« first day (3477 days earlier)      last day (1530 days later) » 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

12:38 AM
Were there any posts about the new tag page design?
@Shadow9 You missed the opportunity last time I was there.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:48 AM
!!/tea
 
@V2Blast brews a cup of mint tea for @V2Blast
 
@Alex New design? Or the design for a "new tag page"? I'm not sure I've noticed any changes... Or maybe I've just missed it
 
@V2Blast Compare this screenshot from a couple of weeks ago:
And current:
Now the tags and their stats are enclosed in boxes.
 
2:25 AM
Ah, nice
I rarely visit the general tags page
is that on the same page? or on different sites (given the different colors), and/or a mainsite vs. meta?
 
2:36 AM
@V2Blast The first ine is from Mi Yodeya because that’s where I had an available screenshot from. The second one is from Meta here, but it’s the same on other sites as well.
They are also not exactly the same page, as one is sorted by tag popularity and one by tag newness.
But that only affects minor details (such as which stats are displayed), but not the overall layout.
 
ah okay, was just checking
 
2:52 AM
@user1306322 I had started building a LED cube that could be animated, looked like a fun project...my soldering skills are not quite there though. I need to get back to it
 
Rob
@user1306322 The portmanteau isn't buckboard so it must be wheatbread.
 
Rob
3:25 AM
Build a Theremin, like Jean Michel Jarre uses.
 
Nice!
 
 
2 hours later…
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog nuked 3 of 4
Not really sure if I want to nuke the selfie queen
 
Oh, wait...it's the same cross-site spammer from earlier. Sorry, that must have been clipboard error.
@JourneymanGeek I meant this one: meta.stackexchange.com/users/417074/pain-pills
 
 
2 hours later…
8:13 AM
18 messages moved to Chimney
 
35
A: Writing desperately needs moderators!

CatijaI’m sorry. The long-standing repercussions of the fall are something we’re still recovering from. The moderator situation on Writing and a handful of other sites is something we need to address - and we are but we’re not talking about it publicly so I can understand why y’all feel ignored. Whil...

tl;dr elections were supposed to be on hold until the new moderator agreement was ratified and posted publicly. This will probably take until at least march, so it won't be ready in time. First election of 2020 will be on the workplace, supposedly starting nominations today
 
Hmm, so I should hurry up on earning 150 rep there...
 
@Magisch will you run?
 
@Magisch also means, despite the... sudden-ness, that this isn't being held up by legal or marketing... 🤔
 
@rene not sure
I've put off deciding
not even sure what my chances would be
 
8:25 AM
By the way, @JourneymanGeek, would you be willing to help assuage some of my curiosity? I'm really curious to know what happens if you try to visit user #3 on the Mod Team :D
 
the server will explode
 
@JourneymanGeek eh. I'm 99% sure the new mod agreement will be a contract style NDA or some such
 
can't imagine they'll let people continue to be mods without signing one
 
cool, thanks
 
8:26 AM
@Magisch Well - I'll certainly read through it
 
the countdown started ... 403 ... 402 ....
 
and I need to conciously object I will
however that is spelled
 
y'all will probably get to see it before everyone else does
 
@Mithical @It's snowy at your place? Any chance for a pic if so? ;)
I saw snow really few times IRL.... :/
 
@Magisch If so, would that be a legal contract between SO and the mods? I can't imagine that going over very well.
 
8:27 AM
@Mithical @Magisch we don't really have any details as of yet
 
@Shadow9 It hit freezing overnight, but no actual sticky snowfall
 
@JourneymanGeek I know
 
@rene should begin at 418
 
So no real point in speculating
 
@Mithical doesn't have to be sticky
Falling snow is also good :P
 
8:28 AM
but my best guess is that they'll make you all sign a formal nda, maybe if legal or marketing is really bold it'll also be a non disparagement clause or a indemnification clause
 
@Shadow9 !!/coffee
 
but lets not assume the worst
 
@Magisch I can't agree to a non disparagement clause
 
@Shadow9 I'm a bit too low down for that at the moment, if it's snowing it's usually snowing twenty minutes up the road, not actually by me
 
I want to act in the best interests of my communities, and that includes in some cases, calling a spade a spade.
 
