« first day (3050 days earlier)      last day (1958 days later) » 

3:00 PM
Well 512 minus the length of the channel name iirc.
But you can break it up with a modern client and autothrottle.
 
@forest the problem with that comes when someone has the energy to just keep saying that... Constantly... All day long... Every day...
 
@Shog9 And there are people who will argue against them all day every day.
 
@forest yes
 
So rather than censor, fight it with speech.
 
Ever been stuck at a party or family get-together where the conversation degrades into two people arguing over one thing?
 
3:01 PM
When you censor it, people start thinking "huh, maybe there is something to this holocaust denial I keep hearing about if the government doesn't want us to know"
 
It's... super tedious
 
@Shog9 I dunno, you're talking to someone who's spend 8 hours straight, uninterrupted, arguing with one single person on IRC. Twice.
I never consider it tedious.
 
Normally IRL, you can just go away. Most folks don't take the guy standing on the streetcorner yelling seriously.
@forest and what'd the other folks in the channel think of that?
 
@forest and the \r\n and you need to factor in the user's hostmask and nick unless you want it to get cut off on receiving clients
 
@Shog9 They were very impressed.
 
3:02 PM
@Shog9 Hey now, I'm making a difference!!
 
with the termination it's 510... then you have overhead
 
Ah yeah, you're right.
 
@forest all of them?
 
I have my own hexchat fork
 
@Shog9 I would guess only those who stuck around
 
3:03 PM
how much of an audience actually stuck around for 8 hours?
 
None lol
 
yeah...
folks often forget, but... The reason we censor stuff here isn't because we're afraid of the signal but because it's noise
 
@Shog9 All the ones that mattered. I mean it was an off-topic channel from a few years ago where the discussions were usually 1) sexuality, 2) drugs, 3) illegal sexuality, 4) drugs, 5) how bad our moderators are for kicking us.
So it wasn't that unusual for the channel.
 
@forest ah, right, akin to the traditional soapbox / battleground forum then
"let's put this over here, with the rest of the fire"
 
@Shog9 Even worse. It actually got shut down because it was out of control. :D
 
3:06 PM
lol
This is the bit that always gets me when folks suggest SO shouldn't close questions - that folks should be allowed to ask whatever, and as long as it's tagged properly others can just ignore it if they're not interested.
It ain't like that hasn't been tried... A lot...
 
@Shog9 Well IRC is known to have a low SNR.
It's not something to use as a role model. :D
I mean it's fun, yeah, but when people start saying to just make SE/SO casual like casual off-topic chats, things get weird.
 
folks do say that though. A lot.
 
I imagine said folks are always on the receiving end of VTC?
 
not always
it's a seductive idea
"look at how nice this place is compared to the trashheap that is [other forum] - it sure would be great if folks could ask about [holy war] here instead of over there"
 
in small part this is why I wanted IPS to happen
SE has a real chance at taming the perpetual trash fire that is that topic everywhere else
 
3:18 PM
@Magisch You've given up? You don't want it to happen anymore?
 
I would still like to, but I think they'll cut it off sooner rather then later
 
Why?
Lack of traffic, lack of moderation or just not fitting SE?
 
bad optics
the same reasoning that led to it getting booted off hnq can be extended to justify booting it alltogether
 
3:32 PM
That's quite something though... Something I think we need to be aware of, but just in a 'this site isn't to judge' way, not in a 'OMG they're shutting us down' kinda way.
 
@Magisch the thing is... Folks gotta actually want it to not be a trash fire
There's nothing particularly magical about this format that would prevent it
I think the mods and most of the core users are onboard there
but... That's definitely not a universally-held opinion
The site has had more'n it's share of trolling and troll-baiting, with a small but dedicated faction of users more'n willing to do the whole "argue for 8 hours while everyone else leaves" thing that forest described above.
 
naming no names there ;P
 
Jedi Tricks #1
 
I think it can be a useful site when folks remember that the goal is to inform, to educate. But, that can't be seen as a sideshow or accidental bonus.
 
Morning everybody! It's so nice to see you again on Dec, 11th.
I think Shog9 should click the "activate hats" button any minute now.
 
3:39 PM
message from the future!
 
