@Sha Okay, now I'm clueless. It shouldn't report posts with more than 100 chars if they have more than 15 unique chars... while this one has 46 unique chars, which is calculated using the very same Python code.
> Step One: Gather all of your tests and quizzes that are necessary to study. If you don’t have these pages for some reason, you need to ask a friend to make a copy of theirs. This is only if they agree to help you.
> Step Two: Take a highlighter and go through each of the tests and quizzes in Step One and highlight the necessary questions. Only these questions listed will be used for the final exam. It is NOT guaranteed that each of these questions will be seen on the test, however, no other questions will be added.
You can create table by using Box Drawing Unicode.
This answer helps the new users about the required box-drawing Unicode uses with Unicode-Key.
For creating Table, the following Unicode are essential:
1. Two lines:
Horizontal ━ U+2503
Vertical ┃ U+2501
2. Four ...
Is there an SEDE query that will slow all questions closed by a specific off topic sub-reason, instead of just the general "Off Topic..." parent option?
> “I’m not a fan of teaching to the test,” said Cook, “I think creativity is so important. Training the mind how to think is so important. Teaching to the test, to me, is too much about memorization. In a word where you’ve got all the information you’ve got right here,” Cook gestured to my iPhone, “your ability to memorize what year a war was won and all this kind of stuff isn’t very relevant.”
I'm glad you asked that, @Iain: in the past 30 days, 6355 distinct users have posted something on chat.SO, 4256 on chat.SE, and 354 on chat.MSE. So chat participation is somewhere around 1-2% of active main-site users. — Shog9 ♦31 mins ago
I'm surprised at how low those numbers are. I was expecting above 1-2%
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. the FAQ does need to be updated, but honestly having the discussion - in public, in front of everyone - is a lot more important than the outcome.
I came late to the party, and I don't see a need to participate in the comments section and make it a bigger mess than it is, but I have a feeling we're approaching it too generally for it to be useful.
Most of those answerers have a point, yet their answers have so little in common.
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. it's been approached in detail repeatedly over the years. Folks who wanna pretend chat is something other than what it is ignore the detail. So again, the discussion is more important than any individual conclusions.
You carve out a space and let people enter it - physically or on the 'Net - and you become responsible for what happens to them.
True. Good moderation makes a lot of difference. I've noticed on the (not-so-)social networks that a lack of moderation can turn a good place into a flamefest.
what's concerned me about several of the most recent blow-ups in various chatrooms isn't that they weren't moderated effectively... It's that the folks in those rooms took offense to the idea that chat should be moderated at all.
You can desire unmoderated chat; heck, I see the appeal... But if that's what you want, you're a long way from home.
The ends of the spectrum are what that bother us: People who are bothered by the slightest off-the-seminar expression they hear, and people who believe others shouldn't ever take offense since "i wazn't sirious anywayz".
@Shog9 I think I'm in the don't moderate camp but I do have In absence of all Room Owners, the members lead by example. in our guidance. But I do realize that requires that you have enough people in the room that set the example you're looking for
So I think if we're trying to approach this objectively, we should prolly let go of trying to define parameters by offenses taken and vulgarity and stuff.
@rene Examples? The recent sci-fi chat drama told me chat regs can't sometimes be good examples.
@SmokeDetector Smokey would you mind . . . ? Adults and molecules are talking here.
@rene implies a good point and one I think I made it too, Room Owners are generally trying to keep thing civil but don't have all the tools to do so. Users look to the room owners for guidance and they can do little more than provide a good example.
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. worth noting that some folks in some rooms can talk about seemingly anything without causing problems... Whereas others seem to kick up dust sipping tea. The attitude - both toward the topic and especially toward others - makes a much bigger difference than the topic itself.
It's crazy to suspend someone over a chat message from 5 years ago. Suspension is meant to teach something. Not to punish for a transgression from years past.
@rene Well, people feel it home after a bunch of visits, so they become less careful of what they say. IMO your question is like "how can we change people?" We can't. The fact that I became a chat reg but don't try to offend anyone I see in order to look cool reflects back to my personality.
In response to the effect this question is referring, I am proposing one of two possible scenarios:
Disallow flags on chat messages older than X hours, or
Remove old flagged posts from the transcript, but no suspension occurs (as in the aforementioned question).
Possible Duplicate:
When answering, could we be informed that “the following people are already answering this question”?
I ask a lot of question on SO, so this recommendation/idea comes from that experience. I'm not really sure how this would fit in with the current structure of SE.
...
I'm voting to reopen this question because this question is asking for the OP to be told, whereas the dupe is asking for everyone to be told. — ᔕᖺᘎᕊ1 min ago
@rene Well sure, you can certainly ask some questions about washing machines in Electric Engineering SE. But I'm not trying to repair a washing machine.
I'm glad you asked that, @Iain: in the past 30 days, 6355 distinct users have posted something on chat.SO, 4256 on chat.SE, and 354 on chat.MSE. So chat participation is somewhere around 1-2% of active main-site users. — Shog9 ♦5 hours ago
You joke, @Mysticial, but... Chat has traditionally consumed an awful lot of resources relative to its size, and that's... not getting better. I'm really hoping to avoid having to face that decision. — Shog9 ♦4 hours ago
combing through that post & its answers is kinda depressing.
Two years ago the link to a site's Meta was moved from an always-visible position in the top bar to subitems in the help and Site Switcher menus, as part of the top bar redesign progressively rolled out in November and December 2013.
Shog9 quite fairly noted at the time:
The bigger concern h...
Is there a way to determine if the mind conceives of only one object at a time? This is not to say that the mind only perceives of one thing at a time, but rather that it can think of only one thing at a time. Our predicate knowledge might be an indication of this. For example, when we say 'the d...
Last night, a rather unusual question hit me: is the a correlation between being a troll, especially an elite one and extroversion? Or ... are there any outstanding trolls introvert?
I am not being a troll right now of course, just ... constant curiosity. I was going to start a philosophy question on climate change summit & classic case of free rider problem in economics. But my previous experience taught me that I would only be getting textbook answers and probably nothing with deep insight that I was hoping for.