« first day (139 days earlier)      last day (103 days later) » 

09:46
@AndrasDeak--СлаваУкраїні luckily, this could legally be flushed :P
 
11 hours later…
21:11
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact Does codidact have a software recommendation site?
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact Also, found an example of cross-posting being frowned upon: powerusers.codidact.com/comments/thread/5197#comment-15070 - that's exactly the kind of comment I saw several of over on software.codidact
Also, the answer to my first question is "yes and no". Powerusers allegedly allows it, but that's heavily disputed. I'll just ask on SE instead
@Zoe-Savethedatadump I think PU allows it.
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Sam got smacked for doing that. ;)
@Zoe-Savethedatadump No, ask on Codidact.
21:29
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact Eh
@Zoe-Savethedatadump linux.codidact.com/posts/291818 Eh, for Linux? linux.codidact.com/posts/291818 seems to be a recommendation question that's been allowed.
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact Linux or web server, yeah
Btw, you're making my team lose in Apex Legends by taking my attention here.
Damn it, shot me straight in the head.
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Wait, web server? For development? That may be acceptable on the Software Development site. It's a bit wider than Stack Overflow, granted it's for you as a programmer.
Unless of course it's just a pre-existing web server you're just configuring, in that case, probably PU or Linux.
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact Not for development. The thing I'm looking for has to somehow work on Linux, as in either be a native Linux app, or be a webapp that I can then access from Linux. I don't particularly care about that particular detail
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Well... if you wanna cheat a little, you can maybe even ask on both PU and Linux, then... with asking specifically for a native Linux solution on the Linux site. Bring your thick skin, somebody might be bothered by it. ;)
21:34
Or, I can just ask on softwarerecs.SE
No.
That would turn my renewed happiness into renewed sadness.
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Heavily disputed?
There's also a +3-6 saying no
But fine, I'll post on PU
And there's also an 80% yes and 20% no on the most voted question.
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Yay! I am now happy.
21:38
PU has [software-recommendation] and [software-recommendations]
EEEEWWWW!!!!
I'm flagging for a merge.
Fun fact, I didn't vote on the PU software recommendation meta inquiry question or answers.
Why, I've read it before.
22:33
I don't like that the title is after the post. I understand the rationale, but I just don't like it
@Zoe-Savethedatadump It was weird at first. Then I got used to it.
I imagine I can get used to it
I still won't like it :p
Is there anything in this world that you like, though? :P
I thought you just got used to everything.
I like Vim. And snow. And darkness
22:48
Great, we have two things in common.
Ooh
Codidact supports footnotes
I've been forced to use numbered lists for my SE footnotes
You're welcome! You can even abuse the stylesheets for your posts! That's... a bug. And we aren't enforcing a ban on it because... we kinda like having the functionality, so we probably aren't fixing the bug until we have a replacement. :)
Just one footnote? :p
22:51
Wait, did you run into the footnote bug?
I don't know if that's actually a bug, I just know somebody talked about some footnote issue the other day.
My point was that I've done like 6-7 in a few of my posts on the mod team, and I consider that little :p
Anyway, go ahead, use footnotes. Hopefully they'll sound good...
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Oh, well. Do we have a limit on one footnote on CD?
iDunno, I'm only doing one in this post
22:53
Add 99 more.
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Yay! I'm proud of you! :D
unrelated, as part of the hours of research leading up to me caving and asking, I downloaded gnome calendar from flatpak
And holy fuck, it looks orders of magnitude better
Better than what?
Oh, whoops. Old gnome calendar
Is it the calendar application that's otherwise bundled with Gnome? It's kinda lackluster, if you ask me.
23:12
yes - the flatpak version (which is newer than the apt version) is much better
Wait, what?
Flatpak broke something
There we go
That's Flatpak for you.
That's gnome-calendar 43, the old version currently in apt
vs. gnome-calendar 46, the version currently in flatpak:
Arguably more usable than thunderbird
The main annoying bit about both is that neither of them respect the calendar colours set in baikal
I don't like that neither gnome-calendar nor thunderbird respects per-task colours
Thunderbird at least shows a line, while gnome-calendar only shows the calendar colour. Does look like support there is bad though
I could, of course, just make new calendars
I just haven't bothered :p
I wonder if the main gnome-calendar improvements come from switching to GTK-4 or whatever
I love caldav though. So simple, but so advanced. Baikal is probably the most useful service I host
23:32
Quite sure I have the apt version.
@Zoe-Savethedatadump Make PRs?
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact It's... not trivial
Gnome-calendar syncs from a gnome-accounts WebDAV account. Adding colour support would require going far up the toolchain for something that, ultimately, isn't that critical
And again, I self-host my calendar server. If I want more calendars, I can spin them up in a couple minutes at most, including login time
Maybe I should do that anyway
@Zoe-Savethedatadump I'm fully aware. ;)
@Zoe-Savethedatadump I don't even use the calendar for things other than looking at the date, or checking which week number a future date belongs to...
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact I use it for organising stuff. I used to use a bullet journal, but it got out of hand and turned into a pain in the ass to maintain
Some people like pain in their ass...
That then prompted the switch to digital calendars, which I self-host because I refuse to give google more of my data
23:44
Well, well. Actually, now that I think about it, I wasn't being honest.
I just forgot I used to put appointments and meetings in my calendar.
Been a while.
Woo, first upvote
Wohoo!
> Whoa. It's Zoe.
From the community server. ;)
invite linkie :p
23:52
Only linkie I got.

« first day (139 days earlier)      last day (103 days later) »