« first day (3487 days earlier)      last day (1519 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

5:00 PM
@JonEricson I figured you'd done something like that. And while more staff participation on Meta would be great, it's definitely not something that's easy without the right mindset or preparation. OTOH, Yaakov has seemed to have done pretty well.
 
How are we feeling? Cautiously optimistic? Burned out? A dismissive shrug and "I'll believe it when I see it"? Or actually hopeful?
I ask because I'm not at all sure how I'm feeling.
 
@TRiG Combination of the last two.
 
wait and see
 
Yes, all of the above
 
@TRiG Cautious mostly :D
 
5:06 PM
@PM2Ring Yes. He's fantastic. The devs are generally successful interacting with people on meta, in my experience.
 
i see no history that would suggest to me that this new executive will resort to attacks on portions of the community, but only time will tell. we can be a rough bunch
 
@JonEricson why did you move them from Enterprise to Team? The company turned out to be too small to handle an Enterprise? ... ;)
 
@rene Dogfooding I guess :D
 
Yeah, I don't assume they have Experts-Exchange running internally ...
 
@rene Yes. Also Enterprise was (is?) behind the VPN that not everyone used.
 
5:09 PM
Ah, yes. That makes sense
Good call ;)
 
@JonEricson the one that convinced Shog his network was crap :D
I both feel good and bad about talking him out of a DIY router...
 
@rene That is an amusing image, though.
 
Enterprise never got traction because it was somewhere you have to seek out. Teams work because everyone is on SO already.
 
@TRiG despite popular belief I'm amusing now and then ...
 
@JonEricson and there's friction. Also VPNs rather suck :D
 
5:13 PM
@JonEricson yeah, one of the key features for knowledge sharing tools is effortless entry and no barriers/obstacles to use it.
 
@rene there also needs to be a willingness to use it, and find information you need
I don't log into confluence as often as I should :/
 
5:27 PM
I'm impressed by Teresa's "the buck stops here" attitude. She's made a couple of promises to do tangible stuff in the next couple of weeks. And she seems to be aware that if she doesn't deliver on those promises her credibility will be totally shot.
 
@PM2Ring I'd be more impressed if that attitude came from the responsible leadership. Even then, it'd be very little.
 
@πάνταῥεῖ How could it possibly be a rant! They even clearly say that their rant is not a rant.
 
How does that matter, if it is just one??
 
you were all so rude on that rant question ....
 
Hmm, I was very kind IMO
 
5:37 PM
i didn't think i was rude
 
Well, maybe from that specific OP's perspective?
 
@user400654 The post leads with an accusation. There's a genuine question in there, but the tone is sour from the get-go.
@user400654 Sorry. You're a different account.
 
@user400654 OK, see:
> It's necessary to provide some kind of "background information" or "context" in many cases
 
Both are "user" and a string of digits, so it's hard to tell.
 
by design
:)
 
5:42 PM
@user400654 Isn't it really offensive to ask about more clarification and example in such case the OP stated?
@TRiG Just sort out the numbs ...
 
@πάνταῥεῖ I was being sarcastic in case that wasn't clear ;)
 
I know of course :-D
 
i mean... it's no more offensive than claiming everything you post is dismissed as a rant without providing evidence that what you've posted in the past wasn't a rant, considering the very post they made is a... rant.
 
I mean, I thought that @rene was also being sarcastic...
 
I know of course :-D
 
5:46 PM
OK lol
 
:)0
i started leveling a new toon in wolcen, leveling through the "maps" is rough
imagine fighting an act boss every 5 minutes
 
@user400654 That post has so many layers of delicious irony.
 
@Shadow9 I can!
Sha is as innocent as a lamb.
Who makes dirty jokes every 10 messages.
 
i started as a melee/caster hybrid with aether ray, that skill melts enemies. but now i'm fully into ailment bleeding edge, but i'm super squishy atm due to not having the block chance/efficiency that the final build relies on for defense
 
A very interesting, outlandish lamb
@user400654 Uh
That is an interesting biography
Oh it's about this game I can't pronounce the name of
 
5:51 PM
yeah i don't know how it's supposed to be pronounced
wolsen?
wolken?
 
