« first day (2576 days earlier)      last day (2429 days later) » 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 23:00

user202362
12:25 AM
@YvetteColomb I posted a similar one, but not this one :)
 
user315433
12:39 AM
-3
A: Does slapping biting mosquitoes attract more mosquitoes?

trekker dbFirst of all...I wanna reply by saying when ur being bitten by a mosquito and u slap it dead. Bare in mind you just killed one of an army . They sense it's blood and the rest of them attack by biting you in anger ..it is the blood of many (slapped dead mosquitos)with ther blood on ur face that i...

 
user315433
> infuriates many more arriving to have a dig at u for killing there friend(s)
 
user310756
@Michelle lol
 
5:21 AM
20 messages moved to Chimney
 
5:39 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in body: A survey of software professionals "Model versus code centric approach" by ahmedul on softwareengineering.SE
 
 
1 hour later…
6:56 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user: Their Skills Academy Shoe Collection 823 by tomrichard618 on wordpress.SE
 
7:42 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title: the monstrous lines, wrinkles and mouth lines. by BrooWallac on drupal.SE
 
8:09 AM
Your master has returned @ShaWizDowArd
With the popcorn you asked for
 
Indeed, here I am
 
Because i'm nice like that
 
but without popcorn
Wait ...
 
Oh
This is a turn of events
 
now where is my smiting stick ...
 
8:20 AM
@Bart Kenny ate it
in Shadow's Den, 8 secs ago, by KennyBOT
~ Thanks for the @Bart's smiting stick, appreciated!
 
8:32 AM
So does anyone know why I can't access any other chats
But this one
Like how to get around that proxy
 
8:42 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in body: Any insights on Lasik surgery? by Helen on health.SE
 
I think I'll be happier if I just stop looking at my flag summary page...
 
@Dukeling how?
 
@Albzi Your Cish is My Wommand!
 
Inevitably some of my flags get declined and that frustrates me. I already try to avoid flagging borderline cases for this reason, but the problem persists. I know I shouldn't take it personally, but it's hard.
If I just avoid looking at my flag summary page, I'd be oblivious to the occasional declined flag.
... and I'm already pretty conservative when it comes to keeping comments.
 
9:05 AM
Hey don't feel bad about it dude
Your flags were declined and that is definitely not a personal attack or anything
It's just that the moderator who declined them didn't share the same views
That's not a bad thing at all
I rarely flag because I'm a horrible judge of what is and isn't OK
But you're flagging to make the site nicer so that's ok, even if they don't get accepted
 
Isn't about time someone out there mixes Malbolge with Emojicode?
All the fun of Malbolge with the added annoyance of using emoji characters (and having to remember the keyboard key combo for them)
 
Is that a new hearthstone card or something the malbolge
 
> Malbolge, invented by Ben Olmstead in 1998, is an esoteric programming language designed to be as difficult to program in as possible. The first "Hello, world!" program written in it was produced by a Lisp program using a local beam search of the space of all possible programs. It is modelled as a virtual machine based on ternary digits.
 
9:32 AM
@ShaWizDowArd correct
 
@Mithrandir is here! Quick, my pony army! Attack!
 
@Derpy "The same program translated to normalized Malbolge for clarity:"
> jpoo*pjoooop*ojoopoo*ojoooooppjoivvv
o/i
<iviv
i<vvvvvvvvvvvvv
oji
... right
 
@Bart why have you summoned me?
 
Surrounded
:P
 
@Oded If that summoned you ... then who was it that appeared when I chanted "Dedo dedo dedo"?
 
9:36 AM
@Bart you did what? Oh, Bart. I'm so sorry. Was nice knowing you.
You can expect a visit from:
Dido Florian Cloud de Bounevialle O'Malley Armstrong, known as Dido (, born 25 December 1971), is an English singer and songwriter. Dido attained international success with her debut album No Angel (1999). It sold over 21 million copies worldwide, and won several awards, including the MTV Europe Music Award for Best New Act, two NRJ Awards for Best New Act and Best Album, and two Brit Awards for Best British Female and Best Album. Her next album, Life for Rent (2003), continued her success with the hit singles "White Flag" and "Life for Rent". Dido's first two albums are among the best-selling...
(must be your accent)
 
and now, we will be able to use the google search query in the original version of the post to discover Oded secret location
 
@Oded oh god no. Anything but Dido!!!
 
