« first day (2133 days earlier)      last day (2879 days later) » 

@Quill :%s/if everything was/if everything were/
 
@Telkitty another good reason to not use Python
 
@Telkitty Wrong butt.
 
user315433
1:20 AM
@doppelgreener This one? Rolling question rate limits are now network-wide by Tim Post on meta.stackexchange.com
 
1:39 AM
@sandwich That's exactly the one. Thank you very much.
 
We're sorry, but there are NO new users allowed here on meta! Privilege: create posts awarded at 2 reputation.
 
That was a temporary response to a wave of off-topic questions
 
I know. The off-topic junk is because a ton of people were reading the "we have updated our terms of service" inbox notification, and not realizing they were no longer on stack overflow. I think a better solution would be to make it so that if you are not a member of the meta or you only have one reputation on meta, all links on the "we have updated our terms of service" page are invalid and the "unanswered... ask question" banner is not showed on that page only.
That way they would have to hit the back button to ask, which would bring them back to stackoverflow
 
1:54 AM
silent blocks are much more productive
 
I'm not suggesting a non-silent block, I'm suggesting for all links on the "we have updated our terms of service" page to be invalidated.
@SmokeDetector why don't you ever beep when you discover smoke?
 
Then why don't I hear it? Is there some glitch with my profile?
 
it's a userscript, meaning it's not part of standard chat
 
Oh.
 
2:26 AM
greetings, @bjb568
 
2:36 AM
15
A: Can limits be thought of as linear functionals (or operators, depending on context)?

Martin ArgeramiLimits can definitely be seen as functionals. The problem is that to consider them as a functional, you need the limit to be defined on all elements of a vector space. If you are dealing with continuous functions on a compact set (or an interval, to make things simpler), then the limit is just ...

Interesting math fight in comments.
@John Hallo
 
 
2 hours later…
4:10 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: TestX Core What if there is a method by balndharry on drupal.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: Under what conditions will healers switch targets? by Owen Curran on gaming.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Evening lotion applied at bedtime by nokithomn jpei on arduino.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching website in body: Now could be the ideal time for you to inspire by user22730 on arduino.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer: Knowing the bad credit (for loans) in Austria (KSV and similar) by Loan Loan on money.stackexchange.com
 
sd 5k
 
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: http://musclebuildingbuy.com/dermaserre/ by Camzocozz on security.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, link following arrow in title, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: 10 Stategies To Increase Natural Testosterone Production..>>> mylaviveeyeserum.com/staminon-reviews by boydmcmillan on askubuntu.com (@kos)
 
sd 2k
 
4:46 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Ways To Bulk Up Build Strength Quickly by danielsstuart on superuser.com
 
5:08 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: How Does Megamaximus work? by rokkythomas on superuser.com
 
ccccccombo breaker
sd 2k
 
5:25 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching website in body: http://iqilicaqenagi.tumblr.com/ by user22734 on arduino.stackexchange.com
 
5:35 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: — Other key fixings in Gavali Advance Skincare by Anall1965 on arduino.stackexchange.com
 
sd 2k
 
user202362
6:14 AM
 
user202362
Umm ... Why?
 
7:05 AM
Why what?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Pattern-matching website in answer: What is a word for "loosely mirror" something/someone else? by cleomliddle on english.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
8:08 AM
turns out I did get an email from Fog Creek about HyperDev...
> Thanks again for your interest and participation; user feedback has been so incredibly helpful to us the last few months. In fact, we'd like to send you a thank you gift! Can you please respond with the best mailing address to reach you? We'll only use this information for good :)
it went to my junk inbox ;-;
 
user202362
@Bart 2 x 2 hours later?
 
user202362
I refreshed .. same probem
 
8:25 AM
Muted user?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in body, email in body: thanks to dr solution for bringing back my lover by AINA on travel.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer: Should I use IRA money to pay down my student loans? by Murilo moore on money.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, link at end of body, link following arrow in body: https://bodybuildingreview721.wordpress.com/ by jagoweuuvi amihxu on arduino.stackexchange.com
 
9:22 AM
(@bjb568 is right, you ignore Feeds for some reason.)
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: you're going through drawback? by catherinbandi on askubuntu.com (@kos)
 
sd 5k
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Mostly non-Latin answer: Call PHP files like index.php?page=PAGEHERE by 犀利士 on wordpress.stackexchange.com
 
9:44 AM
@Shog9 @balpha are you aware that stackexchange.com/sites is down for an hour now?
 
Seems to be up now @ShadowWizard?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Mostly non-Latin answer: 502 errors on WordPress / nginx / php5-fpm by 犀利士 on serverfault.com
 
@Bart not for me.
Maybe some server side cache going wrong for some users, I think they got several "cache centers", or something like that.
 