Walken
 
walking
 
@rene Citation bloody needed!
I remain unconvinced
 
your problem ...
 
6:39 PM
I'm curious why this is now attracting downvotes... it's gotten an unupvote and two downvotes today and I really don't know why.
 
Voting reasons are too arbitrary to tell :-P
 
@Mithical Well it looks like maybe there was an answer deleted today? So that explains the new activity at least...
 
@Mithical Upvote was me, on reading it for the first time because it was linked to from somewhere (cannot now recall where).
 
I could never bring myself to vote on that one. I agree with many of the things you say, but I just can't stand the word "toxic". To me it's a meaningless buzzword, which is horribly overused.
 
^ but I just can't stand the word "toxic" Totally aggree with that.
 
6:50 PM
@terdon I think people use it to mean too many different things and effects. I think it has its place but almost always that is with some sort of clarification.
 
Exactly. And you just can't use the same word to describe a rapist and someone who, say, has a condescending tone and expect the word to retain its strength and meaning.
 
> people use it to mean too many different things
Ah, so you're saying that the word is problematic?
 
Yes
 
I like "toxic" but only when it refers to radioactive contamination or waste
 
This may be my background in the physical sciences talking, but toxic is a very strong word. Its overuse has rendered it useless for me.
 
6:52 PM
Green glows are exciting
I've never grown to its meaning in social contexts
@terdon Exactamundo
 
There's no "social context" at Q&A by definition in 1st place.
 
Ah, you know, the definition of "toxic" people throw around to silence the opponent, for better or worse. Or to incite argument about the word "toxic"
 
@πάνταῥεῖ There is in a chat room, also by definition.
 
Nothing's more fun than semantic quibbling about semantic things about semantic things
 
Toxicity has been reduced to classifying anything which violates the positive bubble of adulation to which newer (American?) generations seem(?) accustomed. Criticism? Toxic. What if it's warranted? Toxic. What if it's constructive? Still toxic and you're toxic too!
 
6:56 PM
Ur face iz toxic!
 
@TRiG I'd say it has issues.
 
omg mah face!!!111oneone
 
@Rubiksmoose and that it's problematic
 
@canon That might be a tad reductionist. There are valid uses for the word, it's just that these days, it seems like all sides use it to basically mean "those who don't have the exact same position I do", unfortunately.
 
@It'sOver Sure lol.
 
6:58 PM
@terdon I don't think it's reductive to say that people bandy about that term when their ego is wounded.
 
@canon They do indeed. I objected to your limiting it to a specific geographic and generational range.
 
Sure, some behavior is combative and malicious.
 
Ego died. Chris Pratt can attest to that.
. . . I know that doesn't sound like much but he stopped the galaxy from turning into pudding
 
@canon It's also not the only way the term is used. Toxic relationships, toxic workplace environments, etc.
 
Drug toxicity
 
6:59 PM
@terdon Ah, well... that's just based on my own limited observation. I'll readily admit I don't have all the data. I've simply, personally, seen the term wielded way more often by the groups I've described.
 
Oh wait that's the objective one
Yeah, to me, one set of definitions for "toxic" has clear enough criteria and objective ways of measurement, and the other is only heard when there's an unpleasant conversation to be had. No wonder I only prefer the former
 
@Rubiksmoose sure. And the behavior we've been describing cheapens that term as a qualifier for anything truly hazardous.
 
LOL
-28
Q: Why is Stack Exchange full of people who don't know what the word "rant" means?

user12933550Every other question I ask gets a snarky, useless comment claiming that what I asked is a "rant", themselves providing zero answer/input. Ironically, that is a rant in my book. They are "ranting" about my question being a "rant" (which it isn't) instead of answering it or even trying to provide a...