8:29 AM
back when I was at minecraftforums they had all mods sign all 3 clauses, but it's not super common.
 
@Magisch if that is in there I would certainly ask what the monthly payment will be ....
sounds too much like work
 
it's definitely a valid concern
it makes sense they'd hold back elections when there's a non zero chance that newly elected mods would run for the hills when the new agreement drops
 
@rene isn't it...
!!/teapot
 
@Shadow9 No such command 'teapot'.
 
:(
@Mithical too low down? What does it mean?
 
8:35 AM
at too low an elevation for the snow to form
 
@Magisch on the other hand, well I don't think that massive moderator attrition was something that was planned for. (Even if that sometimes feels... dubious)
Also... uhm
interesting part is, there's nothing there that says I'm bound to a new version :D
 
@JourneymanGeek yeah but, put yourself into the shoes of the community team right now
 
@Magisch only 6 shoes
 
@Magisch Well, those are not great shoes to be in
 
they know they might have to drop a steamer on their mods soon with a new mod agreement everyone needs to agree to as a precondition to continuing, would you rather elect new people before or after that?
 
8:37 AM
On the other hand, they're the one part of the community I trust to at least want to act in our best interests all the time
 
in a lot of elections, people don't run if they see other more qualified candidates run. So you'd lose a lot of potential mods that way
 
@Magisch that's not always a terrible thing.
If more qualified candidates run
 
no I mean
if 4 well qualified candidates run, a 5th might not because they don't see the need. If all 4 of those object to the new mod agreement, there's no candidates left. but if the 4 knew beforehand and wouldn't run, a 5th might run because nobody else does.
 
true
but once again, we don't really know
But clearly, the damage from lack of moderation is greater than the damage of the hypothetical clauses of a moderator agreement we have not seen yet
 
true
 
8:49 AM
Wait. Are you saying we shouldn't speculate about the doom that is upon us?
That is no fun.
 
I don't get paid to have fun
:D
 
You don't get paid.
 
EXACTLY
Also, if I wanted to panic needlessly?
Coronavirus :D
 
@JourneymanGeek be like the small office dog here
deathly afraid of gusts of wind
 
@Magisch we've the most cases outside china
 
8:52 AM
we have a huge storm weather system in right now, a lot of wind. And the small office dog got blown like 10 feet by a gust
 
I live near one hotspot, work near another...
@Magisch 0_0
 
now he's afraid of wind
 
@Magisch we've had it here last evening. Near the coast it went pretty rough.
 
his owner (a coworker in the processing department) told that story this morning as an explaination for why he's suddenly terrified of wind noises
apparently he got swept by a gust yesterday evening and was quite scared by it
 
poor doggie
Just bring the dog to Scheveningen beach with the next storm. He'll be fine with wind afterwards ....
 
9:00 AM
@Alex huh? When? There wasn't really any opportunity before... unless you mean "private" meetup without SE staff? That can be fun too.
This gives me idea...
 
9:13 AM
@rene Of course you won't know where exactly he landed
 
@Magisch I'm pretty sure Ash is afraid of nothing by now, other than heights.
 
9:26 AM
@rene ShEnAnIgAn beach!?!?
I'd watch that youtube clip
 
@user1306322 ... no?
 
it looks like anchor links to this site give 404 on Firefox but work fine in Chrome
 
ah firefox, I don't have that installed
 
yea that's what I figured :D
9% represent!
 
