dropped when I pointed out that I had driven 20,000km since visiting in April so maybe they should have measured the brake pads again instead of guessing there was still some there.
We're grinding through the old /review queues, moving them into the new Community Review Dashboard format.
Recently, Emmett's been slaving over a hot compiler to bring you: the First Posts queue:
This is a bit different from the preview queues, which tend to focus on a handful of very specif...
The previous review stats had more options which you could complete on a post than the new review beta seems to provide: flagging, voting, and commenting. While I'm not sure if any of these three will be present in the other review tasks yet to be created, I'm curious as to what you're planning t...
@Shog9 In the case of "I'm sure that post needs neither editing nor commenting, and I don't want to vote on it", can we get a "Next" button, or will we have to use "Not Sure"?
@DanielFischer Meh. The idea behind all of the queues is that something should be done, some decision should be made. If you don't want to do anything, that's fine - but from the perspective of the system, you haven't really accomplished anything.
@Shog9 Yes, but if somebody else already left a nice "Welcome to SO" comment, somebody already edited the post into shape, but it's still not worthy of an upvote (IMO), then I'm not "Not Sure", I am sure that I have nothing to do to that post. There's a difference between "No action required, IMO, it's okay as is" and "I don't know what to do with this".
If I use http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/*sql* I get all tags which include sql.
But I want all tags which include or vb6 So I tried this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/*sql*+or+vb6
But I am getting like this:
So I need or between *sql* and vb6 like this:
Is it possible?
We're grinding through the old /review queues, moving them into the new Community Review Dashboard format.
Recently, Emmett's been slaving over a hot compiler to bring you: the First Posts queue:
This is a bit different from the preview queues, which tend to focus on a handful of very specif...