@Shog9 shhhh! Don't spoil my attempt at tricking Shog :P
 
Noooo! Looks like the timer is actually going the wrong way
 
@Derpy 1940 minutes, to be precise
 
I wouldn't an 8-hour-inferno every once in a while as long as it's properly contained, 100% opt-in with quick-escape and behind informed consent.
... and it sports a spectator-only mode
 
@Shog9 When's the next town hall meeting so I can corner Haney again?
 
3:44 PM
:shrug:
when we get someone with the time to do it
 
@canon wasn't it aborted?
 
Haney?
 
Haha, yeah, I know that.
Just bad humour. Ignore me.
 
3:51 PM
lol...
 
heh
 
huh
9
Q: What happened to meta Town Hall chats?

Sonic the Inclusive HedgehogAs the title of the announcement post suggests, Town Hall chats are currently on hiatus. Why were they discontinued after six sessions? Weren't there plans to run them every two weeks? If I remember correctly, they brought in quite a few people from different branches about SE and allowed them t...

 
uh
 
<rant>...voting the wrong post guys. You must vote the swag submission, not my reply about Frodo on SciFi</rant>
 
Ask for a Frodo swag
 
3:57 PM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ thanks, I already have Two rings.
 
@Forest wouldn't that make my internet even slower than it is right now?
That's probably a reference to something.
I can safely dismiss it so as not to look awkward
 
An One Ring and a "Second Ring that Tolkien never intend but won't stop a game company to make a game about"
 
Don't let them figure out you didn't get it. And don't type on the chat that you didn't get it. Never.
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Oh, for tutorials and guides on how to manage my random obscure references to games no one played, shows no one watched or books no one read ask @ShadowWizard
 
4:16 PM
 
12
Q: Is there any canon evidence of a second "One Ring?"

Profetik OneIn the videogame "Middle-Earth: Shadow of War" the opening scene shows Talion, really Celebrimbor, forging a second Ring of Power to combat the original One Ring. My question is whether this is completely made up for game purpose or if there is some obscure reference to it in some of the append...

/cc @M.A.R. ^
 
@forest Victim blaming is never the answer. Do not put the onus on people for not having a "thick enough skin". Cyberbullying somebody causes real damage and can result in a loss of life. It is not "harmless" at all. At all.
 
Sounds like you talk from experience? :/
 
The only acceptable form of blame is The Wheel
 
@Shog9 The changes to the flagging UI are great. There's one thing, though, that I wanted to address. Since the system only considers the handling time of the flags, and doesn't in any way consider the actual flagging time, it's possible that if flags are allowed to linger for a while before being eventually declined, the user can be banned from flagging without any sort of warning.
 
4:25 PM
yep
This can be handy at times
for example, when you've been warning them manually in chat for months
 
@Shog9 I'm not referring to the old loophole that I used to exploit. (Side note: you or someone else has since plugged that hole apparently)
 
Adam patched it up; AFAIK we discussed the cause here a few times
 
@ShadowWizard it is somehow accepted by the fans of that game that the inscription on the second rings read:
> "You shall have light undiminished,
All shall fear me and rejoice."
 
@ShadowWizard Not first hand, but I am part of an online community that has a lot of kids who have been cyberbullied for e.g. being trans.
 
@ShadowWizard so, since it is basically "YOU ARE GOING TO LOVE ME" it is pretty appropriate for me.
 
4:28 PM
@Shog9 Yeah, I can see where this is handy. For instance, if a user makes a lot of bad flags, but they're sufficiently spaced apart such that if each one were to be immediately handled, it'd be fewer than 10 flags handled per week and thus ineligible for a ban, whereas holding off on handling them and then doing so at once bans them.
 
@Mithrandir yeah I can imagine this being super sensitive and hard for them. Kudos for trying to help! :)
 
anyone else read "cyberbully" and picture...
 
(... thinking of it, I could turn it into a necklace for the 'Shy plush).
 
@Shog9 tin man? Nah... too cute looking.
 
on The Internet, no one can see your shiny metal face
 
4:29 PM
@Shog9 There is another issue with the current system, though. It's possible for recently banned users to get immediately re-banned even if a flag they cast after the ban wears off is deemed helpful.
 
@Shog9 or yellow face
 
@ShadowWizard Sometimes... you have to just keep them talking.
@Shog9 What are those?
 
The Cybermen are a fictional race of cyborgs who are among the most persistent enemies of the Doctor in the British science fiction television programme, Doctor Who. Within the context of the series, the Cybermen are a species of emotionless space-faring cyborgs who look to co-opt human beings or other similar species to join and populate their ranks. First appearing in 1966, the Cybermen were created by Dr. Kit Pedler (the unofficial scientific advisor to the show) and story editor Gerry Davis. The Cybermen have seen many redesigns and costume changes over Doctor Who's long run. Over the years...
 
So the Doctor Who version of the Borg ;)
 
@Mithrandir ...kinda? I don't know much about the Borg beyond one TNG episode and the old Slashdot MS image.
cybermen were one of the few monsters that actually saw a really solid episode in the last season
 
4:45 PM
@Mithrandir yeah, but problem is when you/they stop talking, how to have them "self sustain" themselves. No?
 
We have and - which one do you prefer?
 
@AnneDaunted I think we should go with
 
@Mithrandir What is your actual
 
@ShadowWizard Usually, the conversation will involve urging to call a suicide hotline.
 
@Shog9 I pretty much just picture Biff from Back to the Future II.
 
MEE
4:59 PM
Hi, just something I saw here. The site description for MSO is for discussion, support, and feature requests for this site. This should probably be changed to ... for Stack Overflow...
 
Where exactly do you see that @MEE? I must be overlooking it.
 
MEE
on the migration banner
 
@MEE The description should probably be updated to read: [Deprecated] See: Twitter
 
@MEE Ah yes. If it's not a dupe, it might be worth an MSE post.
 
MEE
or better on MSO?
 
5:04 PM
Given that it's shown on MSE, I'd go for that. But I suspect that issue to exist network wide.
 
5:18 PM
@Bart it does; any question migrated from anywhere to a meta site will have that same description
 
MEE
@Shog9 oh, just posted it on MSO: meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/377679/…
 
oh well
you might want to look at how the banner reads on the destination question...
@MEE FWIW, MSO's audience description is the same as Stack Overflow's
"professional and enthusiast programmers"
this is true for all/most meta sites
the problem here is simply that this isn't used when migrating questions to/from meta sites
the origin question always has the same description
the destination question has that description with "site" replaced by the audience string for the originating site
 
@Mithrandir lol
took me a
 
yeah, it also took me a grea
@Shog9 Maybe time to change "audience" of meta sites to "discussions for [main name]"?
> This question came from our site for discussions for Slack Stack Overflow.
 
Sounds tedious
Also inaccurate
 
5:32 PM
yeah, tbf, SE is a bit on-topic over MSO...
 
The purpose of the audience string is to describe... The audience. The people who use the site
 
an audience of bots? :P
 
MEE
@Shog9 so essentially, "this site" should just be replaced in the migration banner.
 
Maybe?
 
MEE
But in this case it is probably not so important because most people won't see this page ever. I just thougt the whole string was wrong but it seems not to be so.
 
5:42 PM
Accurate when going parent->child
We generally shouldn't be moving many questions between metas
 
MEE
yeah, that is probably only occuring ("often") for MSE<->MSO due to Jobs, Teams, etc.
 
MEE
5:55 PM
I don't know if anyone else noticed but suddenly the tabs on /questions are gone on MSE, SO and MSO. Other sites are still fine. Might this be related to CQLs?
 
what do you mean?
 
MEE
@Shog9 I don't see the tabs (Newest, etc.) on this page but I see them here. I have CQL active and previously there were tabs shown (or CQL navigation controls).
 
uh-oh
uh... oops
 
@MEE you should have posted a question and you would have got good reps ;-)
 
MEE
@NogShine ahr, always doing it wrong....
 
6:06 PM
@MEE Me?
 
MEE
No, I am always doing it wrong, posted it now.
 
Posting question will create a record and when that bug occurs again, dev's job will be easy.
 
MEE
yeah
 
6:38 PM
so... yeah, what can I, eh, put on this empty avatar to make it a bit more full? ... oh right, a hat... wait...
 
MEE
@EKons unfortunately you will have to wait yet an other day (1d 5h)
 
that's the point... ;-)
 
MEE
there is a unicode symbol for HATS: 🎩
 
Interestingly, this old MSE question was closed as a duplicate of a Server Fault Meta question. Probably before the schism, but still the first time I saw that.
 
lol that's the old way duplicates were represented back then, automatic edit
 
6:49 PM
@AnneDaunted Looks like the target was migrated - the original link is on MSE.
 
