« first day (3367 days earlier)      last day (1646 days later) » 

3:00 PM
(>' ')> <(' '<) ^( ' ' )^ V( ' ' )V
Kirby dance!
 
@Trasiva Like Rowley Birkin QC?
 
♪┏(・o・)┛♪┗ ( ・o・) ┓♪
 
I have no idea who that person is
 
3:16 PM
@SPArchaeologist-様 That's what you get for living in Cydonia
 
@Raedwald Can I just take a moment to thank you for your very good comments on, well, comments?
Oh wait, maybe they have (ironically?) been removed.
 
Yep, you made me confused so I looked :P They've been gone for a few minutes now :)
 
@Rubiksmoose I saw that the FAQ was posted when most of the US would not have seen it, so as a European there was an opportunity for me to forestall problems.
 
Hah, well they were good and a good attempt. I really think if people used comments properly, they'd find that both they would become more helpful and that less drastic moderation of them would be needed.
 
@Rubiksmoose Irony indeed. Well, we shall see who gets the last laugh.
 
3:23 PM
@Raedwald I'm assuming they were flagged then, not self-deleted?
 
@Rubiksmoose I did not self delete them.
 
Fascinating.
 
user384163
But also, comments have always been ephemeral. I have had many comments removed, both recently and in the distant past. Many of those comments were good productive comments that had upvotes. We routinely explain to new people that that is the fate of comments. It has always been the way it works.
 
@AGirlHasNoName makes me wonder if there shouldn't be some system to deal with this sort of thing and 'promote' the most useful comments into something akin to a post
 
This seems a good time to make my exit. Bye.
 
3:25 PM
@Rubiksmoose The good faith interpretation is that all posts implicitly have the FAQs as ground rules, so appeals to follow the guidance in FAQs is not needed.
 
@AGirlHasNoName I'm finding I'm spending less time reading comments and sitting on a particular thread that's obviously going down hill to start flagging.
 
@AGirlHasNoName Definitely! You'll probably not find many people around that will agree to that as readily as I. The site I moderate (from the impression I get from other folks) has one of the more stringent comment-handling guidance.
 
user384163
@Mgetz I'm not sure that would work. Most comments that deserve promotion are super incomplete. If the answerer isn't prepared to put in the effort to flesh it out then you will get a lot of half-formed answers.
 
I think that's one of those really diversive things
 
@AGirlHasNoName not to an answer but to something else that's clearly not a normal comment but not a full answer either
 
user384163
3:27 PM
@Trasiva most comment threads have gone downhill lately
 
especially on meta
 
Definitely.
 
If it matters you need to put up and make it a post.
 
let's call it a sidebar
 
user194636
I had a lot of comments deleted. They were terrible comments. Good riddance I say!
 
3:28 PM
@JourneymanGeek that can be extremely anxiety inducing to some (me at least)
 
@Mgetz I know :/
 
An answer can be converted to a comment by a moderator. And happens automatically in some cases (link only?). But not the other way around (?)
 
@Mgetz There is: it's called editing. If a comment is so useful, it should be edited into the answer. There are very few cases where a comment is both worth keeping and not worth adding to the relevant answer.
 
Or someone can roll it into an answer for you
 
@Raedwald Yes, there's no way of converting a comment into an answer.
 
user384163
3:29 PM
@Rubiksmoose I am on both TWP (read very lax comment moderation) and IPS (probably the strictest) So I do understand how attached some people get to their comments
 
@terdon not going to fully agree, there are cases where things like best practices aren't relevant to the answer or would distract. But absolutely should be called out.
 
@AGirlHasNoName I saw, on one of your posts very badly so. (by other people posting bad things)
 
@AGirlHasNoName I love the proposal to rename comments or make it more obvious they're meant for clarifications
 
@Mgetz As I said, there are very few cases.
 
user384163
@JourneymanGeek agreed
 
3:30 PM
I'm annoyed that didn't work out
 
@terdon And honestly, I can't think of a single time that I've seen on the site I moderate where it would have been appropriate. Especially without the knowledge and consent of the person involved. Simply, 99.999% of comments are not answer-quality.
But that doesn't mean they belong as comments either of course.
 