I guess it sort of makes sense that chrome dev tools are reported as not available for another browser :)
 
9:30 AM
yea but it's on github tho
doesn't microsoft own that
 
works in safari too though, so it would be oddly targeted.
 
but I guess since Edge is now chrome-based that kinda makes sense
yea I'm gonna have to get chrome to navigate that documentation site :s
 
Main article title in a leading newspaper in Israel: "Jerusalem is colder than Sweden". :D
 
9:47 AM
in other news, fish can not only fart, but cause international military tensions by doing it
 
10:00 AM
ha ha :) Fish farts are funny.
 
My fish don't fart
 
Rob
@Magisch The fine print: "... we’ve been hesitant to hold new elections while waiting for the update out of concern that some moderators, including just-elected ones, would step down rather than agreeing to the new terms.". --- So they're only selecting specific people whom meet special requirements. If you have to "can't even write that here", well what is there to say.
 
@Rob They're holding elections
they can't select who is who
 
Rob
The rules do.
 
@Rob How do you mean? The election they're launching today is as open as any other
everyone with more then 300 rep on TWP can nominate
 
Rob
10:14 AM
You've essentially said the same thing here:
2 hours ago, by Magisch
it makes sense they'd hold back elections when there's a non zero chance that newly elected mods would run for the hills when the new agreement drops
 
yeah, thats what they originally wanted, but it didn't end up working out
so they decided against it
 
Rob
Even your top posts on TWP echo an understanding of the concept, why the how do you mean:
 
@Rob They wanted to hold back on elections. Now they've decided they can't hold back any longer, so they're holding a normal, unmodified election. They're not selecting specific people at all.
 
The elections coming up right now are completly 100% normal elections
 
JAD
nothing to see here
move along
 
10:21 AM
the reason for that is that the new mod agreement takes more time to finalize, and they don't predict it'll be ready until march. The community team seems to have made a conscious choice that the risk of having people resign after being elected is for now lower then the risk of not having enough moderators in that timespan
probably also because they want to give themselves more time to do the updated mod agreement right, and having the looming spectre of holding back elections until then is probably not helping
I said earlier I understand the train of thought that went into holding back elections until now, it's a legitimate argument, but it doesn't seem to be what they've chosen to do now, which I also understand.
they're caught between a rock and a hard place there
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog I'm also at 20k now, if you want you can ping me also for these
 
boom
 
@Magisch Good to know. I do comparatively fewer pings than the others, so might want to let them know too.
 
10:36 AM
I've noticed ...
 
10:52 AM
@Rob or more that some of those terms might not be acceptable, and its going to take time to hammer out a compromise.
cause I suspect mods quitting isn't something that's going to have good optics past a point + I don't think it makes for a healthy community
 
@Sha @Son @rene @Bart @Glo likewise, you can ping me on 20k delv-pls
 
likewise
 
status-added-too
 
I didn't know @-ping in comments in a team would give you an inbox item.
 
11:07 AM
@rene inbox is shared? Or does Teams got its own inbox?
@ArtOfCode cheers, that would make the list pretty long... :)
 
@rene Special Channels feature
 
Rob
@JourneymanGeek It's not a good idea to lead with a bunch of conditions that no one will accept and then have to drop them all and come begging. It may end up that they'll have to hire and pay big bucks, or do without. Take for example Wal-Mart, they can't hire Cashiers; so they've replaced half the checkout lanes with self-checkout. --- SE will end up lowering the thresholds again:
 
@Rob Cashiers is bad example, they're being replaced all over, regardless of their quality or what they do - they're simply not needed anymore, as whole, with the self-checkout becoming simple and cheap. Mods can't be replaced with AI just yet, maybe in 6-8 years.
 
Rob
Lower thresholds isn't AI
🚀⚗️
 
!!/AI
 
11:18 AM
@Shadow9 No such command 'ai'.
 
:(
 
Rob
With "self checkout being so cheap" they can have "self shelf stocking" too. Just bring the stuff out from the back with a forklift, dump the pallet on the floor, leave a crowbar on top of the crate ... --- Just like CostCo.
 
And? They still need security, janitors, etc.
 
@Mithical kewl!
 
