« first day (3347 days earlier)      last day (1666 days later) » 

11:00 AM
Jeff & Joel are gone. There are a few people around from back then, but... no one in the positions of power is listening.
And I am talking about the company here, not the community.
 
Frankly it sucks seeing former employees react to this and the animated ads and stuff. Feels like it really is a brave new era.
 
Promises were made
... to be broken.
 
Brave?? Won't call it like that.
 
And honestly I can't blame the current batch for all the problems
I'd love to 😁😁😁😁
 
Brave new world, eh?
Need to go read that book again.
 
11:01 AM
@Oded uhm
What can be done about that?
 
oh
 
@JourneymanGeek by us? Probably nothing
 
@JourneymanGeek apart from what you have been doing? Not much. And I don't believe that a mass mod exodus will change anything - things are fundementaly broken.
 
11:03 AM
The people in charge are no longer people who believe in the mission that Jeff had. Or the background Joel has - and his understanding of the developer community at large.
6
 
@Oded no
But there's literally nothing else we can do
 
I do think it will take time for things to change if that does happen.
 
A significant part of the issue is people feel powerless
 
@JourneymanGeek because they are
 
Both in the community and the company.
 
11:05 AM
I'm afraid premium membership is closer than ever. That's the only thing that can save SE, financially, and now that they have no obligations to ancient rules made by long gone managers, they have nothing to stop them.
 
@Oded I don't know how that can be fixed
 
@Shadow nah, that's what the ruined front page is for
 
@Shadow It's called teams :P
 
@AndrasDeak Not enough
 
@AndrasDeak the front page dosen't matter
 
11:06 AM
@Oded if Teams was a success they wouldn't be allowing the evil ads. I think.
 
@JourneymanGeek sometimes things are just broken and stay that way. Relationships come to mind.
 
The cc 4.0 dosen't matter
 
@JourneymanGeek shows intent
 
@JourneymanGeek nor do I. If mods go, trash will accumulate. In time, they will see that it is not sustainable. But only if most mods stop modding.
 
Trust matters
 
11:06 AM
@Shadow you underestimate VC greed.
 
@Oded yeah
 
hmm
 
@JourneymanGeek and it will take time. Months.
 
Still, I have a feeling Teams isn't giving them the money they need.
 
@JourneymanGeek and that shows how out of touch they are with the community
 
11:07 AM
I have no insight into the company financials.
 
@Shadow they changed the pricing model recently...
 
@AndrasDeak yeah saw something too.
 
Could be both a good and a bad sign
 
If there was a way to estimate the number of teams, you'd have an idea.
 
@AndrasDeak yup
 
11:08 AM
It's free for small teams...so probably a bad sign
 
user194636
Teams generates easy ongoing cash, with a lock-in, and no moderation overhead.
To sell the most Teams to the most people, SO needs to be seen to be a place for everyone.
All else is detail.
 
Anyhow - I need to go get lunch. Laters
 
And that's where we need to start
 
@Oded have a good one :)
 
@JourneymanGeek in lunch?
;)
 
11:11 AM
@Shadow by getting in touch with the community
 
@Paul and that's the core mistake. Same way nothing can be 100% perfect, it's impossible to have a place that treats everyone equally. If you treat one section better, other section will be mistreated.
 
I think folks in the CM team know what I feel lol
 
Some must compromise. and that's what they failed to see.
 
@Shadow uhm
I disagree
So I had a talk about this with folks in my community
And well we are not the most PC bunch
 
@Shadow fallacy. It could treat everyone equally badly
You can treat everyone fairly
 
user194636
11:13 AM
@Shadow Maybe, maybe not. Depends whether you see it as a zero-sum or not. It is possible SO see the traditional Q & A model as saturated - little prospect for growth. To grow, they need different groups to participate more than they have in the past. These groups might include coding beginners, for example.
 
@PaulWhite and yet the experience folks have is shaped by who we have now
I gained a lot from the kindness and patience of more experienced users
 
user194636
@JourneymanGeek To a large extent, yes. But "who we have now" can change, and change at different rates.
 
That's true
 
user194636
Ultimately, if all one is interested in is volume, it makes little sense to pay much attention to a tiny group on meta, or volunteer mods.
 
user194636
I have no idea whether any of that is true. It is plausible to me. They will never state such strategy publicly of course.
 
user194636
11:19 AM
My perception is that Teams rescued a business model that was teetering on the brink of collapse.
 
user194636
And there's a reason Teams is only integrated with SO. That's where everyone is.
 
