That's always best but then you miss the 'good' news (you know, the ones where the orphan crusher machine is turned off for two minutes because someone paid a huge effort/amount of money) too
Thing my parent's taught me as a little kid: Things will happen anyway and lying awake waiting for them is only making it feel like it takes much longer before it happens.
Granted, that was for birthdays, but it also works awesomely for anything the US may do.
@VLAZ Of course not. That's why those groceries are so expensive!
In other less depressing news...... Nope, I'm empty XD
Oh! I made stir-fried pineapple rice again last night and it was goooood :D
And it seems I'm integrating into this neighborhood far better than I ever expected, I got invited to a surprise coffee-then-drinks-evening at the neighbor's last Monday :D
@M.A.R. Thanks that is enough for me. I don't care for either approach, I just wanted to look into the abyss. You know, stare enough and it stares back to you.
@JourneymanGeek Well, I just lost my will to live, again, today, so I guess we're two. Welcome back, fascism! The people have spoken! They wanted you back!
@ShadowWizard It would've been better for the European economy if Harris had won, I was told. I wouldn't call it happy or sad, just... it's not the best outcome from an economy-in-this-country perspective.
@JourneymanGeek Well, I just lost my will to live, again, today, so I guess we're two. Welcome back, fascism! The people have spoken! They wanted you back!
@Tinkeringbell To be fair to Kamala, she's apparently drinking beer in weirdly short glass. I think Trunp is trying to measure just how small it is. It's probably harder with a real beer glass - half a litre. Harder still with the full litre ones, those are a challenge even by using the handle (properly).
Depends on your definition of 'real beer glass' yeah. Many places here will serve you 25cl or 33cl in a 'real beer glass'. Perfectly doable (though I tried it with some water in a similar glass ;) )
The litre ones? I mean, they are heavy even empty.
Also, not really impossible to lift. But can be a challenge.
Mostly it's just killing my wrist after a while. So, I end up having to support the glass with a second hand just to make sure it doesn't slip from my other hand.
Hmm, probably all of these status tag wikis are going to need to be revised. I'll drop an excerpt in for [status-wontfix] because that's fast and easy and I'll probably come back to fixing the others later
Can non-mods suggest and approve edits to wikis for mod-only tags?
@Slate on the other hand - to an extent, its now a set of tags used entirely by staff, so to an extent you know best when they are used, and if those uses need to evolve
@Slate ah, thought you mean giving feedback by "community's had a pass at it" but on second read, you mean just to see that it doesn't cause any problems when used?
@Spevacus [status-review] is the only tag that has a directly mechanical effect, which is to copy the post and its link over to Jira where the CM team triages it out to the appropriate handling team. But [status-review], [status-planned], and [status-deferred] have quantified measurement attached to them. Buuuut... it's hard to imagine a situation where changing a tag would screw that up, unless it ended up in the wrong state.
Like if you went [status-review] -> [status-deferred] by mistake -> [status-planned] correctly, it would be fine. tl;dr I guess it could have an impact but you don't need to worry about it
@ShadowWizard Slate means, prior to making tag wiki changes apply across the network for the new tag, she wants the community to have an opportunity to make changes to it/improve it.
@JourneymanGeek this system shouldn't really require mods to pay attention to what's going on behind the curtain, except insofar as "[status-review] makes a Jira ticket" is already common knowledge
Staff with mod powers see the flags we do, they just have no reason to go looking for them unless they're Slate. They see flags surface when they open a post that has outstanding flags.
For clarity's sake I'm more than happy to lean on mod judgment for a lot of this stuff, but that's not the same as saying "no one's reading Meta"
So like, we absolutely can and do pick up stuff that wasn't flagged, and mods do drop posts into [status-review] when they're not flagged
It's definitely a weak point of this system that there's not a clear systematic chain of ownership from moment of post creation, but... one problem at a time
@ShadowWizard I think its more 'it gives it a better chance of being in the system' - but its a bit more like a lottery ticket (you could win) than a sure chance of things getting through
@JourneymanGeek Donald Trump is the new president of the planet's largest and possibly most influential country. What can possibly be more problematic?
Any chance of reviving the guidance for what should be escalated using status-review or is it just "Escalate what makes sense/what your community needs/whatever's related to what we've stated we're working on for this quarter on Meta"
It's also that like... taken literally, no one at the company has "read Meta Stack Exchange posts" in their job description. There are people who read MSE.
Who is on the Community Management Team?
Here is the list of people who make up the Community Management Team (aka CM, CMs), in order of hire date:
Name
Flair (links to blog or article announcing them)
Subteam
Title
JNat
Community Engagement and Enablement
Staff Community Manager
Cesar ...
Some of those listed I don't see a lot on meta, so that's the motivation for the question.
Basically all CMs read and interact with Metas on a regular basis. There might be a couple exceptions for people whose jobs focus more on project work and there is natural fluctuation in the amount of attention posts on Meta will get. There is also no guarantee that every post gets read.
2
But like, familiar with the rough shape of happenings? Sees posts and processes their contents? Yeah, absolutely
When I began work on the now defunct Community Leadership Team in early 2020, one of our early initiatives was to share details on the work being done for the community from both Community and Engineering teams. This was done in the form of Community Roadmap blog posts, each of which had an accom...
@Spevacus oh, sorry, I processed this and forgot to write a reply. tl;dr: yeah. ts;wm: I don't want to step on @JNat's toes, so put a pin in this for now
The push to put AI in places I don't feel it belongs makes me annoyed. I'll continue to express my annoyance with it. But at the end of the day it seems it's here to stay, so bleh. I'm hoping that side-along to that AI shtuff other pubplat changes make their way in that the community's wanted. The Community Asks sprints have been neat. It seems like a good few old requests were addressed. Better late than never.
@Spevacus eh, to me it feels like a reversion to focusing on anything but pub plat. I'm also convinced its a bubble
I'm chill with SE making money out of it, but some of these things have an adverse effect on well, the people who probably care the most about the network
I think the popularity of AI is assuredly a bubble, but I'm definitely in agreement with SO that AI is here to stay (in the world) and it's only going to get better. Adapting to that has to happen. It's just... I'd prefer that said adaptation didn't include "Put AI in the Ask Question page".
Lately, SO has been pushing out experiments or new experiences on SO that are Minimum Viable Products. I can only reach the conclusion that the feedback they get as a result of those MVPs not being up to snuff is... Expected. Which begs the question: Why not toss them back in the oven for a bit longer and come back with something where the expected feedback looks a bit more positive?
I'm pretty sure if they came up with something that would entirely respect your input and walk you through a perfect answer, people would be unhappy. And that's not really what we get
On the other hand, its a pretty hard sell to an outside investor to go "we need to hire and retain staff for longer periods of time, and have them do stuff that dosen't directly impact the bottom line, and we're not sure if its too late for it to work"
I'd also guess that in a year or so of pushing genAI... there's been no good product fits
assuming this is coming from above, or prosus, well... there's probably questions
@Spevacus tbh it's kind of due to people having different definitions of "minimum". I agree that certain things could use more time to cook before they're released for public consumption, but to some degree, the team probably wants to include the community earlier in the process rather than waiting until the kinks are all ironed out