@Rob actually not a bad tactic 😁
 
Rob
11:30 AM
The first was: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piggly_Wiggly and the latest scans you inside and out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Go
 
@Rob I suspect they'll want to gauge the mod community reaction thoroughly before proceeding there
the last thing they're probably looking for right now is another huge wave of resignations
might also be why the draft takes longer then expected to get to mods
 
Rob
@Shadow9 Security and Janitors aren't "employees", they're 3rd party, contracted. Bottom line is that "employees" don't get the money. The Janitorial Firm is whomever will work for the least and security only detains the elderly, Workplace Insurance won't let them confront someone whom may be armed.
 
I see that Trashcan is often used for messages from this room - and it was inactive for 13 days, so it might get frozen. Perhaps some user who has access to that room might prevent it from freezing - if it's worth keeping.
That was fast. Thanks!
 
@Rob It's a bad sign that the changes they are considering to the mod agreement are likely to lead to mods to resign. I hope that SE is simply fearing that some people won't sign that they'd enforce the Code of Conduct including the pronoun issue. But if it is some clause beyond the CoC, that would indicate something ugly
 
11:46 AM
maybe a bot could post in the trashcan every 13 days to keep the garbage hot
 
@SEisevil Informed reading of the post says that at least something about adhering to and enforcing the CoC will be in there. I don't know beyond that (and Catija doesn't say - understandably) if they'll put anything else in, but my guess is there'll be at least a formal NDA contract in there to disincentivize leaking and maybe some other industry standard clauses for volunteers.
> I sincerely hope that the new mod agreement is something that all of the current and future mods will agree to - that it’s written in a way that recognizes what moderation means on this network and that it asks moderators to agree to a set of things that aren’t onerous and takes their volunteer status into account.
The passive language in that suggests they're in a tug-of-war with legal and management over this. It could be that they want a non disparagement clause or similarly odious language in there
 
@Magisch I really doubt the NDA stuff, it just doesn't provide enough benefit for the company compared to the damage it would cause
There was one leak, and if there are more and SE doesn't like that, they'll simply stop sharing stuff in advance with the moderators.
 
I wonder if they'll make the text of mod agreement public or only available to mod-elects
 
maybe the line of thinking was that, and the CMs intervened and argued to continue sharing stuff with mods in advance, and the compromise is making mods sign a NDA
 
Rob
@SEisevil The quote from a CM that I referenced makes it sound like they are adding stuff they know people won't like. -- Don't you want Mustard or Ketchup with your Coffee?
 
11:50 AM
If I'm under 18, is an NDA even legally binding?
 
@user1306322 it always has been public
 
@user1306322 It's currently public, I don't see why that'd change.
 
@Mithical not a lawyer. but here, your parents would have to sign it
 
@Mithical you wouldn't be able to be a mod in that case, I assume
 
they might say all mods need to be > 18 though
like they've done with the survey, working groups and any other involvement
 
11:51 AM
have they previously verified 18+ age of mods?
 
@Magisch In that case I should request my diamond back quickly, so that they have to forcibly remove me... and cause another stir...
</evil>
@user1306322 No.
 
if legal is having a say in this it'll probably be 18+ only because it's not worth the money and time (to them) to design a process to get guardians to sign off
 
I became a mod at 14.
 
Thats just it isn't it. Technically speaking I'm not even sure if the current lack of a NDA complies with GDPR. If this was my company (where I advise on such matters) I would insist on a NDA before any personal data is handed over
 
Such a clause would mean no more Undos in the future.
 
