@Snow I agree with the idea, I reject how it's expressed as non inclusive.

← 1 message moved from Tavern on the Meta

At least it provides for a good game of spot the assholes

@CaldeiraG muito obrigado pela sua revisao

← 2 messages moved from Tavern on the Meta

@OptimusPrime please don't

← 1 message moved from Tavern on the Meta

:7941820 it was her first MSE post. Possibly also the last.

← 2 messages moved from Tavern on the Meta

@peterh dosen't matter

Does it matter? Is it anybody's business?

@JourneymanGeek My workplace experience says, yes it does

@peterh It dosen't matter

← 6 messages moved from Tavern on the Meta

← 1 message moved from Tavern on the Meta

@AndrasDeak The only reason to avoid the ban, if I remain inactive. But it is practically the same, as if I would be banned.

@PaulWhite For example, that I was banned for an innocent question. I was banned by a narrow group of internet users on an on-the-spot created reason. This on-the-spot created reason is clearly to defend one of the top3 dirtiest hostility in the history of the SE network. Roughly this.

@AndrasDeak There is yet another problem: 1) I did not attack anybody personally. 2) You actually don't need to lie about me to ban me. | So you could simply ban me for anything, isn't it?

← 3 messages moved from Tavern on the Meta