The levels of irony in this
And this
There is no better way to answer a question like that
 
To speak frankly free: The OP just made an idiot of themselves.
 
Uh, a bit too far maybe
 
7:05 PM
Although there is a kernel of truth. I have to admit I've see the word "rant" thrown around a bit too easily. There's a difference between "rude" and "not constructive" and "rant".
We do sometimes use "rant" as a substitute for "crappy and unpleasant".
 
Yes
Which only tells me that people are doing more meta than is healthy for them
 
The OP insulted many members not to understand what a rant actually means. That's enough.
 
Shrug
 
@It'sOver 11
@It'sOver Shog?
 
@It'sOver meta has been found to cause navel gazing in the state of California
 
7:10 PM
@πάνταῥεῖ Let's not be rude please.
 
@πάνταῥεῖ Why is that an insult?
 
@terdon How it isn't?
 
Telling me I don't understand something is not insulting. Either you're right, and I don't understand it, or you're wrong and I do understand it. Either way, why would I be insulted?
We all have things we don't know and a suggestion of ignorance shouldn't be insulting.
 
Ahh, that's gone now. I feel good.
 
@terdon There is a subtle difference between insulting and actually feeling insulted of course.
 
7:13 PM
@πάνταῥεῖ Wow. You must be very spiritual.
:P
 
Of course I am.
 
Like I can easily be insulting by writing in a comment that, for example, everyone who downvotes my answer must not be able to read or be able to think critically.
 
@Rubiksmoose Sure, but then you're insulting their abilities, not their knowledge. Knowledge can be easily acquired.
"Anyone who downvotes my answer can't think" => insulting. "Anyone who downvotes my answer doesn't know enough to understand it" => extremely irritating, but not really insulting.
It insults the OP more.
 
@terdon I would say it is certainly rude though.
But [shrug].
I'm too tired for arguments lol
 
@Rubiksmoose False!
 
7:19 PM
XD
 
@Rubiksmoose What!? You pestilential worm, you! You sack of overgrown and underfed ferrets! You... oh, you said argument! Sorry, my bad. Down the corridor, second door on your right.
 
@terdon hahahaha
 
The rudeness lies in the assumption that other users are undable to understand something that's basically agreed in a wide larger community, instead of asking a real question why things are happening as they do.
 
@Rubiksmoose I take it you know the reference :)
 
@terdon I do! Love me some Monty Python.
 
7:23 PM
Di dum, di dum, di dum di dum di dum :D
-3
Q: Can you please consider to use the word "please" more often?

GhostCat salutes Monica C.The "reminder" blog post about the 2020 developer survey says: First and foremost, we ask that you share the survey with your networks. and ... we want to learn about how they work. Okay, I got it. You want something from your readers. The same users that you annoyed so much over th...

 
please no
 
:-D
@user400654 You nailed it.
@terdon Not that bad response.
 
7:38 PM
Thanks
I was really pissed off at that request to spam our friends, so I do share Ghost's outrage. But the language wasn't the problem, the content was.
I mean seriously, how out of touch are these marketing people?
 
i mean, how out of touch are normal people with how marketing works?
 
It's always the content.
 
:shrug:
 
The very same day that we had a top-level executive apologize and admit that there are serious problems in the relationship between community and company, we had a marketing email talking about how much we love the company and would do things to help them.
 
it's literally their job to paint a rosy picture and fool entice people to join and participate. you don't do that by not sending marketing emails showing how everything is great, false or otherwise
 
7:42 PM
@user400654 Marketeers aren't normal people? I love ours in my company, even if they sometime spread weird announcements and news. We just level them back to the ground ;-)
 
well, normal might not be the right word
 
Oh, so something did happen other than the apology
 
enlightened maybe?
 
