« first day (3892 days earlier)      last day (1115 days later) » 

Rob
2:54 AM
@Luuklag Not if you poke it precisely:
 
 
4 hours later…
6:51 AM
@Rob Yes you can indeed have a flair like that, but you need at least 200 rep on one site to enable it.
 
7:26 AM
Hmm, if I want to change my cookie preferences, how is that supposed to happen? Right now, I mean - I saw the FR to add the settings to the profile.
Also, this is out of curiosity. I wonder if there is a better mechanism than "delete all cookies, login, and accept the cookie policy again". If that even works.
 
@VLAZ yeah that would work
also they time out after a while, so every now and then you get it again
 
Ugh...
I wonder if that qualifies as a dark pattern. Hammer users with a choice until they cave in. Or just click "accept all" by accident. And then not have any (visible) option to let them amend their choice.
 
@VLAZ in the footer there is a link called Cookie settings
 
OK, it's new, then. I was looking at a page and I couldn't see it. refreshed and it was there.
 
7:51 AM
@Luuklag I disagree
It's old enough a feature that a new question makes more sense
 
@JourneymanGeek except that it isn't a bug
It is intended behaviour
re-rendering only took place for questions of which the result would not change.
In this case it just got re-rendered as I edited the post.
 
8:05 AM
and here we wait for the incoming rants
Call me in about... 7 hours?
 
@Luuklag but if it was... 😁
I'm not particularly convinced it's the best option
 
@SPArcheon I have so many rants I could give you right now... but sure, I'll wait 7 hours :P
 
@Tinkeringbell let's at least wait for people to start ranting about the probable April prank. No need to hurry.
 
Ah yes, the April prank evil grin
 
@SPArcheon Look, why is Wednesday considered the middle of the week? Clearly it's Thursday noon. There are three days before Thursday and three days after it. It's exactly in the middle. And noon is the middle if the day. Therefore, after lunch time Thursday you've entered the second half of the week. /rant
Does that work for you?
 
8:16 AM
@VLAZ Because for any reasonable person, the week starts on Sundays.
 
@Tinkeringbell You misspelled unreasonable. They who use body parts for measuring. QED
 
I don't know... I like the thought of a week starting with a day off :D
 
Also, doesn't quite work with the Bible they are so fond of. So, God created earth in 6 days and took a rest on the seventh. We honour that action by also taking a break on the seventh day. (Saturday was not an off day until relatively recently). But somehow that seventh day is the first day of the week.
 
Saturday is the 7th day, ask anyone that's Jewish ;)
 
@VLAZ Not everywhere.
 
8:31 AM
@JourneymanGeek Meh I'll answer then ;)
 
@Tinkeringbell Actually, it's a bit more complicated, but well... generally Saturday works :P
 
@VLAZ cause most people work monday till friday...
yup that is very much spam
also NSFW,
 
@VLAZ thanks haha
 
8:49 AM
@QueenieGoldstein no prob!.... I guess...?
(removed)
 
@JourneymanGeek I've answered it then :)
0
A: Markdown list rendering mismatch between preview and actual post

LuuklagIn the old days the only valid markdown to create a numbered list was: 1. 2. 3. or 1. 1. 1. In June of 2020 the Stack Exchange network migrated to CommonMark, of which the Stack Overflow founder Jeff Atwood is one of the contributors. The CommonMark spec defines an ordered list as: a sequence ...

 
Excellent 😁
 
Now I should do some real work xD
 
9:31 AM
 
WUT?
which? what? where?
 
shouldn't it be that instead of what
 
You're probably right.
 
m00t now, tink nuked it
 
Yeah, I can't spend too much time on those comments as I run the risk the post gets nuked under my hands.
 
9:44 AM
BOOM!
 
My usual workflow is: click lost soul, copy title to clipboard, open stackexchange.com/search paste title, tune the search a bit so it looks like it returns sane results, copy url, paste as comment. Formulate a welcoming message around that link before the parrot sees the question. Basically I have seconds to process all that ...
 
You have a bit longer during office hours, as I don't have my lost souls button then :P
 
:D lucky me!
 
@rene You should add a step, leave a cookie when done, then the parrot knows to eat it ;)
 
I can try and wait for a minute after I see the first lost soul comment, if that helps...
But it still won't guarantee no race conditions when someone else posts the lost soul comment ;)
 
9:48 AM
We need a the flower is typing message ...
 