I do see the 0 visitors thing, but the /sites is up for me it seems.
 
user202362
@ShadowWizard can't blame myself, I am very productive person despite spending most of my time idle ...
 
user202362
9:57 AM
</shameless self promotion>
 
pro-crastination
 
@Bart for me it redirect to the panda after a minute or so. Well, if it's working for SE team guess all is good.
 
user202362
TIL there are many types of door and window seals ...
 
user202362
 
@ShadowWizard thanks; it should work now - please let me know
we did a SQL upgrade on the weekend; I think the cardinality estimator really, really hated a particular query
 
user202362
10:10 AM
yesterday, by sandwich
5 out of 6 is 83%, good enough for a B.
 
user202362
I would smack him a little too
 
@MarcGravell yes, working now. "cardinality estimator"? Sounds... Stack Exchange-ish... ;)
@Marc also, what about the 0 visitors/day in beta site stats? This one isn't fixed yet.
 
no, that's SQL Server; that is the part of the engine that looks at your query, glances at the table, and says "meh, that'll probably be 100 rows; that bit over there will be 10000 rows" - which helps it decide what strategy to use
if the CE gets it wrong, the strategy picked can be wildly inappropriate
@ShadowWizard context? is that a new thing? or something that has just always been that way?
 
5
Q: Site Stats data showing "0 visitors/day" in all beta sites and link to stack exchange timing out

fedorquiI just noticed that all beta sites show 0 visitors/day in the Site Stats. I checked Spanish Language, Personal Productivity and many others, and all have the problem. Furthermore, clicking on the "stack exchange" link on that Site Stats block times out: the page http://stackexchange.com/sites se...

(mentioned it before, though easily missed :))
Since it was reported together, assumed it's related.
@MarcGravell so, leading to a time out?
 
leading to hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of timeouts, yes
I think the zero thing is unrelated
 
10:20 AM
Yep, I reported them together since both things come in the "stats box"
 
that's fair
 
but let's not be attached to formality: I can split this in two questions ; )
 
@ShadowWizard the reason it worked for @bart and not you is that ?view=grid was fine, ?view=list was ... very much not
 
@MarcGravell oh, I see. Thanks!
Just curious, what is the misbehaving query?
 
user202362
shadow is ready for some SQL injection ...
 
10:37 AM
Ah, so @ShadowWizard is one of those list people ... for shame.
 
@ShadowWizard sure thing; there's nothing business critical here - basically, simply this:
DECLARE @p0 datetime = '2016-05-23T09:49:19',
        @p1 tinyint = '1',
        @p2 tinyint = '2';

SELECT COUNT(*) AS [Count], [t0].[SiteId], [t0].[PostTypeId]
FROM [dbo].[NetworkPosts] AS [t0]
WHERE ([t0].[DeletionDate] IS NULL) AND ([t0].[CreationDate] > @p0) AND ([t0].[PostTypeId] IN (@p1, @p2))
GROUP BY [t0].[SiteId], [t0].[PostTypeId];
which is a LINQ-generated query that looks at two post-types (questions and answers) in a given time range
the parameterization of the post-types confused it
this, conversely, is absolutely fine:
DECLARE @p0 datetime = '2016-05-23T09:49:19'

SELECT COUNT(*) AS [Count], [t0].[SiteId], [t0].[PostTypeId]
FROM [dbo].[NetworkPosts] AS [t0]
WHERE ([t0].[DeletionDate] IS NULL) AND ([t0].[CreationDate] > @p0) AND ([t0].[PostTypeId] IN (1, 2))
GROUP BY [t0].[SiteId], [t0].[PostTypeId];
so basically, I ripped out the LINQ part and replaced it with "dapper", which is especially convenient because dapper has a handy "literal injection" feature which means we don't have to hard-code the ids
but the time still ends up parameterized
 
Awesome, thanks!
 
the "posts by post-type" is massively skewed towards answers > questions > .... > everything-else (a few other post types exist, but tiny tiny quantities) - if the CE made decisions based on the other possible post types ids, it would have been many orders of magnitude wrong
PostTypeId Count
---------- -----------
2          29620905
1          20156575
4          192
5          192
10         1
so... yeah, if it suggested a strategy based on 4/5/10: lolz
 
10:54 AM
Glad you find it funny! :-D
 
oh I missed some code talk from Marc Gravell ;-;
 
user202362
you missed live show, code is still on the board
 
11:28 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, link following arrow in body: Training Will Modernise Fat Burning by jimyrivers on drupal.stackexchange.com
 
12:02 PM
hi guys!
I have a question, can a RO in chat-room ban you permanently?
 