11:55 AM
@Magisch That probably doesn't require an NDA, but if mods count as external to SO, something more specific like an "Auftragsdatenverarbeitungvertrag"
 
@SEisevil Yes, if you want to be precise. But not really also. An Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag (Data processing agreement - dpa) is a business - to - business level agreement
 
If PII access is a big legal issue, they probably need to create two levels of mods, with most mods not having PII access
 
for an individual <-> business level you'd be looking at a NDA
for instance we have the school research teams we work with sign a NDA, while our EDI processor has signed a DPA at my workplace
 
@Magisch I don't think an NDA would be sufficient if mods are seen as a separate entity. But you're also right that it's more B2B, and I don't think it would be feasible to make this kind of contract with volunteer mods. My strictest interpretation would essentially mean that mods can't have PII access at all
 
going into pedantic prick mode (which is what I do to prep myself for audits) it would mean each mod would have to sign a DPA through an intermediary entity (e.g the mod itself wouldn't get PII, only a LLC the mod sets up or something) but that would be super inane and stupid. I don't actually have enough caselaw knowledge or legal expertise to make an informed argument either way
 
11:59 AM
@SEisevil Rhabarberbarbarabarbarbarenbartbarbierbierbarbärbel
4
 
The other thing is that SE would also have to require mods to provide proper identification. In many cases they don't necessarily know the real name of the mod
 
true
given what they did to monica a lot of mods are probably not too keen on giving that
8
 
It doesn't make much sense to sign something with serious legal repercussions for this kind of volunteer thing.
 
> but that would be super inane and stupid.
personally I'd probably sign a standard issue NDA covering PII in particular, but not a b2b level DPA with damages and level of service provisions (like auditing and request production).
 
12:04 PM
@Magisch And the prize for the understatement of the year goes to...
I sure as hell wouldn't sign an NDA, since that would require me to enter a legal agreement with SE, sharing my real name with them. Not to mention that any company that requires its volunteers to sign NDAs (instead of ensuring these volunteers don't have access to sensitive information) isn't a company I want to volunteer for.
 
@Magisch I think anything that would create legal risk for yourself in any case except intentional misuse of PII (or maybe gross negligence as well) would be a bad idea to sign. SE doesn't even provide 2FA for accounts, you don't want to be liable in case your account is compromised, or your PC is and PII leaks that way
 
And, SE being who they have become, I refuse to give them legal weapons to use against me.
4
 
@SEisevil pretty much
 
Intentional misuse of PII is criminal anyway, so it would likely be actionable under the current agreement as well
 
the current agreement isn't even a real contract, iirc. But I'm not a lawyer so cant say either way
 
12:08 PM
@Magisch It's probably enough if I dump PII from my site and spam the users or try to sell the data. Not because of the agreement, but because I'm likely violating the law while doing these things
 
@SEisevil What could we sell though? It's not like we have access to passwords or credit cards or anything like that.
 
@terdon emails
 
@SEisevil might be, I have actually no exposure to criminal PII laws
all I know is GDPR business level stuff
 
@SEisevil ah, point
 
It's probably still possible to dump most emails from a small site as a mod, I doubt they fixed that since I resigned
 
Rob
12:15 PM
Spamming could result in up to 20 years imprisonment and >$1M in fines under US law:
The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act of 2003, signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 16, 2003, established the United States' first national standards for the sending of commercial e-mail and requires the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enforce its provisions. == History == The backronym CAN-SPAM derives from the bill's full name: Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing Act of 2003. It plays on the word "canning" (putting an end to) spam, as in the usual term for unsolicited email of this type. The bill...
 
And in the meanwhile, Israel developed anti-balloon laser weapon.
(No. Not a joke.)
 
so a high energy laser pointer?
 
That's a rather hi-tech weapon to combat a really low-tech weapon.
 
@Magisch probably, didn't check in depth. But it can't take down missiles, only balloons.
@Gimby yup. Low tech weapon with potential for big damage.
(Starting fires.)
 
@Shadow9 maybe the budget had balooned and they wanted to wrap development of it up?
;)
 
12:24 PM
So far they burned lots of fields, and one time an empty kindergarden.
If it was full..... the whole world would have heard about the war that it would start.
So both sides are lucky, in a way. :/
 
@BlueSoul Now that looks like a GDPR issue
 
@BlueSoul hmm?
 