@Mgetz and, conciousness and spoons permitting
I'm happy to help folks on meta with drafting questions, at least as far as my rather limited abilities allow ;)
 
Oh, I've seen a few. The sites I moderate are all technical and the useful comments are usually improvements that can easily be added to the answer.
 
My biggest issues are the people calling for flag mobs lately.
 
user194636
mobs are rarely a great idea
 
3:31 PM
@JourneymanGeek Me too!
 
Then trying to disguise them as "drawing attention to a bad thread"
 
@Trasiva Or for flag data to be made public.
 
@terdon I think the ground rules of a technical site, a non technical domain specific site (cooking!) and a site on squishy things are all different
 
Asking flag data to be public is a terrible idea in general
 
@Trasiva people are free to flag as they wish
 
3:31 PM
@JourneymanGeek yes
 
and the concept of bringing stuff up on chat's old
only really got rare cause we got queues
we used to use chat as a way to do queues
 
@terdon That certainly makes sense. Chances are, on RPG, if your answer is only two lines long it needs more to it to be a helpful and complete answer.
 
Indulging these meatspace concerns is tiresome.
 
@Trasiva It definitely is.
 
user384163
I'm terrified it will turn into a witch hunt
 
3:33 PM
@canon people are people, whether in bits or atoms.
 
There's a difference of trying to get legitimate bad actors flagged, and trying to get flags for disagreeing with something.
 
user384163
because if it does I can almost guarantee I am a target
 
user194636
@AGirlHasNoName you would have witches roaming free across the land?!
 
@JourneymanGeek oh wow! That makes a lot of sense. I had never considered that before.
 
@Rubiksmoose I've been here a while ;p
 
3:34 PM
fun fact: the term "witch hunt" is gendered because "witch" refers specifically to female wizards and herbologists / cat owners
 
@194636 Hey, I've dated several witches. They're lovely folks.
 
Luckily, I trust the MSE mod(s) to not only handle flags properly, but keep that information private as it should be.
 
and honestly "Be patient and realise people don't know what you know" applies so much to me because we've had so much change in the early days ;p
 
user384163
@Trasiva yes but no one has to prove that people are doing this. They just start casting aspersions that their content is being deleted because of brigades.
 
user194636
@Trasiva Unless you're a toad I guess. Perhaps that is an unfair stereotype.
 
3:35 PM
@Rubiksmoose I've been tempted to refer people to presdam vs arkhell when they get too pushy over information like that.
 
user194636
@Rubiksmoose I don't know they've hot some pretty sketchy people in that role
 
user194636
Oh hai JG
 
user206222
@terdon I do not do much, but I wish I did more!
 
user206222
One of these days.
 
@194636 Oh hai stranger!
Not a MSE mod at the moment ;p
 
user194636
3:36 PM
🙂
 
@AGirlHasNoName There's been at least one genuine interaction of this. However it's difficult to sell people on it simple because the context has been removed around it (once they were called out).
 
@AGirlHasNoName It already has. Some of the the people talking about "flag mobs"... I recognize them as repeatedly posting comments that are only just acceptable (IMHO) and so I infer might not be... entirely constructive.
 
(cause I literally can't keep track of people without names and numbers)
@Raedwald if you notice, some terms get... parroted
 
@Aza You should! You write well!
 
"Compelled speech" and "flag mobs" kinda take lives of their own
 
3:37 PM
@JourneymanGeek [looks up reference] ... hah!
 
user384163
@Trasiva If you mean this then you are catagorically wrong
 
And frankly, I don't get all the hate that herbologists get. I'd rather slap a leaf on my skin and hope it works than spend yet another week closed in a tiny room with six other people that can't even sleep in a way that doesn't make my ears hurt. And I'm lucky enough that I don't have to pay cash for the experience.
 