@PaulWhite sigh
That's kinda what the old marketing team felt as well I suspect
 
user194636
I don't mean to sound cynical, if I do. I am attempting to be realistic.
 
And got us into this mess
@PaulWhite honestly if I cannot believe smaller sites and meta matters... I'm done
 
@PaulWhite reality is cynical. ;)
 
11:23 AM
There is nothing left for me here
 
user194636
Oh I'm sure SO prefer to have the wider network, just so long as it doesn't cost too much, or cause too much trouble.
 
@JourneymanGeek matters to us. Meta explicitly doesn't matter to them
 
@AndrasDeak meta is pointless if all we do is tilt at windmills
 
user194636
TPTB regard meta as unrepresentative and unconstructive. They may be right.
 
Ugh
 
11:25 AM
@AndrasDeak I am aware of that. But changing viewpoints is hard and needs patience
 
user194636
If a company engages data scientists and private research programmes, why would they listen to meta over those inputs?
 
@JourneymanGeek it also needs openness, an intent of wanting to change
 
@AndrasDeak assume good intent?
 
If hypothetically they are dead set on their views nothing matters
 
user194636
Tim has stated as much.
 
11:26 AM
I don't think Sara wants this place to burn to the ground
 
@JourneymanGeek good intent doesn't include humility
 
@AndrasDeak it does not
 
@JourneymanGeek really?
 
@JourneymanGeek and I heard they wanted to shut meta down and only CMs' please prevented that
 
11:28 AM
@Shadow everyone here is acting as they feel is best.
 
user194636
Why would a Director of Public Q & A want to see Public Q & A burn to the ground?
 
@Shadow folks are overwhelmed
 
user194636
Sunsetting meta would not surprise me in the least.
The company would simply provide something "better".
 
They have good intent. Toward the "oppressed". If your premise is "meta is toxic, just like April said" then good intent doesn't cover catering to the wants of the sealions
 
:7940432 Sorry, that was a misclick :\
 
11:29 AM
@PaulWhite not Q&A. Meta.
 
@AndrasDeak uhm
 
Yes?
 
user194636
@AndrasDeak Oh right then see my "sunsetting" comment.
 
Even April is doing what she feels is right
Which is why attacking her is dumb
 
@JourneymanGeek my point exactly. Good intent.
 
11:30 AM
@JNat ouch it stings ;)
 
And here in hurting others we hurt ourselves
 
Nah, I'm good
 
user194636
One can still mess things up rather badly with good intentions.
 
Well, I can totally see a "Sorry to see you go" blog post after they shut down MSE and all meta sites.
 
11:31 AM
To be clear it's not about April, nor Sara. It's about a mindset on which they seem to be.
 
@Shadow and that's something that we need to work to prevent
 
@PaulWhite not the Q&A sites, just the meta sites where people can complain or disagree with the company decisions.
2
 
@AndrasDeak and yet...
 
And yet it's easier to explain the mindset this way.
 
By taking this line encourage both the intolerant and those who hate us
 
11:33 AM
I don't tolerate intolerance, and those who hate us can't be pushed further away. We're deep in alea iacta est territory
 
Imagine if someone said how toxic we were
 
Toxic is so 2018
 
And all the voices replying disagreed 😁
 
@JourneymanGeek *when
 
user194636
@Shadow Certainly, which is why I said SO would likely sell the death of meta as a positive. A better feedback mechanism open to everyone, and refreshingly private.
 
11:35 AM
That moment has not come
@PaulWhite I would have no say there
 
@PaulWhite *"the murder of meta" (how meta)
 
user194636
@JourneymanGeek You'd have exactly as much say as everyone else 😀
 
@PaulWhite they'll keep the contact us open, so people can still report bugs or ask for urgent things to be done.
 
user194636
I would expect an exciting programme of outreach using multiple media formats. Or somesuch.
 
The best irony would be if Contact Us got overrun with homework dumps as a result of meta closing down.
 
11:37 AM
You know what... after some thought... in the current state of things.... I would not be surprised a bit if they shut down all meta sites including MSE.
 
user194636
For sure.
 