@terdon se voluntary mods already have access to PII. They probably already have to sign some paper about it. So, if I understand your post correctly "requires its volunteers to sign NDAs instead of ensuring these volunteers don't have access to sensitive information" is already happening
 
@BlueSoul I know. I have been a mod on multiple sites for many years and still am on one, I know exactly what mods have access to :)
But they do not require me to sign ay NDA.
 
12:39 PM
even worse.
 
@BlueSoul the only agreement involved is the moderator agreement: meta.stackexchange.com/legal/moderator-agreement
 
And, obviously, the vast majority of users who don't use their real name as a username also don't share their real name when creating an account.
@BlueSoul How so? Nobody requires anyone to share their real name.
 
@terdon my real name for instance is not in my account
 
I should hope not!
 
well... since I know what you folks will say next... let's start from the end, shall we?
 
12:44 PM
yaakov knows my real name, then art, catija probably and shog
 
> Personal data is any information relating to an individual, whether it relates to his or her private, professional or public life. It can be anything from a name, a photo, an email address, bank details, your posts on social networking websites, your medical information, or your computer's IP address.
 
@BlueSoul yes?
 
personal data is only personal if you can couple it to an individual
 
Why is any of this relevant to requiring volunteers to enter legally binding contracts with a corporate entity?
(NDAs)
 
JAD
@Magisch exactly, that's why I share my e-mailaccount with multiple people. That was they can't know it was me
\s
 
12:46 PM
I think @BlueSoul is arguing that mods shouldn't have any PII access according to gdpr
 
@Magisch exactly.
 
Fine by me. I don't want PII.
 
@JAD there's a regionally differing rule but in my area any information that can be suitably tied to 10 people or less is considered personal data
the number varies in different regions in germany
 
or, to be fair, I am just arguing that based on GDPR definitions, mods already have access to PII.
 
All I'm saying is the way to do that is to make sure I don't have it, not to give it to me and then force me into a legal agreement with SE.
@BlueSoul Of course we do. Whoever said we didn't?
Granted, relatively unimportant PII, but PII regardless, yes.
 
12:48 PM
@terdon yep, exactly what I mean. They should remove that instead of even thinking about a NDA contract.
 
@BlueSoul Which is precisely what I've been saying :)
And SEisevil.
43 mins ago, by terdon
I sure as hell wouldn't sign an NDA, since that would require me to enter a legal agreement with SE, sharing my real name with them. Not to mention that any company that requires its volunteers to sign NDAs (instead of ensuring these volunteers don't have access to sensitive information) isn't a company I want to volunteer for.
In any case, an NDA would be irrelevant here. The GDPR requires user consent, and user consent is given. It also requires that the user be informed who has access to their PII, which is something SE could indeed make clearer.
 
there are legitimate use cases to have volunteers signing NDAs
when I was on the school budget committee in my school years I had to have my parents sign one on my behalf
 
However, there is no requirement for me to sign any sort of NDA in order to have access to PII. The GDPR just means that I may also be liable if I do anything inappropriate with that PII.
 
@terdon yep, I read that as if you meant that SE isn't yet giving volunteers PII access
 
@BlueSoul Oh no, on the contrary, it is but it shouldn't. Or, well, that isn't entirely true.
We do get a bit more than strictly necessary, but not much. And some of what we do have access to can be very useful in identifying socks and fraud.
But yeah, we should have better methods for that based on abstractions of the data instead of having access to the data directly, even as limited access as we have.
 
12:52 PM
@terdon which... to be fair... IMHO should be an activity best reserved to the employees...
 
@Shadow9 Why? Did Yaakov get hired recently?
 
@BlueSoul there's entirely too much socking and fraud for employees to deal with alone
 
@BlueSoul Weeelll... why? I mean, I certainly trust SE employees less than community-elected moderators. And, on a practical level, that would never work. Finding socks is complex and time consuming, having employees do that for all sites of the network isn't really feasible.
Not unless you somehow manage to automate things that are very hard to automate (fuzzy human intuition is often involved).
 