And my problem with terms like "flag mods" and "witch hunt" is it discourages and villanises flagging
 
user310756
@Trasiva people seem to be making a lot of claim that people are flagging for disagreeing. Yet no one can see anyone's flagging history - outside of mods and CMs. It's a pretty nebulous and destructive claim to make
 
At the end of the day, you're using your own brain to decide what you will do.
 
user194636
3:39 PM
Oh good this discussion again.
 
and you are always free not to act.
 
That we can't see it doesn't mean our claims are wrong
 
And I have openly disagreed with a few flag requests. That's ... fine?
 
The "flag mob" aspersions I find to be very pernicious because it kind of erodes trust in everything from the base up. Flag data is private so it makes the perfect boogeyman when casting aspersions on why your (undoubtedly perfect) comment was deleted. It also serves as a great deflection point to avoid having to consider why someone might have flagged your comment.
 
@YvetteColomb the lack of transparency is why people are worried that the moderation efforts of various groups may turn against them
 
3:40 PM
@JohnDvorak but flags are anonymous
Have always been
 
It certainly looks pretty problematic for half a conversation to be removed via flags, and then all flags on the comments replying at the deleted comments being declined.
4
 
@JourneymanGeek I mean, punished by flagging, not punished for flagging
Although I have seen the latter, too
 
@JohnDvorak you'd still need "transparency" for folks to see it
 
@KevinB remember that some flags are automatic, mods might not even see them at all.
 
user384163
@KevinB when the conversation is one person screeching transphobic garbage and the other side calmly trying to stand there ground it makes sense
 
3:42 PM
might be better to focus on what was flagged and whether it has value over who flagged it and whether it was organised
 
@AGirlHasNoName That wasn't what I was talking about, can we not simply assume please?
 
@AGirlHasNoName No, it makes no sense to leave a comment in place that is a direct reply to a comment that is gone.
regardless of the topic
 
and you can totally red flag half the comments
then go back and NLN the rest
 
user384163
@KevinB true
 
user384163
orphaned coments should be removed
 
3:43 PM
and yet all of my flags on them have been declined.
 
and honestly. right now?
 
user310756
@Trasiva who is calling for flag mobs? It's been ok across the site to ask for flags or votes on posts or questions. In fact there's several chatrooms dedicated to just that
 
@KevinB How did you flag them?
As obsolete or as offensive?
 
no longer needed
 
wierd
I can't speculate why, I can't see these things ;p
 
user310756
3:44 PM
@JohnDvorak anyone with an unpopular opinion has no strength of a group behind them. So I don't know why the vocal majority is upset by the vocal minority
 
@AGirlHasNoName Once the actual transphobic garbage is removed, it looks like what's left is being labeled unfairly as transphobic simply for disagreeing. I suppose this is a misunderstanding that causes a lot of drama. And I don't know how to fix it.
 
I'm not going to link to it
 
Generally, all other concerns aside, I've found that removing both sides of an argument where one side is in the wrong (as far as R/A or other policy) and one side isn't is generally the best way to go because generally that one side of the argument is enough to bring people back to fight more.
 
@KevinB And were they really? I mean, maybe the deleted comment was making a valid point in a horrible way, so the answer could still be useful if it is answering that point but not in a horrible way. it's impossible to know without clear examples.
 
user384163
@Trasiva I apologize for the assumption
 
user310756
@KevinB I have flags pending and the posts or comments are deleted - so I cannot see them and retract the flags :/ wonder if there's a bug
 
@KevinB oh
also the comment flag interface can be quirky.
 
I can't tell when my comments are deleted so that's a moot point
 
@YvetteColomb Again, I'm not going to throw out accusations when the context surrounding the original evidence has been deleted either through flagging or user deletion (which I can't assume).
 
