[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer: How to ride when the weather is hot? by Hammer Ofthor on bicycles.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer: Running Mist with INFURA by user1297097 on ethereum.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Enjoy Your Own Personal Existence By Dropping Weight by user662188 on superuser.com

sd trueu-

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Start by taking a peek at your own are by jenniferjnoyola on drupal.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: This ‘body on fire’ (and excess acid) by bashirkhan on drupal.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body: the removing of excessive sweating by monikashingh on graphicdesign.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in body: ev derma : Injection-Free Solution For A Youthful Skin | by Eashe1949 on apple.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title: Power Testo Blast Male enhancement capsules and supplements? by AlexanderaSander on graphicdesign.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer (batch report: post 1 out of 2): Do more people die of drinking related complications than smoking related complications? by niklas on skeptics.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with a link in answer: Measuring feline capacitance by willsmith on electronics.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching website in body: Lovera Serum To help with acne and get by dixonrobert on drupal.stackexchange.com

Are you going to leave us to be their leader?

:D

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer: Recover bricked android device by Steve St-cyr on android.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title, repeated URL at end of long post: quicksupplementfact.com/slumber-pm/ by AntonRook on graphicdesign.stackexchange.com

@ShadowWizard Someone already tried that

@Telkitty I will keep waiting for the day someone will ask you to list all the "trolling" you did here.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body: Can applications be written directly onto the CC2541? by Lily123 on mechanics.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer: Connect cisco router with tp-link wireless adapter by Kim Willson on superuser.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer: How to find the clock speed my fpga runs in XPS or EDK? by Van Loi on electronics.stackexchange.com

Is there any way to do a custom mod flag on the chat?

oh, right.

@Magisch I guess that I will keep my eyes open then. I wonder if the one you are discussing with is really "discussing" or just aiming at fueling a flame war...

@Derpy I'm not letting myself get baited

@Magisch you know, I am more into "let's remove the one who dropped those baits"

@Derpy If I was fully convinced it was a troll, I wouldn't be responding.

seem more moderate now, but some of the lines seemed a little weird.

this one for example almost got my flag. I will just consider it an hyperbole. For now.

@Derpy flag as... "not true"?

as I said, I will keep a drone there watching and monitoring the room

fine if that is discussion, everyone deserve to have his/her ideas. Not fine if someone is trying to drive the discussion into flame war.

@Derpy I also said Trump is a bad choice. If this starts a flame war, this is really not my fault. Though here it's off topic. :)

@ShadowWizard your opinion about the election may be different from other people opinion but it is your opinion. Diving in an already anxious argument with a line that reads "They have money, they are over moral" MAY be your opinion and I won't blame your for it even if I don't agree.... but it also seems like you are poking the boiling pot to see if you can make it spill.

@Derpy I see. Still, can't be proved, so chat suspension due to this won't be fair.

That is the whole point

lol :D

@Glorfindel That guy deleted his question after you answered :(

Anyone knows a question that deals with insta-deletion after an answer was posted? Something like in my answer here?

@PatrickHofman yeah, too bad :( If you can vote to undelete, I wouldn't mind.

Already did @Glo

thx

This one for the record:

meta.stackexchange.com/q/286798/245360

so, you are not "true" here?

@Telkitty so, are you now a telkitty that is dreaming of being a "1337 tr011" or a "1337 tr011" that is dreaming of being a telkitty?

@PatrickHofman none that I found, but if there was one my own answer would be something like "It's acceptable, at least when the question itself has negative score and especially on meta sites, e.g. feature request where OP realize not being popular, so won't be done"

> "A (superior) 1337 tr011 is a superior 1337 tr011 anywhere on the internet. Nothing modifies you, nothing is capable of changing you"

Since Stack Exchange is indeed changing you, you can't be a superior 1337 tr011 now and here

Hey, give our local trolless some slack... she's doing fine. :D

@ShadowWizard leave me work. Give me some time and the trolless will be another pony in the herd.

Maybe you just don't realize it yet. We have time.

@Derpy no no, you are our local pony. She is our local trolless. Don't mix things, it will get messy. ;)

@ShadowWizard I am asking you, how many MLP character names you used to know? And now?

still Donald Trump, but much younger

@Derpy hmm... uhhh.... ohhhhh.... welll......

@Telkitty evolution just needs to add four legs

@ShadowWizard lies. Not orange enough.

@Bart so how about this?

Better

:)

For whatever horrid definition of "better"

:(

@ShadowWizard ;)

OK, what about Dark Young Trump?

