« first day (3374 days earlier)      last day (1637 days later) » 

8:00 PM
@Catija Random uninformed thought: Meta fails because it's not a Q&A site running on Q&A software. Rather it's something that should run it's own... meta software where rep really isn't a thing at all or is earned a completely different way.
Getting downvoted on meta really shouldn't matter or be a problem
it really should just be part of being on meta
 
@Mgetz Eh. Meta is a great idea and serves a valuable purpose... but the mechanics need a major overhaul. We took the easy way by just making it identical to main sites... but it's becoming clear that that decision isn't aging well.
 
@Catija I believe we are in violent agreement?
 
yup
 
Random thought: see how many tomatoes and cupcakes you can pick up in one arm (not at once). That's how many tomatoes (disagrees) and cupcakes (agrees) you get per day
 
@Catija I don't think it ever worked well from its inception, to be honest. It has always been scary. I've always had users ask me to post for them or tell me they're scared to post on MSE. Quite apart from the "toxicity", if any, knowing that an unpopular suggestion will cost you privileges is a strong deterrent to participation.
 
8:04 PM
we'll roll for CM to see which arm we use
 
But I think you and I may have had this discussion before, once or thrice ;)
 
Should meta even have privileges?
 
Yes. For things like editing, at least.
But I have always been in favor of using network rep for this.
 
ok but what should determine how to get those?
 
Then again, this discussion is as old as meta itself.
 
8:05 PM
I'll put one cupcake on network wide rep, myself
 
And there are strong opinions, and good arguments, on both sides.
 
did everyone who had a MSO account pre-split retain their (M)SO reputation on MSE?
 
@pkamb no
1000% no
 
@Mgetz you sure?
 
so everyone started at ~100 a couple years ago?
 
8:08 PM
I seem to remember there being loads of rep on MSE from day one.
 
@terdon very, because I had an MSO account
 
No, we definitely kept our rep
 
...
 
and I only moved over with 100 rep association bonus
 
@Bart Yes, that's what I thought.
 
8:09 PM
ah so many of the high-rep users GOT exactly what I want, which is using SO rep on MSE :)
 
@Bart must have been above a certain threshold because mine didn't carry over.
 
@pkamb I think MSO had its own rep.
Which became the MSE rep.
But I don't really remember.
 
@pkamb no, because that never was SO rep. SO and MSO back in the day had their own rep systems. We transferred MSO rep to what is now MSE
 
interesting
 
MSO was a weird hybrid "yeah it's the SO meta, but it's also the network meta" deal with its own reputation.
 
8:11 PM
Yep. MSE will have all your MSO reps (minus the few posts that will be migrated back over to MSO) and you'll continue to earn new rep there, and the new MSO will behave like all other child metas and inherit your main site (SO) rep. — Laura Apr 9 '14 at 17:39
 
I seem to be remembering differently, and complaints from other sites
regardless I don't care because I refuse to participate in MSE because of how it works
 
Good, more useless rep for us
 
Way to be toxic... that's really not a nice thing to say
 
> It's also odd that Stack Overflow is the only network site without a proper, dedicated per-site meta, where its meta has its own reputation system not tied to the parent site in any way.
(old behavior)
 
It's basically telling me to f the hell off
 
8:13 PM
@Mgetz ????
 
Hahaha, it was not a serious remark in any way @Mgetz
 
@Bart Sarcasm doesn't work in text
 
"great, more foo for me" is a classic jocular expression.
 
It's something my grandfather used to say if someone didn't take a biscuit or slice of cake. "Good, more for me". @Mgetz
 
I'm sure Bart meant it as a joke
 
8:14 PM
@terdon and you assume people understand or get that joke?
 
@Mgetz it might be rather Dutch.
 
remember not everybody has the same context as you
 
@Mgetz I assume nothing, I am just explaining that it is a very common expression and one almost always used in a very friendly way. So I pointed that out because I saw you had misunderstood.
 
It's a pretty common joke, IME...
 
8:16 PM
@terdon my point stands, and stands in light of the CoC too. What may seem like a joke to one person can be truly offensive to another.
 
that is true of literally anything
 
@Mgetz OOokay.
 