@JohnDvorak surely many people will do it on purpose as revenge, but it's just childish.
Those who read the emails and have to handle them are not the problem.
 
user194636
There will be no shortage of internal people and external consultancies telling SO how they can gather genuinely useful feedback much more effectively than meta.
3
 
@PaulWhite and nowhere to say it 😆
 
user194636
@JourneymanGeek Jeff Atwood has a solution for that, I hear
 
11:43 AM
@PaulWhite uservoice? 😁😁😁😁
 
user194636
ha!
 
Twitter, duh
 
Controversial option. People have a rose tinted view of the Atwood era
 
user194636
I don't think that's terribly controversial. Can't argue with the success though.
 
user194636
Name SO's main competitors.
 
11:45 AM
@JourneymanGeek Probably. And boundary conditions were different.
 
@PaulWhite quora
 
user194636
@JohnDvorak LMAO
 
@JourneymanGeek and yet...
 
user194636
Seriously I can't breathe
 
@PaulWhite freelance programmers for hire
 
11:46 AM
Yahoo Answers
 
user194636
dies
 
the hyphen site, maybe?
 
user194636
I understood that referecne
 
thumbs up
 
8 messages moved to Chimney
 
11:57 AM
you tried ;)
 
There's a bit of a spam wave at the moment, so there might be bit of smoke in here.
 
I didn't notice
 
Smokey is delayed by 30 minutes due to chat rate limit
 
I'm trying to see what can be done, FYI
 
Not sure how the 15-minute intentional delay into this room interacts with the unintentional one
 
12:00 PM
about this spam flood, that is
 
@JNat thanks
 
@JNat and here I thought you were going to fix the other issue ;)
 
singlehandedly, yes ;)
 
the best way!
 
@JNat We believe in you...
 
12:21 PM
Oo
 
2 messages moved to Chimney
4 messages moved to Chimney
1 message moved to Chimney
really need to practice more with the manual move list, sorry
 
@rene Need to get Makyen to write you a userscript ;)
 
@PaulWhite becuase data driven is quantitative, not qualitative.
It can tell you something will drive more traffic, but not tell if the user experience will be nicer.
 
it can tell you if something is 1.2 welcoming
 
Imo the tech industry is in a bit of a data driven craze right now
 
12:31 PM
@AndrasDeak No. It can tell you that 20% more traffic/people are coming, but it doesn't tell you how welcome they feel when they are on the site.
 
user194636
smokey in here
 
user194636
(yes I know, spam wave)
 
One lesson I did learn from my years at SO is - popular != good
 
user194636
popular as in meta reception? or?
 
not necessarily
the company has been working based on "popular for external viewers", in any case
 
12:34 PM
4 messages moved to Chimney
 
user194636
many things have changed quite fundamentally in a short period of time
 
user194636
plus ça change
 
given the fact that there always is resistance to change ...
 
@PaulWhite not really, we're just acknowledging them now
 
user194636
I'm just stating my perception
 
12:42 PM
My perception is one long rooted in seeing an attitude towards the userbase that's existed for a long time. This is just the first time it's hit a wider section of the network
 
@rene most people would've supported the change for being nicer, if it hadn't kicked off with that blog post
(and then followed down exactly along it)
and the remaining people who wouldn't have supported it; well, they were the problem
 
@Shadow I've said this for awhile, they could effectively have something just as effective with a FAQ curated by the CMs/Mods
@AndrasDeak They were the existing users, the high rep experts that the site depended on in many cases.
 
12:58 PM
Wait ... there is an @Oded in here? What year is this?
 
@AndrasDeak maybe the strategy is to shake-off some participants?
 
@Oded That's so true! I've read arguments that it's wiser to stay silent and I agree - but that's just one point of view. But it would be the right thing to do (a real reply, not just some canned messages like the ones a staff member copy-pasted) and show that at least somewhat care about the people making SE worth visiting, even if it got downvoted into oblivion. And because it is the right thing to do, I doubt they will respond, opting to sit it out instead.
 
@rene but their aim is way off...
 
@rene As best I can tell that seems to be entirely the intention. Or at least to get them to change behavior away from what the site taught them to do originally.
 
@Mgetz you're probably misreading me
 
1:00 PM
@AndrasDeak no I'm providing a viewpoint that isn't necessarily obvious if you haven't had a longer term look at the problem
 
Okay
 
@rene No, not even that. I doubt they consider any volunteer important enough to actively want to get rid off them. We are interchangeable. One leaves, others come here. Doesn't matter. The only exception would be Jon Skeet...
 
@rene thought about that a couple days ago, but didn't dare to write. :/
 
well, I formulated it as a question on purpose as I can only guess as much as anyone else can.
 