@BlueSoul which employees? There aren't enough CMs left, and even with the old numbers doing all the vote fraud investigation by CMs would have been impossible
 
@terdon eh
I got pretty far with it even as a user
but it is time consuming
 
12:54 PM
@Magisch Yes, some can be automated and yes I am thinking of your data.se query. But that, while very helpful, only scratches the surface.
 
true
 
@terdon for the simple reason that in case a) you are giving access to your email to someone that already has it from the moment you subscribed. Yep, we are talking about company and not specific person but that should suffice in that case. For volunteers instead you are giving access to my address to random, could disappear tomorrow people.
note, I don't mean that I fear the dog will send me spam but....
in the unfortunate event that a certain user manages to become mod thanks to lack of options....
considering he already managed to show his "quirks" with leaked addresses in the past....
 
@BlueSoul Sure, but that's why we have multiple emails, right? I mean, this is pretty standard every time you give your email somewhere for a new account, you are giving it to some rando online.
 
63
Q: More than 15k bottles of Viagra from Kenya, asking 110+ people for money, seriously?

iBug is disappointed in SEI received a strange mail from a well-known SE user with the following body two days ago: HALLO EVERYONE. I am writing to you from Kenya. I have recently come into contact with a great bunches of Viagras -- roughly 15,395.5 bottles worths! That's FIFTEEN THREE NINE FIVE and a half bottles. Th...

 
@BlueSoul I have deleted my account in two cases after specific mods won an election. And I have a few times told SE employees that they should just nuke my account in case Evan wins one, if they would actually give him the diamond (it was never clear to me whether SE would do that or not)
 
12:59 PM
But, anyway, you're preaching to the choir. I would far, far prefer to have tools that let me investigate fraud based on PII without actually showing me the PII. You could, for example, just convert the user's email to some random string and show me that.
 
@terdon which is again "not giving out the PII in the first place"
 
Yes. Which, everyone agrees, is the best option.
 
For what I care, they could even implement a "does user A have the same email address / IP / whatever as user B" feature.
but there is no need to disclose the email or other data in the first place.
 
exact algorithms of those tools would have to be obscured from mods to prevent possibility of reverse-engineering them and figuring out the actual PII
who's got time for that
 
@user1306322 the obscurity would just be the fact that you give out no data. You just answer a question without sharing the internal state
You don't need to be showed an "encoded" email.
You ask if User A has same email as User B
The system replies "yes" or "no". No other info is shared with you.
 
1:03 PM
I mean potentially you could misuse the tools like this: create multiple accounts with emails known to you, use the tool to match these accounts with the target account's email, see what the tool says, if it's a very close match then you can figure out that target email
 
@BlueSoul You do, actually, since you will often not know userB. Showing an encoded email would be fine and helpful.
 
puzzling would have a field day with these tools
 
@user1306322 you don't tell "how close" it is. The answer is a boolean, yes or no.
 
@BlueSoul but telling how close it is is super helpful for fraud investigations
especially for telling conflict of interests or affiliations
 
@BlueSoul even so, you can test for exact matches to identify the users you are targeting
 
1:05 PM
@user1306322 Very often you don't actually find exact matches.
 
same domain, no info. Similar username........
 
Thats a lot of dev time you're proposing to be put to work on that
probably not realistic
 
we can ask Yaakov :p
 
yep, it would be so informative to know that the name is similar to "superM4rio74"
 
Teaching a machine that "mike_jones" "mikey" "jonesy" and "michael jones" are simlar is very hard to do but is trivial for a human.
 
1:08 PM
@terdon this takes maybe a couple weeks :p
just hire people with appropriate experience
 
@user1306322 I very much doubt that.
 
@Alex no, Yaakov became... involved (?) only recently, after the Monica drama started and Meta was on fire.
 
a dictionary of common names, conjugated forms, doesn't sound very hard
 
Especially if you need to work with different scripts (alphabets) and cultural norms. For instance, I might know that "Pucho Montaña" is the same name as "Jose Maria Mountain" but I couldn't explain that to a computer.
 