We are last I checked discouraged from using sarcasm for that reason
 
... it's not even sarcastic.
 
Rob
One would assume good intentions, unless it's made clear that the person obviously intends harm.
 
8:17 PM
@Rob it's hard to assume good intentions when someone is casting a negative action in a positive light for themselves in text
ironically if Bart had appended a /s this would be moot
 
ok, I posted an answer
0
A: How does Meta Stack Exchange work?

pkambReputation Accounts on Meta Stack Exchange have their own reputation, unassociated with any other sites on the Stack Exchange Network. Other Meta sites share reputation with their main sites. For example, a Meta Stack Overflow account has the same reputation as the associated Stack Overflow ac...

is there anything to add?
 
Bart has clarified it was just a joke. @Mgetz I'm sure nobody meant you any offense, so everyone, maybe move on?
 
Rob
I don't see that, in the line prior to your swearing, and more than three others have said the same.
 
/sigh /facepalm
 
That sounds like a plan
 
Rob
8:19 PM
✔️
 
I give up
 
@Mgetz what other outcome had you hoped for?
 
@rene for people to actually take a moment to reflect on how imperfect communication and assumed shared context can create this exact situation which led to the whole CoC thing?
 
possibly, people actually had such reflection and got to a different conclusion than yours?
 
@FélixGagnon-Grenier Possibly they never bothered to reflect or consider that there was even an alternative view point or even bothered to try to understand it
which is more likely
regardless I'm frustrated and done here for now
 
8:24 PM
@Mgetz now that, is directly insulting, and not even in a "possibly depends on shared context" way.
 
@Mgetz We did. Which is why so many of us tried to explain how we read it. You read it differently which, as you say, is a common problem with text-based communication. But that's why we discussed it. Your position was heard, and it was pointed out that the message was meant in jest.
 
Is this our "war" moment now? Everything is explained or reasoned about in the context of their own CoC perceptions, no matter the issue? If I offended or upset anyone with an attempt at a joke which I thought was obvious particularly due to the "useless rep" reference, then I apologize. Unreservedly. But holy frick people, there is more than the CoC. There has been more before it, there will be more after it.
 
How can we do better? Honest question.
 
1 min ago, by Mgetz
regardless I'm frustrated and done here for now
 
well then, cya
 
8:25 PM
Folks... tensions are running high and people have shorter fuses than usual. Might I suggest this gets dropped for now?
 
🚽
 
@pkamb well done ;)
 
8:42 PM
o/
 
"unassociated" is not a word?!?
 
It is
 
I know!
 
Not worth it to fight over, but it's a word @SonictheReinstateMonica-hog! shakes fist
^ that's a joke btw, just making sure ...
 
@Bart My browser flags it as an incorrectly spelled word
 
Your browser is poopy
 
I also pulled out every paper dictionary in my house, and couldn't find it
 
Ooh, you have multiple paper dictionaries? Fancy :)
 
> paper
See, this is where you're going wrong in life
 
8:45 PM
Everyone knows that only what you find online is true. None of that book nonsense
 
books can be modified, what's online is forever
 
It was, of course, a paper book that prompted me to use singular they by default for so many years (before this fiasco happened)
 
@Bart ....I have like twelve....
 
no, not that, but English evolves fast. TL;DR: was actually added to the dictionary recently, but any paper dictionaries written before that won't be up to date
 
8:46 PM
we have an entire shelf for dictionaries in my house
 
that... must make for wonderful supper discussions...
runs away :P
 
As you might imagine, Banagrams at my place gets really intense.
 
@user58 you're part of the Webster family?
 
yeah, they're on the web a lot
... at some point I'll create a pun that will be funny. you just wait.
 
Speaking of online dictionaries, my personal favorite is Vocabulary.com. It not only provides a formal definition, but also a thorough plain-English explanation of what a word means
 
8:48 PM
@terdon only 50 or so of such accounts and none with extreme privileges (like a dupe hammer)
 
@SonictheReinstateMonica-hog ooh, nice
 
huh unassociated is not on vocabulary.com?
 