@AnneDaunted honestly staying silent is just as bad
There is no 'easy' solution
 
1:06 PM
@john ditto, trying to ask that as a meta question will just come off as trying to be a troll. So I haven't bothered.
 
user351483
I think there's enough Meta questions now.
 
No way they'd answer that. Nobody would and should.
 
@Mgetz FAQ can't accept bug reports, which is crucial part of the meta sites.
 
@Shadow create a separate JIRA/Bugzilla etc. Or just have a submit bug button.
 
@Mgetz I don't mind being considered a troll, but I don't want to bring more gasoline to the fire.
 
1:07 PM
@AnneDaunted could be. It can be economical to optimize for short and high throughput instead of long and slow refresh rates.
 
(But that doesn't mean I don't have a bit of fun in watching this mess).
 
@AnneDaunted staying quite invites speculation. And that's not good for anyone.
@Bart 👋🏼
 
@Oded I still guess that's their strategy. They just wait until we forget about it or the upset people left.
 
For a company that claims to care about people (improve the lives of developers), that's not a great attitude.
 
user194636
@rene I think it's more likely acceptable collateral damage
 
1:16 PM
@john 🍿
 
well specifically this shitstorm reeks of "if you dare defy us you'll be shown the door"
 
I guess their vision for SO is to become some kind of debugging help until it becomes so useless that no one cares about it. In the future, when an SO question shows up in your search results, you will have learned by then that it doesn't contain useful advice, but is just another guy having forgotten a curly brace.
 
@AndrasDeak correction: "you'll be forced out"
 
user194636
yesterday, by ArtOfCode
Simplified: "I think us doing something, in a way that was going to cause backlash, has violated people's expectations. We did it anyway, and that's significant. We're sticking by our actions, and that's also significant. When people take significant actions [like the one Aza took] we want them to be able to see that we've responded in the best way possible."
 
it is a power game and a community has a lot of power but not the ultimate power. That is for the company. Now you're not supposed to use that power but once you do there is no way back. Do note that you can never exercise that power again. That is what brought us here.
 
1:22 PM
@Shadow "shown the door" is just euphemism for "forced out", yes?
 
@rene It needn't and shouldn't be a power game. They haven't understood that such a community is an asset not an obstacle.
 
No, they love the community. They just don't think any of the community channels represent the community.
 
user194636
by the same token, parts of the community that don't act like an asset (over a period time) aren't really an asset at all
 
and they don't obey the community in any way, including feature requests, but that's nothing new
 
@AnneDaunted I beg to differ. They haven't understood ... SE is an Anglo-American business. I yet have to see a business / management that don't assume they have the ultimate power in the end.
 
1:27 PM
@AndrasDeak oh. Well, I'd imagine it more as "pushed out gently". ;)
 
@AndrasDeak yeah, I think that is a fair analysis and that is something we can only blame ourselves for.
 
@rene I'm not disputing that they have the power (or don't assume that).
 
@rene meh
 
@AndrasDeak language!
Also uhm
So there's different ways to deal with conflict
I often find folks are often a lot more confrontational in some cultures than others
And our concepts of what sort of power matters varies
 
@AnneDaunted I think they are frustrated the community has become an obstacle instead of changing to meet their needs and desires. To me this is because they haven't been clear on what they really want from a high level vision perspective. This is something we've been asking for now for years.
3
 
1:38 PM
@Mgetz I agree. And I guess they aren't clear because they themselves have no clue which way to go. But I'm not sure the community is that much of an obstacle. Furthermore, they play(ed) their part by treating the community they did and do.
Let's take the relicensing, for example. They suddenly announce that change. Instead, they could have informed the community beforehand and even gotten feedback. For sure, they could ignore it and make the change anyway, but they could also profit from feedback. The way they did it didn't really make the community shut up about it, did it? It was rather the opposite...
 
Dated 03 Feb 2012
 
Hi @Oded :)
 
👋🏼
 
user351483
Asking for feedback implies that the community has an input into the change. But asking if there's any questions up-front doesn't neccessarly imply the same thing. As in "Here's an upcoming change, do you folks have questions about it before we put it in place?"
 
there's someone in Spanish.SE vandalizing their own answers :/
 
user351483
1:45 PM
@Oded The irony of the next blog post: "Farewell Stack Exchange"
 
21
A: Would you use "llamarse" for an animal's name?

guifaSelf deleting a bad answer. Of course you can

 
@AnneDaunted can you show me any change announced in any sort of way, which made the community go "Ah, well, we have nothing to say on that" ... ;)
 
@Snow It's a subtle distinction... yes... but sometimes asking the right questions helps the authors come to a realization that there's some confusion about the change that they need to clear up before the change is made. In that sense, asking if there are questions can lead to substantial change in what is released.
 