@Shadow9 Slightly before.
71
A: Let's take a look at the interaction between staff and the "power users" of the network

Yaakov EllisI saw this post, and wanted to chime in. As I haven't officially introduced myself, my name is Yaakov Ellis, and I am a developer on the Community Dev team. Before that I was Team Lead for the Internal Dev team at Stack, and have been working here for nearly six years. As you can see from my user...

 
1:09 PM
@terdon you couldn't :p
 
@user1306322 Extrapolate that to the hundreds of languages and cultures on SE...
 
@user1306322 what we are willing to risk >>> probability that an ex mod will sue us > probability of actual GDPR issues ===> keep as is.
 
sure, I'm just talking hypotheticals without regard of what's probably going to happen
to highlight the amount of effort it could possibly involve
 
I don't have high expectations for SE on this kind of privacy issues, especially after nothing happened with my complaint about the mass export of emails that is possible as a mod
 
You'd have to know things like "Μήτσος == Δημήτρης" or "James == Ιάκωβος" or "Francisco == Paco", you'd have to know that "michael@foo.com" is similar to "jordan@foo.com". These are really non trivial to do for machines.
 
1:12 PM
I don't actually think they're gonna overengineer the tools like that
 
@Mithical oh, yeah. Well, now we know why no CM could step in.
(direct orders from up above)
 
well, back to browsing the SE leaks I am. Ping if ye need me.
 
Just to give you an idea, @user1306322, here's how complicated even a seemingly trivial task of natural language processing is:
5
Q: Frequency of words in non-English language text: how can I merge singular and plural forms etc.?

user44370I'm sorting French language words in some text files according to frequency with a focus on insight rather than statistical significance. The challenge is about preserving accented characters and dealing with the article forms in front of vowels(l', d') in the context of shaping word tokens for s...

 
No task in NLP seems trivial to me :P
 
exactly
 
1:50 PM
@terdon personally, I would not and have not in the past approached complex guessing algos with a one-line regular expression lol
yea each language takes a separate approach
it's a complex task, but not impossible
thankfully I don't work there anymore so that's not my problem these days
I have made a grave mistake of drinking real coffee for the first time in many years
"I am once again asking for your intestinal support"
 
hashing emails or otherwise obfuscating would hurt finding some types of sockputtetry. eg jimbob@gmail, jim_bob1234@yahoo.com, jimmyb9876@hotmail.com and jbob@companyname.com These all look like the same person to an eyeball check, but linking them as similar via code would be a tricky problem at best
 
@DanisFiddlingbyFirelight the guy that took the time to use different addresses for different socks hopefully would be smart enough to use names that don't look similar to each other....
 
2:27 PM
@BlueSoul I'd expect a lot of 1st time sockers to just reuse the email addresses they already have; and only try being sneaky after their first set of accounts all get ban hammered
 
@DanisFiddlingbyFirelight I guess I have too much faith in the average bad user intelligence then.
 
2:45 PM
Ryan Donovan on February 10, 2020
One thing we continuously speak about in the programming community is impostor syndrome and how to cope with it, but no one talks about tangible steps on how to solve it within yourself. What if instead of learning how to endure, we learned how to cure it? While It’s something that happens to everyone at […]
 
@Feeds Imposter syndrome... Deku?
 
I have faith in infinite stupidity, laziness, and arrogance. Starting from the assumption that "no one will catch me using sock puppets" taking the time to create new email addresses for socks instead of just recycling ones the cheater already has makes perfect sense. I wouldn't be surprised if a significant fraction of bad socks are in the form of user+1@gmail, user+2@gmail, etc.
 
Rob
Feeds is not all-knowing:
Jan 22 at 19:13, by Feeds
"Actually, Jupiter already has a very impressive ring system!" --someone who knows Jupiter is within earshot
 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (3477 days earlier)      last day (1530 days later) »