I hope you survive.
 
9:50 AM
@Bart who's that?
is he danger than beiber?
 
user202362
cats of tavern, unite!
 
user202362
too many horses and doggies
 
user202362
need more kitties to off balance that
 
@Telkitty cats can't survive dogs
but I am too young
once I grew up, I can kill and eat all kitties
grrr
waiting
 
user202362
 
9:59 AM
@Telkitty that'll happen if you kitties try to play with dogs
/Cc JourneymanGeek
 
Third stage evolution of a dog is a wolf. The third stage evolution of a cat is probably a lion/tiger.
Nope, at lev. 100 the Catmon wins
 
 
 
2 hours later…
11:42 AM
@Oded hehe, I once knew a girl named Didi... real name... :D
 
i--
12:25 PM
hiya
 
user315433
12:47 PM
Christianity is 6 years old today. Most viewed question of the year: Are there any Christian sects that believe in “curative intercourse”? (probably HNQ)
 
user315433
I always know where I am by the way the road looks... River Phoenix would be 47 today.
 
Q: How to Publish Excel, A: Install Sharepoint ....
 
you just said a very very very bad thing, @rene
(maybe I should create a second scold button to use when someone suggests installing the horror).
 
1:30 PM
@Derpy yes, I was hoping you would see that ... ;)
@Derpy well, they didn't really suggest to install it, here is the context
@Derpy cuddle, cuddle, cuddle ....
 
Can someone show me how does the setting to mark your question as a community wiki post look like? I'm not sure if I can't mark a question as a CW or if I haven't found the option. Please post a screenshot (you could also edit this answer: meta.stackexchange.com/a/50314/339050)
I missed that there is no community wiki checkbox when asking a question.
 
1:47 PM
@rene corrected version:
> Maybe it is already to late, but do you use Sharepoint at work? That your problem! Quick! Race to Mt. Doom and toss the server in the fire where it was forged!
 
@user598527 you can't mark your question CW
 
@Derpy XD
@user598527 what @Bart says and you can flag for a mod and ask them to CW the question for you
sorry, double ping
Is anyone following what is going on with the latest questions on MSE?
 
i--
@rene it's fun
like watching the share value of some company in share market
 
He's incredibly lazy
 
yeah, well I have the popcorn out but it also gets annoying
@Oded that's a way of saying it, yes ....
 
i--
2:03 PM
@Oded you're commenting in the same way. unnecessary bold marking
 
@i-- was trying to make a point to the OP.
 
i--
may be the best way to make someone understood how bad it is
I said it ^^^ :)
 
@Oded you get points for trying
 
i--
his graph looks like the share market
 
@rene something tells me he won't be annoying anyone for much longer
 
2:17 PM
You knock on his door now?
 
user202362
@i-- obviously you have not traded shares before
 
i--
don't consider it as 0.
 
user202362
share trading is fun, it's like playing a mass multi-player game
 
user202362
although it's only 2D - either going up or down
 
user202362
or stay the same, but chance of that happening in the long run is small ...
 
i--
2:21 PM
recently heard a news that some of the shareholders of facebook want to change Mark from the position of CEO
didn't remember exactly when
@Telkitty the same happens for cryptocurrencies
 
2:46 PM
However I registered for Town Hall Chat, I can't/won't be present or discuss with you because there will be mid night in India at the scheduled time.
 
i--
3:11 PM
@Pandya I raised this issue long ago
but no response
I participated once. well it's at midnight 1
and another time it happened very early say 11PM so I am not able to participate
 
If you look at the hours I'm generally active you'll see why - I need someone else to run it if it's gonna happen during UTC-ish working hours.
 
Your weekly messages chart looks it's giving us the finger. :/
 
3:31 PM
@Shog9 the first thing I see at that link is "Bart's dirty secrets" ... right ...
 
that says more about you than me
clearly we don't own enough rooms together
Need: Bart's clean secrets, Bart's slightly soiled but still good if you turn 'em inside out secrets, Bart's secrets that should've been thrown out years ago but remain as tattered reminders of a past best forgotten...
 
