@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M No. It shouldn't change. When you authorize an app to act on your behalf it provides you with a token. You pass that token through the app when you do something.
1. Developer creates app
2. User authorizes app to act on their behalf (receive a token)
3. User uses app to do *thing*. Passes token to app
4. App uses passed token to do *thing*.
5. API sees token belongs to user and does performs action under user's name
The spoiler markdown is sometimes cough messed up. Today's edition: Spoiler doesn't work with numbered lists.
>! 1. Foo
2. Bar
3. Baz
renders like
! 1. Foo
2. Bar
3. Baz
I could instead do
>! 1. Foo
>! 2. Bar
>! 3. Baz
but that also turns into
Sheesh, it's ugly! I cou...
Gahd it's the 3rd week of a tech club and we haven't started the projects that we'll be presenting, but we're enduring a presentation now on presenting skills.
@durron597 I think 24 votes/day is reasonably generous as a baseline. Rather than artificially spiking this on sites like SO, that limit should scale with rep - so at 10K you'd have 38, 20K you'd have 58, 800K you'd have 1618...
There have been several proposals for how to handle the ever-mounting
close-vote queue. Dupehammer has been especially successful, and there
have been several proposals since them for awarding more close votes one
way or the other, including one to give extra close votes, only accessible
via /re...
@rene That the proposal would give more close votes to the people who don't close vote a ton but have a ton of rep than the people who close vote a ton & don't have a ton of rep.
Double-Badger Superpowers
Photo credit: Chris Noble at The Wildwood Trust
TL;DR:
Give holders of CVRQ Steward + silver tag-badge holders double-weighted CVs in that badged tag
Give holders of CVRQ Steward +...
For example, this question presents the equation
$$\omega(n) < \frac{\log n}{\log \log n} + 1.4573 \frac{\log n}{(\log \log n)^{2}},$$
but I'm not entirely sure if this is referring to log base $10$ or the natural logarithm.
Let me ask this as constructively as possible. Programmers gets only 25 questions per day; why then is gnat so tetchy about close votes there? With 24, everybody gets to vote on very nearly every question that come in.
This may be connected to his touchiness. I don't know.
I do know that I blow through my close votes on ELU more often than I don't, but I only get 24 there. However, I almost never do so through the review queue.
That said, I'm the top CVRQer there. But I seldom use it much.
Without discipline, all 24 CVs are gone within the first hour UTC.
the eternal figth for supremacy between closing incoming crap and historical crap, and the anoyance when you have to think too much before using your votes, so you can deal when you see one
Part of that all three of our most active moderators are gone to bed by then, and the stuff they would just unilaterally close needs five of us that late in the day.
The other part is that India and China are getting up soon. See the first part.
The problem
@tchrist recently asked this question: Proposal to make close votes scale with rep
While I completely agree with the sentiment, I wholeheartedly disagree with the solution.
As one of the more active close voters on Stack Overflow and a top five close voter on Programmers.SE (in the...
@tchrist Programmers is the top closing site because we have a really dedicated userbase that works really hard and uses all their votes every single day
> Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. This page checks to see if it's really you sending the requests, and not a robot. Why did this happen?
@durron597 I agree that getting more people to vote really is the best scalable solution. I wonder though, if the problem is that once you've run the close-vote review queue, you have frustratingly few close votes to spend outside of the queue, would it also work to have "extra" votes that can only be spent on the queue, or must be first spent there or something?
@NormalHuman has 1390 flags on Mathematics and 1079 on Meta Stack Exchange. Can't access the spam flag counts, though; these are total flag counts, which are public.
Then again, he's one of the maintainers of SmokeDetector and so he probably does have more spam flags.
My focus has been on Super User, where we get all sorts of tricky spam that often escapes less experienced reviewers.
As of now, I have 2299 helpful flags on Super User, of which 581 are for spam.
I have; I like him, and I find him sometimes hilarious and sometimes brilliant. But he can definitely set people off when he wants to, and sometimes when he doesn't.
Not that there is any excuse for abusive vandalism.
user259867
No interactions outside of meta.math, where we sometimes agree and sometimes don't. We don't answer same kind of questions on the main site.
user259867
He put together the MathJax tutorial, the top-voted post on meta math (1K votes by now). And started the collection of words that should not be in titles which I expanded and Shog used in a warning pop-up.
user259867
11:45 PM
Depressing to click on those and find that the current number of appearances is about twice what it was at the time of writing.
SO blocked “problems” for like a 21% close-rate, whereas we have “CORRECT” at 51% and “GRAMMA” at 56%.
And we don’t block those.
This happens because there is no upward bound on the number of sentences that non-native speakers can post and ask us to tell them whether or not it is grammatical correct. And they do.
We could also have a popup like people putting regex in the titles get, rather than a true block.
That might do more towards getting folks to post better questions.
The spoiler markdown is sometimes cough messed up. Today's edition: Spoiler doesn't work with numbered lists.
>! 1. Foo
2. Bar
3. Baz
renders like
! 1. Foo
2. Bar
3. Baz
I could instead do
>! 1. Foo
>! 2. Bar
>! 3. Baz
but that also turns into
Sheesh, it's ugly! I cou...
For example, this question presents the equation
$$\omega(n) < \frac{\log n}{\log \log n} + 1.4573 \frac{\log n}{(\log \log n)^{2}},$$
but I'm not entirely sure if this is referring to log base $10$ or the natural logarithm.
The problem
@tchrist recently asked this question: Proposal to make close votes scale with rep
While I completely agree with the sentiment, I wholeheartedly disagree with the solution.
As one of the more active close voters on Stack Overflow and a top five close voter on Programmers.SE (in the...