I was reaching for the close button just seconds before you closed it :P
I don't see an issue. The situation is covered by the FAQ. In fact, the answer defers to the FAQ. No need to keep multiple sources that all need to be updated on change.
There was apparently at least one other occasion when the answer became outdated, looking at the comments.
Catija is right that the FAQ doesn't quite cover what happens if you don't have answers on a closed question with a bounty. I mean, it should just lapse and you lose it. However, it's not very clearly defined in the section seeking to define it. Also, the situation can definitely be handled differently. If somebody adds a bounty to a question and that question gets closed, they certainly could get the bounty refunded.
Like, what's the worse that can happen? A user starts bountying closeable question and the community whack-a-closes them all? Seems the user is actually helping clean up the site.
Well the other bad thing is that the user gets frustrated and leaves forever. But there is a much higher chance of that if they just lose their bounty.
The criteria can be refined, like you lose the bounty if the question was open for X days (say, closed on the last or last two days). But the specifics can be ironed out separately.
@VLAZ Yeah, I did a top of my head suggestion with reasoning but as much as I enjoy working out mechanics, one would assume that these sort of changes would come with them built in D:
So, Internet Archive got hacked, 33M emails and passwords (hashed, but still) now out in the open. I wonder, did SE know anything in advance, deciding to move away from there? ;)
@SPArcheon-onstrike valid doesn't have to mean "good". It means it's on topic and should not get closed/deleted, but it can still be poorly written, or if in meta site, have content that the downvoter doesn't agree with.
@JourneymanGeek +1 this is fine.
@SPArcheon-onstrike there's no more image search, it's now called "Google Lens".