@JourneymanGeek Didn't say I'd want to restrict their privileges. Just say that I'd expect them to defer to other, "non-supplemental" mods if something involves the subject matter. Also, moderating a site can teach you quite a bit about the subject. (I often find that I understand a post better if I edit it.)
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog with the former? ehhhhhhhhh. In the background we actually often cross check things, If you are not listening to the other mods, things do not go smoothly
as for the latter. Seeing the reactions people have to some of your edits, I'm not always convinced
The ability to step back and consider alternate viewpoints from both regular (and trusted) users and deferring to the community as a whole is very useful
The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus. This process is not mandated by Wikipedia policy, but it can be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. In other situations, you may have better success with alternatives to this approach. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient.
Bold editing is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia. All editors are welcome to make positive contributions. When in doubt, edit! Similarly, if...
Anyway, my point is, normally, the team tries to appoint more mods if moderation activity slows down, and if no one steps up, it creates a case for closing the site. Currently, the team only appoints mods with subject or site experience; my draft proposal is to allow the team to take on mods who don't have much site experience but do have SE experience, and are willing to learn the norms of the site.
We do have sites where the mods know about the subject a lot but don't know how SE works. This would create mod teams that know both about the subject and SE.
And personally as someone who had a fair amount of SE experience, I don't think what I do on SU gives me the right stuff to moderate something like, say IPS directly
@JourneymanGeek "draft". I don't want an incomplete proposal to reach meta and attract downvotes from people who misinterpret it. In fact, one of the stated reasons of this room is to get opinion from other users and help writing FRs in order to increase the likelihood they're positively received.
More specifically what would an outsider bring that a 10ker with a little mentorship couldn't
Or more specifically if we need "outsiders" - the broader goals of community outreach and "management" are not met, and your community is not stepping up to take care of itself
@JourneymanGeek You make a good point. If a town's police force is so bad that police from another city many miles away need to step in to resolve things, perhaps the city itself is doomed.
At this point, you probably want the CM team looking at why the site is dead, and the intristic and extrinsic motivations for people to stay or come back
See, alternative opinions I get here factor into my decision of whether or not to actually propose ideas. If I posted this on Meta quickly, I would have gotten downvotes from users who think this way.
The one situation where I think this can work is if the person you appoint somehow is both engaged in the topic and charismatic enough to singlehandedly save a site. and selfless enough to spend the time and effort on the site
But if SE knows of people like that, they bloody well hire them cause they're rare
Well, it crosses boundaries that most people have. Its a shade better than "I know what you did last summer" or "HI! I AM LOOKING THROUGH YOUR WINDOW!"
People may choose to engage with you outside the internet, or even talk about some personal stuff to people on the internet but you need to respect that they might not want folks mentioning real life stuff, especially geographical locations all the time.
@JourneymanGeek What would be creepy is if someone were to see what song I'm listening to right now on Spotify and post it here. What I said above is nowhere near that.
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog so.. here's the thing. People might be a little too polite. People might not notice. If you're constantly expecting specific people to tell you specifically it is creepy, it makes it impossible for me, as an RO to try to help the folks in question till its too late.
Then I end up needing to set rules
and people get mad at us for that, when I just rather tell you, straight up that normal people find that creepy.
Honestly, it's creepy for me... while I sometimes contact my friend when I heard something (e.g. my friend in Japan, about the deadly hot weather), I do it on private channel.
@JourneymanGeek I think I've explicitly told people that if they find something amiss with my behavior towards themselves, let me know, because there generally aren't enough signals here for me to figure that out.
You don't like to be yelled at. You won't listen to hints. You won't listen to me trying to tell you, nicely not to do something, and keep justifying that specific people need to tell you to stop.
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog part of what I've been saying is the justification that you need each and every person to set their own boundaries makes it very difficult for us to try to help you when you're doing stuff that people are not comfortable with.
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog A random, unsolicited ping late at night when I'm not already in here to ask me if I'm enjoying the rain... yeah, it's kinda weird. It's one thing if I'm here and already engaging in conversation and talking about weather or something... but to do it out of the blue... doesn't really make sense to me.
More precisely, if someone, especially an RO or mod/cm asks you to stop doing something, its cause its an issue that has been brought up here or elsewhere. We're trying our best to help you and others, well, enjoy being in this chatroom.
In general, if someone says "hello, this thing is uncomfortable", that kinda needs to be the point where you go "okay" and not do the thing, regardless of whether or not it's the person you're actively directing the comment to. This is a public room, so like...more people get a say, and everyone has a right to say "hey, this is not great", and have those feelings be respected as valid.