@rene Oh wow. That's some impressive DB-fu. What are you searching for exactly? Is it something like (MSE rep / top non-MSE rep)?
 
mag
rene is a tsql wizard
 
8:52 PM
@terdon it takes all users from MSE and then adds an extra row if that accountid exists in another database/site as well. from there it is just grouping and suming.
 
Its Challenge game proved immensely useful to me as a high school student, as one of the biggest college entrance exams here in the U.S. used to test knowledge of extremely obscure English vocabulary words.
 
it does look awesome
 
@rene Ah, OK. I was thinking of people who had thousands of MSE rep and not even 1k or so on any normal site. But I may be prejudiced, I had a nasty run in with someone like that a few years ago who felt he could come into another site and throw his weight around because he had MSE rep.
@mag I'll say.
 
@SonictheReinstateMonica-hog If you want to learn extremely obscure words, play Contact when Gareth is around. Sheesh.
 
@user58 Well, it no longer tests such words as of 2016
 
8:54 PM
Sure, but still. Learning new words is always fun.
 
mag
I like to dabble in sede myself sometime, but rene is another level
 
I didn't know we could create table. That's surprising.
 
(from vocabulary challenge):
> Your health is the condition of your body. If you barely get any sleep and only eat frozen pizza and jellybeans, you probably have poor health.
 
@FélixGagnon-Grenier I feel judged
 
mag
9:00 PM
temporary tables
very useful when you're skirting the timeout
 
and if you need an index on a column that lack one in the current schema
 
I mean, that's been something that Shog's been suggesting for like a month now
 
But now it's been implemented.
 
That is actually motivating
 
@SonictheReinstateMonica-hog cool. Poor MSE mods though, but cool.
 
mag
seems like a good idea
 
9:33 PM
It means more FAQs for me to rewrite and update...
 
mag
a chat room with 200 people and no moderation sounds like a recipe for disaster, even if the people skew towards reasonable
 
May 16 at 0:24, by Sonic the Inclusive Hedgehog
"When everyone is super, no one is." - Syndrome
 
eh, i believe most people are capable/willing to be reasonable when they feel listened to.
 
Also, from a technical standpoint, how are you going to control access? Manually give access to every new diamond? Manually remove access every time someone steps down?
 
@SonictheReinstateMonica-hog please wait. It’s a test and temporary for now.
 
9:36 PM
@mag Huh, you reminded me of this movie scene
 
@user58 it's probably scripted... I doubt Shog gave each and every one of us access manually
 
what's faster, writing a script or clicking 600 times
 
Rob
On OR.SE we moderated ourselves and gave the CMs no trouble and very little work when they checked in from time to time. Eventually we had an election and things continue smoothly.
 
@Catija Is the TL frozen during this time?
 
mag
not like freezing or deleting it would do anything
mods can talk past that
 
9:40 PM
Well, is it a new room or was the room itself migrated?
 
I guess I meant to ask...is talking in the TL forbidden during this time?
 
shog threatening us with evisceration if we utter a sound is pretty effective, though :)
 
mag
probably gonna work on the informal ton of bricks theory of moderation
whereas the theorethical existance of the ton of bricks makes it unlikely having to use it
 
or simply what was set up when the TL was frozen last time
 
@mag call it "Another brick in the wall"?
 
9:41 PM
@user58 New room.
 
Good luck to ChrisF, JourneymanGeek and Tinkeringbell who will have to moderate it!
 
mag
@user58 an automatic trashing moving and obfuscating script?
 
@Tinkeringbell you can borrow my smiting stick if you need it.
 
@mag automatic deletion + reparent + kick
 
mag
huh
 
9:56 PM
aquatic
 
Glub glub
 
🦀
 
Well, it's nice to see SE taking steps to fix the problems in the TL, at least.
Although I'd be very interested in seeing that chat moderator idea come to life....
Note to self: Write up a proper FR with ideas for that.
 
@user58 You mean, designated chat moderators?
 
Yes.
We've thought about it, @user58 - but of course there's no support for such a thing within the system right now. Perhaps it is time for that to change. — Shog9 ♦ 18 mins ago
 
10:04 PM
@terdon not only that, you can create procedure.
 