@john moderators are already aware of it. And it's pointless anyway. Rollbacks are their future :D
 
user351483
@Catija Yes, and prepares people for that change, and helps them understand it.
 
1:48 PM
@Bart I proposed it (rollback) before pasting here :D
 
@AnneDaunted ironically I think this is a bad example, they incurred this issue by making a mistake on the site and linking to the wrong license. The change was IMHO dictated by lawyers rather than anything intentional.
 
Ah, is this person pissed off by this stuff.
 
@john the one who reported deleted answer?
 
@Oded Must've been a completely different site back then with Jeff. They made huge steps backward since then.
 
@Shadow Aye, I read the nickname matching.
 
1:52 PM
Rage quit in 3... 2... 1...
Well the answer did contain abusive language, but wasn't undeleted even after it was edited out, so dunno.
Guess it's now too late anyway. /cc @JNat
 
@AnneDaunted to an extent. I never worked with him, but hearng about him - he wasn't pleasant to work with...
 
I assume he at least responded to feedback, even if by shouting and yelling at you. ;)
 
My favorite response has been "This is why you don't deploy changes on a Friday"
 
"This change sucks! How dare you suggest it!1!!!!" goes to make the change
 
@Shadow It seems that the new staff also responds to feedback - by firing volunteers.
 
1:56 PM
hehe it's not common to see you being so sarcastic, @Anne
 
And sulking.
 
@Shadow I didn't read it carefully but smelled quite a bit like a passive agressive blatant request for moderation.
 
The shitstorm appears to reach far and high.
@john there was "screw yourself" in the answer, that's enough for a red flag, on any site.
Issue is: 1) It was added later by other user, and 2) It was edited out and yet answer was not undeleted.
 
Was too large to read it completely, but I found a few things to fix. That's the thing in posts that large. :)
 
I feel bad for any SE employees who came back from vacation this week.
 
1:58 PM
That's what I read, at least.
 
@Shadow the Spanish mods had pinged me a few minutes back. But thanks
 
@JNat cheers, counting on your decisions.
 
@Snow Change is a complicated ball of yarn to unroll. For some people, they'll poke at it and only make it into a snarled mess. For others, they can unroll it into a beautiful sweater by intentionally knotting it in special ways. Most of us are somewhere in the middle.
 
410
Knitting does look like a good solution to the problem.
More of SE users should take it up.
 
Where is @Tinkeringbell when you need her to knit or crochet?
 
2:04 PM
Being a rather small parrot, I hope she wasn't sucked into the shitstorm and stuck inside... :(
She has lots of inner power though, so I don't worry. :D
 
@410 Either that or just sit back and keep watching as SE turns more and more into Yahoo Answers with a cooler name.
 
@Shadow "Look, that individual has been tarred and feathered ... wait a minute ... that's not tar ..."
 
tar is black
@Tink with glowing power ^
 
@Shadow Ah, a neon genesis for Tink
 
:)
 
410
2:07 PM
@AnneDaunted That's boring. There surely are better ways to use the newly available free time Me, I'm way more up to date on motor sports than I was a year ago.
 
@AnneDaunted it won't be Yahoo Answers! until it will have 6000-8000 questions with same title and same answers.
 
410
And the reading list is moving along faster.
 
2:38 PM
Smokey, are you also going to take a break from reporting spam, to make a point?
 
@Shadow I'd be interested to see if someone can put together a duped question query that collapses all the dupes down by parent (potentially recursively) to see what questions on SO are duped the most. My guess is this is probably it
 
That would add spam right into the shitstorm, making it even more yucky.
 
@Mgetz still, the volume of dupes on Yahoo! Answers is terrible. Small example from their non programming section: once visited their Health section. 90% of the questions were the same, though with somewhat different title. That made me realize I have nothing to do there.
 