I won't care if you say that through, let's say, WhatsApp, or anything else. As an introvert person, I might even encourage it, if you are already a close friend and want to have a better... I dunno, communication skill? Though, probably an introduction would help, like "it's raining heavily here!", not suddenly "enjoying the rain?"...
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog You have a great need for "from the horse's mouth" support and that's something that I understand... I like getting it, too... but you have got to get used to not getting it all the time because most of the time in my experience, you're going to have to assume that what other informed people are telling you - is the case.
Err... no, I don't need to know the email exchange between you, Shog, and Catija. I just want you to at least try to putting in our shoes instead and have a little more trust in what us considered as... norms
Ok. Extremely simple, pointed question. How do I tell you certain boundaries are mostly universal, with respect to this room?
I don't want to have to get each and every person to have to tell you "no, don't do that"
I don't want to set formal rules.
I would like to avoid needing to yell.
I want to go "Ok, most people would feel uncomfortable with $foo, please don't do this" and have you do it with minimal arguement, backtalk or justification
@JourneymanGeek I'll tell you about a real life situation that firmed up this behavior in me. A while ago, I worked with a mentor, learning how to teach kids. I found quite a few things wrong with their teaching skill, and I was quick to mention those to them. The main advisor of the program came to me and told me what I was doing was "offensive", so I stopped.
A few days later, the mentor asked me why I wasn't giving them critical feedback, and I told them what the advisor said, and they said that they actually preferred and appreciated such feedback.
So that's why I'm always a little leery when someone says some social action is bad; there's been quite a few documented cases where the actual person involved came forward and told me they didn't find it bad.
@JourneymanGeek Yeah, I can see there's a difference here. The mentor in question wasn't involved in my chat between me and the advisor, so they couldn't immediately come forward and say, "I don't find that offensive".
once again, we've talked about how "you cannot expect each and every single person to tell you a specific behaviour is unwelcome"
user168476
Here's the thing, you're not having one-on-one conversations in here though, not really - this is a public room, so.....comfort level is shared with everyone. So maybe you're right, maybe @Catija is okay with it, but you're still making other people uncomfortable.
@JourneymanGeek Okay, I won't disagree with you or anyone else telling me some action here is bad. I may still ask why, but that doesn't mean I'm disagreeing.
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog I will keep complaining until things improve. Then I will have nothing to complain about.
(happy happy days that will be!)
user168476
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog Understand that explaining why shouldn't be necessary - I might find it uncomfortable for intensely personal reasons that I should not have to explain to a public google indexed chat just so you will stop.
Just assume an RO or "mod" speaks for everyone. If someone is unhappy with us doing so specifically, they can let us know, and we can come to an understanding.
If the other party says they don't mind, find somewhere else to do it... it's still making the people in here uncomfortable. If I have major fears of clowns but you're talking to someone who loves clowns and posting images... if that person says "please, you're making me really uncomfortable with the images of clowns"... it might be a good time to stop posting them unless you want to exclude them from a public place. Go talk about clowns in a less general mainstream place.
My previous (not current) opinion is that if some conversation here doesn't involve them, they shouldn't be annoyed. (Just explaining some context, NOT saying that I still hold that opinion.)
@Catija I just want to say, thanks for putting up with my antics ever since the beginning. I know life has been hard on you, having to take care of a (now) two-year-old, as well as another little one in the works. I'd like to apologize for it all.
@JourneymanGeek Well, I guess that's better than naming a kid "Amber" because of their golden baby hair and then having them turn into a brunette as an adult.
@Somewhat I was in a crowded restaurant once when one of those things went off. It was like a freaking war siren or something. Everyone's phone did it at once, like, 250 peoples worth of that sound.
@TravisJ They scare me and interrupt movies since the alerts ignore the volume settings on your phone. You practically have to turn your phone off if you want to prevent them from coming in and making a huge ruckus.
Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA, formerly known as the Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS), and prior to that as the Personal Localized Alerting Network (PLAN)), is an alerting network in the United States designed to disseminate emergency alerts to mobile devices such as cell phones and pagers.
== Background ==
The Federal Communications Commission proposed and adopted the network structure, operational procedures and technical requirements in 2007 and 2008 in response to the Warning, Alert, and Response Network (WARN) Act passed by Congress in 2006, which allocated $106 million to fund...
@StephenRauch that's not really fair. The fact he many times ask why his edits are rejected and "fight" for them does not mean he is expected to blindly approve all edits made on his own posts. If anything, saying "I don't want to explain" when asked why he rejected will be a "really?!" situation.