Yes, that was a bit confusing
has a very informative tag wiki excerpt: "Ghost town - Population: You"
 
@Tinkeringbell a story for you...
A parrot who possesses people. Sound familiar? ;)
 
7:07 PM
@Derpy Oh so he does have a function other than urine references
 
uh... remember that @ShadowWizard shadows...
 
@Mithrandir I don't possess people :P
 
@Tinkeringbell That's Satan's excuse
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Ssssht.
 
the cold finger of Satan rests on a poor fellow's lips
 
7:16 PM
It is a relief to know that Satan is a parrot
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ hardly
 
yeah, we thought it was a goat...
 
@EKons true
 
Yeah goats are dumb
 
51
Q: How do I become a goat again after turning into a bag?

Zero StackI was walking around in the Goat Simulator: PayDay expansion when I came to a Bag Vendor with a platform to the left of it. I stood on the platform and literally mutated into a bag (a loot bag in PayDay). Now all I can do is hop around as a bag. How do I change back into a Goat? Note: I am as...

 
7:19 PM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Hey... I know my character isn't flawless, but that's kinda insulting!
 
Are you the only parrot in existence?
Bingo! You're caught
 
then she wouldn't hate green parrots...?
 
@ShadowWizard Linguists always express amazement over the range of possible meaningful sentences you can make with a language
 
@EKons The neighbour's parrot is always greener
 
And can do more tricks
 
7:25 PM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I dunno. The neighbor's parrot looks pretty dead to me :P
 
Huh, did everyone get kicked out of sites?
@Tinkeringbell See what I mean, playing dead for so long in such an authentic manner
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I didn't.
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ blame @Bart
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I didn't.
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I did
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Poing
 
 
2 hours later…
9:28 PM
in The Water Cooler on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 5 mins ago, by Aaron Hall
Keep the upvotes where they count - on the answer.
 
9:44 PM
@AaronHall Without questions, there would be no answers. Questions are the bloodstream of the site. Without questions, there can be no answers - and there can be no site. Make sure to upvote good questions as well.
 
@Mithrandir I'm referring to comments but that's a good point too...
 
@AaronHall Good comments need upvotes too ;) If I make a comment pointing out a need to improve a question, it having a few upvotes shows the user that this is a really important change to consider ;)
 
Heh, I didn't even look at the context. But enough people diss questions or just don't vote on them that it ticks me off when people claim questions are useless.
 
I'm talking to an answerer who responds in the comments too much.
 
@AaronHall ;) How are we supposed to know! There's only one message :P
 
10:17 PM
@AaronHall When I search for something ans the question helped me, I upvote the question.
When I don't know the answer to the question and it's well-written, I upvote the question (hardly ever happens)
When I answer the question and my answer is accepted, I also always upvote the question but I edit it to become a good question before I upvote. (If needed: most of the time, I've edited it already)
Comments get upvoted when I'm in the queues doing reviews: E.g. in the Low Quality queue if someone posts a comment "Hey, this is a duplicate of the existing answer" (=Thank you answer) I upvote
When a comment makes me LOL, I upvote it as well.
That's about it, really... @AaronHall 0:-)
@AaronHall Ah... Urgh... One of those that think this is a forum...
 
I try to upvote questions I answer ("if they're good enough to answer, they're probably good enough to upvote.") and comments that suggest improvements.
 
(Sorry for the rant!)
 
If they're just jokes, I flag them for deletion as this isn't the lay-person side of reddit.
 
@AaronHall :D True! I'm with you on that one
@AaronHall One of my goals in life it to make this planet a happier place to be, so I upvote anything that makes me LOL...
(as I assume maybe wrongly that it will improve someone else's mood too!)
 
As a "post author" I put my effort into posts where it counts. I don't usually respond in comments, I put the material in my answer.
 
10:24 PM
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@AaronHall :D [Answer edited] is 50% of my comments.
Sometimes when they run into other issues while trying to solve their original question, I'll point them to other Q&As though.
 
I really like it when the new guys where I work tell me my answers are really good and helped them a lot.
 
If they become too chatty without upvoting, I delete my answer.
@AaronHall Urgh... You should come work where I work then: lots of new guys all the time!
(Please don't: stay away! Not because I don't like you, but because you wouldn't...)
 

« first day (3050 days earlier)      last day (1958 days later) »