« first day (699 days earlier)      last day (4305 days later) » 

10:18 AM
Mod: May be two voteup from same user on my rep tab , is it ? I mean someone has did it for flagging
 
 
2 hours later…
12:46 PM
-1, not enough waffles... — Lix 3 hours ago
-1, too many waffles (I missed breakfast today) — jadarnel27 1 min ago
 
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.jpg
:P
 
Hahah. Can't please everyone, I suppose.
 
1:41 PM
Could I get some dupe close votes here? I voted to close as "Not a real question" before I realized it was a repost by the same user (of a question that's already closed as "Not a real question")
 
Can't - it's got 4 other NaRQ votes
So my dupe vote was overriden
 
Ah, I thought it might be too late. Thanks for trying.
 
1:56 PM
Too much snark / not enough snark.... What really seems to be missing here is some STARK!Lix 2 mins ago
That is what's always missing - more comic book references!
 
 
1 hour later…
3:18 PM
@Lix - Sorry I missed you the other day. We just went to the beach. I need to get up north again. I'm in the Old City for now.
 
Anonymous
3:36 PM
First of, I'm not referring to jQuery-UI or anything but whats used in SO source. Remember this is supposed to be a feedback merely for 5 warnings found on SO. Like I replied to Jermy's answer, browser sniffing is carried out in SO's javascript where it can be substituted by feature detection. For example, in cdn.sstatic.net/js/full.js file, we got window.attachEvent?window.attachEvent("onmessage",d):window.addEventListener("m‌​essage",d,!1); which can be replaced by window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("message",d,!1):window.attachEv‌​ent("onmessage",d);. — vulcan raven 3 hours ago
 
That's from inside jQuery, isn't it?
 
Anonymous
I'm having a very hard time understanding this fellow. Checking for the presence of .attachEvent is "browser sniffing", but checking for the presence of .addEventListener is "feature detection"? My troll detector is starting to hum quietly.
 
Anonymous
@TimYiJiang Don't think so.
 
@JeremyBanks Both are feature detection. I guess he wants to test for the standard eventListener stuff first? Doesn't make any sense
 
@JeremyBanks Well, rearranging that makes sense but has absolutely no effect.
 
3:42 PM
The ActiveX thing might come from Flash, which chat uses
That can probably be removed now, though the script does do feature detection to use HTML5 audio anyway I think
The browser sniffing part probably all come from jQuery's internal $.browser.
Except for the bits which balpha mentions
 
@TimYiJiang Does it? The configuration used to force Flash, for some reason.
 
Dunno, I'm guessing since the script used supports this
Firefox still pops up the "Flash has crashed" bar on chat pages when the plugin-container process dies
 
h.jPlayer({swfPath: b.swfPath,warningAlerts: !0,nativeSupport: !1
:(
 
Weirdness.
Not that I care much about the alert sound, I prefer the visual alerts using the favicons
 
I just care when Flash crashed and I have to clear the damn bar on so many tabs. :P
Though thankfully that hasn't happened for some time.
 
3:48 PM
It won't be that hard to write a userscript to kill the sound thingy once and for all, since I don't use it anyway
Also, whoa, the Nexus 7 is shipping out in a week or two? That means 4.1 Jelly Beans is technically speaking already released?
That silly tablet I've got there's still on 3.2 Honeycomb
 
4:01 PM
@TimStone We'll probably go with native HTML audio by default with flash as a fallback at some point; should be much more stable these days than when we originally created chat
@TimYiJiang If it's an acer, make sure to update their stupid "update enhancement app", you'll never be notified of the ICS update if the update app isn't up-to-date.
And yes, that is a weird sentence.
Anyway, that was the problem for me
 
4:31 PM
Sounds good :)
 
5:27 PM
@TimStone I knew that user-card real-time-updates thing sounded familiar.
 
Hahah, I actually was a little surprised you didn't beat me to the duplicate.
 
I blame getting distracted by the confusion over flair vs user-card.
(Although, as usual, I'm open to blaming anyone other than myself)
 
5:47 PM
wow: meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/138551/wheres-my-question is a dupe asking about the same question someone complained about an answer being deleted on previously
 
6:19 PM
Heh, go figure.
 
6:33 PM
facebook seems to have copied SO's "edit comment" feature - when's the lawsuit?
 
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
7:43 PM
@Gilles Unfortunately, we're going to have to agree to disagree on this one. What I should and should not have done is not dictated by you. — casperOne 1 hour ago
 
7:58 PM
@JeremyBanks Yeah. I think casperOne handled that interaction kind of poorly. Even though it sounded like Gilles was talking down to him / telling him what to do, he was making a good point.
 
8:37 PM
@jadarnel27 it'd be nice is there was a way to schedule closed things for deletion if they're not fixed within a specific time period
it's easy to leave something bad around with no answers and -1 score given that it'll be auto cleaned up
but leaving something known bad indefinitely seems weird
(clearly it would have to be manual because not all closures should map to delayed deletes)
 
30
Q: Automatically delete old closed questions, regardless of question score

OakAccording to http://meta.stackoverflow.com/a/92006/141361, we automatically delete old question with negative/0/1 scores (depending on time passed) and no answers. I'd like to suggest extending something like that to closed questions as well. In general, closed questions with no good answers ar...

 
@PopularDemand that wouldn't have hit the question under discussion though since there's a "no answers" / "no upvoted answers" criteria. What I was thinking was more like a "delete vote that only applies in 30 days time, only if the question hasn't been reopened in that period"
because really using favorites to record things you want to delete is a terrible abuse of the term "favorite"
 
There's a question under discussion?
 
1
Q: Where's my question?

gsharp Possible Duplicate: Why was this perfectly legit question removed without any close votes? I've posted a question in SO and somehow it's gone. I just don't understand why. the link: http://stackoverflow.com/posts/11097234/revisions

 
Oh, the one casper deleted earlier.
 
8:44 PM
was related to what @JeremyBanks quoted and I assume @jadarnel27 was talking about
 
I saw your other comment "in a vacuum." Never mind, I guess.
 
9:18 PM
Hi - what should someone do if there is an answer which is like a cooking recipe and does not give explanation why you should do it
 
9:30 PM
Request clarification. If it seems worth it. Otherwise, there is an arrow with a tooltip "This answer is not useful".
 
The answer itself seems good - i commented a moment ago and asked for clarification
 
Good. So you help make it better. Thumbs up.
 
dances
 
9:47 PM
:)
 
@Flexo Yeah, that's what I was talking about. I agree with you, it would be nice to be able to schedule stuff for deletion. Considering the moderator workload on SO, I can understand why casperOne would act immediately.
 
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
11:15 PM
What the...? I didn't even know this existed — Nick Craver 2 mins ago
 
Anonymous
Haha, I wonder who was involved in adding Annotated Posts.
 
Anonymous
I'd like to imagine it was something Waffles did while nobody else was paying attention; left in the code unknown to anybody else on the team after he left... though that's probably not so.
 
Or how he managed to find that page. What even links to it?
 
Anonymous
The list of unlinked pages, of course!
 
11:28 PM
@JeremyBanks Thanks for sharing this; I felt dumb for not knowing about that page until just now.
Now if only I could understand what sixlettervariables meant here, I'd be all set for the day.
 
Anonymous
11:46 PM
Could somebody with 10k on meta make any edit to this deleted test question for me? I forgot that I wouldn't be able to edit it myself without undeleting.
 
@JeremyBanks Edited.
 
Anonymous
Thanks!
 
Weird, I get my first 'popular question' badge from diy.
Weird, I will say things in strange tenses.
 

« first day (699 days earlier)      last day (4305 days later) »