@Shadow Oh I believe it, I suspect the dupe count is probably higher on another question but it's hard to know guess as I'm not good at SEDE. Also those are probably only questions closed as exact dupe not near dupe
 
2:43 PM
@Mgetz C++: Boy, we have a lot of undefined reference dupes. Java: Hold my beer
 
@Mgetz but note they're closed. On Yahoo, they're all open, and all getting whole new, similar, answers.
That's order vs. chaos
 
@Shadow better question: is closing a question for a new user as duplicate hostile?
 
(quality aside)
 
@Mgetz "parse error" sounds like as common as "undefined reference"
 
@Mgetz not at all
It's basic moderation act.
 
2:44 PM
@Shadow Check the hacker news thread, a LOT of complaints about it.
 
@Mgetz too bad. That's really basic. That's like house cleaning. If people want to reach a dirty place that's their problem.
Issue is whether all the dupe closures are correct or not. That I can't know.
 
@Shadow so this gets back to the core issue of "What type of site does SE (and thus SO) want to be?"
 
@Shadow You disappoint me. I thought you knew all
 
@Shadow anecdotally they're all wrong
 
Maybe a better Reopen review is in order, to make those who oppose dupe closure feel better.
@Mgetz these days? Site that makes money first, and nothing else matters.
In the olden days? Site for serious Q&A.
 
user351483
 
@Shadow Yet another reason I think SE should largely (but not completely) transition to a foundation model
 
@Snow more nonsense
 
user351483
Sometimes humour helps.
 
user351483
At least to dispel some tension.
 
@john The reporters name is wrong it should be "Tom Cruise"
 
2:54 PM
@Mgetz I don't get that :/
 
"The Minority Report" is a 1956 science fiction short story by American writer Philip K. Dick, first published in Fantastic Universe. In a future society, three mutants foresee all crime before it occurs. Plugged into a great machine, these "precogs" allow a division of the police called Precrime to arrest suspects before they can commit any actual crimes. When the head of Precrime, John Anderton, is himself predicted to murder a man whom he has never met, Anderton is convinced a great conspiracy is afoot. The story reflects many of Philip K. Dick's personal Cold War anxieties, particularl...
 
ah ya, ya. :D
 
@Mgetz hmm depends on what they want
Do they want to ask a question or get an answer?
 
@JourneymanGeek in my experience they want debugging help, not to know that there is a generic solution
 
Hey there, it's been a while! Anything interesting happening in the world of SE? 😬
2
 
3:04 PM
@balpha nope
 
user351483
Business as usual.
 
@balpha Nothing at all. it's totally quiet. No community-wide disasters ongoing or anything. Why do you ask?
 
balpha isn't blue? since when
 
@OptimusPrime six months
 
@OptimusPrime He quit before quitting was cool
3
 
3:18 PM
looks like SE doesn't use dns entry for subdomains, instead redirect [a-z0-9]+.se.com to se.com -> $1
 
probably handled by the ha-proxy
 
user351483
Huh. So Writing.SE becomes the second site with no active moderators.
 
never heard of it before. But got it
 
410
Cyn's resignation message is worth reading it's a bit different from most.
3
 
user351483
3:33 PM
Oh my. That's a big stick to shake.
 
meh
 
user351483
Awesome. Comments on TWP are going into melt-down. Usually we shove comments into chatrooms and delete them. No comment->chat operations have happened since we all stepped down. And TWP generates a hell of a lot of comments.
 
-1
Q: An Update to our Community and an Apology

Sara ChippsFriends, Last week we made an important decision for our community. We removed a moderator for repeatedly violating our existing Code of Conduct and being unwilling to accept our CM’s repeated requests to change the behavior. We recognize it has caused concern in the community as a whole. We mad...

3
 
410
3:50 PM
Oh, so we are friends? Since when?
 
I've been logged out automatically. Don't know what happened
 
Am I mistaken in thinking the moderator in question did not repeatedly violate the CoC, but instead repeatedly questioned a CoC not yet in effect?
22
^ serious question btw. The post confuses me on what I thought actually happened.
 
410
I hear there's a transcript of TL.
 
@Bart If you are then I'm in the same boat
 
410
But if we leave that out, and weigh MC's word vs SC's word, I know which one carries more weight for me.
 
3:57 PM
@410 Shog said that it was very selective, so doesn't tell the whole story. Also don't think we're supposed to mention that it exists...
 
user351483
Starting that post with "Friends" seems kinda wrong to me.
 
410
Maybe it's addressed to the family of Joe Friend.
 

« first day (3347 days earlier)      last day (1666 days later) »