 
Rob
Apropos
 
10:23 PM
@user58 I sounds like its kinda sorta kinda being thought about.
 
hmmmm chat moderators
:O
 
TBH that's something I'd actually be interested in doing personally, so
 
It's something I've done in other functions in the past
IRC, large IRC channels, etc.
Though I partly feel like you could maybe make all 10k users 'mods' with RO/actual mods overseeing it.
 
That's... how it works now.
 
The flagging system doesn't particularly work well
That shouldn't really surprise anyone here though, I would expect you to all know why and whatnot
 
10:30 PM
You need to go regular user > [10ker >] RO > mod > chat mod > staff for it to work, I think.
or even mod > RO > chat mod
 
RO = mod > chat mod, maybe
 
Wouldn't matter
Rooms are excessively difficult to control once they reach critical mass and the topic of discussion becomes too open.
Even with a set of room owners, or in house mods, it is impossible for a small minority to influence a discussion in such an outnumbered scenario.
 
not if you give the minority decent tools
 
Even with intervention, so long as a user doesn't have a singularly insulting comment, they are generally allowed to continue on with their diatribe. When it is constructive, as is designed, there isn't necessarily a problem with that design. When it becomes trollish, and it is ingrained, it can almost not be removed.
 
unpopular opinion: chat moderation tools aren't bad. Okay, they're not brilliant, but the tools we do have are pretty powerful.
4
 
10:34 PM
@ArtOfCode - Sorry, but the history of chat on the exchange would disagree.
 
@ArtOfCode For mods, yes; for ROs, not so much.
 
Almost every large population of chat on the exchange has hit critical mass and imploded.
 
@user58 aye, that
 
Thanks @Glorfinder. This is a good point. — Yaakov Ellis ♦ yesterday
Finder of glor . . . y
 
@ArtOfCode As someone who has had to deal with such "tools" in a much larger arena: they don't scale. To put it mildly.
 
10:35 PM
@ArtOfCode They're pretty good but their distribution sucks
Of course a British mod wouldn't say otherwise
 
@TravisJ [citation needed]. There are plenty of active rooms that are just fine. Mods are empowered to remove problematic stuff that's not clearly over the line if it's being a persistent problem.
 
@ArtOfCode - I thought you would understand the references.
 
—powered but not –powered
 
You are aware how many chat communities moved to Slack, right?
 
Star wars
They did? Shucks
I can't slack
 
10:37 PM
@TravisJ I can go to any chatroom on chat.SE, no matter how huge it is, and if it gets out of hand I can send everyone in it home for a period of time I choose, or I can completely shut the room down until I feel it's time to let it open up again. That's pretty powerful.
 
No, it's not.
 
It's nearsighted and drives the community away.
 
@TravisJ that's... not the point
 
@202324 dammit, I was gonna flag it
 
10:38 PM
Yes, that is exactly the point.
You can't just hammer communities out of chat and expect that to solve problems.
 
@M.A.R. that was a nice movie wasn't it?
 
@TravisJ No, the point I'm making is we have some pretty powerful moderation tools, which are perfectly capable in the right hands of moderating chat here on SE just fine.
 
It's a black circle. A BLACK CIRCLE
 
Again, clearly not the case when some very large communities left chat at SE.
 
case in point: the tavern, which still exists after many years
with many of the same people still in it, too
 
10:39 PM
Mostly because of the mentality used against them, which was to just hammer instantly.
 
@202324 Can't access YouTube, BUT
 
Look at the C++ lounge, C#, JavaScript
 
I just rewatched Commando yesterday
 
The 3 largest chat rooms in the network, almost all abandoned for slack.
 
@TravisJ and some other very large communities stayed. It's just about what works for each community, and finding a way to moderate that works with people not against people.
@TravisJ Heh. Lounge<C++> was abandoned for other reasons :P
 
10:41 PM
 
@ArtOfCode I am unsure if you are familiar with any of these events.
I certainly don't have the time to rehash.
 
@ArtOfCode that's the nicest thing anyone's ever called me!
 
@TravisJ I watched the moderation of the lounge happen from the relative safety of the TL... t'weren't pretty.
 
@ArtOfCode It is just one example of many where the minority cannot influence a large group in chat. That is just the way it is designed.
 
