@DavidPostill There's a chance that they will be killed:
> "Under Hvivo’s proposals, up to 100 paid volunteers aged between 18 and 30 will take part — half will receive an experimental vaccine and half a placebo. All will be exposed to the virus and monitored for symptoms. ".
The editor isn't privileged, and made an incomplete edit (with errors) on a nine year old post; which you approved. - You could have improved it, but it's nine years old; that's why I didn't bother. --- Also, my comment is intended to be a humorous one; I'll leave it to the System to add any Review Audit tests it sees fit. - Don't sweat it. - Usually if there's any reason to reject, that's reason enough.
The reason trivial (and incorrect) edits are discouraged is because it takes a few people to do the work of one.
When clicking "edit" I see:
Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.
We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for e...
Hahaha. That wasn't a very serious question... but I do check everything that's reported in this room (while I'm paying attention to this room), and it's disappointing if I can't flag :D