@SPArcheon How's the 'council' supposed to cherry-pick besides looking at 'what's most asked for' vs. maybe 'expected implementation effort'? And the first part very much can already be done on meta, through voting on feature requests XD
The implementation effort thing is more of an SE thing anyways, you're always going to need someone to look into it and say 'this would take 10 minutes/10years', and you can put that in a comment on a meta post as well.
I didn't mean that the council will cherry pick, I meant that the council looks like it would be cherry picked. Let's be honest: we have tons of mods, yet one may notice that some are far more "active" in pointing out issues than others... and I expect those to be kept out of the LAB
@SPArcheon I dunno. It does say elect, not appoint. ;)
Or pick
I'd more worry about the opposite: Having a group of users with not enough 'new blood'/'new ways of thinking', meaning the LAB would kinda get stuck in the way things are and not what they can/should be. Kinda where I'm at now with that whole election revamp working group :P
oh, I know, that is why I give it the benefit of doubt for now. Part of me kinda remember the word "election" being used for the Moderator Council too at some time, and in the end that was company picked if I am not mistaken.
@SPArcheon There was some voting on a Team's instance, not really an election but more 'upvote nominations in answers' kinda thing. I can't remember there being any 'picking' there either.
IIRC everyone that nominated also was 'picked' eventually, or at least the top x users were just 'elected'. I don't have access to that SOfT instance anymore though, I voluntarily left it because it wasn't active anymore and just 'clutter'.
So I can't check the validity of my recollections.
Oh, I found the pro-tem mod council voting post. It was a proper election with opavote results and such. No picking happened, just electing ;)
@Tinkeringbell True. But my point is less about what actually happened and more about what it looked like from the outside, especially when you are already grumpy because you were just reading things like removed CM and so on
> Back in November when Sara and Juan announced “The Loop”, one of the things mentioned there was that we were building an advisory group of moderators - what’s now called the Moderator Council.
I'm kinda sure they're specifically trying to avoid things like it with the LAB... I'm withholding my opinion until there'll be more details in April ;)
these were Catjia words back there. Mind you, no rancor or anything against her (actually she is one of my favorite - ex sadly - employees") but you can see where it is going.
Sure. I can see how someone might read into that. It's not what eventually really happened though... and if it was, then I think the mod council failing proved we're not that easily fooled :P
(I was there btw and I don't think it failed for that reason, but for the ones already described on main :) )
> they become a group of drones with no clear reason for existing and eventually everyone just forgets they ever existed.
Honestly, as someone on the Pro-Tempore Moderator Council, it vaguely petered out. It is really hard to keep a group of volunteers on target, and it didn't really work that well. That's one of the reasons I pivoted over to trying to encourage more community representation in staff, and staff repr...
> it got mired in bureaucracy. I had thought it would just be a small group of mods who would make themselves available to provide a community perspective to the company. However, it quickly devolved into discussions of having a President and a Secretary and all sorts of positions (although this was abandoned in favor of a flat structure, in the end), on strict rules, regular elections and just all sorts of bureaucratic overhead.
Not mentioned there is that the original plan for a moderator council specifically mentioned 'not moderating the moderators', but some of the endless bureaucracy discussions were about e.g. involving the council in the reinstatement process (which was very new back then) in addition to it just being a company thing, and that would have been moderating moderators in some form so ....
Those discussions petered out too, but it was one of those 'no clear reason for existing' being found :P
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact I love the sound of that :D
Yeah, things like this can take up loads of time... And it only just started! :P
Imagine the kind of time-sink it would be if you actually wanted to be on the PAC or LAB :P
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact Poor little stomach :P
Though I must admit, since slowly changing my eating habits to be healthier, my poor little stomach doesn't complain about extended period of 'no food' as much anymore either ;)
@Tinkeringbell meh, IMO it's just (pretty lame) non-effort on SE side to make it appear they're doing something, and like ALL past cases (mod council, anyone remember? No, good) it will evaporate and be forgotten with time.
So someone did think hard, came with bunch of buzz and cool acronyms, and that's about it, there it ends.
PAC, LAB, BLAH, etc.
I'm also sure some people in the company, like Slate, actually believe in this and want it to happen, but the people upstairs? Nada. They probably laugh at those silly efforts.
https://www.tv2.no/nyheter/forbruker/aesj-fy-faen-sa-nasty/16263521/ You can translate the article for reviews, or just look for "terningkast" ("dice roll"). I mostly just buy the cheaper ones (that they reviewed as "disgusting". So less than 200 NOK per kg.
Although they gave the one for 172 NOK/kg 6, so top score.
Sounds good enough for me, I'm not the kind of person that can usually taste a difference between cheap or expensive when it comes to 'fresh' produce... and when it comes to highly processed foods like cola, I usually prefer cheap over the 'real' brand XD
In other news, I'm trying to pretend to work in this office, and now there's three people with guitars being loudly directed onto stairs and playing...
It was like that the first time I got the Bose headphones. Then a slight bit in the beginning with XM4, but nothing since. Maybe I've used headphones for so long my ears have adapted.
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact I mean, my ears usually pick up a lot too :P My tv volume is stuck on 6 (out of 100) and that's 'loud' for me, even though the yelling of the neighbor sometimes breaks through that.
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact it isn't new either. I got a stick of 4 gigs for 80 NOK or so, the remaining 12 came reinstalled IIRC
The most expensive thing in that machine is a 1TB SATA SSD I bought. It's more expensive than the rest of the hardware combined
Gotta love the used market :p
@SPArcheon Down the line, yes
But when the current list of requests starts with a lot of high-priority issues, cherry-picking isn't useful. Starting anywhere right now would be more impactful than spending months to create a group that's going to mention the same list of long-standing issues
Right now, and for the near foreseeable future, the PAC is indeed just meta
I didn't mean that the council will cherry pick, I meant that the council looks like it would be cherry picked. Let's be honest: we have tons of mods, yet one may notice that some are far more "active" in pointing out issues than others... and I expect those to be kept out of the LAB
(for context, the current "main" type of RAM has been DDR4 for many years, and we're currently shifting to DDR5. It's possible the main shift to DDR5 is complete now as well)
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact DDR5 wasn't a thing until 2020, but it took another couple years for CPUs and motherboards to actually support it. I got my current computer in 2022, and it still had DDR4. Granted, year-old or so model, but meh. It's fine
but I bought a full 32 gig RAM kit with two sticks, not just another 16 gig kit to build on top of the RAM I already had. Sold the existing RAM sticks for like 800-1k or something (don't remember), so I mean, in net cost, it's closer to 6-800 :p
@SPArcheon Well, I've been to the rank of Master in AL, but I only started out with ranked because I was sick of my teammates in non-ranked. And now I'm sick of the teammates in ranked, too. Those in Platinum are the most toxic.
And they're not that good either.
Diamond rank players are preferable.
So, no.
I'm not that competitive.
Although I like winning.
As does everyone.
But not too much. Call of Duty Mobile got rather boring after my 1000th game of 50-100 kills and 0 deaths.
But that's mobile. Apex Legends mobile wasn't very hard either. Annoying controls, but other players had no idea how to win at games. :P
@AndreasmovedtoCodidact so.. I could point you to a little challenge that could keep you busy for a while... would you be interested? Don't worry, there is no pony in there...