It wasn't mine
 
3:46 PM
@Raedwald ah, one issue with the current system is that you don't know your comment got deleted until you get a one-strike-left note in your inbox.
 
user310756
@Trasiva there's nothing disguised. Just because you see a thread as bad, it doesn't mean the thread is not bad.
 
@YvetteColomb If they are custom flags, then they are not automatically marked as "helpful" when the comments are deleted. Those have to be done manually.
 
user310756
@Rubiksmoose yep I know- a lot are no longer needed. I'll go check
 
user384163
@JohnDvorak Yes the waters are muddy and it is a sensitive topic and a lot of the civil disagreement is also coming from the people who have had the uncivil disagreement removed. I don't know how to make it less of an ideological war than it is. I just dont.
 
Is there some way to review your own comments which were flagged/deleted along with flag info/status?
 
3:47 PM
@YvetteColomb Sorry I didn't see who I was replying to until I hit enter. I would have figured that you probably would have known that. (Though it was something I just recently learned!)
 
@canon no.
 
user310756
@Rubiksmoose that's ok :)
 
@KevinB lovely
 
user384163
@Trasiva then lets stop saying that it is happening
 
user384163
don't we have enough claims that we can't or wont prove
 
3:47 PM
It clearly is happening.
 
@AGirlHasNoName Fair point, I'll drop it. Especially since I just pointed out myself that I can't fulfill the burden of proof.
 
user310756
@Rubiksmoose it's also a way to push pressure people. Individuals are sometimes targeted with veiled comments and it's underhanded and really causing problems on the site
 
@KevinB What is happening? That may people are flagging? Yes, absolutely. I still haven't understood why that's a problem though. We want people to flag.
 
It's like the mob killed a witness. Nice and tidy.
 
And people are flagging on all sides of the "Debate".
 
3:48 PM
sizes up @canon for concrete booties
 
Yes, people are flagging on all sides, and one side is being accepted more than the other. The evidence is in what remains.
We can clearly see what isn't being removed
 
user310756
@KevinB please prove it. What is happening? There's a lot of accusations and no proof, People are making assumptions about how other people are flagging and they have no clue
 
user310756
@KevinB that's a matter of opinion.
 
@Bart I know that song!
 
3:50 PM
@KevinB That's the one we have absolutely no way of knowing. You'd need to know i) how many flags cast by each of whatever you perceive as "sides" ii) how many of each are marked as helpful. We have neither i nor ii so we're just wildly speculating on a tiny subset of the actual information.
 
Also many flag mobs assertions aren't about flags that get sent to the mod for approval. They are centered around the fact that after a certain number of flags comments will automatically get deleted.
 
@KevinB Only an MSE moderator could have evidence that it was happening. No MSE moderator has claimed it is happening.
 
And they never will.
Convenient right?
 
@Rubiksmoose This too. But Kevin specifically claimed that "one side is being accepted more than the other."
 
user310756
@terdon the people who know are the mds and the CMs
 
3:52 PM
Yes. Who else?
 
@KevinB tbh mods have too much to do, probably especially now than to worry about "sides"
 
@KevinB Again, see my comment about the whole issue of "flag mobs" being just a disguised way to say "we don't trust that MSE moderators are acting fairly"
 
I agree
 
user384163
@KevinB If you are going to cast aspersions on the moderation of MSE then you should probably back that up
 
The CMs are probably 3x as busy
 
3:52 PM
Fine, i'll link to it
 
user310756
@terdon I'm agreeing with you. is that ok?
 
user206222
@terdon Aw, thanks, :)
 
@AGirlHasNoName keep it cool and friendly pls.
 
And well, look, I know most of these folks, and I've been in their shoes
 
user310756
@Rubiksmoose and it's attacking some individual/s
 
user206222
3:53 PM
I've been on the fence about taking it up & honing it more seriously as a craft, I really love it when I do get the chance.
 