!!/alive

@Magisch Watching this endless list of new questions never gets boring

!!/reboot

Goodbye, cruel world

@ShadowWizard That's not a report.

@SmokeDetector I know

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer: Can a Christian marry his deceased brother's wife? by Rober magampa on christianity.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title: Want to develop a web site such as bankifsccode.com/ in Drupal 8 by user343870 on meta.stackexchange.com

@ShadowWizard \N{SHEEP}\N{EMOJI MODIFIER FITZPATRICK TYPE-6}

@tchrist huh?

@ShadowWizard Talk to the duck.

Why should I talk to @Inf? ;)

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Non-English link in answer: Usual taxi fares and things to know about transportation inside Antalya by user343723 on travel.stackexchange.com

sd k

@Shog9 The comments under a nomination, are they free 4 all or generally required to be constructive?

@Magisch same rules as everywhere else, with a bit more allowance for personal observations (NOT insults)

@Shog9 Cause Art has been getting lots of (imo not very based in facts) flack from a particular user

Not direct insults mind you but very distracting nonetheless

well, distracting is a different issue... Lotta comments right now, but that'll end with the nomination phase

@Shog9 Does the election phase come with a fresh slate of comments

or do the current ones stay

they stay on the nomination phase; no comments in either of the latter phases

No comments on the election tab

I have a feeling I may not make it this time, but maybe some years from now

hmm... I wonder if "move to chat" works on nominations?

@Shog9 I don't think so

I looked for it

let's make Art our guinea pig

It's been a great learning experience so far, though

lol

denied!

@Shog9 That'd have been a real mess if it worked

        if (post == null || post.IsDeleted || !(post.IsQuestion || post.IsAnswer))
            return JsonNotFound();

@Shog9 just add || post.IsNomination and it will work then.

@zaq YCS?

Tavernous

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Email in body: I would like to transfer small some from India to US to my son by Srinivasulu huggahalli on money.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Chinese character in title, messaging number in body: 办美国学位证/Rice毕业证#文凭/成绩单Q!微6272.12264莱斯大学教育部认证#毕业证￥成绩单/回国人员证明 Rice University by xiguai216 on hinduism.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer: Material Design by Alex Saplacan on blender.stackexchange.com

@ShadowWizard Was YCS likely to nominate? He didn't strike me as someone who wants to be a moderator.

Meanwhile I've been going over some of the candidates reviews. Let's just say that there are some that won't get my vote.

@zaq You've got a point, the entropy of that statement was close to 0.

It surprises me, though, that some of the candidates had done little reviewing.

I've found a lot of problematic issues surfacing in the review queues. From spam posts, to vandalism edits. The latter usually from a user trying to rage-quit.

So, I feel it's a plus if a mod candidate is a prolific reviewer. IF they're reviewing right.

Not sure about that... especially with the amount of robo-reviewing going on.

What you'd really want to know is how the candidates voted; what they voted to close, reopen, delete or undelete. To get at that information, you need to dig through the site.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-Latin answer: how to show persian or arabic numbers in Magento? by user46997 on magento.stackexchange.com

So, you'd go into the chatroom to say "Well, you closed this which was should stay open, and reopened this which was cr*p"?

Much better wording yes.

Now how would I phrase "this tag wiki was blatantly copy-pasted from the official documentation, why did you approve it"? ....because that's what I've seen.

Any candidate who responds with that, hasn't understood what they're applying for.

@zaq To which we should just lower their pay grade.

@zaq Why not btw

@Magisch I was actually surprised to see you running. You once told me you'd been doxxed in the past. As a moderator, you'd be a target again.

@S.L.Barth Yeah

It was mildly unpleasant

I weathered it once I'll do it again

Well, I guess having been through it once can be helpful.

I usually Reject edits that add links like that. Too many links are a distraction, not an improvement.

I tried to Reject another one like that with a custom reason, but the Reject bug struck again :-(

People are taking to the "Content is too specific" reason as the standard Reject. Note that there's one of these among the Rejecters as well.

@S.L.Barth I have dealt with way worse then this site could throw at me

@Magisch Well, I guess you can handle it.

Meanwhile let's just hope that if you do become a moderator, things will stay nice.

Of course thats always preferable

I wonder if I will be able to overcome the fact that I don't have 10k rep yet

People really should look beyond rep. It's about the worst yardstick in the system.

Indeed

For example... just yesterday I saw a bad edit in Documentation. One Approver above 500 rep, one Rejecter below. The lower rep user understood it better.

@S.L.Barth But people should and reality don't always align

I'm giving it my best shot, so I hope I at least wont get primaried

Well, good luck from me!

zaq is everywhere