@ShadowtheWelcomingWizard actually I typically do answer when asked - but the answer is often "It dosen't respect the intent of the poster". I only get annoyed when he goes extreme rules lawyer on me.
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog, Do you think I do not not know how to read? Or maybe I do not actually bother to read? Is that why your response is that I should just read your rejection notes? That statement implies that I did not, or maybe could not read what you wrote. My English skills are good. Thank you for your concern.
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog, So I will be more explicit in expressing my consternation. I feel your reject reason was narrow to the point of silliness. You are of course entitled to it. But to what end? Is your goal to make sure that no one else ever contributes, because their contribution was not perfect? Really? Well, more power to you...
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog Looking at one of your recent edits, please don't change the British spelling into the American spelling, there's no need for that and this kind of edits are usually frowned upon on many sites.
@MassimoOrtolano It was tagged as a proposed FAQ, and those are standardized on American spelling. Also, the author had explicitly asked for their question to be edited.
@StephenRauch "Really, you rejected my edit?" very strongly implies that you didn't check the rejection reason. "I don't understand the reason for rejection, can you please explain?" is a better way to express that you did read it.
@StephenRauch If you submit another edit that addresses the rejection reason, I might approve it...
@MassimoOrtolano Also, that was the only time I've ever only edited the localized form of spelling in a post. Generally, I always pair it with some other major edit.
@Tinkeringbell How's your knot-tying project going?
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog, So you are suggesting that I should take a second cut at winning your approval? Why? I feel that the first cut was fine and was rejected arbitrarily. Why do you think I would be interested in trying to impress you with a second cut at this? Why do you think I need to care what you think?
@StephenRauch It wasn't "arbitrary", I explained why I rejected your edit, and gave a further explanation here after you first asked me. It's my post; it's why SE gave post owners binding edit review powers and the ability to override edit outcomes if they disagree with community reviewers' decisions. I also told you that if you submit an edit that addresses the rejection reason, I'd approve it.
@StephenRauch If you submit a screenshot of Stack Overflow, or Super User, or Travel, or some other Q&A site, that would work. A screenshot of stackexchange.com or Meta Stack Exchange doesn't clearly express the point, and since your screenshot was of that, I rejected your edit.
heh can't use @Ano now without pinging poor @anonymous2 lol... well... @Sonic for what it's worth, I agree with the rejection, and added a "correct" screenshot with FHRC.
@SonictheInclusiveHedgehog Stop that. You've had plenty of warnings now from the RO's and CM's here. Don't randomly ping me, as I already told you back in May. The next one I'll just flag.
(Actually that's a pretty interesting thing. I actually am ok with a certain amount of pinging for non official stuff on SE chat. I did grow up on IRC)
For official stuff, ugh, I really would rather formal means simply cause if you ping me, I'll possibly forget and nothing gets done
I got a question.. Is that A good Idea to ask for good question/answer on meta? Im tired of Json/c# question answer that are 80% duplicate, 80% plagiat. Either I go Under 1k rep just by shooting everyone standing in front of a roomba
Some sites have a guide/FAQ on how to write a good question/answer on their meta, though usually it's very generalized. Some has gone beyond to handle more specific kinds (like Scifi.SE's "How to ask..." series). I don't know though for SO, since it's too big. Otherwise, you probably wanted to discuss with their community on particular language's chat room...
I wan't to have a really well construct answer on how to serilise deserialise that do not look like "the 101 Library and totaly different way to deserialize". There are a lot of unique good answer to those question, but they are not on the same question.
I am assuming you are not using Json.NET (Newtonsoft.Json NuGet package). If this the case, then you should try it.
It has the following features:
LINQ to JSON
The JsonSerializer for quickly converting your .NET objects to JSON and back again
Json.NET can optionally produce well formatted, ind...
I know there are a few posts about Newtonsoft so hopefully this isn't exactly a repeat...I'm trying to convert JSON data returned by Kazaa's API into a nice object of some kind
WebClient client = new WebClient();
Stream stream = client.OpenRead("http://api.kazaa.com/api/v1/search.json?q=muse&typ...
You see, the thing about that is... It was all going good. Cucumber, eggs, milk, peppers -- CAT! ugh, so close. Clearly the sorting algorithm broke down somewhere. I am pretty sure that cat was supposed to be in a different closure.
Was it on MSE? I went there, but... and I never really thought I would say this... there are too many hamburgers. There. I said it. Navigating is like trying to negotiate with this guy: