I'm using gradient as a background:
-moz-linear-gradient(center bottom , #E8E8E8 0%, #F2F2F1 50%) repeat scroll 0 0 #F5F5F4;
This is not showing in IE, I haven't found links or anything about what I need to do if the browser is IE.
Any ideas on how to handle this?
@Shog9 Tonight I've gone with the extremely boring Blue Moon Winter Abbey Ale, which I refer to as my soda of beers. When it's not beer, I'm a Jack and Coke kind of guy, for various substitutions of Jack.
In my job I have been ordered to make a dynamic application.Also, that all the pages should have a .php extension rather than a .html extension. I could strongly agree the php files will be needed for dynamic related subjects, but I just don't know why is a php file needed ?
Security? it's going...
First we should agree on a date and time for writing an agenda for a meeting to talk about considering discussing the procedure by which discussions occur.
agree on date and time -> write agenda -> talk about considering -> discuss discussions -> proper discussions
Still a long way to go! :)
No ... I don't find it that hard to discuss this topic at all. :)
For those who don't get the 'meta layers' theory: "First we should agree on a date and time for writing an agenda for a meeting to talk about considering discussing the need to consider discussing the procedure by which discussions occur." Hopefully you do believe that just sounds silly. :) But it's the same concept.
If Meta Meta belongs on Meta, don't push it aside as if it does not.
Otherwise you can infinitely add new 'meta layers' and you eliminate the possibility of having this discussion at all.
... bottomline, we shouldn't be discussing 'considering discussing the procedure', we should be 'discussing the procedure by which discussions occur'.
But, I'll still gladly hear the date for that proposal, and find out how we will be able to attract other people to participate in that discussion.
I don't care about how much rep I have any more, but I am curious how it's calculated. If you look at my profile, you'll see that two days ago I got 206 rep in total. For one answer I got 14 upvotes and 121 rep. How is this possible at all?
I'd expect that since I had one expected answer that day, I'd cap at 215 (not 206), and for that 14-upvote question I'd get 135 rep (not 121).
Before, if the rep score looked strange, I'd just do a recalc and everything would be clear. But now it should always be precise and the recalc button does nothing.
@Szabolcs: You should have. If there's no hidden events that only you can see, try filing a bug report. The devs can figure it out (or explain it to you if there's nothing wrong).