You should see my glow in the dark secrets. They didn't do that originally, but if you leave them for long enough that happens.
 
slowly steps out of the room
 
user315433
4:01 PM
> I'm making changes to Stack Overflow reputation calculations today. What could possibly go wrong? twitter.com/aalear/status/900380455190618112 … -- Adam Lear at 8:44 AM - 23 Aug 2017
 
Maybe someone should ask Adam to step away from the keyboard?
 
Let's wait and see whether the mistakes help or hurt our reputations.
 
You're feeling lucky today?
First wrong rep calc report is already in: meta.stackexchange.com/q/300088/158100
 
We really do need to test our database backups once in awhile.
 
and always test in production ...
 
4:08 PM
@rene Got my hopes up. Boring!
 
XD
 
 
2 hours later…
i--
6:16 PM
@rene that's another issue
 
srsly?
 
Adam's changes aren't in production just yet. We really are testing on dev first.
 
Oh come on, live life on the edge ;)
@JonEricson maybe verify if my rep still looks OK on dev ....
Oh, maybe not. I didn't have much Documentation rep
I wouldn't be a good test-case
 
@rene Huh. -1. Never seen that before. ;-)
 
Ha!
 
user315433
6:31 PM
Pets got two new mods, one with 580 rep.
 
Yeah, do you remember we talked about if you could become a mod without much contributing, only by moderating (suggested edits etc)? I think I concluded it was hard and unlikely but I might have to re-assess that position
 
Pro tempore moderators are kinda special in that their primary responsibility is just to keep the site from completely going to shit (keep the grass mowed...).
 
Ah yes, town hall soon.
 
One of the main things that makes SO attractive, to me at least, is that the content is heavily curated by the community. It'll be interesting to see whether Channels™ can succeed without the involvement of the greater community... you know... without becoming private little cesspools.
 
@Shog9 So a bit of participation on a site but a solid track record elsewhere will work in that case?
 
6:43 PM
@rene maybe
 
lego.SE needs to get buildin'
 
it depends
 
@canon this is a big open question. Critically, it's why we've resisted a lot of spin-off sites in the past; you lose those "municipal services" that being a small tag on SO provides. For private sites especially, we've seen the need for a very large number of regular users and/or full-time staff just to be even slightly useful; finding ways to integrate Channels into the larger SO experience while still enabling a dedicated maintainer to take action is going to make or break Channels, IMHO.
 
After thinking about what my constituency wants, I... am absolutely certain that we 1. need a opt-in (eventually transitioning to default) hotness sort for answers 2. need to unpin (not unaccept) accepteds after a year of being pinned, 3. need to consider a process for debating and deleting bad answers.
 
"hotness" is readily gamed
unpin is a good idea, but massively controversial
#3 already exists
 
6:50 PM
"hotness" needs to be debated.
#3 only exists for low-voted answers.
low-voted != bad
 
then we don't need a process, we need an objective definition for "bad" that doesn't include score
 
I don't think hotness is easy to game over the long run, I would want to consider it over a period of 6 months to a year, depending on the age of the question.
 
an idea I came across a while back that seemed useful was the notion of voting velocity: essentially, an answer with a high score that's consistently dropping would be highlighted as potentially inaccurate, while an answer with a low score that's consistently rising would be highlighted as potentially more current.
Note that this wouldn't necessarily affect the sort order
The problem with using heat as a sort criteria is that it tends to feed back into itself: you put the post that's getting the most attention up-top, it gets more attention.
 
Expiring oldest votes could work where people are still actively voting...
 
and utterly fail in the huge long tail where only a tiny number of people on earth will ever need the answer
 
6:58 PM
@Shog9 That's the problem with the current pinning and top voted sorting....
How about "new canonicals"?
 
@AaronHall we're looking for something better than that, right?
 
Well, now I'm just brainstorming.
 
Accepted answers are actually an escape-hatch for the problem with pure score-based sorts - an answer that looks good but doesn't work for the asker doesn't necessarily get the top spot.
What tends to irritate the most people then isn't so much that good answers don't get the top spot, it's that answers they like don't actually solve the problem being asked about.
 
Give users easy access to the signal of the new answers that are getting votes at a higher rate than their vote-ranked-neighbors.
 
@Shog9 That is essentially the formula used for the hot posts though, isn't it?
I always wanted a sort option that was "Hot".
 
