@OrangeDog The ultimate corporate world: 911 does not accept friend requests but most operators do, and 911 is friends with operators. Get ready to pay $$$$ to your operator to contact 911
honestly if you're not using an ad blocker as any kind of internet browsing user, you're doing yourself a disservice and putting yourself at an unnecessary risk of cross-site tracking and feeding the ad corporations your interests for free
We do intend to display animated ads on Stack Exchange. However, jarring and wiggling ads will be blocked and removed from our properties. Thank you for reporting.
@Sklivvz nobody who claims that deserves trust lol
you can't expect good from a profit-oriented business, ever. Look around, look in the news -- environment issues, political conflicts, censorship, in some countries incarceration is even done for profit. It's a sad state of affairs but the world is slowly changing. Also don't actually go on any news sites today if you're not feeling well already :)
I'm wondering how much of how Wikipedia is governed can be adapted into a new, better version of SE network
If they manage to completly scare it off or, to say it in more succinct words make us "remove our problematic selves", then a lot of reasons why SE works cease to function
@user1306322 Wikipedia does have some interesting approaches. For instance, they can issue topic bans and interaction bans (sort of like judicial restraining orders).
If an admin (of which there are various kinds) cannot resolve a dispute then there's a "supreme court" with a pretty formal process, tons of case law, etc.
@OrangeDog yet they recently banned and desysopped someone completly bypassing the arbcom process and dispute resolution processes because that someone ran afoul of the spouse of one of the board members
some 40 admins resigned at wikipedia over it, and the community elected board members had to pitch a fit to cause the T&S team to agree their case files could be reviewed by arbcom
and all of arbcom had to threaten to resign in an open letter
also this: meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/… is a strategy paper from one of the working groups that details a proposed pivot to a more top down decision model and the implementation of a code of conduct across all projects
In the end, everything was resolved somewhat amicably. The admin in question got unbanned but not reinstated as an admin (and a petition to the community to be reinstated got denied, so he has come to terms with the fact that his behavior was not up to standards).
Effective today, all Subscriber Content on Stack Overflow and the Stack Exchange network will be available under the terms of version 4.0 of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license.
This change follows our last Terms Of Service (ToS) update where we inadvertently introduce...
@OrangeDog I suppose my contributions since that announcement would be under 4.0, but prior ones are still 3.0, as I did not explicitly receive a relicensing request and therefore could not agree to it, which I wouldn't anyway.
@SébastienRenauld as I said in a Meta post, the Google Ads platform does indeed provide age and content category filtering. You just have to actually enable them.
also, how funny is that -- promised not to ship on Fridays anymore, but picked the next closest day that isn't on weekend? That's straight out of a comedy show
All they need to do is track the license of each comment/post and ask people to bulk-relicense their stuff when logging in. Editing a post creates a derivative work which can be licensed under the new CC (upgrading it on the spot), but older revisions might be a problem.
@OrangeDog nah people have already voiced their concern about the network misrepresenting them by "editing words into their mouths" (I get that was a joke but it's something people think has merit, and there is this counter-argument to that)
@SébastienRenauld "You may Distribute or Publicly Perform an Adaptation only under the terms of: (i) this License; (ii) a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License; (iii) a Creative Commons jurisdiction license (either this or a later license version) that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g., Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 US)); (iv) a Creative Commons Compatible License."
What I'm doing:
I'm adapting a work licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported license to a different language.
I'm indicating the original work and its license.
I'm indicating that I have made changes to it.
Can I release my modified version of the license under CC BY-SA 4.0 or do I have to licens...
Update (Dec. 22, 2015): Thanks, everyone, for your feedback to this proposal. We're going to digest this one over the holidays and should have a follow-up announcement answering your questions and addressing your concerns after the new year. We won't be making any hurried decisions on this top...
I'm majorly looking forward to a brand new society and legal code being formed on Mars and Moon colonies in the future, it's gonna be interesting what they come up with. Perhaps it could be a "be nice" policy mediated by a reasonably intelligent AI
@user1306322 Based on past experience, the only way I see this blowing up in the media is someone creating a twitter storm or forwarding it to Vice, Vox, or Gizmodo.
I'm resigning as a Stack Overflow Moderator.
Thank you to everyone who has worked hard to make this Q&A site what it is.
I'm resigning for three reasons:
Stack Overflow Inc. has forgotten how to lead, how to persuade, and how to talk with the community. This has been a slow decline since 2014...
@M.A.R. depends, if you look at what Jeff and Joel were originally trying to make then yes I would have believed you. Because what's happening is in direct conflict with the platform's original intent
yeah, but that was the only time I remember seeing the community at large arguing with the moderators or moderators public arguing with each other (and staff publicly arguing with moderators)
@DavidA I have a public facing job and its why I had to change my username and picture (I used to trust that being active on SE was a positive but not since last year)
@JourneymanGeek yeah, I'm not saying it contributed. I'm saying that I'm not surprised just because of how tired all the mods must be (and esp. SO mods due to my involvement in that site)
yeah, just this one did not surprise me (personally). There are a lot of reasons tiring people out and I just happened to be involved in that one (of many - I just remember it getting heated between users and moderators and that's rare for me to see)
George gives his reasons and I respect them (not arguing that it was that or that it was even handled badly ---- just one more reason to be tired out really)
bleh, soo much I've left unsaid over the past few weeks as I've watched the bridges to the community get systematically burned one by one, in effect with the CMs standing on them.
@Mgetz for all that's happened, I still think that the CMs are the one bright spark, and the only reason the network got to where it is, or could survive
@Mgetz They could probably fix most of the big stuff in 2-3 weeks with enough support. Give a good answer to the CC changes backed up by legal, handle the pissed off mods...
@JourneymanGeek yes but until they stop getting undermined, nothing they do is going to matter. We the community need to be able to know that they won't get undercut and that they have the authority to manage they community as appropriate.
The point stands, we the community might support our CMs. But if the CMs are trying to stand on ground that's constantly shifting it's a losing proposition for all involved.
I'm really sorry to see you go. It's difficult for me to envision the office without you.
I'm also sorry that you feel the way you do about the proposed procedures. They're still open for feedback, we've got the condensed text versions to clear up some ambiguities in the charts ready to go out ...
hmm...wish I had more than bold or italics for emphasis on comments (tends to either look like shouting or just blend in too much) - way low priority I know but I just noticed it
> I hate how everything happened too. I've been literally sick about it for the last few weeks, but it is also a very rare anomaly when it comes to moderation here. It is very rare that a moderator is asked to step down for reasons other than vanishing