volunteers are paid up to £3,500.

@Spevacus meh. I wouldn't be speciesist even if she was a rabbit 😁

@Rob on the other hand hares are trust fund babies....

Rabbits have big ears; perfect for listening to the community. Rating: highly qualified as community managers.

@DavidPostill There's a chance that they will be killed:

> "Under Hvivo’s proposals, up to 100 paid volunteers aged between 18 and 30 will take part — half will receive an experimental vaccine and half a placebo. All will be exposed to the virus and monitored for symptoms. ".

Wow, a challenge trial with a placebo seems...questionable, ethically.

@RyanM Yes, they also hired a Civet for basic office duties; including making coffee.

@Ollie There's a lot more, either guess from the 10K Tool's Statistics or run a SEDE Query:

meta.stackexchange.com/tools/post-feedback?filter=month data.stackexchange.com/meta.stackexchange/query/1356242/…

@Luuklag hehe, Arabic. Like I said, very similar for those who know neither. ;)

My work is done here. I've the gold badge in data-explorer.

Now I wait for Glorfindel to catch-up, unless Tim feels challenged.

thx

→ 32 messages moved to Chimney

→ 6 messages moved to Chimney

@rene Nice, congratulations :P

@Ollie, you 9+ year old trivial edit bumper. 😀

@Rob Huh?

I'll add my congrats @rene ;)

@Ollie meta.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/77340

Guilty. I probably should've picked "Improve edit"...

But @Splevacus approved it as well.

I threw a supplementary edit on top of it to try and save face

Guilty as charged, though

@Spevacus So did I ;)

I'm pretty sure that's on and not in.

mhm

The editor isn't privileged, and made an incomplete edit (with errors) on a nine year old post; which you approved. - You could have improved it, but it's nine years old; that's why I didn't bother. --- Also, my comment is intended to be a humorous one; I'll leave it to the System to add any Review Audit tests it sees fit. - Don't sweat it. - Usually if there's any reason to reject, that's reason enough.

The reason trivial (and incorrect) edits are discouraged is because it takes a few people to do the work of one.

Don't lose sleep over it, carry on.

@Ollie, @Spe, I prefer when advice is offered that a link is supplied: meta.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/edit

> "Tiny, trivial edits are discouraged - try to make the post significantly better when you edit, correcting all problems that you observe.".

There's another link to the FAQ somewhere, no time to find it ...

This one?

Already gone too

That was me :)

Then why report it? (in this room) ;)

@Tinkeringbell To make sure SD knew about it :)

Hahaha. That wasn't a very serious question... but I do check everything that's reported in this room (while I'm paying attention to this room), and it's disappointing if I can't flag :D