7:03 PM
@TravisJ not really; Hot Questions are more like fancy vote-aging
 
The formula used for hotness was based on the reddit sort (which is velocity based), or at least that is what is listed on meta.
 
What you probably care about when viewing some old question with a bunch of answers is... Does this +200 answer at the top still work 5 years later? If not, do any of them?
 
To note though, I find it extremely rare where sorting by hot would be different than by votes.
Yeah, that is definitely more of a concern
 
Did I miss a Town Hall announcement?
 
@Shog9 mhmm.
 
7:05 PM
You can have a great, simple, effective answer that solves everyone's problem in 2012 and gets upvoted to the heavens and when it breaks in 2016 it's gonna take years for that score to drop. OTOH... if it still works just as well as it did when it was written then you absolutely don't want to de-emphasize it for some Late Answer that just parrots the same solution without code formatting because who has time to copy the source when plagiarizing...
 
I think this is one of those times where it is just required to have some ability to accomplish a task.
 
Thing is... Whenever we discuss pinning (or sorting) everyone tends to bring a little bit different idea of what the problem is to the table.
Obsolete answers are a real problem.
 
If searchers can't see the best/right new answer ranked at the top, they perpetuate bad coding practices or get frustrated because Stack Overflow's Q&A model has stopped giving them working code.
 
@Shog9 green checkmarks are the devil
 
leave the checkmarks, just let them float like self-accepts after a year.
 
7:08 PM
I once suggested aging off the checkmarks
It was the worst meta experience ever
 
Lengthy answers that get beat out by some bare code snippet are annoying but kinda expected: the problem isn't pinning, it's that you wrote for an audience other than the one facing the problem.
 
How would an automated, or feedback, related system indicate an answer which was perfectly valid in 2012 no longer works with 2016 though (hence obsolete)? Some people still have that 2012 environment where the answer is still valid.
 
@TravisJ You can't get rid of the checkmarks arbitrarily. Maybe debate -> deletion - but that would only cover a small number of applicable cases.
 
@canon Let's change them to red.
 
lol
 
7:10 PM
@TravisJ an automated system can't necessarily know why an answer is much less useful now than it was 5 years ago. But it can recognize the fact that it is less useful now and let future readers know that.
If you're one of 3 people out of 10000 still using that 2012 system, you can still benefit from the answer. If you're in the other 9997, you can skip it and go to the one that works without having to wait for the score to slowly adjust.
 
@JonEricson that'd be as confusing as our cabernet review queue indicators!
 
@Shog9 Is the voting really that skewed though?
In the past 6 months, it seems that if there were +3 on one answer, and +9997 on another it would catch up very quickly and reach the top without incident.
 
@canon We'll change the checkmark to ⸘
 
@TravisJ Not all 10000 vote
 
@Shog9 but it could if we could provide the system some additional context for our downvotes through a radio selection or something.
 
7:14 PM
@TravisJ It took 5 years for whatever fraction of those 10000 could vote to all need the answer and vote on it. It may take another five years for that fraction to need it again.
 
@Andy Sigh, is there a difference? Okay, so one answer gets +1 and the other +999, is that more to your liking?
 
@canon almost no one downvotes to start with
 
A 4-step process for getting rid of never ever was good answers:

1. Identify
2. Escalate
3. Debate
4. Delete
 
for starters, many fewer people even can downvote
 
@Shog9 In that case though, you wouldn't notice the velocity. Especially if the users who vote the new one, also felt the old one was still "kinda useful" and +1'd anyway.
 
7:15 PM
@Shog9 might as well. Apparently we don't need our icons to look like anything recognizable. :P
 
@TravisJ if the old one is "still kinda useful" then we have less of a problem to start with
 
Well many of these answers which were at least correct at some point are still kinda useful.
 
@TravisJ was it really useful or was that a blind pile-on upvote?
 
Another problem with this is flat out wrong answers being pinned.
 
We could have a similar process (we kinda already do) for answers with deprecated and uncurated info.
 
7:17 PM
@canon Could go either way.
I have an example of something like this happening to me. I wrote an answer on a post where the top answer was at +90, and wrong. It only handled one edge case and improperly used a jQuery function. It was for validation. I wrote an entire method to handle it, and tons of people like it. That was in 2013. Now, that incorrect answer still sits at 165, and mine only recently is sitting beneath it, at 95. It only took 4 years.
Will probably never catch up with the accepted answer.
 