@rene Propose a FR. Will back it up.
I'd also request a fancy animation of petals slowly coalescing into the message as you're typing.
2
Critical priority, site literally unusable. Thanks in advice.
 
@tink got time for another nuke
-1
A: Allow to translate http to https migration revision text

Aaron SmithHTTP to HTTPS Migration: The Ultimate Stress-Free Guide To enable HTTPS for your website you'll need to get and configure the required SSL/TLS certificates on your server. Revise your robots.txt and make sure you haven't restricted your HTTPS pages

the entire account can go IMHO
 
yeah, the small tag was already Huh? from me but now it has become spammy
 
@rene Yeah, I believe I flagged that NAA
 
10:09 AM
@Luuklag Someone beat me to it. Too bad, spam goes well with lunch
 
10:25 AM
o/ I'm aware that there's several patterns that get deleted from the front of tag descriptions, is there a go-to meta about that topic? Or is it just this one where Jeff's answer is at -14?
i figure the regex might be more up to date since then
The tag wiki FAQ doesn't even mention this behaviour
 
It hasn't been updated since then AFAIK...
 
i've just tried doing some tag wiki edits ("use this tag for something something", "this tag is for bla bla") on a dummy tag i created for those edits, and they were accepted as the description
though it was on a meta site if that makes any difference
 
I think the text goes as is, only on the view/page it gets stripped
 
several of those patterns are just fine now...
i wonder if the regex is just gone
 
10:45 AM
@doppelgreener Can you try with a first capital, so "This tag is for". And notice that the regex only is applied on the tagpage, not when it shows the excerpt in the popup. Compare the design tag here: meta.stackexchange.com/tags
 
yeah, and then only for tags that show on the first page.
So it is super inconsistent behavior depending on where you access/see/view the excerpt
at least, that is how I interpret Jeffs answer
 
oh, huh, ok
that makes sense
Yep, that's it!
 
Rob
@VLAZ There's a video from which to derive the animation; of course the real life time-lapse withering of the flower isn't particularly exciting, the animated version would need to take a bit of liberty with the truth.
 
11:06 AM
a few minutes later and some job changed my revision completely
huzzah!
 
 
3 hours later…
2:02 PM
@MetaAndrewT. Lol...actually I was typing VLAZ's message number and typed yours haha
 
2:38 PM
mmmm how is my spam flag marked helpful on this post @SmokeDetector, but the post is still there
 
@Luuklag a mod choosing "The flags have merit, but no other action is required."
(and dismissed the flag)
But to be fair, the answer seems passing the minimum bar of /help/promotion
 
2:57 PM
@MetaAndrewT. I sometimes wonder if we should set higher standards...
 
Dunno, after moderating a tech site that got quite a lot of spam, perhaps I did lower my bar. Especially due to those "happy customer"-type answers...
 
It always irks me if I see answers that require a lot of imagination to even be interpreted as 'answering the question', that don't add anything to already existing answers, that are sometimes written years after a post was made... are very low quality overall, and have a promotional link.
Just had a discussion about this somewhere yesterday too, I know some people disagree but... blegh :P
I feel SE is making advertising/spamming your own links too easy.
 
@Tinkeringbell I did read this discussion...
 
I just commented the post this time, urging others to flag as spam too.
 
I guess some of us are already used to XKCD #810...
 
3:57 PM
@Spevacus gone
 
✔️
 
 
4 hours later…
8:10 PM
 
 
3 hours later…
Rob
11:07 PM
@Feeds The 8th, at the earliest.
 
11:27 PM
Hello, does anyone know if SE is doing anything for April Fools'?
 
Rob
11:46 PM
Last year it created extra work, maybe this year there will be none; that will be the joke:
31
Q: Looking back at the Time Machine

Jon EricsonThis year Microsoft banned April Fools, which deprived the internet of their unique sense of humor as illustrated by Clippy and Windows 9. Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange users were not so lucky. Inspired by Captain Marvel, Space Jam and our own misspent youth, we inflicted a 90s theme on the n...

 
That was two years ago.
Last year we cancelled sort of due to COVID-19.
We just launched dark mode and made ultra dark mode an Easter egg.
 

« first day (3892 days earlier)      last day (1115 days later) »