Why didn't no one tell me? :(
On-fire
 
Erin Martin on February 19, 2020
We’re two weeks into collection of data for our 2020 Developer Survey. If you haven’t yet taken the survey, be sure to do so before it closes on February 25th. Read on for background on this year’s survey, what we hope to achieve this year, and how you can help. Primarily, you can take the…
 
7:43 PM
err, non-enlightened
whatver word would describe that
I didn't enjoy filling out the survey
 
That's the brilliant survey where, if you go back to check a previous question, all of your answers are lost and you need to start from the beginning.
I made that error. And never finished the survey.
grrr
 
because it's a constant question of should i choose x because it's correct, or y because it'll actually be heard
 
@terdon Eh, the tone is of something I'd read or hear back . . . back when dinosaurs existed, and the world was ending. Like, 2012.
Who knew, it was gonna be 2020. Some typo someone made.
 
I used the phrase "Reinstate Monica" repeatedly while filling it out. I assume my responses were routed to /dev/null on arrival.
 
why ask for something unrealistic
 
7:47 PM
Think about it. Merely two months in, and we've had pandemic alerts, assassinations, wars, downed civilian aircraft
And Trump.
 
who was assassinated?
 
A foreign general on another foreign soil by another foreign power
The first six questions have a net score of -40. GO META
@Rob what was that bug about chat avatars . . . I think I repro it
 
Rob
Me?, it was for hats.
 
@Rob Uh, I dunno. There are like, three Robs in this chat, I think
Contemplates renaming to Rob
 
Rob
Ert is the other Rob
 
7:55 PM
So you're in-Ert?
Ha, take that, @Mag
 
@It'sOver i consider that copyright infringement
 
Rob
Try bob it's easy to spell, forwards and backwards; also handy if you go overboard.
 
;)
 
Robbob
 
7:57 PM
Roboross...
 
Rhubarb
 
Rob
Marzipan
 
Oh, that would actually go well with the MAR- theme
 
Rob
You'd be delicious
 
7:59 PM
Nervous laughter
 
^Took me some seconds :-D
 
Rob
and nutty, and pasty.
 
ur nutty
Crosses Marzipan out of future usernames
 
🔩
 
Rob
There's always that smokin' name
 
8:02 PM
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTnYl87p6bw

Utterance
 
 
2 hours later…
9:35 PM
That's rude / abusive, isn't it?
> Why are you smoking pot?
Even if I am myself love to smoke pot, that seems to be an accusation coming from nowhere.
 
@πάνταῥεῖ It appears to be gone now.
 
@It'sOver knowing you that'd be H.C.N
 
But yeah I'd consider that to be rude.
 
@Rubiksmoose Still there when reloading the page.
 
@πάνταῥεῖ Still?
 
9:40 PM
Still?
 
Still?
 
Gone now.
 
"Still, still, still" is an Austrian Christmas carol and lullaby. The melody is a folk tune from the district of Salzburg. The tune appeared for the first time in 1865 in a folksong collection of Vinzenz Maria Süß (1802–1868), founder of the Salzburg Museum. The words describe the peace of the infant Jesus and his mother as the baby is sung to sleep. They have changed slightly over the years but the modern Standard German version remains attributed to Georg Götsch (1895–1956). There are various English translations. == Lyrics == == Melody == == References == == External links == Au...
@πάνταῥεῖ (I missed it the first time because it was at the end of a comment and not the whole thing as I expected)
 
I had to go back to the home page and open the question again to see that comment gone.
 
9:59 PM
I guess the correct question is why are you still caching?
 
10:25 PM
🚽
 
 
2 hours later…
11:59 PM
@TeresaDietrich: Over the last few years the CM team has been whittled down from 14 to 6. As the team got smaller, we were asked to justify the work we were doing. It seems to me that we had already hit the limits of that strategy before Robert and Shog were let go. I'd encourage you to consider the size of community management teams on networks of similar size to Stack Exchange/Overflow. Even given the amazing work volunteer moderators do for the sites, I can't see how the current CM team isn't understaffed by an order of magnitude or more. — Jon Ericson 6 hours ago
 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (3487 days earlier)      last day (1519 days later) »