@Shog9 then maybe they should be granted a bit more weight than upvotes.
 
For the debate for deletion stage, we'd want several gold-badged users to authenticate that the answer was never good for any prior version of the language/framework.
 
@canon so again here's where velocity would be really interesting. Assume everything gets some number of downvotes in its life... If an answer is sitting at +200 / -1, that's still huge positive velocity over its entire life. If, over the past month, it's gotten +0 / -1, that's a lot more damning.
 
@TravisJ When I read an answer on Stack Overflow to a question I'm facing, I always read past the first answer just in case the second (or following) has better/newer/more substantial information. I don't have any evidence that other readers stop at the first answer (accepted or not).
 
@Shog9 I like it.
 
7:22 PM
OTOH, if a 5 year old answer has +10 / -1, you might not expect it to get any votes in a given month - so velocity over a month is meaningless. But velocity over 6 months starts to be interesting.
 
@JonEricson Sure, but again this took 4 years. There are 19 answers there! It took a really long time for that post to gain traction, as in years of time.
If you are calcing the velocity you might as well get into the acceleration of the post.
 
(my bias toward measurements that don't require looking at the votes table for a majority of posts may be showing in these examples...)
 
@TravisJ Clearly people have read your answer, right? (I'm not saying there isn't a problem. It just seems like a symptom of the deeper problem: people don't like editing old/highly upvoted answers written by others.)
 
Jul 20 '16 at 15:10, by Aaron Hall
how about a system informed by votes and the timing of those votes?
Jul 20 '16 at 14:58, by Aaron Hall
We don't want a bunch of one-offs to "deprecate". We need to automate. The way to do that is: 1) Unpin the accepted answer after 1 year, and 2) value more recent votes more than much older votes.
 
7:33 PM
Neat
That is interesting with a higher active post as well (the JS closures canonical) data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/713857
I had expected it to be in the same order the answers were, but it wasn't.
The famous "sorted versus unsorted array" question is pretty much as expected, which seems to show a true positive in that regard. Wouldn't want it to sort Mysticial's answer anywhere but in the top spot.
 
@TravisJ yeah, that's kinda interesting. Added more info to make this easier
Note the top answer there is pretty heavily edited - it's a wiki - so it's actually getting more useful over time.
 
7:49 PM
Heh, reminds me of that spam xkcd
 
I wonder how many people read with the Activity sort active?
 
I don't like sorting by active because it gives too much noise - I am often looking for solutions. However, I could see if you were curating or just perusing how sorting by active (and thus using the active tab) would go hand in hand.
Can't be a large percent though.
 
wouldn't think
 
I hypothesize that 00.0001% of users sort by Activity as their default.
You guys don't store the selection?
 
It gets stored as the last used.
(so its stored somewhere)
 
8:02 PM
well, that's a decent measure.
 
It may be in localstorage though
 
well that's no good, then, is it.
 
You could regex it from the request cache :)
 
very nice, @canon
 
8:11 PM
Nice! Now I am truly convinced my answer will never catch up to the accepted one lol
 
@AaronHall why'd it have to be snakes?
@TravisJ entrenched answers are notoriously difficult to unseat...
 
@TravisJ maybe it's not that bad, or maybe you need to leave a pointed comment laying out its criticisms clearly and concisely?
 
yup
 
@canon I have done it.
 
@AaronHall I mean, this is just a reflection of the design, I am not really that inclined to go harp on other people's answers.
 
8:16 PM
@AaronHall Oh, it happens. It's tough, though.
 
@TravisJ You might have a conflict of interest, but you're also probably the best qualified to explain what's wrong with the answer and prevent poor souls from going with the wrong answer.
 
If someone cannot figure out that an incorrect approach fails, or to scroll a bit, then that is more their problem than mine. Can I help them? I literally gave them the solution. Can I help them more by being negative to someone else? Perhaps, but that is not really who I am.
 
As for the other comments, they seem to parse as criticisms after carefully reading them, but that's too much effort... searchers are desperate for answers and will grasp at the first thing that seems to offer an answer...
 