@Shog9 you're a "too", or a "Sam people Still"?
 
10:44 PM
I agree, it wasn't pretty. It was ugly, and rough, and it certainly caused all sorts of problems.
 
@TravisJ the minority did influence the large community, assuming you're meaning the moderators to be the minority
 
I am making that assumption. And no, it didn't.
It just drove them off.
 
the minority persuaded the community, one way or another, that the room they wanted wasn't appropriate for SE, and it moved away
it wasn't a pretty way to do it, but it worked
 
It didn't work.
 
Alright, gute Nacht while you folks dig up old history \o
 
10:45 PM
You think losing community members works?
Is that not exactly the same problem the exchange faces today?
 
@TravisJ I mean... it moved a room that wasn't appropriate for SE to somewhere that was not-SE... I'd call that working.
 
Look, we are pretty far apart here.
 
That we are
 
The javascript room used to be an incredible resource for people who needed live help with problems
now it's a sad depressing place
 
Top 100 Tavern users by # of days between their first and last messages here:
UserId name                           daysSpanned daysActive first       last
------ ------------------------------ ----------- ---------- ----------- -----------
811    Shog9                          3375        1755       Aug 03 2010 Oct 30 2019
16587  George Stocker                 3367        45         Aug 11 2010 Oct 30 2019
115866 balpha                         3346        805        Aug 05 2010 Oct 03 2019
149052 NullUserException  อ_อ         3321        16         Sep 16 2010 Oct 20 2019
2
 
10:49 PM
@Shog9 Curious question: if Jeff Atwood chooses to return to the network and resume his role as "honorary moderator for life", will he have to go through the reinstatement process?
 
That’s an unfair metric :(
 
them that writes the queries chooses the sort order
 
I don’t think Jeff was ever a moderator.
 
Between his leaving the company in 2012 and until his diamonds were procedurally removed in 2017, he was an "honorary moderator for life", with that status having been granted to him as a co-founder of the site.
 
He was user 1
 
10:51 PM
Not really the same thing.
 
@SonictheReinstateMonica-hog he would have to have mods from every site he wants modship on OK it then 🤣
 
I asked later on somewhere if he held the right to be reinstated later given that his removal was described as solely procedural, and I believe I was told he could at the time.
 
It was a reference to him writing the code for the database @Catija
 
This may take.... 6 to 8 something
 
1 is the first index that SQL starts at for auto increase by default
 
10:54 PM
Practically SE can just do what they feel like
 
@TravisJ Was responding to Sonic :)
 
@Catija my bad
 
No worries;)
 
:)
 
11:12 PM
0
Q: Appoint chat moderators responsible for exclusively moderating chat

user58Currently, the way that chat moderation is set up, it relies heavily on site moderators moderating chat in addition to their main Q&A site. Moderators have some pretty powerful tools (freezing rooms, suspensions), and rooms also have a first line of defense in the form of room owners, who have sm...

@SonictheReinstateMonica-hog that was fun, I was the one who made his chat diamond disappear :D
(Okay, that means I just refreshed the profile, but still.)
@user58 Looks like this is going to be contentious.
 
Rob
Seems to me like a lot of extra work/complexity for a problem I haven't yet seen
 
11:28 PM
The worst behavior I've seen in here over the last week or two has been pretty tame. I'm guessing TL and other rooms might be a bit more rowdy.
 
@DavidA ...this room has also had some pretty heavy-handed moderation going on, with a team of ROs with staff and moderator backup. It's a bit of an exception.
 
Rob
It kinda is, but, I still haven't seen any consistently problematic rooms except for the lounge some years ago
TL is also being fixed
The largest rooms on SO pretty much all have an active moderator in, with a bunch of room owners. For other network sites, the flags go out to every moderator - so I don't think there's a lack of eyes
Unfortunately with the change to TL, it means mods won't necessarily be in a chat.se room anymore
 
Charcoal is another big 24/7 diamond center
Not as big as TL, of course, but we've usually got a couple
 
there's 7 in there right now
 
who knows how active they are, but it's something helpful
 

« first day (3374 days earlier)      last day (1637 days later) »