12:19 PM
nope only kick mute
 
@AbhishekBhatia what Quill said is true, and RO can kick for one minute every time. Several kicks in a row will create automatic flag so moderators can come and take a look.
(either to handle the problematic user, or RO who might abuse their power)
 
@AbhishekBhatia it's not kicking, it's moving messages to a different room.
 
And he is barring me to ask any questions in the room. He kicks even before I can complete my question chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/30975632#30975632
It doesn't show but he kicked me both times, I can't verify that through log though.
There was a similar with the same guy before meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/320204/…
Is there any way I ask questions in that room, without creating an new account or posting it directly to the main site?
 
12:35 PM
@AbhishekBhatia sorry it's really between you and him and/or that chat room. I don't think we need a moderator to intervene, it's not kindergarten.
 
sd k
 
hmm... I think it is an abuse of power from stopping a guy who is contributing to the community to ask a question.
 
@AbhishekBhatia you simply stepped a few times to many on some toes, based on this. Ignoring advice given by both regulars and RO's is not abuse, that is just keeping a room tidy and focused.
But you can always try Meta or the Contact Us link.
I don't have high hopes though ...
 
@rene I think it is fair to kick if you think a question is not upto the standard. But kicking a guy before he can even ask his question is a bit too unfair. chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/30974890#30974890 chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/30974890#30974890
 
@AbhishekBhatia It is perfectly OK as the users that are kicked are notorious for not accepting advice, they constantly blame others, and they all assume they did nothing wrong. Most often by referencing all kind evidence to prove their point. Unfortunately by doing so they lowered once more their chance to ever get back into that room.
 
12:50 PM
@rene OK is letting a guy complete his question, and then evaluating whether the question was upto the standard to kick him or not. A permanent ban is a mere abuse of power.
 
@AbhishekBhatia not really. It's their room, they got the right to decide who can and can't be in the room.
You can create a new room, and do the same to them.
 
You don't seem to get my point ... I totally agree with any RO that kicks users who have caused issues. It doesn't matter if you think it is abuse or not.
 
@rene The RO has been previously reported to abuse power, from the meta post I linked before.
@ShadowWizard I guess that's True but not feasible.
 
@AbhishekBhatia Just wait until the RO post on meta about a user constantly trying to enter their room while being told to leave. Then the game is even again.
 
So I guess the answer to original question- "can a RO in chat-room ban you permanently?" is Yes.
 
1:01 PM
Yup
 
@AbhishekBhatia Yes, it is the only actual moderation option RO's have for users that refuse to change their behavior
 
@rene But not letting them post at all? They should rather evaluate the question before, that's what I think.
 
Given how far the problems seem to go back @AbhishekBhatia, the point where that was still an option may simple have gone by.
 
@AbhishekBhatia Yes, you think that because that is supporting your case. You might be the only one with that point of view ... and what Bart says
 
I don't have a case, I just wanted guy to stopping kicking me before I post. I guess I can do that only when he is not in the room.
 
1:07 PM
@AbhishekBhatia no. RO can "ban" you only from the specific room he/she owns. Not from any other room.
@AbhishekBhatia friendly advice: keep away from the room.
 
Okay, thank you guys for your time. :)
 
Does anybody knows of studies/research about why people vote on StackOverflow/StackExchange sites?
I'll also take any suggestions about where I should ask this. :)
 
1:24 PM
@musically_ut perhaps something in here? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/134495/…
 
/me checks out the titles.
 
Other than that the obvious answer is that we do it because we're bastards and we maliciously dowvote every idiot noob coming to the site, while we sit on our thrones and mock the poor souls.
 
I was looking for the canonical meta post for that ^
Strangely, I can't find it
 
We probably downvoted it and then it got deleted.
3
 
Let me rant on meta about that ...
 
1:35 PM
:D
I am primarily interested in upvotes on answers (downvotes form a relatively tiny fraction of those votes).
I can see multiple motivations: "helped me learn something", "thanking for the effort", "good/well written answer", etc.
I'm working on modelling user's expertise and one of the assumptions I am making is that if a user upvotes an answer, then it is because the user learned something from the Q&A pair.
 
Don't forget the "I have the same question" vote.
 
But I think that would be an upvote on the question.
 
Ah yeah, missed that part. Sorry
 
There are several studies revolving around "contributions" to the site on the list of research papers based on SO. However, the "contributions" usually map to Questions or Answers.
In one of the papers (cs.cmu.edu/~ylataus/files/TausczikPennebaker2012.pdf) the authors say that they managed to get a link to their user-survey to show up on the MathOverflow website for ~ 4 days.
I wonder how they did that
 
That might have been from the time Mathoverflow was still a separate site?
Myeah, 2012
 
1:58 PM
Oh.
BTW, how are the Featured meta posts selected?
I'm going to see if there is a meta post about them.
 