@terdon Ah yeah, that comment was more directed at Kevin than you (I was agreeing with you there)
 
there's a whole lot of comments in this thread replying to now deleted comments that have been flagged, and the flags declined
 
user310756
@AGirlHasNoName I agree. people are now saying that the mods cannot be trusted
 
user384163
@Bart indeed
 
user310756
@KevinB and you're not the only one.
 
3:54 PM
I'm spitballing here
but that might be for reference?
 
@KevinB I see two that seem like they're answering something but both are making useful points that can stand on their own.
 
user206222
Oh, wow, okay. So, this flags chat is a really useful case study on how anger at a vaguely-defined 'politics' quickly turns into anger against a vaguely-defined them.
 
user384163
@KevinB pretty dubious evidence of intentional mismanagement by moderators.
 
useful to, one side of the isle
 
user310756
@Aza exactly
 
3:56 PM
I'm curious to see how the reinstatement process works in practice instead of just theory. I think SE Inc is going to discover very quickly certain mods if reinstated will cause more harm than good to their "repairing" of good faith.
 
@KevinB If whatever the other side of the aisle is would post something civil, maybe it wouldn't be deleted. I don't know what was posted, but based on other things I've seen, I will assume it was not just disagreeing but doing so particularly aggressively.
 
The FAQ What recourse do I have if I believe a moderator has abused their privileges? includes the sub question "My post(s) were wrongly deleted or locked by a moderator". Complaining about it in comments is not given as advice.
 
I've seen aggression from all sides, mind you, not only one.
 
user206222
Like, to be clear, I have been trying to communicate that this is a risk for weeks, now. It's very easy to re-cast efforts to make the site better as a wedge by simply saying, "look at what they're doing to us!!"
 
Frankly i find the comments that remain quite aggressive.
YMMV
 
3:57 PM
@AGirlHasNoName given that moderators control the evidence...
 
@KevinB Then flag them?
 
user206222
Repeating it over and over again is not a coincidence. If these discussions are starting to sound and look repetitive, that's by design.
 
I did
 
@Trasiva The reinstatment process is a joke: all they need to say is "no", and the mod won't come back. So if SE feel a mod won't be a good influence they can simply claim they failed the "process".
 
user310756
@KevinB the network is going to side with the CoC. And as for declined flags, you're no the only one with declined flags through this. Why are you assuming people are being favoured. In some comment thread clean ups, Tim Post made it clear it was easier to delete them all - I think Shog did too - they're just doing their best to handle flags and literally don't have time to read each flag
 
3:58 PM
If they deleted them all, i'd be happy
that's not what is happening
 
user194636
when's happy hour?
 
user194636
this is a drag
 
user310756
@terdon the bottom line is. they are a corporation - or something - but they can actually create whatever rules they want. We have all been working for a for-profit business. It's something I had trouble reconciling and still do at times
 
@YvetteColomb I'm not totally convinced by that.
 
@Aza yeah the problem is that Whataboutism doesn't solve the problem. It's almost better to have a separate conversation
 
user206222
3:59 PM
Y'all are watching a radicalization process happen live on MSE, and aren't recognizing it as a time-tested radicalization pattern. Stack is deeply unprepared to deal with this.
 
@194636 There's a place near my apartment which has a bourbon barrel stout on draft. My body is ready.
 
@KevinB That's definitely what is happening on many of the most active ones.
 
@Aza stack isn't prepared for any of this.
 
user384163
@canon Unsubstatiated claims of injustice that are propped up by the fact that those people hold the power are still unsubstantiated. If your trust is that far gone that I don't know what to tell you but you are bordering on conspiracy theory here.
 
user310756
3:59 PM
@KevinB I agree- but I think there's different people handling flags with different mod styles (mod referring to employees as well) it's adhoc atm
 

« first day (3367 days earlier)      last day (1646 days later) »