Also, this was just supposed to be an example of this happening, not a call to action :) I am not really concerned about the current state of the ordering on that post and my jibe to canon was in jest.
Overall though, the graph feature @canon showed is pretty sweet looking
 
@TravisJ It sorta depends on how it's wrong, I think. If the other answer spews out errors or something, it might be helpful to tell people so they won't have to try for themselves. But if it works ok in the limited case of the question, maybe it's not a big deal that people try it rather than a more general/elegant/robust solution.
 
8:26 PM
@AaronHall have a question id for that?
 
It isn't dangerous, it just doesn't work. It will look like the errors are gone, but on submission, they come right back! (just like a Jeffrey)
 
@canon Here's a good one: 472000
 
@AaronHall nice :)
 
@canon just look at most of my top answers' questions. I'm a late-comer to Stack Overflow
 
@TravisJ So that seems like a reasonable comment to add. (Either as a comment to the other answer or commentary on your answer.)
 
merge_two_dicts sounds nsfw...
 
better than zipping them!
 
LOL
 
does anyone know how long SE usually takes to respond to reports of security issues
 
8:32 PM
From experience, fairly quickly, although they tend not to tell you what they changed.
 
@Magisch 6-8... nevermind...
 
@TravisJ do they tell me if they consider my reported thing a security issue to begin with
Because I reported something which I wasn't sure was one or not and I didn't want to use it publicly before knowing for sure.
 
Depends on who examines it I guess
 
@Magisch did you use the contact us form and did you already get a confirmation your message was received? It can take a couple of days before you here something back
 
I once demonstrated that your fkey was obtainable by third party, never really followed up on it though, maybe I should go double check....
 
8:35 PM
@rene Yes I used it
But I got no confirmation yet
 
changing the input didn't perform a pushState to update the querystring
 
@Magisch I see the ticket but I don't think anyone has examined it just yet.
 
@AaronHall That is pretty impressive. I am surprised that such a writeup fared so well, sometimes when posts get really long they get overlooked. Good job!
2
 
I'd give you an upvote but I'm not reading all of that.
 
@canon what, no TLDR?
 
8:39 PM
hah
 
I try to add those...
to my long ones, anyways...
I wonder what happened here?
Summer? http://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/713956/answer-score-over-question-lifetime?QuestionId=576169#graph
 
I don't weigh in on a post unless I read it in its totality.
 
Your vote is your own to do with as you wish. I feel the same way sometimes, but not always.
 
@JonEricson I assume you guys have researchers for finding out the full scope of the situation so I don't have to try anything that might look sketchy coming from my end, right?
 
For example, if a question is clearly bad or wrong from the start, I don't feel compelled to read the whole thing.
 
8:45 PM
@AaronHall If a question starts with or ends with "URGENT HELP NEEDED" my finger twitches towards the downvote almost instinctively..
 
@Magisch In my opinion, and this could be totally wrong, so long as you don't actually break anything, abuse anything, or violate ToS, and are only gathering evidence to demonstrate the issue, I don't see why that would be a concern. However, once you have properly demonstrated the problem, continually using it or exploiting it would be problematic.
 
I don't know the scope of the problem myself. But finding out would almost certainly violate several points of the TOS, depending on how stack sees it
 
s/question/post/
 
Unsure
You should probably wait for permission to move forward if it violates ToS. Or let them handle it then.
 
which is what I was asking jon
I'm not looking for a bannin'
 
8:48 PM
wasn't there something about a bug-hunting program?
 
Also if it turns out they don't consider it a bug but a feature I could make great use of it
 
240
Q: Setting Up a HackerOne Security Bug Bounty Program

animusonWe at Stack Overflow are interested in setting up a security bug bounty program to begin rewarding users monetarily who report serious security vulnerabilities to us, and we want to know what the community thinks. This program will be run through HackerOne where we are currently testing features ...

 
@Magisch I'm sure a dev will look into it, but I don't know when or who at the moment. I'd defer to whoever that ends up being as to whether a demonstration of the problem is necessary.
 
What's the ticket id, @JonEricson? I have a feel it's probably on my list somewhere.
 
@AdamLear 105726
 
8:53 PM
ah, that one's unassigned so far
 
I'm sure you'll get the assignment soon enough. ;-)
 
Ha, probably
 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 23:00

« first day (2576 days earlier)      last day (2429 days later) »