@musically_ut you mean "FEATURED ON META" or "HOT META POSTS"?
 
Featured on meta.
 
manually tagged
 
Who tags them? Can they be.... Ahem... Persuaded?
 
@musically_ut diamonds
 
Looking.
 
Hold on, you need the timeline
 
So... Any one diamond can feature a post?
 
@musically_ut bribing SE moderators is a federal crime, sure you want to do that? ;)
@musically_ut yes, it's a moderator only tag, just like the status tags.
 
2:07 PM
@rene not really strange, it's off topic on MSE since it's pure psychology.
 
Good to know and what bribing? ;)
 
(* shifty eyes *)
 
2:21 PM
@Marc finally I had the time to really look into what you posted, and got couple of questions. First, why don't you put that NetworkPosts table as part of the data dump, at least for SEDE, so that we can make cross site queries easily? Second, isn't that failure of the cardinality estimator a bug worth reporting to Microsoft?
 
2:40 PM
sd f
eh.. wait...
nvm
 
Just a bit doubt on the last smokey report.
 
3:37 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklisted website in answer: Closed source binary blobs in chipsets - privacy threat? by Eva Skinner on security.stackexchange.com
 
3:49 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklisted website in answer, blacklisted user: How to know if a file is decrypted or not by Eva Skinner on security.stackexchange.com
 
4:00 PM
Today's xkcd comic (Time-Tracking Software):
 
4:47 PM
waffles
 
5:02 PM
SO chat is on and off for me
lot of timeouts
 
5:58 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer: Full list of ISO ALPHA-2 and ISO ALPHA-3 country codes by enric montmorency on gis.stackexchange.com
 
6:15 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer: Is it permissible to give zakat to a family member? by sultanali on islam.stackexchange.com
 
6:51 PM
@ShadowWizard 1: because it is redundant info that you could do from the dump; 2: yes
 
7:05 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: Dealing with rashes between thighs and around the groin by Armando on outdoors.stackexchange.com
 
7:52 PM
sd k
offensive ^^
 
8:07 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Link at end of answer, pattern-matching website in answer: Automatic SEO for wordpress by aa bb on wordpress.stackexchange.com
 
8:21 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: Condescending Employee: How do I react and how to handle the situation by Jimmy on workplace.stackexchange.com
 
@SmokeDetector why
sd remove
@SmokeDetector k
@SmokeDetector k
 
8:37 PM
> Hi Quill!
I am contacting you about the site: languagelearning.stackexchange.com.
I am in the process of selecting temporary moderators and was wondering if you would like to be considered for the position.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Pattern-matching website in answer: How much heat from a fire actually warms your home? by Nick Gordon on physics.stackexchange.com
 
@Quill and?
 
8:56 PM
sd remove
 
@rene there was some other stuff too
 
sd remove
@SmokeDetector k
 
Ok; you're five and I don't want you to spoil your supper, but there's cookies on the table for later. I point at them and tell you, "don't eat these cookies". So you go into the pantry and eat the rest of the package of cookies, because I didn't tell you not to eat those cookies. Here, we have a system that inadvertently said, "don't vote exactly like that" when it really meant, "don't vote for people, vote for posts". — Shog9 ♦ 6 mins ago
 
9:34 PM
sd sd sd
 
Anyone in NYC want cake?
 
sd f
@SmokeDetector f
 
10:05 PM
in The Nineteenth Byte on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 4 hours ago, by gcampbell
"Jeff Atwood shows solidarity with Stack Exchangians by promising to get SE its own missile defence system in 6-8 weeks."
> Don't call users time travelers just because their clock is off
cryptic changelogs are cryptic
 
user315433
10:57 PM
Ubuntu election #5. Five candidates so far. Max candidate score so far is 18 which is pretty weak for a large site where a lot of posts need work...
 
I suppose that provides some back story to:
33
Q: Exchange votes or favours

Jacob VlijmProbably the most risky post I ever posted on AU, nevertheless need to get it of my chest... Don't ask me how I got the impression, nor whom it involves, but there seems to be a tendency lately that people "exchange" favours. No one on AU has any objection to an occasional sympathizing vote, n...

 
11:47 PM
Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange have now moved to Fastly. If you see any issues, please let us know.
 
user315433
I hope that Fastly's oops screen is better than Cloudflare's.
2
 

« first day (2133 days earlier)      last day (2879 days later) »